Sagan was completely exonerated
#1
Old Legs
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Mass.
Posts: 1,205
Bikes: '80 Strayvaigin, '84 Ciocc Aelle-Shimano 105, '90 Concorde Astore /Campy Triple ,85 Bridgestone 500/Suntour, 2005 Jamis Quest, 2017 Raleigh Merit 1, Raleigh Carbon Clubman
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 300 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
19 Posts
Sagan was completely exonerated
ROADBIKERIDER has the news release. "All parties agreed that "the crash was an unfortunate and unintentional race incident and that the UCI Commissaires made their decision based on their best judgment in the circumstances."KB
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,084
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 755 Post(s)
Liked 543 Times
in
312 Posts
not in cycling's best interest to make a villain out of Sagan. he blocked with his elbow as a reaction to Cavendish's pass attempt. again, imo it was a reaction not a conscious action
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
not in cycling's best interest to make a villain out of Sagan. he blocked with his elbow as a reaction to Cavendish's pass attempt. again, imo it was a reaction not a conscious action
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
Perhaps you haven't watched some of the hours of youtube slo-mo analysis.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,794
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4129 Post(s)
Liked 3,089 Times
in
2,011 Posts
not in cycling's best interest to make a villain out of Sagan. he blocked with his elbow as a reaction to Cavendish's pass attempt. again, imo it was a reaction not a conscious action
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
Yes, Sagan did nothing intentional to harm Cavendish but: Cavendish has established his lane long before and Sagan did not remotely hold his line. Cavendish established his lane maybe half a minute before and Sagan moved over 15 feet or more. Yes Sagan was ahead of Cavendish but they were overlapped the entire time. That space belonged to Cavendish and he was under no obligation to yield. (And Cavendish being as fierce a competitor as he is and basically a feral cat, he didn't and instead pushed Sagan as hard as he could to keep from crashing. Sadly for Cavendish, Saga was a little bigger, stronger and didn't move.)
Sagan was disqualified for not holding his line and causing real injury to another rider, knocking that rider out of the Tour. We can argue the penalty but DSQ is not unreasonable. Sagan served his DSQ. This latest does not exonerate him. All it does is put this to bed.
Ben
#6
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,780
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1145 Post(s)
Liked 775 Times
in
513 Posts
Moved from "General" forum.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#7
Senior Member
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
Disagree with 79pmooney- Cavendish was not overlapped w/ Sagan the whole time. He came from behind. It makes no difference what line he established 30 seconds before & 5 bike lengths behind.
After moving right, Sagan doesn't get closer to barriers until Cavendish pushes into him.
Last edited by woodcraft; 12-07-17 at 03:40 PM.
#10
Old Legs
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Mass.
Posts: 1,205
Bikes: '80 Strayvaigin, '84 Ciocc Aelle-Shimano 105, '90 Concorde Astore /Campy Triple ,85 Bridgestone 500/Suntour, 2005 Jamis Quest, 2017 Raleigh Merit 1, Raleigh Carbon Clubman
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 300 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
19 Posts
First time I've seen that breakdown. Why couldn't UCI do this prior to taking action ? Sad. KB
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,525
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17504 Post(s)
Liked 4,133 Times
in
3,072 Posts
It is a little late for saying "oops".
Had they given him a penalty of an hour or something, then he would have been able to continue riding, sprint finishes might still have become more cordial, and they could have argued while the race was still on whether or not it was an accident, there was intent, or if Sagan even elbowed Cavendish. Perhaps scheduled a mini hearing during the following rest day.
Two riders plunged into a single hole. The lead rider on the road side came out, the following rider on the wall side didn't. If I remember right, it wasn't as much that Sagan was moving right, but the whole field was moving right, and if anybody should be criticized for not holding the lane, it would have been the left most rider of the whole pack (oh, and one rider that madly cut left to avoid the whole thing, cutting across several others).
Had they given him a penalty of an hour or something, then he would have been able to continue riding, sprint finishes might still have become more cordial, and they could have argued while the race was still on whether or not it was an accident, there was intent, or if Sagan even elbowed Cavendish. Perhaps scheduled a mini hearing during the following rest day.
Two riders plunged into a single hole. The lead rider on the road side came out, the following rider on the wall side didn't. If I remember right, it wasn't as much that Sagan was moving right, but the whole field was moving right, and if anybody should be criticized for not holding the lane, it would have been the left most rider of the whole pack (oh, and one rider that madly cut left to avoid the whole thing, cutting across several others).
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,761
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1972 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
171 Posts
It is a little late for saying "oops".
Had they given him a penalty of an hour or something, then he would have been able to continue riding, sprint finishes might still have become more cordial, and they could have argued while the race was still on whether or not it was an accident, there was intent, or if Sagan even elbowed Cavendish. Perhaps scheduled a mini hearing during the following rest day.
Two riders plunged into a single hole. The lead rider on the road side came out, the following rider on the wall side didn't. If I remember right, it wasn't as much that Sagan was moving right, but the whole field was moving right, and if anybody should be criticized for not holding the lane, it would have been the left most rider of the whole pack (oh, and one rider that madly cut left to avoid the whole thing, cutting across several others).
Had they given him a penalty of an hour or something, then he would have been able to continue riding, sprint finishes might still have become more cordial, and they could have argued while the race was still on whether or not it was an accident, there was intent, or if Sagan even elbowed Cavendish. Perhaps scheduled a mini hearing during the following rest day.
Two riders plunged into a single hole. The lead rider on the road side came out, the following rider on the wall side didn't. If I remember right, it wasn't as much that Sagan was moving right, but the whole field was moving right, and if anybody should be criticized for not holding the lane, it would have been the left most rider of the whole pack (oh, and one rider that madly cut left to avoid the whole thing, cutting across several others).
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,501
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1374 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 703 Times
in
388 Posts
Didn't we already have this argument? Viewing all the shots and angles, I find the conclusion that Sagan was wholly innocent to be inescapable. It was a bad call.
#14
Pokemon Master
#16
Hear myself getting fat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inland Northwest
Posts: 755
Bikes: Black Road Bike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 334 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
131 Posts
Yes, we did. And so did the UCI. They made the statement as a way to "fix" their error which was pretty clear when viewing from all angles. Reading Sagan's statement, sounds to me that the UCI wrote that for him. PC crap.
I'm not a Sagan fan, and what I've found is there are three reasons people still think he did something wrong.
1. The hate Sagan
2. They didn't watch all of the videos and that they have slow eyes, i.e they cannot see that Cav was already wrecking and out of control and Sagan's elbow was a result of Cav ****ing up next to him...not blocking.
3. Go back to 1.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 60
Bikes: Fixed Gear(46x14), Road Bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
not in cycling's best interest to make a villain out of Sagan. he blocked with his elbow as a reaction to Cavendish's pass attempt. again, imo it was a reaction not a conscious action
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
they can say what they want, you don't throw your elbow out like that when racing in close quarters
still hate that he didn't get to finish the tour
#18
Walmart bike rider
The punishment didn't fit the crime and obviously too late to fix now. What should have happened is he get docked enough points to make it impossible for him to have won the green jersey but allowed him to remain in the race and fine the hell out of him.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 14,588
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7156 Post(s)
Liked 2,611 Times
in
1,424 Posts
What should have happened was nothing. A crazed competor dove for a closing hole, lost control, and crashed into Sagan, and nearly hooked Sagan off his bike with his shifter .... why should Sagan get penalized?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
That's about it. Any fair viewing of the evidence would have sent Cav some flowers and moved on without penalty to Sagan. Unfortunately, there were clearly some folks who wanted to stop Sagan's run of green at almost any cost, and not all of them pinned on numbers.