Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-30-05, 09:02 AM   #1
Thread Starter
fishigan's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On the AuSable
Bikes: Trek 1000
Posts: 208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Since it was brought up about his doping.

Lance's libel trial starts in November
Posted: Friday July 29, 2005 4:21PM; Updated: Friday July 29, 2005 4:21PM

LONDON (AP) -- Lance Armstrong's libel case against The Sunday Times will go to trial in November after London's Court of Appeal finalized defense details on Friday.

Armstrong, who retired after winning his seventh straight Tour de France last Sunday, is suing the British newspaper for printing a review of the book LA Confidentiel: les secrets de Lance Armstrong -- LA Confidential, The Secrets of Lance Armstrong -- in June 2004.

The article reprinted allegations that Armstrong had taken performance enhancing drugs. Armstrong has denied all doping allegations.
The book, written by Sunday Times sportswriter David Walsh and Pierre Ballester, a former writer for French sports paper L'Equipe, was published in France shortly before the 2004 Tour de France.

Armstrong's lawyer, Matthew Himsworth, said the libel case will start in the High Court on Nov. 6 and is expected to take three weeks.

Last edited by fishigan; 07-30-05 at 09:17 AM.
fishigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-05, 09:00 AM   #2
Senior Member (Retired)
gmason's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Great North Woods
Bikes: Vittorio, Centaur triple; Casati Laser Piu, Chorus Triple.
Posts: 2,671
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
He has already suffered a setback in this one.

But, OTOH, the presiding judge threw out the Simeoni case re last year's TdF the other day.
gmason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-05, 02:23 PM   #3
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Armstrong is attempting to bully anyone from publishing La Confidential in the US with lawyers, but this case will lose in UK court, the libel laws do not extend to third parties and freedom of press.
I read La Confidential -a lot of unsubstantiated hearsay, it's just a crap book.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-05, 04:51 PM   #4
Hill Climber
Senior Member
Hill Climber's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Being the newspaper business, I really don't see how he can win a case vs. The Times. The paper really didn't make the assertation Lance was doping. All the paper did was do a book review. If you were doing a hard news story, obviously if someone made such a claim against another person, you would give that person a chance to deny it.
I haven't read the review, but my guess is what the paper published was something along the lines of "In the book blah blah blah, author so and so writes..."
If they're smart, that's what they would have done.
Hill Climber is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.