Stage 1: Saturday, July 2 192 km Passage du Gois → Mont des Alouettes
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,230
Bikes: 2007 Giant Cypress DX, Windsor Tourist 2011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, that depends. A guy like Contador is capable of bringing back over a minute in the mountains, but a guy like Ryder Hesjedal losing 1.30 could cost him to miss out on the top 10, and Sammy Sanchez could easily miss out on the podium. Of course, other riders have come back from much bigger deficits, so it's not impossible.
#54
Upgrading my engine
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, that depends. A guy like Contador is capable of bringing back over a minute in the mountains, but a guy like Ryder Hesjedal losing 1.30 could cost him to miss out on the top 10, and Sammy Sanchez could easily miss out on the podium. Of course, other riders have come back from much bigger deficits, so it's not impossible.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, that depends. A guy like Contador is capable of bringing back over a minute in the mountains, but a guy like Ryder Hesjedal losing 1.30 could cost him to miss out on the top 10, and Sammy Sanchez could easily miss out on the podium. Of course, other riders have come back from much bigger deficits, so it's not impossible.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought was very interesting lead in to the finish. Fabian seemed very concerned about Gilbert. He even tried to break, away but Gilbert easily reeled him in. For the past couple of seasons, Fabian has been the big dog, but it looks like Gilbert is the dominant single race/stage man now.
#57
Resident PIA
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Oaks, NC
Posts: 848
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Look 765 Optimum, Spesh Aethos
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Liked 356 Times
in
186 Posts
So I was wrong AS was in the first group.
Surprised he didn't wait?
Surprised he didn't wait?
__________________
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,230
Bikes: 2007 Giant Cypress DX, Windsor Tourist 2011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
AS was in the first group, but he was involved in another crash at the 3k mark and rode in with Contador. The officials later gave A. Schleck the same time as the lead group that came in 6 seconds behind Gilbert.
The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.
Contador will get no sympathy from the French, especially as Spain has won every Tour since 2006. If he wants to win this one, he's going to have to do it 'the hard way', by dropping everyone in the mountains in much the same way that he did in the Giro.
The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.
Contador will get no sympathy from the French, especially as Spain has won every Tour since 2006. If he wants to win this one, he's going to have to do it 'the hard way', by dropping everyone in the mountains in much the same way that he did in the Giro.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought was very interesting lead in to the finish. Fabian seemed very concerned about Gilbert. He even tried to break, away but Gilbert easily reeled him in. For the past couple of seasons, Fabian has been the big dog, but it looks like Gilbert is the dominant single race/stage man now.
#60
Lance Hater
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A spectator should never be in a position that a rider who is in the road is able to hit him. This rider was clearly in the road.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cancellara has been the big dog for the past couple seasons was because the tour started with ITT prologue in which Cancellara absolutely dominated. This year the first stage ends with a category 4 climb, there's little surprise that Cancellara isn't wearing the maillot jaune. It was undoubtedly a remarkable win for Gilbert but it remains to be seen whether he will be contention for the podium in 3 weeks with Evan and AS just seconds behind.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Plus, the spectator was looking up the road at riders who had ridden past him. Not at the riders coming towards him. Had his back to the rider that hit him. Bad when you're leaning out over the road.
#63
Heretic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,246
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2827 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times
in
429 Posts
Make up your own mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfWotphjMC0
IMO just one of those things.
edit: She does appear to be standing on the road. Just.
Last edited by Caretaker; 07-02-11 at 03:50 PM.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Man or woman makes no difference. The person should have been paying attention while standing at the edge of the road when the peloton is rolling by.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.
Has this standard been applied before in seperate crash groups, one outside the 3K and one inside? Seems pretty harsh to add an additional 35 seconds onto a crash that is within the 3k to the chase group. Seems to me the fair thing would be to give the chase group the time gap they had at the time of the 3k crash and call it even from there.
thoughts??
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you for the explanation.
Has this standard been applied before in seperate crash groups, one outside the 3K and one inside? Seems pretty harsh to add an additional 35 seconds onto a crash that is within the 3k to the chase group. Seems to me the fair thing would be to give the chase group the time gap they had at the time of the 3k crash and call it even from there.
thoughts??
Has this standard been applied before in seperate crash groups, one outside the 3K and one inside? Seems pretty harsh to add an additional 35 seconds onto a crash that is within the 3k to the chase group. Seems to me the fair thing would be to give the chase group the time gap they had at the time of the 3k crash and call it even from there.
thoughts??
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Physically, CT / Mentally, San Francisco
Posts: 207
Bikes: BMC Team Machine, BMC Road Racer, BMC Streetfire, BMC AlpenChallenge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm having a hard time understanding how AS got his time moved to the same as FS, while AC was placed the additional time back, when the two of them rode in together. It's not computing in my head. If AC really is that far behind AS, AC just lost the tour on the first day out. He's a terrific climber and TT'er, but there's no way he makes up that amount of time.
#68
These Guys Eat Oreos
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm having a hard time understanding how AS got his time moved to the same as FS, while AC was placed the additional time back, when the two of them rode in together. It's not computing in my head. If AC really is that far behind AS, AC just lost the tour on the first day out. He's a terrific climber and TT'er, but there's no way he makes up that amount of time.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
AS was in the first group, but he was involved in another crash at the 3k mark and rode in with Contador. The officials later gave A. Schleck the same time as the lead group that came in 6 seconds behind Gilbert.
The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.
Contador will get no sympathy from the French, especially as Spain has won every Tour since 2006. If he wants to win this one, he's going to have to do it 'the hard way', by dropping everyone in the mountains in much the same way that he did in the Giro.
The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.
Contador will get no sympathy from the French, especially as Spain has won every Tour since 2006. If he wants to win this one, he's going to have to do it 'the hard way', by dropping everyone in the mountains in much the same way that he did in the Giro.
We reward people for crashing now, and punish people for not rolling over their heads as they chase the lead group, so if you're within 3K of the finish and sucking wind, it's best you just flop over. It's called tactics people.
Last edited by Kind of Blued; 07-02-11 at 06:02 PM.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm having a hard time understanding how AS got his time moved to the same as FS, while AC was placed the additional time back, when the two of them rode in together. It's not computing in my head. If AC really is that far behind AS, AC just lost the tour on the first day out. He's a terrific climber and TT'er, but there's no way he makes up that amount of time.
This is to help keep the sprints safe, and I think it's a good idea.
In today's stage, Contador was held up by a crash with 8km to go, so the rule referenced above doesn't apply. Schleck made it through safely and stayed with the front group. Then Andy was caught up in another crash with about 2km to go, so the rule referenced above does apply. It's not really relevant that Contador caught up to that group due to the crash at 2km.
Hope that helps.
__________________
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Article 20 in the rule book, which roughly says that on a stage not otherwise designated as a mountain stage, riders that crash or have a mechanical inside the last 3km get the same time as the group they were with before the incident.
This is to help keep the sprints safe, and I think it's a good idea.
In today's stage, Contador was held up by a crash with 8km to go, so the rule referenced above doesn't apply. Schleck made it through safely and stayed with the front group. Then Andy was caught up in another crash with about 2km to go, so the rule referenced above does apply. It's not really relevant that Contador caught up to that group due to the crash at 2km.
Hope that helps.
This is to help keep the sprints safe, and I think it's a good idea.
In today's stage, Contador was held up by a crash with 8km to go, so the rule referenced above doesn't apply. Schleck made it through safely and stayed with the front group. Then Andy was caught up in another crash with about 2km to go, so the rule referenced above does apply. It's not really relevant that Contador caught up to that group due to the crash at 2km.
Hope that helps.
The issue that is relevant is that Contador was held up by the group that crashed at 2km. AC's group was only 35-40 seconds behind the group when it crashed. They then were held up by the crash and lost another 40-45 seconds because of that crash in the road. The group that crashed got their time back, but AC's group lost additional time. I don't think anyone believes that AC's group should be given the time of the winner. And AS's group should get the same time. But should AC's group be penalized another 40-45 seconds because of the crash of AS's group? That's essentially what has happened. Its an unusual situation.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 4,420
Bikes: The keepers: 1958 Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, 1968 Ranger, 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Tourist, 3 - 1986 Rossins, and a '77 PX-10 frame in process.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
129 Posts
One thing's for sure: This year's Tour is already more interesting than I expected the entire three weeks to be.
__________________
Syke
“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”
H.L. Mencken, (1926)
Syke
“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”
H.L. Mencken, (1926)
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,010
Bikes: Bianchi San Jose, Dahon Mu Uno, Origami Wasp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
15 Posts
Ok now I get it. I was so confused. So now it seems to me that the guys in AC's group should not be penalized the 45 seconds for the similar reason they will not get the same time as AS's group. If that makes sense...