Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Professional Cycling For the Fans
Reload this Page >

Stage 1: Saturday, July 2 192 km Passage du Gois → Mont des Alouettes

Search
Notices
Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

Stage 1: Saturday, July 2 192 km Passage du Gois → Mont des Alouettes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-11, 10:53 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DXchulo
Not a chance. The biggest losers are two Spanish guys.
That's the way I see it too. In addition to the fact that AC is fortunate to even be in the race.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 10:56 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
SouthFLpix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,230

Bikes: 2007 Giant Cypress DX, Windsor Tourist 2011

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DXchulo
Not a chance. The biggest losers are two Spanish guys.
Well, that depends. A guy like Contador is capable of bringing back over a minute in the mountains, but a guy like Ryder Hesjedal losing 1.30 could cost him to miss out on the top 10, and Sammy Sanchez could easily miss out on the podium. Of course, other riders have come back from much bigger deficits, so it's not impossible.
SouthFLpix is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 10:58 AM
  #53  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not to interrupt - quick question:

Is there any way of listening to the official Tour radio online? This might be a stupid question.

Cheers.
georgegeorge is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 10:59 AM
  #54  
Upgrading my engine
 
DXchulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFLpix
Well, that depends. A guy like Contador is capable of bringing back over a minute in the mountains, but a guy like Ryder Hesjedal losing 1.30 could cost him to miss out on the top 10, and Sammy Sanchez could easily miss out on the podium. Of course, other riders have come back from much bigger deficits, so it's not impossible.
Sanchez was the 2nd Spanish guy I was referring to. You could be right about Ryder. What happened to him? He lost 35 seconds more than Contador/Sanchez.
DXchulo is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 11:01 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFLpix
Well, that depends. A guy like Contador is capable of bringing back over a minute in the mountains, but a guy like Ryder Hesjedal losing 1.30 could cost him to miss out on the top 10, and Sammy Sanchez could easily miss out on the podium. Of course, other riders have come back from much bigger deficits, so it's not impossible.
Oh, we were referring to the possible appeal of today's race. I still think AC is in the hunt. Losing that much time to Andy Schleck is the biggest problem. If his form is anywhere near where it was at the Giro, he could pull back a 1:30 on anyone. Including A. Schleck. But if his legs are a little dead, he might be in trouble. It will be interesting to see if he loses or gains time tomorrow in the TTT.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 11:29 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I thought was very interesting lead in to the finish. Fabian seemed very concerned about Gilbert. He even tried to break, away but Gilbert easily reeled him in. For the past couple of seasons, Fabian has been the big dog, but it looks like Gilbert is the dominant single race/stage man now.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 11:38 AM
  #57  
Resident PIA
 
Shadco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Oaks, NC
Posts: 848

Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Look 765 Optimum, Spesh Aethos

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Liked 356 Times in 186 Posts
So I was wrong AS was in the first group.

Surprised he didn't wait?
__________________
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
Shadco is online now  
Old 07-02-11, 11:46 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
SouthFLpix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,230

Bikes: 2007 Giant Cypress DX, Windsor Tourist 2011

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Shadco
So I was wrong AS was in the first group.

Surprised he didn't wait?
AS was in the first group, but he was involved in another crash at the 3k mark and rode in with Contador. The officials later gave A. Schleck the same time as the lead group that came in 6 seconds behind Gilbert.

The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.

Contador will get no sympathy from the French, especially as Spain has won every Tour since 2006. If he wants to win this one, he's going to have to do it 'the hard way', by dropping everyone in the mountains in much the same way that he did in the Giro.
SouthFLpix is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 11:49 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
finale23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OrionKhan
I thought was very interesting lead in to the finish. Fabian seemed very concerned about Gilbert. He even tried to break, away but Gilbert easily reeled him in. For the past couple of seasons, Fabian has been the big dog, but it looks like Gilbert is the dominant single race/stage man now.
Cancellara has been the big dog for the past couple seasons was because the tour started with ITT prologue in which Cancellara absolutely dominated. This year the first stage ends with a category 4 climb, there's little surprise that Cancellara isn't wearing the maillot jaune. It was undoubtedly a remarkable win for Gilbert but it remains to be seen whether he will be contention for the podium in 3 weeks with Evan and AS just seconds behind.
finale23 is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 12:06 PM
  #60  
Lance Hater
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by K&K_Dad
I'm not so sure it was 100% the spectator's fault.. it looked like he/she was off the road and whoever crashed ran into him.
Spectator was clearly partly in the road. Enough that a rider had to move out of the way to avoid him.

A spectator should never be in a position that a rider who is in the road is able to hit him. This rider was clearly in the road.
Laggard is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 03:01 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by finale23
Cancellara has been the big dog for the past couple seasons was because the tour started with ITT prologue in which Cancellara absolutely dominated. This year the first stage ends with a category 4 climb, there's little surprise that Cancellara isn't wearing the maillot jaune. It was undoubtedly a remarkable win for Gilbert but it remains to be seen whether he will be contention for the podium in 3 weeks with Evan and AS just seconds behind.
Gilbert or Fabian won't be near contention for the overall. Didn't mean to imply so if it sounded that way. They're not GC contenders for grand tours, and never will be, due to mountain top finishes. But in for stage wins and one day classic races, they are monsters.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 03:03 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Laggard
Spectator was clearly partly in the road. Enough that a rider had to move out of the way to avoid him.

A spectator should never be in a position that a rider who is in the road is able to hit him. This rider was clearly in the road.
Plus, the spectator was looking up the road at riders who had ridden past him. Not at the riders coming towards him. Had his back to the rider that hit him. Bad when you're leaning out over the road.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 03:43 PM
  #63  
Heretic
 
Caretaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,246

Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2827 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times in 429 Posts
Originally Posted by OrionKhan
Plus, the spectator was looking up the road at riders who had ridden past him. Not at the riders coming towards him. Had his back to the rider that hit him. Bad when you're leaning out over the road.
Looks like a woman spectator to me. Astana rider already off balance shoulder swipes spectator causing pileup.

Make up your own mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfWotphjMC0

IMO just one of those things.

edit: She does appear to be standing on the road. Just.

Last edited by Caretaker; 07-02-11 at 03:50 PM.
Caretaker is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 03:56 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Man or woman makes no difference. The person should have been paying attention while standing at the edge of the road when the peloton is rolling by.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:37 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
SunSwingsLow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFLpix
The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.
Thank you for the explanation.

Has this standard been applied before in seperate crash groups, one outside the 3K and one inside? Seems pretty harsh to add an additional 35 seconds onto a crash that is within the 3k to the chase group. Seems to me the fair thing would be to give the chase group the time gap they had at the time of the 3k crash and call it even from there.

thoughts??
SunSwingsLow is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:42 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SunSwingsLow
Thank you for the explanation.

Has this standard been applied before in seperate crash groups, one outside the 3K and one inside? Seems pretty harsh to add an additional 35 seconds onto a crash that is within the 3k to the chase group. Seems to me the fair thing would be to give the chase group the time gap they had at the time of the 3k crash and call it even from there.

thoughts??
Some of our earlier comments were regarding whether or not teams would appeal. Its weird because the guys that crashed won't lose time but the ones who were chasing will lose more because of their crash. Its a pretty unusual situation. I suspect if there is a ruling in their favor, we won't hear about it until tomorrow morning.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:45 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Physically, CT / Mentally, San Francisco
Posts: 207

Bikes: BMC Team Machine, BMC Road Racer, BMC Streetfire, BMC AlpenChallenge

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm having a hard time understanding how AS got his time moved to the same as FS, while AC was placed the additional time back, when the two of them rode in together. It's not computing in my head. If AC really is that far behind AS, AC just lost the tour on the first day out. He's a terrific climber and TT'er, but there's no way he makes up that amount of time.
FriendlyFred is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:49 PM
  #68  
These Guys Eat Oreos
 
Creatre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FriendlyFred
I'm having a hard time understanding how AS got his time moved to the same as FS, while AC was placed the additional time back, when the two of them rode in together. It's not computing in my head. If AC really is that far behind AS, AC just lost the tour on the first day out. He's a terrific climber and TT'er, but there's no way he makes up that amount of time.
1 minute is nothing in the Tour de France. Lance won multiple times with over a 5 minute gap on 2nd place. It can easily be made up, or lost by the others. There are many, many days left to decide the outcome.
Creatre is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:52 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFLpix
AS was in the first group, but he was involved in another crash at the 3k mark and rode in with Contador. The officials later gave A. Schleck the same time as the lead group that came in 6 seconds behind Gilbert.

The main debate seems to be that when the AS group crashed, that cost the chase group (Contador's group) another 35 seconds because the crash blocked the road and Contador had to stop once again for a 2nd time. However, because of the '3k rule', AS's group was given the same time as if they had finished with the lead group, and Contador's group just had to absorb those 35 extra seconds from the hold-up of the 2nd crash.

Contador will get no sympathy from the French, especially as Spain has won every Tour since 2006. If he wants to win this one, he's going to have to do it 'the hard way', by dropping everyone in the mountains in much the same way that he did in the Giro.
The way I see it, if they don't give everybody the same time, stage one, and possibly the final Tour standings, could be a complete sham.

We reward people for crashing now, and punish people for not rolling over their heads as they chase the lead group, so if you're within 3K of the finish and sucking wind, it's best you just flop over. It's called tactics people.

Last edited by Kind of Blued; 07-02-11 at 06:02 PM.
Kind of Blued is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:54 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
SunSwingsLow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I dont think AC just lost the tour but he will have to have a better performance vs AS than he did last year.
SunSwingsLow is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 05:55 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
SunSwingsLow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kind of Blued
If Andy Schleck wins the tour by 39 seconds over Contador, it'll be more of a stupid win than dropping all the chains in the chains in the world.
+10

Ive been waiting for the AC haters to say its some kind of justice to the chain dropping incident.
SunSwingsLow is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 06:06 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FriendlyFred
I'm having a hard time understanding how AS got his time moved to the same as FS, while AC was placed the additional time back, when the two of them rode in together. It's not computing in my head. If AC really is that far behind AS, AC just lost the tour on the first day out. He's a terrific climber and TT'er, but there's no way he makes up that amount of time.
Article 20 in the rule book, which roughly says that on a stage not otherwise designated as a mountain stage, riders that crash or have a mechanical inside the last 3km get the same time as the group they were with before the incident.

This is to help keep the sprints safe, and I think it's a good idea.

In today's stage, Contador was held up by a crash with 8km to go, so the rule referenced above doesn't apply. Schleck made it through safely and stayed with the front group. Then Andy was caught up in another crash with about 2km to go, so the rule referenced above does apply. It's not really relevant that Contador caught up to that group due to the crash at 2km.

Hope that helps.
__________________
-------

Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
JoelS is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 06:48 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JoelS
Article 20 in the rule book, which roughly says that on a stage not otherwise designated as a mountain stage, riders that crash or have a mechanical inside the last 3km get the same time as the group they were with before the incident.

This is to help keep the sprints safe, and I think it's a good idea.

In today's stage, Contador was held up by a crash with 8km to go, so the rule referenced above doesn't apply. Schleck made it through safely and stayed with the front group. Then Andy was caught up in another crash with about 2km to go, so the rule referenced above does apply. It's not really relevant that Contador caught up to that group due to the crash at 2km.

Hope that helps.
You are correct in recitation of the rule.

The issue that is relevant is that Contador was held up by the group that crashed at 2km. AC's group was only 35-40 seconds behind the group when it crashed. They then were held up by the crash and lost another 40-45 seconds because of that crash in the road. The group that crashed got their time back, but AC's group lost additional time. I don't think anyone believes that AC's group should be given the time of the winner. And AS's group should get the same time. But should AC's group be penalized another 40-45 seconds because of the crash of AS's group? That's essentially what has happened. Its an unusual situation.
OrionKhan is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 07:01 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
sykerocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 4,420

Bikes: The keepers: 1958 Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, 1968 Ranger, 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Tourist, 3 - 1986 Rossins, and a '77 PX-10 frame in process.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times in 129 Posts
One thing's for sure: This year's Tour is already more interesting than I expected the entire three weeks to be.
__________________
Syke

“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

H.L. Mencken, (1926)

sykerocker is offline  
Old 07-02-11, 07:24 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
DLBroox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,010

Bikes: Bianchi San Jose, Dahon Mu Uno, Origami Wasp

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 15 Posts
Ok now I get it. I was so confused. So now it seems to me that the guys in AC's group should not be penalized the 45 seconds for the similar reason they will not get the same time as AS's group. If that makes sense...
DLBroox is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.