The Levi Effect
10-19-12, 09:32 PM
#26
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by sprince
I have to think that the doping is as much a psychological advantage as it is a physical advantage.
10-20-12, 06:39 AM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 888
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
I have to think you've both never competed at a high level nor done much research about blood manipulation.
Of course there are studies that indicate a physical advantage for athletes on a doping program. Let's say we have 10 test subjects. All are told that they will be put on a doping program but 5 are administered a placebo. Does performance increase for the placebo group? Does performance decline for the non-placebo group after they are falsely told that they are being switched to a placebo? But my point is that a psychological advantage can't be dismissed based on studies that are carefully constructed to exclude psychological factors. Levi has some free time on his hands now, maybe he could volunteer for such a study.
Last edited by gsteinb; 10-20-12 at 07:03 AM. Reason: Smilie face or not, insinuating folks you don't know have doped is a personal attack and against forum rules.
10-20-12, 08:51 AM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by sprince
Yes, I am speculating. I have never competed at any endurance sport, and have no personal experience with doping.
Of course there are studies that indicate a physical advantage for athletes on a doping program. Let's say we have 10 test subjects. All are told that they will be put on a doping program but 5 are administered a placebo. Does performance increase for the placebo group? Does performance decline for the non-placebo group after they are falsely told that they are being switched to a placebo? But my point is that a psychological advantage can't be dismissed based on studies that are carefully constructed to exclude psychological factors. Levi has some free time on his hands now, maybe he could volunteer for such a study.
Of course there are studies that indicate a physical advantage for athletes on a doping program. Let's say we have 10 test subjects. All are told that they will be put on a doping program but 5 are administered a placebo. Does performance increase for the placebo group? Does performance decline for the non-placebo group after they are falsely told that they are being switched to a placebo? But my point is that a psychological advantage can't be dismissed based on studies that are carefully constructed to exclude psychological factors. Levi has some free time on his hands now, maybe he could volunteer for such a study.
10-20-12, 09:06 AM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,060
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3068 Post(s)
Liked 4,528 Times
in
2,303 Posts
Originally Posted by sprince
Yes, I am speculating. I have never competed at any endurance sport, and have no personal experience with doping.
Of course there are studies that indicate a physical advantage for athletes on a doping program. Let's say we have 10 test subjects. All are told that they will be put on a doping program but 5 are administered a placebo. Does performance increase for the placebo group? Does performance decline for the non-placebo group after they are falsely told that they are being switched to a placebo? But my point is that a psychological advantage can't be dismissed based on studies that are carefully constructed to exclude psychological factors. Levi has some free time on his hands now, maybe he could volunteer for such a study.
Of course there are studies that indicate a physical advantage for athletes on a doping program. Let's say we have 10 test subjects. All are told that they will be put on a doping program but 5 are administered a placebo. Does performance increase for the placebo group? Does performance decline for the non-placebo group after they are falsely told that they are being switched to a placebo? But my point is that a psychological advantage can't be dismissed based on studies that are carefully constructed to exclude psychological factors. Levi has some free time on his hands now, maybe he could volunteer for such a study.
10-20-12, 07:47 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by sprince
I have to think that the doping is as much a psychological advantage as it is a physical advantage.
10-20-12, 07:52 PM
#31
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In clinal trials of medication you would be shocked at how well placebo's do compared with "real" medications.
The belief in a drug is often times just as effective as the drug itself.
There has to be a major physicological effect from using PED's.
The belief in a drug is often times just as effective as the drug itself.
There has to be a major physicological effect from using PED's.
10-20-12, 08:04 PM
#32
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Angio Graham
In clinal trials of medication you would be shocked at how well placebo's do compared with "real" medications.
The belief in a drug is often times just as effective as the drug itself.
There has to be a major physicological effect from using PED's.
The belief in a drug is often times just as effective as the drug itself.
There has to be a major physicological effect from using PED's.
Armstrong, Levi, and the other top guys didn't suddenly gain motivation from doping, they threw up after their TT's on or off dope. They went looking for dope because they got their asses handed to them.
There might be an exception for a few of the head cases out there, where they might perform up to capability thinking they are tuned up, but those guys are pretty few and far between these days.
Last edited by Racer Ex; 10-20-12 at 08:23 PM.
10-21-12, 07:17 AM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 888
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
Myth for the most part in the people we're discussing. A watt is a watt. At the top level the best guys are motivated and will pretty much destroy themselves. What wins is watts. And that's what doping delivers.
10-21-12, 07:48 AM
#34
starting pistol means war
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sprince
Doesn't that take all the fun out of sport? If it comes down to only numbers (watts, hematocrit, etc.) wouldn't that mean that it's just numbers with or without doping? Race winners could be decided with a blood test, then go on a ceremonial ride so they can wave to the fans. Maybe it's wishful thinking, but there has to be more to it than that.
10-22-12, 01:30 AM
#35
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by YMCA
you seem to have misunderstood
Non athletes and casual athletes have no frame of reference to understand just how willing many endurance athletes are to tear themselves into little pieces. Throwing up, passing out, cramping so badly you can't stay on the bike; when you go that deep you don't have enough brain cells firing to have a placebo effect.
Winning any race is the confluence of a huge number of players, factors, and tactics. But there are times within that spectrum where it's simple math and those moments decide the outcome. And blood manipulation makes a big difference during those moments.
I've raced against several people who were using EPO. It looked a lot like this:
10-22-12, 03:28 AM
#36
out walking the earth
the cat 4s and 5s can begin to wrap their head around it. Here's a group of guys riding at speeds faster than your crits, up a HC mountain, 100 or so miles into a race.
10-22-12, 07:16 AM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsteinb
the cat 4s and 5s can begin to wrap their head around it. Here's a group of guys riding at speeds faster than your crits, up a HC mountain, 100 or so miles into a race.
10-22-12, 11:32 AM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
Ayup, he did.
Non athletes and casual athletes have no frame of reference to understand just how willing many endurance athletes are to tear themselves into little pieces. Throwing up, passing out, cramping so badly you can't stay on the bike; when you go that deep you don't have enough brain cells firing to have a placebo effect.
Winning any race is the confluence of a huge number of players, factors, and tactics. But there are times within that spectrum where it's simple math and those moments decide the outcome. And blood manipulation makes a big difference during those moments.
I've raced against several people who were using EPO. It looked a lot like this:
Non athletes and casual athletes have no frame of reference to understand just how willing many endurance athletes are to tear themselves into little pieces. Throwing up, passing out, cramping so badly you can't stay on the bike; when you go that deep you don't have enough brain cells firing to have a placebo effect.
Winning any race is the confluence of a huge number of players, factors, and tactics. But there are times within that spectrum where it's simple math and those moments decide the outcome. And blood manipulation makes a big difference during those moments.
I've raced against several people who were using EPO. It looked a lot like this:
10-23-12, 08:29 PM
#39
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 15
Bikes: Fuji Gran Fondo, Gary Fisher Marlin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just came home from seeing the movie. As a new fan of cycling (I've been watching since the beginning of the '11 season), I thought the film was presented well and wasn't too technical. It served to humanize him by letting us see his home life and meeting his parents/family. Doping wasn't a huge subject in the film, although it was discussed a few times. He tried to explain his actions for the camera and seemed sincere. The film was really two basic parts: a bio of Levi and then his Gran Fondo in Santa Rosa. The bio took us from his roots in Butte, Montana up through his latest season, with special concentration on the Amgen ToC. The Gran Fondo part was letting us see what the fundraising did for his community and the excitement of thousands of riders sharing the day. The Q&A session after the film was a candid look into his thoughts as well as the film makers. Tom Danielson was there and proved to be the comic relief. Overall, it was a good story and didn't bore my wife too bad (as she has no interest in bike racing).
10-23-12, 09:11 PM
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I also just came back from the show. First, Levi is not particularly interesting. Second, the movie spends more time telling us about his somewhat ditsy wife's love of animals than it does about Levi's doping. Third, Levi tell us almost nothing about his doping, only that he decided to go down "that dark path," that he made decisions he's not happy about, but cycling has been clean for several years now. He tells us nothing about why he doped, other than peer pressure, he says nothing specific about what he did, when he did it (other than he's been clean for 6 years), who he did it with, what drugs he used, or how they affected him. If you're one of the nation's best in a sport that has just been turned completely upside down, and you're part of it, and you want us to believe you're a good guy, we need more - much more - than this.
10-24-12, 10:24 AM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kurt Erlenbach
I also just came back from the show. First, Levi is not particularly interesting. Second, the movie spends more time telling us about his somewhat ditsy wife's love of animals than it does about Levi's doping. Third, Levi tell us almost nothing about his doping, only that he decided to go down "that dark path," that he made decisions he's not happy about, but cycling has been clean for several years now. He tells us nothing about why he doped, other than peer pressure, he says nothing specific about what he did, when he did it (other than he's been clean for 6 years), who he did it with, what drugs he used, or how they affected him. If you're one of the nation's best in a sport that has just been turned completely upside down, and you're part of it, and you want us to believe you're a good guy, we need more - much more - than this.
10-24-12, 11:46 AM
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,344
Bikes: '17 Trek Emonda, '16 Yeti ASR5, '14 Cdale F29 '08 Orbea Orca.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordy748
Look if you want American media style angst and a granular examination of every molecule of how racers doped 10 years ago then why not tune into CNN? The movie was about the human behind the demon we now believe to be Levi Leipheimer and the good he's done for his community.
It wasn't all bad though. Without question, Levi has done very well for the community of Santa Rosa with raising money for charities and services there as well as the Gran Fondo... Hope to see that the GF remains health for the local community.
10-26-12, 08:00 AM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 888
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
Ayup, he did.
Non athletes and casual athletes have no frame of reference to understand just how willing many endurance athletes are to tear themselves into little pieces. Throwing up, passing out, cramping so badly you can't stay on the bike; when you go that deep you don't have enough brain cells firing to have a placebo effect.
Winning any race is the confluence of a huge number of players, factors, and tactics. But there are times within that spectrum where it's simple math and those moments decide the outcome. And blood manipulation makes a big difference during those moments.
I've raced against several people who were using EPO. It looked a lot like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwHlCl2s0UM
Non athletes and casual athletes have no frame of reference to understand just how willing many endurance athletes are to tear themselves into little pieces. Throwing up, passing out, cramping so badly you can't stay on the bike; when you go that deep you don't have enough brain cells firing to have a placebo effect.
Winning any race is the confluence of a huge number of players, factors, and tactics. But there are times within that spectrum where it's simple math and those moments decide the outcome. And blood manipulation makes a big difference during those moments.
I've raced against several people who were using EPO. It looked a lot like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwHlCl2s0UM
What strikes me most about that video is that the guy in the yellow jersey looks to be a fairly average looking person. Quite a contrast to the oxygen deprivation freaks you see winning on the big climbs today. Does simple math eliminate the possibility of someone like Bjarne Riis ever winning the tour in a clean race?
Last edited by sprince; 10-26-12 at 08:01 AM. Reason: removed video from quote
10-26-12, 11:02 AM
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by gsteinb
the cat 4s and 5s can begin to wrap their head around it. Here's a group of guys riding at speeds faster than your crits, up a HC mountain, 100 or so miles into a race.
And they were commenting about how the guys went over some climbs like a speed bump in a parking lot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pandraztic
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
9
03-05-17 12:57 AM
