Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Professional Cycling For the Fans
Reload this Page >

The Chris Froome thread

Search
Notices
Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

The Chris Froome thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-13, 01:34 PM
  #251  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Y'all need to pop a quaalude and relax.
License2Ill is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:04 PM
  #252  
Senior Member
 
whitemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by License2Ill
Y'all need to pop a quaalude and relax.
They still makes those?
whitemax is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:04 PM
  #253  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by jambreck
No apology necessary.

It's quite enough to enjoy how foolish, in hindsight, all that teeth gnashing about the Sky feedbags really was.
Too bad you weren't here to school us, newb.
RJM is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:05 PM
  #254  
Senior Member
 
whitemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Laggard
Tommybing. You are one sad sad person. I hope you find the help you need. Now please take leave from here and this "dead" thread.
Fixed
whitemax is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:16 PM
  #255  
Lance Hater
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by whitemax
Fixed
Probably a good idea also.
Laggard is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:17 PM
  #256  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by whitemax
They still makes those?
The best part is that the test labs have forgotten all about them too.
License2Ill is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:19 PM
  #257  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by RJM
You want an apology? Really?
No, I don't at all, I wasn't the one accused of cheating.

I won't even feel better if you do, but admitting when you are wrong is supposed to make you feel better, good for the soul and all that.
Steve C is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:24 PM
  #258  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What helmet size are these guys wearing? I mean, look at the size of that guy's head. Gotta be HGH.
License2Ill is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:30 PM
  #259  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve C
No, I don't at all, I wasn't the one accused of cheating.

I won't even feel better if you do, but admitting when you are wrong is supposed to make you feel better, good for the soul and all that.
Oh give me a break. When the info came out that said it was legal it makes the issue moot. I did say if "it is legal it's legal" after the issue came out.


Froome and sky are still doping, so take that. jesus...forums.


Apologies....
RJM is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:37 PM
  #260  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
Too bad you weren't here to school us, newb.
Nah. That wasn't necessary either.

Resisting the urge to ejaculate prematurely was sufficient.

Barely credible, really, that those working themselves into a lather of self righteous indignation didn't think to question why Sky would have flouted the rules so brazenly and openly and thereby risked a potentially damaging penalty for their riders.

And "newb"??? Really??? Bless!

Last edited by jambreck; 07-16-13 at 02:41 PM.
jambreck is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:42 PM
  #261  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
TDF pro riders = dopers

Forum riders = dopes

Simple math based on W/kg
License2Ill is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:42 PM
  #262  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by jambreck
Nah. That wasn't necessary either.

Resisting the urge to ejaculate prematurely was sufficient.

Barely credible, really, that those working themselves into a self righteous lather of indignation didn't think to question why Sky would have flouted the rules so brazenly and openly and thereby risked a potentially damaging penalty for their riders.

And "newb"??? Really??? Bless!
You should take it up with Phil Liggett.
RJM is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:45 PM
  #263  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
You should take it up with Phil Liggett.
No need. I have a mind of my own. Do you believe everything the television tells you?
jambreck is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 02:55 PM
  #264  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
he's referring to the team bus stuck at the finish line, not the autobus.

I don't know if they announced the change in the feed zone rules before the Ventoux stage.

It may have been a decision to let them feed on the climb, due to the length of the stage, and the length of the climb. Even for those guys, most of them would take more than a hour up Ventoux.
I follow other sports too. Rugby officially does not allow stopages in play to allow players to get a drink. BUT it is very common for there to be an exception made under very hot conditions.

Cycling has a long history of changes made after a stage starts. The most common being shortening a stage in the mountains due to bad weather. The most recent I recall took out an entire mountain because the decent would have been overly dangerous.

I think it is also worth pointing out that the time gaps put in By Froome are NOT large historically speaking. Though they might seem that way to a 99er.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:10 PM
  #265  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Posts: 2,085
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Leinster
But all that applies to the Discovery Channel, to the US Postal Service, to Livestrong just as much. It applied to US athletics, but they had no problem covering up Carl Lewis' doping. And you're presupposing that if Brailsford is doping his riders, it would only be under instructions from BC, rather than on his own intiative.
No it doesn't. None of those organisations, US Athletics excepted, had the responsibility for governing the sport nationally and even US Athletics weren't running their sport in the way that British Cycling do. Neither did I say that Brailsford would be doping under BC instructions, simply that, as the driving force behind BC's successes on the track and then the road, those making the accusations have to provide some rationale for them to do so, given the total disaster it would cause cycling in Britain.


I see a lot of "Brailsford and Froome can't be doping; they wouldn't do that." Well I bet somebody who knew him really well thought Ben Johnson was never the kind of guy to cheat like that.
Ben Johnson had everything to gain, Brailsford/BC/Sky do not and he was only responsible for himself

None of this is to say one way or the other whether Froome is clean as a whistle, dirty as sin, or somewhere in between. Only that you can't just blanket say "he wouldn't dope, he has too much to lose."
What I was saying was that those making the accusations have to provide some overwhelming rationale, given that the damage it would do to all concerned would be of an order greater than even the Armstrong debacle and would affect the whole of the sport in the country

It might turn out that they are using some unkown, untestable, superdrug, but when you consider that other teams didn't, until they started copying Sky, have a tailored roller/turbo warming down routine, might in not be that they are simply more efficient in there preparation and, given their development of track success, simply know more about training and preparing riders for the demands of a major tour?

Which other teams have the wealth of thoroughly tested, scientific eveidence as to what works and what doesn't, together with the resources of teh best funded national governing body in cycling?
atbman is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:11 PM
  #266  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by License2Ill
Just the fact that these guys can come back from a single stage of a lifetime epic ride and do it over again the next day or two days later, for at least 2 weeks worth of those stages is suspicious enough at this point. We act like it's the matter of leading, but the whole event of a cycle tour is grueling enough to question drug use. The suffering alone looks like an addiction.
What race are you watching? There has not been a single stage that has been a lifetime epic stage that I can recall. Quintana made two attacks that had the potential for such if all went great. Both time he was caught.

On the first of those Froome made time on everyone, in large part because his team turned itself inside out chasing while Froome sat on their wheels. The next day again in the mountains, but not a mountaintop finish Froome found himself isolated because the rest of his team was spent.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:14 PM
  #267  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
What race are you watching? There has not been a single stage that has been a lifetime epic stage that I can recall. Quintana made two attacks that had the potential for such if all went great. Both time he was caught.

On the first of those Froome made time on everyone, in large part because his team turned itself inside out chasing while Froome sat on their wheels. The next day again in the mountains, but not a mountaintop finish Froome found himself isolated because the rest of his team was spent.
The race as a whole is epic enough. 100 miles every day, some of it with huge climbs. The third week with the most climbs back to back is coming. It's already been enough to question drug use though. Even if you could do the stages, to do that at a competitive level, and at the top competitive level takes it up so many notches into territory where recovery ability alone is not-of-this-world. I couldn't do it slowly with one of those stages each week, let alone one every day at speeds I could only dream of maintaining. But I'm not comparing it to my slow ass, I'm simply saying that known recovery issues and time for any of this type of activity at a level that hurts means longer than one day is needed to do it all over again for the human body regardless of talent and conditioning.

Last edited by License2Ill; 07-16-13 at 03:17 PM.
License2Ill is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:16 PM
  #268  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I'm watching the non-rose-colored-glasses version of the 2013 TdF
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:23 PM
  #269  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Physically, CT / Mentally, San Francisco
Posts: 207

Bikes: BMC Team Machine, BMC Road Racer, BMC Streetfire, BMC AlpenChallenge

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by atbman
No it doesn't. None of those organisations, US Athletics excepted, had the responsibility for governing the sport nationally and even US Athletics weren't running their sport in the way that British Cycling do. Neither did I say that Brailsford would be doping under BC instructions, simply that, as the driving force behind BC's successes on the track and then the road, those making the accusations have to provide some rationale for them to do so, given the total disaster it would cause cycling in Britain.




Ben Johnson had everything to gain, Brailsford/BC/Sky do not and he was only responsible for himself



What I was saying was that those making the accusations have to provide some overwhelming rationale, given that the damage it would do to all concerned would be of an order greater than even the Armstrong debacle and would affect the whole of the sport in the country

It might turn out that they are using some unkown, untestable, superdrug, but when you consider that other teams didn't, until they started copying Sky, have a tailored roller/turbo warming down routine, might in not be that they are simply more efficient in there preparation and, given their development of track success, simply know more about training and preparing riders for the demands of a major tour?

Which other teams have the wealth of thoroughly tested, scientific evidence as to what works and what doesn't, together with the resources of the best funded national governing body in cycling?
are you honestly trying to say that the rides we've seen from Froome (and Porte) are the results of riding rollers before and after the race? Really? Really?! How can anyone have watched either of those stages and not immediately think - know - Froome is doping. Nationalism is one thing, but the way Froome rode away from people, the times he put in - equal to or beating known doper's times - the whole package just screams doping. There are a LOT of drugs out there which don't yet have valid tests associated with them.
FriendlyFred is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:27 PM
  #270  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Physically, CT / Mentally, San Francisco
Posts: 207

Bikes: BMC Team Machine, BMC Road Racer, BMC Streetfire, BMC AlpenChallenge

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Keith99
What race are you watching? There has not been a single stage that has been a lifetime epic stage that I can recall. Quintana made two attacks that had the potential for such if all went great. Both time he was caught.

On the first of those Froome made time on everyone, in large part because his team turned itself inside out chasing while Froome sat on their wheels. The next day again in the mountains, but not a mountaintop finish Froome found himself isolated because the rest of his team was spent.
you act like Froome didn't have to even pedal. Like everyone else, he too had to keep up with the pace the rest of SKY was setting. Unlike everyone else, Froome took off SPRINTING and had a time up that mountain only approached by known dopers. It's not like Froome got a free ride.
FriendlyFred is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:30 PM
  #271  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by FriendlyFred
you act like Froome didn't have to even pedal. Like everyone else, he too had to keep up with the pace the rest of SKY was setting. Unlike everyone else, Froome took off SPRINTING and had a time up that mountain only approached by known dopers. It's not like Froome got a free ride.
How do you get this out of my pointing out there have not been any lifetime epic stages in this Tour and that Froome had the benefit of following teammates?

Please give a source for Froome's time compared to other doped riders.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:37 PM
  #272  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
https://www.fillarifoorumi.fi/forum/s...73#post2061073
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:38 PM
  #273  
out walking the earth
 
gsteinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Placid, NY
Posts: 21,441
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 752 Times in 342 Posts
the bikes are better
gsteinb is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:39 PM
  #274  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I love the responses that talk about how it was Sky blowing up the peleton that made it so easy for Froome to ride away from everybody. Ok, so he sat behind Porte for the first 100 miles and took it easy. So why is he so much faster in the last 8 miles than Contador or anybody else who sat on Froome's wheel for the first 100 miles?

And I really love all the talk of new training techniques, special equipment used, and how Froome's physiology is just different than everybody else. I seem to recall another team that "paid attention to all the little details" for the first time in the history of the sport...and who tweaked all their gear and equipment to get every last gram of weight out...and who had a special rider with an oversized heart and remarkable ability to clear lactic acid...and as it turned out, the most sophisticated doping program in the history of sport. We have heard all these kinds of claims before...and everytime we have heard them about a team that just seems better than everybody else by a wide margin, we have always subsequently found out that they were a bunch of dopers. So forgive me if I am not wide-eyed and slack-jawed at the claims of new training programs and special equipment and unique physiology...I have heard it several times before and I won't be fooled by it again.

As for the warming down on rollers I keep seeing mentioned...I can remember watching racers at my local crit cool down on rollers years ago, and I can remember seeing riders interviewed on TV while cooling down on a trainer years ago as well. So it is not a new thing. Maybe SKY really does it in some way that is different than other teams...but simply warming down on rollers/trainers is not new at all.

Last edited by txags92; 07-16-13 at 03:49 PM.
txags92 is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 03:41 PM
  #275  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
gsteinb warms up on rollers. I demand a urine sample
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.