Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Professional Cycling For the Fans
Reload this Page >

Cookson Want Vino and Riis to Testify

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

Cookson Want Vino and Riis to Testify

Old 07-28-14, 10:51 AM
  #1  
Leinster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cookson Want Vino and Riis to Testify

From the "I'm not saying you guys are doping, I'm just saying it'd be nice if you swung by and gave a sworn testimony about what exactly used to happen when you were riding, and why things are so completely different now, that we should be happy to believe it when riders that you no coach totally dominate the race..." files;

UCI chief Brian Cookson wants Astana?s Alexandr Vinokourov to testify | Sport | The Guardian

UCI chief Brian Cookson wants Astana’s Alexandr Vinokourov to testify
• Plea to head of Tour de France-winning team
• Bjarne Riis also urged to talk to doping commission

William Fotheringham in Paris
The Guardian, Monday 28 July 2014 07.00 EDT
Alexandr Vinokorouv
Astana's head, Alexandr Vinokorouv, right, tested positive for blood doping in 2007. Photograph: Jean-Paul Pelissier/Reuters
The UCI president, Brian Cookson, has called upon Alexandr Vinokourov and Bjarne Riis, the heads of the two most prominent teams in this year’s Tour de France, to testify before the independent commission on cycling’s doping history as a way of helping the sport move on from its past.

Vinokourov, who is in charge of the Tour de France winner’s Astana squad, tested positive for blood doping in 2007. Riis, who is in charge of Tinkoff-Saxo, winners of three mountain stages and the King of the Mountains prize, confessed to having used erythropoietin to win the 1996 Tour; he was initially expunged from the record but subsequently reinstated.

“I would like both of them to come to the commission,” Cookson told the Guardian at the Tour de France finish in Paris. “The commission doesn’t have powers of subpoena, but there is a court of public opinion here which is really important; those two people and others as well need to bear that in mind if they want to continue to operate in our world, opinion in the world of cycling would be much more favourable towards them if they came forward.”
Leinster is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 02:58 PM
  #2  
Giacomo 1 
Senior Member
 
Giacomo 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 3,183

Bikes: Colnago Super, Basso Gap, Pogliaghi, Fabio Barecci, Torelli Pista, Miyata 1400A

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 311 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I wouldn't go.

These guys already paid their price for doping and the public certainly doesn't seem to be clamoring for something like this since the end of the Tour. Everybody seemed very pleased with this years edition, and besides a few forum types here and there who just love to talk doping, there has been little complaint from the general fan about possible doping.

There is nothing to be gained by these two guys going, but they can surely lose something. A question not answered to somebodies liking, an answer seen as obscure or only partially answered, or a question that they would rather not answer at all, would be seen as guilty pleas.

Better to let this sleeping dog lie IMHO...
__________________
It never gets easier, you just go faster. ~ Greg LeMond
Giacomo 1 is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 03:01 PM
  #3  
DLBroox
Senior Member
 
DLBroox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 961

Bikes: Bianchi San Jose, Dahon Mu Uno

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
^I agree.
DLBroox is online now  
Old 07-28-14, 03:09 PM
  #4  
Caretaker
Heretic
 
Caretaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,049

Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
I agree with Cookson. They should testify. As long as they don't the teams/riders they are associated with will be tainted by the secrets.

The truth will set you free.
Caretaker is online now  
Old 07-28-14, 03:16 PM
  #5  
Giacomo 1 
Senior Member
 
Giacomo 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 3,183

Bikes: Colnago Super, Basso Gap, Pogliaghi, Fabio Barecci, Torelli Pista, Miyata 1400A

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 311 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Caretaker View Post
I agree with Cookson. They should testify. As long as they don't the teams/riders they are associated with will be tainted by the secrets.

The truth will set you free.
Testify to what exactly?

There is no reasonable cause here, nobody is crying foul, nobody is being accused of cheating, and nobody has filed a complaint, it's just some guy named Cookson that needs to stay employed and the way to do that is to keep doping in the spotlight - forever!
__________________
It never gets easier, you just go faster. ~ Greg LeMond
Giacomo 1 is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 03:54 PM
  #6  
Leinster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giacomo 1 View Post
I wouldn't go.

These guys already paid their price for doping and the public certainly doesn't seem to be clamoring for something like this since the end of the Tour. Everybody seemed very pleased with this years edition, and besides a few forum types here and there who just love to talk doping, there has been little complaint from the general fan about possible doping.

There is nothing to be gained by these two guys going, but they can surely lose something. A question not answered to somebodies liking, an answer seen as obscure or only partially answered, or a question that they would rather not answer at all, would be seen as guilty pleas.

Better to let this sleeping dog lie IMHO...
Would that not be as good a reason as any to have them testify? To actually get 2 guys known to have been at the heart of the heaviest doping era stand up and say "I know it was bad, but here's how I know it's better these days"? Why wait for the public outcry? Why not get ahead of it and be seen to be proactive about these things for once?

Like you say, the 2 of them have paid their penalties, so there shouldn't be anything to worry about for the, should there? Though I would like to hear what Riis has to say about Kreuziger's current situation.
Leinster is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 03:55 PM
  #7  
Caretaker
Heretic
 
Caretaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,049

Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Giacomo 1 View Post
Testify to what exactly?

There is no reasonable cause here, nobody is crying foul, nobody is being accused of cheating, and nobody has filed a complaint, it's just some guy named Cookson that needs to stay employed and the way to do that is to keep doping in the spotlight - forever!
Testify to the when, where, why and how of their doping.

OK, so you clearly think the past should be forgotten and as long as it's ignored it won't reappear. I take a different view.
Caretaker is online now  
Old 07-28-14, 03:59 PM
  #8  
Giacomo 1 
Senior Member
 
Giacomo 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 3,183

Bikes: Colnago Super, Basso Gap, Pogliaghi, Fabio Barecci, Torelli Pista, Miyata 1400A

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 311 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Caretaker View Post
Testify to the when, where, why and how of their doping.
I'm quite sure they did that once already, and once should be all that is required.

Would you re-testify to a crime you committed, and paid the price for, 10 or 20 years ago? What would be the upside?

This is grandstanding on Cooksons part IMHO...
__________________
It never gets easier, you just go faster. ~ Greg LeMond
Giacomo 1 is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 04:05 PM
  #9  
Caretaker
Heretic
 
Caretaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,049

Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Giacomo 1 View Post
I'm quite sure they did that once already, and once should be all that is required.

Would you re-testify to a crime you committed, and paid the price for, 10 or 20 years ago? What would be the upside?

This is grandstanding on Cooksons part IMHO...
Never said I thought they would, just that they should.

I'm quite sure Vino hasn't testified to doping and if Riis has then he should have no problem doing it again.

Whether it's grandstanding or not I agree with what he's saying.
Caretaker is online now  
Old 07-28-14, 04:05 PM
  #10  
Giacomo 1 
Senior Member
 
Giacomo 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 3,183

Bikes: Colnago Super, Basso Gap, Pogliaghi, Fabio Barecci, Torelli Pista, Miyata 1400A

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 311 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Leinster View Post
Would that not be as good a reason as any to have them testify? To actually get 2 guys known to have been at the heart of the heaviest doping era stand up and say "I know it was bad, but here's how I know it's better these days"? Why wait for the public outcry? Why not get ahead of it and be seen to be proactive about these things for once?
There won't be any public outcry over this Tour. From everything I've read, fans seem pleased. This Tour actually did much to repair cycling's tarnished image as doping was rarely ever mentioned by anybody. Another 2 or 3 Tours like this, and doping will be all but forgotten, so let it go, move on, nothing to see here.

Originally Posted by Leinster View Post
Like you say, the 2 of them have paid their penalties, so there shouldn't be anything to worry about for the, should there? Though I would like to hear what Riis has to say about Kreuziger's current situation.
You prove the point, you want to get into things a that could be incriminating...
__________________
It never gets easier, you just go faster. ~ Greg LeMond
Giacomo 1 is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 04:23 PM
  #11  
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,530

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1538 Post(s)
Liked 50 Times in 46 Posts
Cook's son want vino and rice? Surely you should feed him before testimony.

Sorry, that one was a great title.
__________________

Marcia Brady rode a ROLLFAST!
Rollfast is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 04:43 PM
  #12  
Leinster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rollfast View Post
Cook's son want vino and rice? Surely you should feed him before testimony.

Sorry, that one was a great title.
Yah. He thirsty and hungry.
Leinster is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 04:49 PM
  #13  
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sound like he wants a show trial.

I sure would not go. Cookson gains from this if someone gets crucified, no other way. Riis and Vino can't gain no matter what happens. If they seem clean it will get ignored. It will be news only if they get implicated in something.

Why not instead invite them to consult with their enforcement group and explain some of the tricks they used to stay uncaught?
Keith99 is offline  
Old 07-28-14, 05:42 PM
  #14  
paperbackwriter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wasn't it only days ago when Cookson tried to avoid making a fuss about Menchov's sanction? Either you're open about doping or you're not; you can't choose what suits you at the given moment.

Also, it's a no-brainer to put Riis and Vino together in this. Vino tested positive but has he ever openly talked about his doping past? And while it was never in question that Riis was doping he's one of the few who never tested positive but felt the need to admit to their past mistakes. What more should he do? Bury his yellow jersey in front of the cheering crowd? There are at least tens of people involved in cycling who should feel just as obliged to come forward but have said much less than Bjarne Riis.

Also I don't think there are unfavourable attitudes towards Riis/Vino. Riis is generally seen as a great DS and I'm sure most people wouldn't like him out of the picture - his tactical sense and team building abilities simply give us better racing. As for Vino, there was a bit of negativity but it had more to do with him smacking Nibali. Other than that, Vino's racing after his ban could be considered a successful redemption. It's pretty hard not to love Vino when you watched him ride.
paperbackwriter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Knet
Classic & Vintage
76
07-31-18 11:29 AM
bikemig
General Cycling Discussion
40
08-13-15 04:03 PM
frantik
Rides and Races
6
10-19-11 06:16 PM
patentcad
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
81
03-24-06 10:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.