Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Recreational & Family
Reload this Page >

Piccolo versus Adams Trail-a-Bike

Search
Notices
Recreational & Family Ride just to ride? Have a family and want to get them into cycling? Drop in here to discuss recreational and family cycling issues.

Piccolo versus Adams Trail-a-Bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-06, 10:59 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Piccolo versus Adams Trail-a-Bike

Having sought advice on trail-a-bikes on this site, and been grateful for having received it, I thought I'd offer some experience. For a year my 5- and then 6-year-old daughter rode an Adams attached to my hybrid. It worked well and she enjoyed it until about a month ago when I started to notice some play and wobbling in the hitch. In researching a replacement for the hitch, I came across some posts about the superior design of the Burley Piccolo. I purchased the Piccolo and the posts were right. It is much better: the seat and the handlebars adjust more easily to a better position (at least for my daughter); the six gears permit the child to pedal even up a hill when a single-gear trailer would leave her feeling useless as a ride participant; and most importantly, the unit's attachment to a rack rather than the seatpost virtually eliminates instability when the child shifts her weight and allows the trailer bike to follow more closely behind the adult's bike, making turning easier. The only negative is that the Burley (inexplicably) does not run the frame down below the front ring as protection, which means that if you rest the trailer unattached on the ground you risk bending the ring and breaking off the rubber guard (which is, also inexplicably, riveted to the ring and thus can't be replaced without replacing the ring (and perhaps the crank with it). The advantages well outweigh the sole negative and justify the price difference for anyone who can even remotely afford it.
Lobalobo is offline  
Old 07-17-06, 08:07 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: oregon
Posts: 204

Bikes: trek,specialized,terry,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting--I have an older Burley Piccolo and the protective cover around the chainring is screwed into the ring, making it easy to replace and easier for cleaning. I agree that a protective piece of metal protecting the chainring would be a good idea.
karmantra is offline  
Old 07-17-06, 10:11 PM
  #3  
Year-round cyclist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montréal (Québec)
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
True. My protective cover is broken in 2-3 places, yet it still stays in place.
Michel Gagnon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.