![]() |
Originally Posted by HD3andMe
(Post 21971885)
What you may have recalled is not the "Larger percentage" of normal riders.
|
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 21972708)
I guess if he knows one other rider, and both he and that other rider have problems clipping in, that qualifies as a "large percentage."
BTW a couple of years ago on a ride of silence with a lot of DF riders I became aware of all the scratching around trying to get clipped in, being only a short distance away from their BBs. |
I have a tadpole trike and a couple of SWB bents, I miss the maneuverability height and general all purpose use of the DF bikes, because of accidents I cannot afford another crash off one of them. I think I have been on borrowed time on the SWB's, they are fast, and have gotten squirrely a few times at speed, and I stay off them as well. The trike is definitely safer as far as falls, but I don't get them over 12-15 MPH, I can see how you could easily flip one at high speeds, and I would never ride one in town because of the visibility.
|
Originally Posted by FREEBIRD1
(Post 21978108)
I have a tadpole trike and a couple of SWB bents, I miss the maneuverability height and general all purpose use of the DF bikes, because of accidents I cannot afford another crash off one of them. I think I have been on borrowed time on the SWB's, they are fast, and have gotten squirrely a few times at speed, and I stay off them as well. The trike is definitely safer as far as falls, but I don't get them over 12-15 MPH, I can see how you could easily flip one at high speeds, and I would never ride one in town because of the visibility.
|
I've ridden a recumbent trike coast-to-coast on the Southern Tier. I don't regret that as the ride that I chose, but everything comes with tradeoffs.
- Comfort: Sure, my wrists and shoulders had it easy. But I had to hold my neck forward, which was a strain, and the buckles that tensioned the seatback eventually dug into my spine, creating a painful growth (this was specific to my model of trike, and I eventually dealt with it by adding some foam). - Speed: A trike is slower. Go ahead and fight me on this. If you've got a long day ahead and are chasing the sunset from the word go, even on tour, that makes a difference. - Navigability: In some places—Arizona and Mississippi especially—there was just no good place to ride because the shoulders are narrow and every road seems to have sleeping policemen. In Arizona, I either had to take the lane or carefully straddle the sleeping policemen with my left front wheel on one side and my rear wheel on the other. This was nerve-wracking, for hours at a time. In other places, I was just taking up more road width where it wasn't really available. - Cargo capacity: I was touring pretty light, and could get everything into two conventional panniers (although this played hell with downhill handling). If I had wanted to carry more, it would have been a problem. |
Originally Posted by HD3andMe
(Post 21971885)
What you may have recalled is not the "Larger percentage" of normal riders.
|
Originally Posted by HD3andMe
(Post 21971885)
What you may have recalled is not the "Larger percentage" of normal riders.
|
Originally Posted by HD3andMe
(Post 21990976)
Twelve days to respond, and you double posted. That's cool.
Of course, your alleged your singular experience and claim "No wobbling around on startup that can make drivers nervous, while you are scratching around trying to get clipped in." is only common, and the "norm," in your mind. Out here in the real world, folks don't have all of these issues with clipless pedals that you repeatedly imagine. |
Originally Posted by HD3andMe
(Post 21993981)
I never claimed that, nor do I believe that.
That's just you making stuff up. Again. |
That's funny right there
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 21990211)
About 3 years ago I participated in a ride of silence,
|
OP should start a thread listing all of the people on BF he alone converted to trikes.
:innocent: |
Originally Posted by downhillmaster
(Post 22033397)
OP should start a thread listing all of the people on BF he alone converted to trikes.
:innocent: |
After several test rides I can say I don't find recumbent bikes practical... They seem comfortable for the flats where you don't have cars to deal with. When I have cars I want to be able to pivot my head around which isn't nearly as easy when reclining and they seem to require mirrors for any rear visibility. The 2 wheelers were the most maneuverable, but I wouldn't want to ride through the city or tight spaces. I don't see them being easy to bail off of, maybe rolling to the side but wouldn't likely get far enough away to avoid a wreckless car. The selection of tires for most of them seems pretty limited at least on the small front wheels, so good luck finding something puncture resistant for commuting. Ithink all of these reasons explain why I see lots of spandex racers with recumbents on bike trails, but almost no recumbents actually commuting through the city very often.
|
Strava says I have 15k miles on my current recumbent. The previous one probably had more but I didn't have Strava back then. Longest single day ride was 400 miles, and longest event was over 900 miles.
I also have an upright MTB, rando bike, commuter, and (as of today) a CX bike. Longest single ride on an upright would be 400k/260 miles, and longest event 600k/370 miles. For comfort, the 'bent is untouchable. True story: on a 1000k brevet, we stopped for a quick nap. The upright guys lay down on the wet grass, while I stayed clipped in, leaned against the fire station, and had a good snooze - because my 'bent seat was the most comfortable thing around even after a few hundred miles. For speed on the flats and downhills, solo, the 'bent is also untouchable. No contest. For climbs, anything above 2% the upright reigns. The steeper the grade, the bigger the difference. I don't know why. Don't care. It just is. For group riding, upright is the way to go. The 'bent sucks in groups, particularly if there is any terrain. I've ridden two 1000ks with groups, in terrain, and it's a pain. I killed myself to stay with them climbing, rode the brakes descending, and loafed on the flats. The draft behind me is sub-par, and I can't see my front wheel well enough to draft closely. For fun? Just plain enjoyment of riding a bicycle? Upright. I don't know what the magic is that comes with a lively upright, but there's nothing like it. I find recumbent evangelizing to be silly, and people who'd rather be shot than ride one to be equally silly. If I had the dollars and space, I'd have a velomobile, FWD 'bent, carbon road bike, fixie, SS, tandem, and a 36" unicycle. It's all good. |
I'm gonna flag that last post ^^^ so that any time I feel that perverse desire to get a 'bent -- which admittedly creeps up every few years -- I can re-read downtube42's astute litany and remind myself that no, I don't want to own one.
Maybe just borrow one... |
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
(Post 22192436)
I'm gonna flag that last post ^^^ so that any time I feel that perverse desire to get a 'bent -- which admittedly creeps up every few years -- I can re-read downtube42's astute litany and remind myself that no, I don't want to own one.
Maybe just borrow one... Both platforms are fun. |
Originally Posted by Steamer
(Post 22192460)
Except his experience is not universal. My bent climbing is only very slightly shy of my upright climbing. Some folks never get the knack of it.
|
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
(Post 22192586)
Fair point, but I was referring to his comments about group riding as much as his comments about climbing.
The other incompatibility goes the other way. The bent rider has to lollygag on the flats. Although this is a nice problem to have. High speed pacelines are a compatability problem, but if the group riding is more a loose bunch, the bent rider (on a high racer) doesn't really have much trouble fitting in. |
Originally Posted by Kingpoo
(Post 22189014)
After several test rides I can say I don't find recumbent bikes practical... They seem comfortable for the flats where you don't have cars to deal with. When I have cars I want to be able to pivot my head around which isn't nearly as easy when reclining and they seem to require mirrors for any rear visibility. The 2 wheelers were the most maneuverable, but I wouldn't want to ride through the city or tight spaces. I don't see them being easy to bail off of, maybe rolling to the side but wouldn't likely get far enough away to avoid a wreckless car. The selection of tires for most of them seems pretty limited at least on the small front wheels, so good luck finding something puncture resistant for commuting. Ithink all of these reasons explain why I see lots of spandex racers with recumbents on bike trails, but almost no recumbents actually commuting through the city very often.
|
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 22193179)
Suitable 20"/406 tires are available - maybe less so during covid times but that is true for many bike parts. Never felt the need to jump off of my bike to avoid a wild car.
I know about mirrors since my bikes, motorcycles and even cars have all had them, but they all had blind spots to check for. maneuverability, vantage point, and visibility were by far the biggest negatives to me. |
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
(Post 22192586)
Fair point, but I was referring to his comments about group riding as much as his comments about climbing.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.