Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Recumbent
Reload this Page >

Gear inches

Search
Notices
Recumbent What IS that thing?! Recumbents may be odd looking, but they have many advantages over a "wedgie" bicycle. Discuss the in's and out's recumbent lifestyle in the recumbent forum.

Gear inches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-06, 08:08 AM
  #1  
Old Noob
Thread Starter
 
oldguy52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mid-MN not the end of the world, but you can see it from here
Posts: 155

Bikes: Downtube VIIIFS folder, 2 Strida 3 folders, HP Velotechnik "Grasshopper" and a Burley "Hep Cat"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gear inches

OK, can somebody explain this gear inch thing??? I was figuring out the gearing on my new Grasshopper and no matter how I add it up I get numbers that aren't even close to what these gear inch calculators give me.

For instance, top gear according to the gear inch program is supposed to be 106 gear inches. When I figure out how far the bike should move using real measurements, 1 turn of the crank in top gear should be about 327 inches. 60 teeth / 11 teeth (5.45) x aprox 60 in. wheel circumference.

Anybody ???
__________________
Downtube VIII FS folder - his .... 2 - Strida3 folders - his n' hers .... HP Velotechnik Grasshopper - his .... Burley Hep Cat - hers .... Whiz Wheels TT Cruiser W/velo kit - his
.
Ayn Rand was a prophet ..... it isn't my fault
.
oldguy52 is offline  
Old 01-04-06, 08:18 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gear inch refers to the diameter of the wheel, not the circumference. So if your wheel has a circumference of 60 inches, then it has a diameter of 60/pi = 19.1 inches. So the gear inch value for your top gear becomes: (60/11) x 19.1 = 104 inches.

Sally
pigasus is offline  
Old 01-04-06, 08:24 AM
  #3  
Old Noob
Thread Starter
 
oldguy52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mid-MN not the end of the world, but you can see it from here
Posts: 155

Bikes: Downtube VIIIFS folder, 2 Strida 3 folders, HP Velotechnik "Grasshopper" and a Burley "Hep Cat"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Sally,

I got to looking at that after I posted and realised that if I divided my result by PI I got about the same number as the gear inch chart. I guess I don't understand why they wouldn't finish the calulation though and figure how far the bike actually moves for one turn in a given gear.
__________________
Downtube VIII FS folder - his .... 2 - Strida3 folders - his n' hers .... HP Velotechnik Grasshopper - his .... Burley Hep Cat - hers .... Whiz Wheels TT Cruiser W/velo kit - his
.
Ayn Rand was a prophet ..... it isn't my fault
.
oldguy52 is offline  
Old 01-04-06, 08:57 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
because "gear inches" was coined to compare bikes with gear trains(chains and sprockets, shafts and gears, etc.) to earlier bikes with a directly cranked drive wheel.
dogsridewith is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 05:28 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
squeaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Sussex, England
Posts: 50

Bikes: Much modified 60's Carlton Corsa, Marin East Peak, Kona Caldera, Challenge Mistral

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's all to do with the good old 'penny farthing' - bigger wheel = faster (provided you have the legs for it). 'How far' in one wheel revolution was just to logical for us Brits, although I think that the continental chappies went that route (as well as inventing recumbents )
squeaker is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 06:54 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,483

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Manufacurer gear range numbers are often off by quite a bit from reality because their calculations are based on having, for instance a 26" wheel, when in fact the wheel in question might only be 24.5" in actual diameter. But yeah, what the others said. Gear inch numbers are meant as a means to compare geared bikes to the wheel size on an 'ordinary' (a.k.a. penny farthing.)
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 10:19 PM
  #7  
lowracer ninja master
 
lowracer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
one of these days I gotta see what my top gear inches are on the vk with the 700c rear with the 58/11 combo. I'm too lazy to search for the gear inch calculator.
lowracer1 is offline  
Old 01-06-06, 06:48 AM
  #8  
meb
Senior Member
 
meb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by lowracer1
one of these days I gotta see what my top gear inches are on the vk with the 700c rear with the 58/11 combo. I'm too lazy to search for the gear inch calculator.
Just under 141.
meb is offline  
Old 01-06-06, 08:25 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
bentcruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oldguy52
OK, can somebody explain this gear inch thing??? I was figuring out the gearing on my new Grasshopper and no matter how I add it up I get numbers that aren't even close to what these gear inch calculators give me.
Another method of measuring gears is by gain ratios and also meter development.

Sheldon Brown has a good calculator for all three methods:

Gear Calculator
__________________
Derek
Burley Canto
bentcruiser is offline  
Old 01-06-06, 08:25 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,483

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
A 700C with a *true* 23C tire would have a diameter of 26.29". That with a 58/11 gear combination would make for a 138.6 inch gear. Carried one step further, if you pedaled that gear at 80 rpm you would be travelling at 32.9 mph. At 90 rpm it would be 37.0 mph, and at 100 rpm it would be 41.2 mph.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 01-07-06, 02:17 AM
  #11  
meb
Senior Member
 
meb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
A 700C with a *true* 23C tire would have a diameter of 26.29". That with a 58/11 gear combination would make for a 138.6 inch gear. Carried one step further, if you pedaled that gear at 80 rpm you would be travelling at 32.9 mph. At 90 rpm it would be 37.0 mph, and at 100 rpm it would be 41.2 mph.
Well Chris could you specify your tire width so we can come to some accord on your top gear inches?
meb is offline  
Old 01-07-06, 08:52 AM
  #12  
Old Noob
Thread Starter
 
oldguy52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mid-MN not the end of the world, but you can see it from here
Posts: 155

Bikes: Downtube VIIIFS folder, 2 Strida 3 folders, HP Velotechnik "Grasshopper" and a Burley "Hep Cat"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by meb
Well Chris could you specify your tire width so we can come to some accord on your top gear inches?
Well...... IF you want to get right down to a perfect measurement ........

Knowing what it says on the side of the tire is meaningless and will never be better than approximate. To get it right down perfect, you need to measure the radius from the center of the wheel hub to the ground, WITH the riders weight on the bike (allow for tire squat). This will give you the TRUE rolling radius of the tire. Only in this way will you be able to figure the "exact" gear inch measurement for any given bike.

Rik
__________________
Downtube VIII FS folder - his .... 2 - Strida3 folders - his n' hers .... HP Velotechnik Grasshopper - his .... Burley Hep Cat - hers .... Whiz Wheels TT Cruiser W/velo kit - his
.
Ayn Rand was a prophet ..... it isn't my fault
.
oldguy52 is offline  
Old 01-07-06, 11:04 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,483

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Originally Posted by oldguy52
To get it right down perfect, you need to measure the radius from the center of the wheel hub to the ground, WITH the riders weight on the bike (allow for tire squat).
Very true. But there's accuracy and there's accuracy. It's not valid to assume a 23C tire will be an actual 23C, which is why I stated it the way I did. But measuring with weight on the tire IMHO is going farther than you'd have to go for mere gear calculations. Deflection for a properly-inflated tire is 10% according to Michelin. For a 23C tire, that means a 0.09 inch reduction in radius. Since we're only stating gear inches to one decimal place, the difference is not significant.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 01-07-06, 02:12 PM
  #14  
meb
Senior Member
 
meb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
Very true. But there's accuracy and there's accuracy. It's not valid to assume a 23C tire will be an actual 23C, which is why I stated it the way I did. But measuring with weight on the tire IMHO is going farther than you'd have to go for mere gear calculations. Deflection for a properly-inflated tire is 10% according to Michelin. For a 23C tire, that means a 0.09 inch reduction in radius. Since we're only stating gear inches to one decimal place, the difference is not significant.
Since we're turning Chris' gear ratio into a forum winter project, there's no need to limit our precision to useful levels.
meb is offline  
Old 01-08-06, 08:36 AM
  #15  
lowracer ninja master
 
lowracer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my rear tire is a 700c x 21mm width have fun splitting hairs.

maybe you can further tweak the gear inch calculation by taking into account chain stretch , chainring and cassette wear, and road surface which can adversely affect the contact patch area and deflection of the tire squat. Of course the tire squat will change by body weight, so maybe make a chart for my body weight starting at 190 lbs through 200 lbs. You might have to take it out 8 decimal places, but knowing the gear inch at different weights would be cool.

oh don't forget to take into account the riding temperature which would effect tire pressure which would of course affect the tire squat.

Now actually, wouldn't your gear inches actually change during a century event where your body weight will change during the event, plus the temperature usually rises a good 10 to 20 degrees from start to finish.

hmmm, this sounds like you guys have quite a project here. might take until winter of 2009 to finish it.
lowracer1 is offline  
Old 01-15-06, 03:40 PM
  #16  
Riding With Scissors
 
mattzees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brooklyn NY & Richmond VA
Posts: 91

Bikes: 2002 Specialized Allez Comp, 1995 Richard Cunningham Nishiki MTB, 2006 Specialized Langster, SUN EZ Speedster SX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wow, you guys are all nuts, huh?


--M
__________________
"So, what do you think of our mountain?"
"Tastes pretty good..."
mattzees is offline  
Old 01-16-06, 08:27 AM
  #17  
meb
Senior Member
 
meb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: arlington, VA
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mattzees
Wow, you guys are all nuts, huh?


--M
Like Waylon-

I've always been crazy but it kept me from going insane.
meb is offline  
Old 09-10-06, 07:33 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok, I know this is an old thread, but thanks for the link to the gear inch calculator. Now I understand why my cadence is so much slower than what most consider average. If I could maintain 100 RPM in my longest gear, I would be rolling at a sustained speed of 44.8 mph.

I can get there on a downhill, but not close on flat terrain.

I could also print out the calculations and use them in reverse to estimate my cadence based upon my gear and speed. Interesting.

Caruso
Carusoswi is offline  
Old 09-10-06, 05:20 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,483

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Carusoswi - we could transmogrify this thread into a cadence thread. Whatever speed you are going, you should pick a gear that allows your feet to spin at your ideal cadence. Bigger gears don't necessarily let you go faster; sometimes they move you off your power curve and actually cause you to go slower.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 09-10-06, 05:48 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Buckeye State
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Too Serious For Me. I Just Pedal And Grin.
OLD GRANDAD is offline  
Old 09-11-06, 05:52 PM
  #21  
Dr.Deltron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by OLD GRANDAD
Too Serious For Me. I Just Pedal And Grin.
+3! I ride a recumbent trike!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.