![]() |
It has to be because they're very different. My trike has drawn more attention in a week than the rest of my bikes in a year! All nice comments, and a lot of older folks like me stop to talk about it at the coffee shop down the road. Many have never seen one. I kinda have to agree if it weren't for my health problems, I would probably still be on a diamond. I am learning to love this thing. As someone stated at least I can ride again!!!
|
Originally Posted by chipcom
(Post 9773526)
Cuz you ain't met nuthin like me yet.
Someday you will behold my larger-than-life okole as it leaves you gasping for fresh air...if you wake up from your moving nap in time. SP Bend, OR |
Originally Posted by bobbycorno
(Post 9778599)
Chip, I meet nuthin's like you all the time. Dream on, troll!
SP Bend, OR |
Originally Posted by Doohickie
(Post 9772760)
Jealous? Of bent? I think not. From what I see and hear and read, recumbents have two primary applications: Old guys with back problems, and extreme touring.
|
Originally Posted by shortboat
(Post 9779530)
I agree. Recumbents do have certain applications. You missed one of the big ones. Breaking speed records. Witness the recent Battle Mountain HPV Trials. Try going 82+mph on a wedgy. The current record for distance in one hour at the Nissan Proving Track is 55 miles. On a recumbent no less.
a open frame bent is like a road bike...the ones breaking land speed records are not the ones cruising the town chillen in a group ride. they are specifically engineered to go fast and break records... |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9779676)
try going 82 mph on an open frame recumbent...not saying that a so called wedgy could do it if it had a aero frame encasing the rider...but it could get a bit closer.
a open frame bent is like a road bike...the ones breaking land speed records are not the ones cruising the town chillen in a group ride. they are specifically engineered to go fast and break records... |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9779676)
try going 82 mph on an open frame recumbent...not saying that a so called wedgy could do it if it had a aero frame encasing the rider...but it could get a bit closer.
a open frame bent is like a road bike...the ones breaking land speed records are not the ones cruising the town chillen in a group ride. they are specifically engineered to go fast and break records... |
Martin and Easy Racers may have been one of the pioneers, but the whole thing was started by Mochet in 1934 with the Velocar which was subsequently banned by the UCI due to its speed. After wallowing in the ditch for decades, the restart began in '76 by Chet Kyle with the IHPVA. The current speed records have been reset again this year.
Sam Whittingham Top Speed at 82.819 mph, 133.284 kph One Hour total 56.295 miles, 90.598 km Barbara Buatois Top Speed at 75.458 mph, 121.437 kph One Hour total 52.208 miles, 84.020 km :)ensen. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9780556)
Martin and Easy Racers may have been one of the pioneers, but the whole thing was started by Mochet in 1934 with the Velocar which was subsequently banned by the UCI due to its speed. After wallowing in the ditch for decades, the restart began in '76 by Chet Kyle with the IHPVA. The current speed records have been reset again this year.
Sam Whittingham Top Speed at 82.819 mph, 133.284 kph One Hour total 56.295 miles, 90.598 km Barbara Buatois Top Speed at 75.458 mph, 121.437 kph One Hour total 52.208 miles, 84.020 km :)ensen. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9780556)
Martin and Easy Racers may have been one of the pioneers, but the whole thing was started by Mochet in 1934 with the Velocar which was subsequently banned by the UCI due to its speed. After wallowing in the ditch for decades, the restart began in '76 by Chet Kyle with the IHPVA. The current speed records have been reset again this year.
Sam Whittingham Top Speed at 82.819 mph, 133.284 kph One Hour total 56.295 miles, 90.598 km Barbara Buatois Top Speed at 75.458 mph, 121.437 kph One Hour total 52.208 miles, 84.020 km :)ensen. Reading about the Velocar racing in the thirties was intersting and some things haven't changed. Then as now an aerodynamic recumbent was quicker on the flats and downhills than a regular bike and was slower uphills. A recumbent with small wheels was slower than a regular bike on rough roads. The speeds set by Sam and Barbara are amazing, but both are very fit and strong riders. If you put me in the same bikes I wouldn't come any where close. |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 9779736)
Again, not saying it's right or wrong, but this explains why bike racers tend to think of recumbents (if they think of them at all) as bicycle-like machines.
|
Originally Posted by gnome
(Post 9780842)
The other problem is that if you enjoy the social aspect of riding in a group and pacelines, it requires much more concentration and is harder on a recumbent.
|
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
(Post 9780984)
On a recumbent, I tend to not ride in pacelines because I don't need to draft in order to go fast or to fight a headwind... Relying on others to do the work is my definition of "cheating."
also, in pro cycling those "others" are paid to be others. and in recreational cycling, everyone i ride with does their share up front...but when it hurts the most on ascents, it doesnt really matter whos up front, everyone is hurting. |
the social aspect of riding in a group and pacelines, it requires much more concentration and is harder on a recumbent.[/QUOTE
WHAT???? |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9781056)
arent you cheating with your super aero position. just sayin.
also, in pro cycling those "others" are paid to be others. and in recreational cycling, everyone i ride with does their share up front...but when it hurts the most on ascents, it doesnt really matter whos up front, everyone is hurting. |
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 9781704)
Is a sub-20 pound bike cheating?
|
does that put me in the non cheating category or were you just pointing out that the weight is a factor in what separates a TRUE cyclist from another? i mean, in your opinion is a 15lb carbon bike cheating or does the fact that they average 30mph over 5 hours with 10k ft of climbing, neutralize the cheating factor.
anyway my point is that its not jealousy, if i wanted a bent, i would get one...but i dont. |
Yeah. I just don't see the jealousy thing. Given the amount of money most racers pour into the sport, they could afford a recumbent if they wanted one. It's indifference, really.
|
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9781056)
arent you cheating with your super aero position. just sayin.
|
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
(Post 9781974)
Getting aero isn't cheating anymore than using an aero position on a TT bike; or as a lesser example, getting down on the drops when fighting a headwind. But our advantage in getting more aero is why we're in a different class for racing purposes. Which gets back to the original question. The upper-level racers recognize that 'bents are in a different class, so I see very little animosity there. They are friendly, sometimes even curious. It's the lower-levels and wannabes that treat 'bent riders like lepers. And of course, when I blow by their little pacelines, ringing my bell and waving, it only makes their attitudes worse. I love that! ;)
|
Anytime someone makes fun of my recumbent, I just pull a massive wheelie and speed off.
|
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9781809)
does that put me in the non cheating category or were you just pointing out that the weight is a factor in what separates a TRUE cyclist from another? i mean, in your opinion is a 15lb carbon bike cheating or does the fact that they average 30mph over 5 hours with 10k ft of climbing, neutralize the cheating factor.
anyway my point is that its not jealousy, if i wanted a bent, i would get one...but i dont. |
Actually it's more fun rubbing it in while eating ice cream. They won't admit to it, but people riding uprights on the MUP definitely show envy when they see you licking at a cone while moseying along.
:)ensen. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9782855)
Actually it's more fun rubbing it in while eating ice cream. They won't admit to it, but people riding uprights on the MUP definitely show envy when they see you licking at a cone while moseying along.
:)ensen. if thats how you ride your recumbent then awesome. but they arent for me because i dont want to mosey along. anyway i dont even belong in this section. you guys have a great time enjoying your bents. peace. |
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
(Post 9772166)
The guy was probably embarrassed that his kid thought they were cool. Probably a Cat 4/5/C, because the Cat 3/2/1 guys usually don't care. I doubt it's jealousy. Remember, in their world recumbents are illegal.
Imagine my even greater surprise and joy when further back in a pack of riders there were no less than three more 'bents, two of them ridden by women, and all riders with numbers. Maybe it wasn't a significant race so they let them in as tokens of good will or something, but they were definitely in the race. All the DF riders were on high end machines. No clue about the 'bents since I'm not familiar with bent bikes, only trikes. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.