![]() |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9779676)
try going 82 mph on an open frame recumbent...not saying that a so called wedgy could do it if it had a aero frame encasing the rider...but it could get a bit closer.
a open frame bent is like a road bike...the ones breaking land speed records are not the ones cruising the town chillen in a group ride. they are specifically engineered to go fast and break records... |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9779676)
try going 82 mph on an open frame recumbent...not saying that a so called wedgy could do it if it had a aero frame encasing the rider...but it could get a bit closer.
a open frame bent is like a road bike...the ones breaking land speed records are not the ones cruising the town chillen in a group ride. they are specifically engineered to go fast and break records... |
Martin and Easy Racers may have been one of the pioneers, but the whole thing was started by Mochet in 1934 with the Velocar which was subsequently banned by the UCI due to its speed. After wallowing in the ditch for decades, the restart began in '76 by Chet Kyle with the IHPVA. The current speed records have been reset again this year.
Sam Whittingham Top Speed at 82.819 mph, 133.284 kph One Hour total 56.295 miles, 90.598 km Barbara Buatois Top Speed at 75.458 mph, 121.437 kph One Hour total 52.208 miles, 84.020 km :)ensen. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9780556)
Martin and Easy Racers may have been one of the pioneers, but the whole thing was started by Mochet in 1934 with the Velocar which was subsequently banned by the UCI due to its speed. After wallowing in the ditch for decades, the restart began in '76 by Chet Kyle with the IHPVA. The current speed records have been reset again this year.
Sam Whittingham Top Speed at 82.819 mph, 133.284 kph One Hour total 56.295 miles, 90.598 km Barbara Buatois Top Speed at 75.458 mph, 121.437 kph One Hour total 52.208 miles, 84.020 km :)ensen. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9780556)
Martin and Easy Racers may have been one of the pioneers, but the whole thing was started by Mochet in 1934 with the Velocar which was subsequently banned by the UCI due to its speed. After wallowing in the ditch for decades, the restart began in '76 by Chet Kyle with the IHPVA. The current speed records have been reset again this year.
Sam Whittingham Top Speed at 82.819 mph, 133.284 kph One Hour total 56.295 miles, 90.598 km Barbara Buatois Top Speed at 75.458 mph, 121.437 kph One Hour total 52.208 miles, 84.020 km :)ensen. Reading about the Velocar racing in the thirties was intersting and some things haven't changed. Then as now an aerodynamic recumbent was quicker on the flats and downhills than a regular bike and was slower uphills. A recumbent with small wheels was slower than a regular bike on rough roads. The speeds set by Sam and Barbara are amazing, but both are very fit and strong riders. If you put me in the same bikes I wouldn't come any where close. |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 9779736)
Again, not saying it's right or wrong, but this explains why bike racers tend to think of recumbents (if they think of them at all) as bicycle-like machines.
|
Originally Posted by gnome
(Post 9780842)
The other problem is that if you enjoy the social aspect of riding in a group and pacelines, it requires much more concentration and is harder on a recumbent.
|
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
(Post 9780984)
On a recumbent, I tend to not ride in pacelines because I don't need to draft in order to go fast or to fight a headwind... Relying on others to do the work is my definition of "cheating."
also, in pro cycling those "others" are paid to be others. and in recreational cycling, everyone i ride with does their share up front...but when it hurts the most on ascents, it doesnt really matter whos up front, everyone is hurting. |
the social aspect of riding in a group and pacelines, it requires much more concentration and is harder on a recumbent.[/QUOTE
WHAT???? |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9781056)
arent you cheating with your super aero position. just sayin.
also, in pro cycling those "others" are paid to be others. and in recreational cycling, everyone i ride with does their share up front...but when it hurts the most on ascents, it doesnt really matter whos up front, everyone is hurting. |
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 9781704)
Is a sub-20 pound bike cheating?
|
does that put me in the non cheating category or were you just pointing out that the weight is a factor in what separates a TRUE cyclist from another? i mean, in your opinion is a 15lb carbon bike cheating or does the fact that they average 30mph over 5 hours with 10k ft of climbing, neutralize the cheating factor.
anyway my point is that its not jealousy, if i wanted a bent, i would get one...but i dont. |
Yeah. I just don't see the jealousy thing. Given the amount of money most racers pour into the sport, they could afford a recumbent if they wanted one. It's indifference, really.
|
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9781056)
arent you cheating with your super aero position. just sayin.
|
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
(Post 9781974)
Getting aero isn't cheating anymore than using an aero position on a TT bike; or as a lesser example, getting down on the drops when fighting a headwind. But our advantage in getting more aero is why we're in a different class for racing purposes. Which gets back to the original question. The upper-level racers recognize that 'bents are in a different class, so I see very little animosity there. They are friendly, sometimes even curious. It's the lower-levels and wannabes that treat 'bent riders like lepers. And of course, when I blow by their little pacelines, ringing my bell and waving, it only makes their attitudes worse. I love that! ;)
|
Anytime someone makes fun of my recumbent, I just pull a massive wheelie and speed off.
|
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9781809)
does that put me in the non cheating category or were you just pointing out that the weight is a factor in what separates a TRUE cyclist from another? i mean, in your opinion is a 15lb carbon bike cheating or does the fact that they average 30mph over 5 hours with 10k ft of climbing, neutralize the cheating factor.
anyway my point is that its not jealousy, if i wanted a bent, i would get one...but i dont. |
Actually it's more fun rubbing it in while eating ice cream. They won't admit to it, but people riding uprights on the MUP definitely show envy when they see you licking at a cone while moseying along.
:)ensen. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9782855)
Actually it's more fun rubbing it in while eating ice cream. They won't admit to it, but people riding uprights on the MUP definitely show envy when they see you licking at a cone while moseying along.
:)ensen. if thats how you ride your recumbent then awesome. but they arent for me because i dont want to mosey along. anyway i dont even belong in this section. you guys have a great time enjoying your bents. peace. |
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
(Post 9772166)
The guy was probably embarrassed that his kid thought they were cool. Probably a Cat 4/5/C, because the Cat 3/2/1 guys usually don't care. I doubt it's jealousy. Remember, in their world recumbents are illegal.
Imagine my even greater surprise and joy when further back in a pack of riders there were no less than three more 'bents, two of them ridden by women, and all riders with numbers. Maybe it wasn't a significant race so they let them in as tokens of good will or something, but they were definitely in the race. All the DF riders were on high end machines. No clue about the 'bents since I'm not familiar with bent bikes, only trikes. |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9783043)
thats the point of my posts. if your setting or training for land speed records...then thats awesome. otherwise everyone else i see is just chillen. cycling is about getting healthy and in shape and suffering and getting an endorphin rush. i ride every ride to try and be faster and better than the ride before.
if thats how you ride your recumbent then awesome. but they arent for me because i dont want to mosey along. anyway i dont even belong in this section. you guys have a great time enjoying your bents. peace. What I'm waiting for is Sam Whittingham to get on on an unfaired low-racer and go further in the hour than the current UCI record. That would finally put paid to the whether or not recumbents are faster. Even better would be for Barbara Buatois to do that too. Seems to me that only when a little girl spanks all these macho men that there will finally be silence. Recumbent riders are not all looking to join the big tours. That up to the USCF and the UCI and if they want to allow recumbents, then I'm sure Rans or Bacchetta could field a team. Really, though, all we want is for the haters to stop hating. Of course, humans are predictable with the hate, but it sure is nice to dream of a world in which everyone just gets along. :)ensen. |
Probably not jealousy. I know a bunch of cyclists who are interested in bents but probably would never buy one. That's the category I'm in. But we're British, and we're just a little bit different ol' chap.
|
Originally Posted by shortboat
(Post 9781646)
the social aspect of riding in a group and pacelines, it requires much more concentration and is harder on a recumbent.[/QUOTE
WHAT???? I find it is much less stressfull to ride in a paceline on a normal bike than on a recumbent. |
Ya know, this need for some to prove that 'bents are superior machines that have been held down by the man' is why many of us like razzing you hammock jockeys. Who cares what bike set what speed or distance record, or which does what better than the other...we ride what we like to ride. I ain't gonna set no speed records on my wedgie, and you ain't gonna set no speed records on your bent. ;)
|
Originally Posted by chipcom
(Post 9778820)
Then your alarm clock goes off, you wake up and remember "hey, I have a sense of humor....if I could only get it out from under my thin skin". :lol:
SP :recum: |
[QUOTE=gnome;9783358]because of the different speed profiles in headwinds, downhills and uphills between a recumbent and upright. And the fact that you have a whopping great chainring and pedals just behind the rear wheel of an upright when drafting on a recumbent means you have to concentrate much more.
I find it is much less stressfull to ride in a paceline on a normal bike than on a recumbent.[/QUOT The chain ring and pedals on my GRR is in the same place as a DF, between the front and rear wheel. The only time my profile changes is when I tuck my head under the fairing on downhill runs. But if you are doing 35+ mph I do not suggest talking to someone at the same time. There is a lot of road passing under you at that speed and a lot of things are happening pretty fast. I keep both eyes on the road at that speed. I have no trouble 'socializing' while riding next to another recumbent. I find that conversing with others is easier when I am sitting up in a normal position. |
Originally Posted by purplepeople
(Post 9783297)
One does not need a road bike for speed training. That day, I happen to be riding my cargo bent with a small rack load. I stopped to get ice cream and was on my way when the micro-paceline blew by. My other bent is a tilting trike low racer. It's not completely finished yet as I still have to put a 72T ring on it, but already, I'm spinning out the 52 at about 35 kph (20" wheel). When the big ring is finished this 40-something with a gut will spend the occasional Sunday hunting pacelines on some of the back roads around here.
What I'm waiting for is Sam Whittingham to get on on an unfaired low-racer and go further in the hour than the current UCI record. That would finally put paid to the whether or not recumbents are faster. Even better would be for Barbara Buatois to do that too. Seems to me that only when a little girl spanks all these macho men that there will finally be silence. Recumbent riders are not all looking to join the big tours. That up to the USCF and the UCI and if they want to allow recumbents, then I'm sure Rans or Bacchetta could field a team. Really, though, all we want is for the haters to stop hating. Of course, humans are predictable with the hate, but it sure is nice to dream of a world in which everyone just gets along. :)ensen. You miss the purpose of the my post. its not about trying to get on a tour, or speed training. its pushing yourself to see what your made of. not sitting on a bent or bike eating ice cream. if you choose to do that on whatever you ride, you will get no respect from me. just like you wouldnt see me on a beach cruiser. just not my idea of what a ride should be. again chill out enjoy the scenery yadda yadda yadda, you cant convince me that a bent is cooler than a bicycle. just like i cant convince you that a bicycle is better. |
Originally Posted by layedback1
(Post 9771861)
We all know that the DF boy racer crowd seem to look down on or hate bent . . . .
|
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9785011)
again chill out enjoy the scenery yadda yadda yadda, you cant convince me that a bent is cooler than a bicycle. just like i cant convince you that a bicycle is better.
When you say that you won't ride slow and thus won't ever be found on a beach cruiser or bent, my immediate thought is that you have no friends with which to enjoy a nice lazy Sunday ride. There is a particular pleasure at just moseying along, watching the scenery and yakking with other cyclists. Of course, if you're not the type that rides a bike everywhere, then you probably wouldn't understand the particular type of cool that goes with a pink basket on a fixie. Maybe you are even that guy that makes nasty comments about recumbents and low-riders. :)ensen. |
Originally Posted by hopsing08
(Post 9785011)
yadda yadda yadda, you cant convince me that a bent is cooler than a bicycle. just like i cant convince you that a bicycle is better.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.