Double and Triple – Pride vs Common Sense??
#1
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Double and Triple – Pride vs Common Sense??
I’ve been wondering about this for a while. I’ve been noticing that most of the riders I know by now that I talk to, ride with in the club, some racers among them, who have a Double are not really strong enough for this set-up. I could count them with the fingers of one hand those riders who really “deserve” to have a double. I, personally, shamelessly have a triple (ride at the B* level by now). One example comes to hand, the other day we went on a very hilly ride where all the riders I was with, w/o exception (well me, the only triple) had a double. I was like saying to myself: “what did I get myself into, these guys look very strong and all have doubles, I’m going to get dropped!”
But then again I thought it’s not a race so I’ll just stick to my rhythm and tempo on the up hills where some were steep and long by the way. The whole ride was 55 miles or so.
Obviously, most of the riders once on the up hills went strong, cranking up big time, they surged ahead about 82 yards, I kept my rhythm, I was third from the last rider in most of the hills, but the funny thing was that by mile 35 or so most of these “double, tough riders” were spent big time, the only rider who “lived up to his double” started hammering at 18mph average for the last 10 or so last miles and I was the only one who pretty much kept up with him, right behind him, the others were lagging behind and only one was hanging on for dear life but got dropped at the end , the very last few miles.
So, I’ve come to realize the double set-up in most cases is just a pride thing.
Corsaire J
But then again I thought it’s not a race so I’ll just stick to my rhythm and tempo on the up hills where some were steep and long by the way. The whole ride was 55 miles or so.
Obviously, most of the riders once on the up hills went strong, cranking up big time, they surged ahead about 82 yards, I kept my rhythm, I was third from the last rider in most of the hills, but the funny thing was that by mile 35 or so most of these “double, tough riders” were spent big time, the only rider who “lived up to his double” started hammering at 18mph average for the last 10 or so last miles and I was the only one who pretty much kept up with him, right behind him, the others were lagging behind and only one was hanging on for dear life but got dropped at the end , the very last few miles.
So, I’ve come to realize the double set-up in most cases is just a pride thing.
Corsaire J
#2
"Great One"
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is a mechanical basis for the double being a better system. It's downfall though is lack of low gearing.
It's not always the best choice for all situations.
It's not always the best choice for all situations.
Last edited by 53-11_alltheway; 04-20-05 at 08:04 AM.
#3
He drop me
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central PA
Posts: 11,664
Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I don't know. I am going to be converting my bike from a triple (52,42,30) with a 12-25 9 spd to a compact double (50/34) with 11-27 10sp and think I will actually be gaining gears while limiting my shifting. Now that I know how to properly shift my triple I find there are a bunch of combinations I don't use and I am shifting onto the small ring sooner and more often to keep revs up and maintain my cadence. By going to the wider ration compact double I will have more top end and the same (are darn near it) bottom end plus less shifting from ring to ring. With 10 on the back and a compact double I think it could be the best option.
Edit: ok maybe gaining gears isn't the correct thing to say. I guess what is really happening is I will be loosing duplicated gears.
Edit: ok maybe gaining gears isn't the correct thing to say. I guess what is really happening is I will be loosing duplicated gears.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
Last edited by Grasschopper; 04-20-05 at 07:55 AM.
#4
Former Hoarder
#5
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
if you can live with lousy shifting, corsaire, go with it.
me? i have never met a road that i couldn't ride up in 39x25, and i'm not a strong climber. i'm not saying it was as easy as watching tv and eating cheetos, but it was do-able. on my cyclo-cross bike, if i come to a hill that i'd need lower than 38x26 for, i'm better off running.
i would run a triple on a loaded touring bike. i would accept the fact that i would be moving at a crawl.
me? i have never met a road that i couldn't ride up in 39x25, and i'm not a strong climber. i'm not saying it was as easy as watching tv and eating cheetos, but it was do-able. on my cyclo-cross bike, if i come to a hill that i'd need lower than 38x26 for, i'm better off running.
i would run a triple on a loaded touring bike. i would accept the fact that i would be moving at a crawl.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#6
"Great One"
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grasschopper
I don't know. I am going to be converting my bike from a triple (52,42,30) with a 12-25 9 spd to a compact double (50/34) with 11-27 10sp and think I will actually be gaining gears while limiting my shifting. Now that I know how to properly shift my triple I find there are a bunch of combinations I don't use and I am shifting onto the small ring sooner and more often to keep revs up and maintain my cadence. By going to the wider ration compact double I will have more top end and the same (are darn near it) bottom end plus less shifting from ring to ring. With 10 on the back and a compact double I think it could be the best option.
Edit: ok maybe gaining gears isn't the correct thing to say. I guess what is really happening is I will be loosing duplicated gears.
Edit: ok maybe gaining gears isn't the correct thing to say. I guess what is really happening is I will be loosing duplicated gears.
#7
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grasschopper
I don't know. I am going to be converting my bike from a triple (52,42,30) with a 12-25 9 spd to a compact double (50/34) with 11-27 10sp and think I will actually be gaining gears while limiting my shifting. Now that I know how to properly shift my triple I find there are a bunch of combinations I don't use and I am shifting onto the small ring sooner and more often to keep revs up and maintain my cadence. By going to the wider ration compact double I will have more top end and the same (are darn near it) bottom end plus less shifting from ring to ring. With 10 on the back and a compact double I think it could be the best option.
Edit: ok maybe gaining gears isn't the correct thing to say. I guess what is really happening is I will be loosing duplicated gears.
Edit: ok maybe gaining gears isn't the correct thing to say. I guess what is really happening is I will be loosing duplicated gears.
Velocipedio
Yeah, I could climb hills on that low gearing (39x25) also, but the question is: will you have "fresh" legs at the end of the day to finish the long ride at a decent speed ? perhaps you can, I can't, not just yet anyway, I'm working on it.
That's the bottom line: measured effort having the right hearing for your pedaling capabilities.
Corsaire
#8
He drop me
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central PA
Posts: 11,664
Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Originally Posted by 53-11_alltheway
I like that idea of using a compact with a 11-27 10s. It gives you pretty low gearing, but with only 1 chainring shift instead of two. You won't get the absolute low gearing of a triple, but everything is a comprimise.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
#9
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
Touring, relaxed centuries, mountain bikeing, fun easy riding = triple
hard training, fitness riding, racing = double.
If you race on a triple you will be dropped. In a race in your 39x23 you may be more tired then some one who spins a 32x27 to the top of the mountain but you will be there first and thats what wins the race.
fwiw thats the way I look at the double/triple argument
hard training, fitness riding, racing = double.
If you race on a triple you will be dropped. In a race in your 39x23 you may be more tired then some one who spins a 32x27 to the top of the mountain but you will be there first and thats what wins the race.
fwiw thats the way I look at the double/triple argument
#10
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jfmckenna
Touring, relaxed centuries, mountain bikeing, fun easy riding = triple
hard training, fitness riding, racing = double.
If you race on a triple you will be dropped. In a race in your 39x23 you may be more tired then some one who spins a 32x27 to the top of the mountain but you will be there first and thats what wins the race.
fwiw thats the way I look at the double/triple argument
hard training, fitness riding, racing = double.
If you race on a triple you will be dropped. In a race in your 39x23 you may be more tired then some one who spins a 32x27 to the top of the mountain but you will be there first and thats what wins the race.
fwiw thats the way I look at the double/triple argument
Corsaire
#11
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Corsaire
Yeah, I could climb hills on that low gearing (39x25) also, but the question is: will you have "fresh" legs at the end of the day to finish the long ride at a decent speed ? perhaps you can, I can't, not just yet anyway, I'm working on it.
That's the bottom line: measured effort having the right hearing for your pedaling capabilities.
Corsaire
That's the bottom line: measured effort having the right hearing for your pedaling capabilities.
Corsaire
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#12
@ Checkmate Cycling
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,617
Bikes: CAAD 8 - Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wouldn't say that if you race on a triple you will be dropped... Its just that if you use it on a lot of hills you will be dropped - unless you are spinning 140rpms or something to climb. You just can't climb with as much speed, obviously... that said, there was a guy recently in Europe who used a triple... Was it Roberto Heras? I forget... someone did... Surely they weren't using a 30-23 to climb anything...
#13
1/2 a binding 1/2 a brain
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dillon, CO
Posts: 1,707
Bikes: Serotta Ottrott ST, Titus RX100, Seven Sola 29er HT in the works
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Beaten to death ...this topic is so hotly debated here. I just don't know why.
Corsaire, I think the more salient argument in your story is about fitness and not pride or common sense. A club racer that blows their load before 55 miles are up hasn't been taking their training seriously ...no matter if they ride a triple or a double. Shame on them.
Corsaire, I think the more salient argument in your story is about fitness and not pride or common sense. A club racer that blows their load before 55 miles are up hasn't been taking their training seriously ...no matter if they ride a triple or a double. Shame on them.
#14
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by telenick
Beaten to death ...this topic is so hotly debated here. I just don't know why.
Corsaire, I think the more salient argument in your story is about fitness and not pride or common sense. A club racer that blows their load before 55 miles are up hasn't been taking their training seriously ...no matter if they ride a triple or a double. Shame on them.
Corsaire, I think the more salient argument in your story is about fitness and not pride or common sense. A club racer that blows their load before 55 miles are up hasn't been taking their training seriously ...no matter if they ride a triple or a double. Shame on them.
Incidentally, one of the double guys in front of me, on this steep long hill cracked wide open on his double, he couldn't crank up seating anymore, so he was standing when he fell over to his side gasping for air, I had to stop to see if he hadn't had a heart attack or something. That was foolish.
Corsaire
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,101
Bikes: bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some of these triple vs double arguments have the same vibe of insecurity and defensiveness that you see on "recumbent vs diamond" debates.
Doubles are great. The problem is these things are marketed with overly optimistic chainrings. I blame this for turning off a lot of people to road bikes. "Cyclocross-sized" chainrings (48/38) on a road bike are more realistic for most non-athletes.
Of course, everyone is different, but more people should assess what they need honestly and then change their equipment as needed. Too many people are willing to suffer in order to conform with what's available in an LBS or catalog, rather than try to find what would work best for them.
Doubles are great. The problem is these things are marketed with overly optimistic chainrings. I blame this for turning off a lot of people to road bikes. "Cyclocross-sized" chainrings (48/38) on a road bike are more realistic for most non-athletes.
Of course, everyone is different, but more people should assess what they need honestly and then change their equipment as needed. Too many people are willing to suffer in order to conform with what's available in an LBS or catalog, rather than try to find what would work best for them.
#16
Roadie/Duathlete
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 431
Bikes: Colnago ExP, Look 595, Look 496, plus a few more...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my expereince (and I've tried both 53/39 double, 53/42/30 triple and 50/34 compacts), the compact is by far the best solution. All the benefits of the triple, but with the mechanical advantages of the double.
#17
"Great One"
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jbhowat
I wouldn't say that if you race on a triple you will be dropped... Its just that if you use it on a lot of hills you will be dropped - unless you are spinning 140rpms or something to climb. You just can't climb with as much speed, obviously... that said, there was a guy recently in Europe who used a triple... Was it Roberto Heras? I forget... someone did... Surely they weren't using a 30-23 to climb anything...
Some here in this forum supposedly asked a pro racer if he pushed tall gears or spun low gears? The Pro racer said I spin high gears. LOL
Last edited by 53-11_alltheway; 04-20-05 at 09:10 AM.
#19
Mad Town Biker
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corsaire
I could count them with the fingers of one hand those riders who really “deserve” to have a double
...
the question is: will you have "fresh" legs at the end of the day to finish the long ride at a decent speed ?
...
the question is: will you have "fresh" legs at the end of the day to finish the long ride at a decent speed ?
You’re limited experience and exposure to riders doesn’t apply to all of us! I couldn’t care less if you think I “deserve a double”.
-murray
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 920
Bikes: 2000-Canary Yellow Trek 1000, 1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by telenick
Beaten to death ...this topic is so hotly debated here. I just don't know why.
When it comes right down to it, it is the cycling industry's fault. By leaving only two "mainstream" choices for cyclers, it polarizes the sides even more. It comes down to an either/or situation. If the industry gave us the choice of 1 through 5 chainrings, I don't think the debate would be nearly as Hatfield and McCoy. Can you imagine a five ring, you wouldn't even need the chain or rear cassette, you could just use the teeth on the ring to chew up the pavement!
#21
Senior Member
There are rides where I wished that I had a triple - or a quadruple, for that matter! Simple fact is that when I bought my bike last fall, LBS owner said "you don't need triples in New Jersey". Which is true, once you're in shape. Having started from no road riding for 25 years to riding "B" level rides over the course of the winter, I'm quite happy with my double 9 spd at this point. Next bike, I'll probably get a compact double. Also, I wasn't aware that I was required to sign a release before buying a bike with a double...
#22
Dancing on the Pedals
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Murrays
You don’t ride with very strong riders, do you? FWIW, my riding buddies do lots of 50+ mile rides over pretty good hills at over 18 mph averages and nobody rides a triple. We did the Wright Stuff Century (very hilly) last year with little problems. While I wouldn’t mind a lower gear now and then, I felt great at the end of 100 hilly miles.
You’re limited experience and exposure to riders doesn’t apply to all of us! I couldn’t care less if you think I “deserve a double”.
-murray
You’re limited experience and exposure to riders doesn’t apply to all of us! I couldn’t care less if you think I “deserve a double”.
-murray
The discussion was about those who can't handle it and still use it.
Corsaire
By the way, you'll burst out a vein if you keep pushing like that, in your avatar.
#23
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Terex
Also, I wasn't aware that I was required to sign a release before buying a bike with a double...
What????
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Neck Tidewater Va.
Posts: 1,688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What was the release for Terex?
It's all about range I think. My old '70s 10 speed had 39/52 and 12 - 35, my 2003 Bianchi Vlope has 30/42/52 and 11-34. Only a little wider with it's 27 than the old one with 10. I usually don't try to fine tune my gear selection but go till I need to shift, but I do like being able to go low if only for part of the hill for a rest. No I don't race.
Joe
It's all about range I think. My old '70s 10 speed had 39/52 and 12 - 35, my 2003 Bianchi Vlope has 30/42/52 and 11-34. Only a little wider with it's 27 than the old one with 10. I usually don't try to fine tune my gear selection but go till I need to shift, but I do like being able to go low if only for part of the hill for a rest. No I don't race.
Joe
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oztraylya
Posts: 2,677
Bikes: '03 Fuji Roubaix Pro; '03 KleinGi Attitude; '06 Soma Rush; '04 Surly Cross-Check; '06 Soma Rush; '07 Scott CR1 / Chorus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Consider a 53/39 with a 12/27 cassette. The 39/27 ratio is almost exactly the same as the 30/21 ratio on a triple. How often do you use the 30/23 or 30/25? The jumps between gears might be slightly larger than on a triple, but there's also the advantage in shifting smoothness and accuracy.
Double/triple arguments are really about choices. Riding a double doesn't mean you have to sacrifice low gears as much as one might think...
Double/triple arguments are really about choices. Riding a double doesn't mean you have to sacrifice low gears as much as one might think...
__________________