![]() |
How much seat post do I need?
I have a Thompson seat post, pretty sure it's Al. There is a line on it that says "Max." I assume that I should not cut above this line? It still seems like a lot of dead weight to me.
|
Max line should be 100mm from the end. Therefore, cut it so that 100mm is inserted in your frame's seat tube. It has to clear the top tube.
|
Unless your seat post is cast iron, I wouldn't cut any of it.
|
Measure from the max line to the end of the seatpost that goes into the frame. You can cut the post to any length as long as you maintain this minimum insertion. For example, if you want to cut two inches off the post, mark a new max line two inches above where the old one was. But I agree with the other poster who said leave it alone. Even three or four inches of an aluminum seatpost doesn't weigh very much. Plus, there is always the possibility that you might cut off so much that you can't raise the saddle later if you want to.
|
The Max line denotes the least post that should inside the frame. Stupid nomenclature, right? It should be Min written upside down. Go figure. Unless you have a crazy long MTB post(400 mm) on a road bike, leave it alone.
|
Originally Posted by moppeddler
(Post 17851600)
I have a Thompson seat post......... It still seems like a lot of dead weight to me.
|
Originally Posted by Dave Cutter
(Post 17851729)
Instead of cutting pieces off... or drilling holes to save a few grams of weight... maybe you could look at Carbon Fiber replacement parts.
Or ride the bike more! |
.
...Max called and he wants his post back. He says please don't cut it. |
You can cut it but probably shouldn't pass the post on in the future. Whatever the distance from end to the "Max" line offers a conservative guide for the minimum insertion depth. But the principle of the max line is based on a very rough calculation of possible rider weight, saddle position, terrain, and other considerations. It is very conservative.
I'm all for making parts your own and personally would have no issue with cutting the post. A 400mm post can be safely shortened to 300mm if the minimum insertion depth is followed. The post becomes less likely to bend when shortened so, theoretically, you could even raise it up a bit. Haha |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 17851712)
The Max line denotes the least post that should inside the frame. Stupid nomenclature, right? It should be Min written upside down. Go figure. Unless you have a crazy long MTB post(400 mm) on a road bike, leave it alone.
J. |
Take a swig of water and you'll save as much weight as cutting a nice Thompson post... not worth the effort and lack of resale value
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 17851712)
The Max line denotes the least post that should inside the frame. Stupid nomenclature, right? It should be Min written upside down. Go figure.
|
Originally Posted by StanSeven
(Post 17853415)
Max makes sense to me. That's the maximum amount of sestpost that should show
|
I think the stress put on the seat tube by a short post is going to cause the tube to fail , not the seat post. The further the post is inserted the more the stress is distributed.
|
http://fcdn.mtbr.com/attachments/ari...301_065037.jpg
...^^^note the minimum insertion markings, clearly visible. |
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
(Post 17853634)
http://fcdn.mtbr.com/attachments/ari...301_065037.jpg
...^^^note the minimum insertion markings, clearly visible. |
I rode a vintage Sakae/Ringyo CT P5E Alloy for five years measured at 180mm long (measurement not from max height line). I bought a 300mm post a couple weeks ago and it takes like 3 DAYS for me to get the seatpost all the way in. Don't cut under 100mm. I'm going to cut my post once I get the tool.
|
Originally Posted by eusebio
(Post 17853704)
I rode a vintage Sakae/Ringyo CT P5E Alloy for five years measured at 180mm long (measurement not from max height line). I bought a 300mm post a couple weeks ago and it takes like 3 DAYS for me to get the seatpost all the way in. Don't cut under 100mm. I'm going to cut my post once I get the tool.
|
Originally Posted by Jakedatc
(Post 17853827)
in that age of bike i'd be more afraid it was an odd size like 26.8mm that you forced a 27.2 into.
26.8 an odd size? It's by far the most common for the steel Japanese of the 70s and 80s. Ben |
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
(Post 17853862)
You won't get a 27.2 post into a 26.8 seattube, but spending three days to get it into a 27.0 frame like my Raleigh Carlton sounds very believable.
26.8 an odd size? It's by far the most common for the steel Japanese of the 70s and 80s. Ben but ya 27.0 sounds more likely |
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
(Post 17853634)
http://fcdn.mtbr.com/attachments/ari...301_065037.jpg
...^^^note the minimum insertion markings, clearly visible. |
I can't believe how many people are saying not to cut the post. As mentioned, just make sure you will have enough left to safely maintain the minimum insertion. There's nothing magical about a seatpost that makes it a bad idea to cut down as long as you do it properly.
|
Originally Posted by milkbaby
(Post 17854309)
I can't believe how many people are saying not to cut the post. As mentioned, just make sure you will have enough left to safely maintain the minimum insertion. There's nothing magical about a seatpost that makes it a bad idea to cut down as long as you do it properly.
plus his problem seems to be a diameter issue rather than length. |
Originally Posted by Jakedatc
(Post 17854404)
It is mostly a waste of time and effort. Plus if he ever wants to get rid of it or changes bikes it will be worthless. Thompson is already one of the lightest alloy posts out there so cutting off a few inches isn't going to do a damn thing.
plus his problem seems to be a diameter issue rather than length. The reason to avoid recommending cutting is, IMHO, an overabundance of caution. You can "save" someone every time you warn them off. It's nice to "save" people. There's an old saying, "You can never be too rich or too thin." Thin is like light weight. Of course it does take considerable restraint to avoid taking this ridiculous saying seriously. |
Originally Posted by Jakedatc
(Post 17853827)
in that age of bike i'd be more afraid it was an odd size like 26.8mm that you forced a 27.2 into.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.