60+ MPH possible?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
60+ MPH possible?
Map My Ride has my top speed for each of my last three days as over 60 MPH, with the highest speed reported as 68mph. There were some very steep hills and I let 'er rip a few times, but surely this is a misread from the app?
A few other 45 MPH readings seem reasonable.
Thoughts?
A few other 45 MPH readings seem reasonable.
Thoughts?
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,100 Times
in
1,414 Posts
68 is flying, but definitely possible on a long, steep straightaway.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,655
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times
in
85 Posts
Well, then if you don't have a computer that reads speed based on wheel rotation, you won't know the truth. I have gotten to 60 just once, and it was on a very wide, straight ~7% road with good pavement in a monster tailwind, and that was pretty scary. A sub 16-lb bike gets pretty skittery at those speeds! It is very possible (professionals do it regularly), but I wouldn't trust a smartphone GPS-based app to provide very accurate numbers (or as accurate as an actual computer will).
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,335
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2431 Post(s)
Liked 632 Times
in
390 Posts
I wouldn't even trust a smartphone to be accurate. And they look stupid mounted on a bike. You can get a basic computer for twenty bucks.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My phone reads nearly identically over the same route every time. Varies around .01-.02 miles over the 11 mile ride.
But the only way the OP could hit over 60mph would be coasting down a long and very steep hill.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,276
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I once hit 62 mph drafting a truck a long time ago. It was more of a challenge spinning the cranks fast enough than anything else - crazy high cadence to hit that.
#12
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have done over 60 mph twice.
The first time required surgical removal of the right, retracted testicle while the 66 mph jaunt lost me my left one. I am now lacking the motivation to do such stupid things.
The first time required surgical removal of the right, retracted testicle while the 66 mph jaunt lost me my left one. I am now lacking the motivation to do such stupid things.
#13
Portland Fred
Over long distances, either should be accurate. Top speeds recorded over short distances are another matter entirely. I'd like to see what stretch of road he hit 68 on. Since this was done via app, there should be data for the entire ride that verifies whether or not this value makes sense. I personally doubt anyone who would need to ask this question has hit 68. That's truly crazy fast and requires a long steep, smooth, and relatively straight road.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
It's possible, but it's also possible that your GPS lost track of you due to hills or trees or whatever else and when it picked you up again you were further down the hill, causing a skip in the GPS data resulting in a faster than normal speed.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 57
Bikes: 2013 Trek 7.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unless there's data showing a proper build-up to 68, followed by slowing down, I'd say it's an error in the GPS speed reading causing a speed spike. Happens to me all the time when I'm using GPS on my phone to record speed, though not quite that high.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Fort Worth Tx
Posts: 291
Bikes: 15 Fuji Altamira 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used to use a bike computer and my strava app. Strava was always within a tiny margin of error for the ride even on single track with a lot of switchbacks so I just ditched computers and stuck with the iPhone to keep track.
That said, last week, I hit 102.54 mph for appx 220 feet on flat ground.
Obviously a glitch (and my only one I've ever had with Strava) but for about 10 miles it made my average mph look like I was a freakin beast
That said, last week, I hit 102.54 mph for appx 220 feet on flat ground.
Obviously a glitch (and my only one I've ever had with Strava) but for about 10 miles it made my average mph look like I was a freakin beast

#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Point Pleasant Boro, NJ
Posts: 258
Bikes: Voodoo Canzo, BMC Granfondo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hit 71mph going down hill on a full suspension in Plattekill, ny. Was like holding on to a jack hammer. Adrenaline Rush was Amazing
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 17
Bikes: Emonda sl6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
if you want an example
for me I use both an node 1.1 with wheel sensor, and an iphone running strava. for my ride yesterday my computer read a max of 38.2, strava read a max of 52.3 this seems like a big difference, but it comes down to a few factors. The wheel is spinning fast enough that it sends a ping to the computer multiple times a second. the gps likely records your position every second and then divides your distance by your time to determine speed, so they essentially function off of the same principle, looking at short intervals of distance and time to determine speed.
Your wheel will always cover the same distance per rotation (unless you have mad drifting skills) whereas the gps is only accurate to 50-70 feet if you are in an area with trees. over four seconds a cyclist traveling 20mph, will cover roughly 120 feet. the margin for error is significant per measurement. over the bike ride this will cancel out as the over estimates and underestimates average out to your overall distance/time.
dedicated cycling gps's have a better system that looks at past and previous values and has better equations to detect erroneous values.
Your phone is not an accurate device for measuring top speed. It is however a decent device for tracking your total distance and elevation.
for me I use both an node 1.1 with wheel sensor, and an iphone running strava. for my ride yesterday my computer read a max of 38.2, strava read a max of 52.3 this seems like a big difference, but it comes down to a few factors. The wheel is spinning fast enough that it sends a ping to the computer multiple times a second. the gps likely records your position every second and then divides your distance by your time to determine speed, so they essentially function off of the same principle, looking at short intervals of distance and time to determine speed.
Your wheel will always cover the same distance per rotation (unless you have mad drifting skills) whereas the gps is only accurate to 50-70 feet if you are in an area with trees. over four seconds a cyclist traveling 20mph, will cover roughly 120 feet. the margin for error is significant per measurement. over the bike ride this will cancel out as the over estimates and underestimates average out to your overall distance/time.
dedicated cycling gps's have a better system that looks at past and previous values and has better equations to detect erroneous values.
Your phone is not an accurate device for measuring top speed. It is however a decent device for tracking your total distance and elevation.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zion
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I for one vote absolutely not.
If you have to ask, you didn't.
IMHO and experience, 55mph feels worlds different than 45mph. Forties are child's play. Fifties require way more attention.
For the record, I've "only" topped out at 57 and change.
If you have to ask, you didn't.
IMHO and experience, 55mph feels worlds different than 45mph. Forties are child's play. Fifties require way more attention.
For the record, I've "only" topped out at 57 and change.
#22
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,803
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1160 Post(s)
Liked 839 Times
in
558 Posts
Did you need to change your shorts at the bottom of the hill ??
I have done 50+ several times, and that is pretty attention getting.
I have done 50+ several times, and that is pretty attention getting.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#23
Full Member
Thread Starter
Road conditions: very steep, like 8% grade! but too curvy for sustained stretches. As Banerjek suggested, I highly doubt the burst speed calculation. I was going really fast, but I'd be shocked if I was going much over 45. The only thing that made me think it was possible was getting a 60+ reading each of the three days I rode it.
And, while I'm a regular 20-mile a day commuter on my CAAD, my 57 year old legs aren't capable of those speeds, even with a huge gravity assist.
And, while I'm a regular 20-mile a day commuter on my CAAD, my 57 year old legs aren't capable of those speeds, even with a huge gravity assist.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,074
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3206 Post(s)
Liked 4,911 Times
in
2,525 Posts
I've hit 55mph only a handful of times:
- Once on a 14-16% mtn descent.
- Once coasting down a 12% grade with a tailwind from hell behind me.
- Once pedaling like hell down a 9% grade with a brisk tailwind.
- Once on a 14-16% mtn descent.
- Once coasting down a 12% grade with a tailwind from hell behind me.
- Once pedaling like hell down a 9% grade with a brisk tailwind.
#25
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,432 Times
in
1,186 Posts
My first ride ended with a long downhill. I quickly ran out of gears and let Sir Issac Newton take control.
It was scary fast and at the bottom I asked my son, who had a computer, said we his 48mph.
I rather not go that fast on a road that i never rode before again.
It was scary fast and at the bottom I asked my son, who had a computer, said we his 48mph.
I rather not go that fast on a road that i never rode before again.