![]() |
Why don't you take the Bontrager wheels off, remove the tires and cassette, and weigh them?
|
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006315)
There are still obviously corners that were cut to get them to that price. Whether or not you are capable of identifying them is a separate discussion.
|
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006349)
Ok, let's compare to the Dura Ace C24.
Do a quick google search... thousands upon thousands of pages of people giving nothing but praise for the hubs. Can you say that about whatever no name hubs are on the Vueltas? It's funny because this guy on the local huge facebook cycling group for buying/selling parts/bikes has been reposting this Vuelta wheelset for MONTHS and nobody wants them. |
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006349)
... thousands upon thousands of pages of people giving nothing but praise for the hubs. Can you say that about whatever no name hubs are on the Vueltas?
What's wrong with them? |
A Google search for "vuelta hubs" brings up 278,000 results. I'm not going to read through them all though...
|
For me, they just go so nicely with my Sora setup that everyone says is not enough. So why get wheels better than the rest of the bike?
To me 2014 Sora is great and for my talents at this time, the Vuelta Corsa SLR fit my needs well. |
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006293)
Yeah... my friend ebayed a pair of 1200g carbon chinese clinchers. I think he said they were around $300. He climbed Mauna Kea on them (look it up if you aren't aware of it--HUGE mountain) and rode them for a while but eventually melted the carbon going down a long steep hill.
|
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006293)
eventually melted the carbon going down a long steep hill.
|
Originally Posted by RPK79
(Post 18006304)
I own these wheels and they're solid, fairly light, and inexpensive in comparison. Unless you're a Fatty McFatterson. In that case your options get limited.
|
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006349)
Ok, let's compare to the Dura Ace C24.
Do a quick google search... thousands upon thousands of pages of people giving nothing but praise for the hubs. Can you say that about whatever no name hubs are on the Vueltas? It's funny because this guy on the local huge facebook cycling group for buying/selling parts/bikes has been reposting this Vuelta wheelset for MONTHS and nobody wants them. |
Originally Posted by Csdhlhcky
(Post 18006412)
Do you know of any chinese carbon wheels with aluminum braking surfaces? I dont ride a lot of hills, so the pricepoint and supposed-average quality of the chinese carbon appeal to me. Also the weight savings would be immense.
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 18006543)
Go ahead. Let's compare. You start. What do you know about the DA wheels that suggests they are better than the Vuelta?
|
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006548)
I already said... the thousands of posts online about people fascinated with the hubs.
|
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006548)
I already said... the thousands of posts online about people fascinated with the hubs.
|
It may come as a shock to some folks to read this, but (IMO) one doesn't always need the very best of everything. Quite often the moderately good product is exactly what fits someone's needs. I frequently find myself buying "up the product line", not to get the best, but only to acquire features. If the features I want are available at a lower price point, I will generally stop right there.
I don't ride Vuelta wheels, not because I don't think they are good enough, but simply because I build my own lighter ones for very similar money. If I bought ready-made, it would be Vuelta. And then "forever" durability doesn't excite me. Good, immediate value does. I like having new and getting it inexpensively. Having to keep a wheel set for 20 years to get my money out of it has no appeal for me, even if the wheels would MAYBE last that long. That is a game I have no desire to play. |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 18006610)
It may come as a shock to some folks to read this, but (IMO) one doesn't always need the very best of everything. Quite often the moderately good product is exactly what fits someone's needs. I frequently find myself buying "up the product line", not to get the best, but only to acquire features. If the features I want are available at a lower price point, I will generally stop right there.
I don't ride Vuelta wheels, not because I don't think they are good enough, but simply because I build my own lighter ones for very similar money. If I bought ready-made, it would be Vuelta. And then "forever" durability doesn't excite me. Good, immediate value does. I like having new and getting it inexpensively. Having to keep a wheel set for 20 years to get my money out of it has no appeal for me, even if the wheels would MAYBE last that long. That is a game I have no desire to play. Also, it's pretty easy to destroy a wheel; only takes a moment of inattentiveness and hitting a sharp pothole, or catching a large nail that punches through the rim, or many other possibilities. They're one of the more vulnerable components on a bike. It would be silly, IMHO, to spend more than necessary on wheels. |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 18006563)
How does that make them better than Vuelta? People love to talk about Shimano hubs, and they are very fine. But what do you know about them being better than Vuelta or Bike Hub Store or Formula or ...?
|
Originally Posted by redlude97
(Post 18006701)
well one thing is the use of cup/cone bearings which are user serviceable compared to cartridges. Another is the titanium freehub which doesn't get eaten up like aluminum freehubs on the vuelta
|
Would something like this be far superior to the SLRs?
Shimano RS81 C24 Carbon Road Wheelset | Chain Reaction Cycles |
Originally Posted by jch3n
(Post 18006746)
So that's "better"? Cartridge bearings aren't meant to be serviced, you just replace the entire cartridge bearing (I guess you could argue that the tools required to replace cartridge bearings are more prohibitive than the tools needed for cup/cone bearings, but either way you still need tools). Also, there are plenty of "higher end" hubs with aluminum freehub bodies that likewise get chewed up.
|
Originally Posted by cicatrize
(Post 18006757)
Would something like this be far superior to the SLRs?
Shimano RS81 C24 Carbon Road Wheelset | Chain Reaction Cycles Shimano RS81 C24 pros/cons: - Typical Shimano build quality (a.k.a great) - More serviceable bearings - Steel freehub body (eliminates gouging from cassette) - Costs more - Low spoke count/high spoke tension (if you break a spoke, the wheel will most likely be unrideable) - Shimano spokes and nipples are typically proprietary and it may be hard to obtain replacements Vuelta SLR pros/cons: - Good value for the money - Higher spoke count - Spokes/nipples can most likely be replaced with off the shelf parts - Cartridge bearings are harder to service/replace - Aluminum freehub body prone to gouging from cassette - Less brand "reputation" |
Originally Posted by himespau
(Post 18006595)
Apparently over 278,000 people are fascinated with the vuelta hubs too. What's your point?
|
Originally Posted by jch3n
(Post 18006868)
I wouldn't say FAR superior. Weight is about the same and everything else is a list of tradeoffs.
Shimano RS81 C24 pros/cons: - Typical Shimano build quality (a.k.a great) - More serviceable bearings - Steel freehub body (eliminates gouging from cassette) - Costs more - Low spoke count/high spoke tension (if you break a spoke, the wheel will most likely be unrideable) - Shimano spokes and nipples are typically proprietary and it may be hard to obtain replacements Vuelta SLR pros/cons: - Good value for the money - Higher spoke count - Spokes/nipples can most likely be replaced with off the shelf parts - Cartridge bearings are harder to service/replace - Aluminum freehub body prone to gouging from cassette - Less brand "reputation" |
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006880)
Higher spoke count isn't always a good thing. I'd rather have fewer higher quality spokes than a ton of junk spokes. Shimano uses a special steel blend for their spokes that makes them stronger, allowing them to use fewer spokes (lighter) and maintain stiffness and durability. The warranty speaks for itself. Dura Ace wheel warranty is TRIPLE that of Vuelta.
The truth of the matter is, with a higher spoke count you will most likely still have a rideable wheel to get you home, should you break a spoke. Not the case with a low spoke count/high tension wheel. I broke a spoke on a set of RS10s (which were pretty good wheels despite its undeserved reputation for being crap) and could not continue. Luckily I was only a few blocks from home. Then came the matter of replacing the spoke. My shop didn't have the Shimano proprietary spoke and nipples available nor was it worth dealing with warranty on a set of RS10s (might be different for higher-end Shimano wheels) but they eventually found a suitable replacement. Some people might not care but who really wants to deal with warranty just to replace a broken spoke? With the Vuelta wheels and other wheelsets, you can probably be in and out of a shop in 20 minutes. |
Originally Posted by Alias530
(Post 18006870)
The word Vuelta appearing in a post 278,000 times is not the same thing as "I've had my Dura Ace hubs for 20 freaking years and they're still perfect". Appearance is not the same thing as praise.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.