What makes pros so much quicker?
#26
blah blah blah
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Really, no. Even a routine domestique in a top team is up there in a tiny percentage of the population in terms of the physiology needed for endurance sports. The vast, vast majority of us, including those who race, could never get close to being as good as them no matter how hard we trained.
But I don't know how anyone could say that if they haven't trained as long and hard as the so-called 'tiny percentage'
Train that long and that hard and then do the comparisons.
This is no offense to you btw Chasm54 as for all I know, you may have trained as much as a pro.
But I believe that most people who say things like that haven't even attempted to train 1/10th of what the pros have so they really shouldn't be talking about gene pools and things in general they know nothing of.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 491
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It all comes down to the size of you engine. Some people have stronger heart muscles then others do. Every sport is the same. A strong heart with dedication and determination.
#28
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
And by god no to the simplification that a good (physical) heart and dedication is all it takes to be elite in "every sport".
Instinct, reaction, speed, the right build, cardio, strength, mental edge, more - all of it.
#29
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but pack riding ups your aero efficiency to a huge degree.
I usually ride on my own, but anytime I can catch a draft of even one rider, even if it's only for a few seconds, I can up my speed by several mph pretty easily and pretty much slingshot past them.
Riding in a large pack is even better. You can cruise along at 27 or 28 km, coasting and pedaling with modest effort every once in a while, rather than pushing the pedals at moderate effort all the time.
This doesn't account for their incredible time trial speeds, but even there, aero helmets, wheels, frames and skinsuits make a noticeable difference.
I usually ride on my own, but anytime I can catch a draft of even one rider, even if it's only for a few seconds, I can up my speed by several mph pretty easily and pretty much slingshot past them.
Riding in a large pack is even better. You can cruise along at 27 or 28 km, coasting and pedaling with modest effort every once in a while, rather than pushing the pedals at moderate effort all the time.
This doesn't account for their incredible time trial speeds, but even there, aero helmets, wheels, frames and skinsuits make a noticeable difference.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No need to look beyond time trial times to understand the difference between road professionals and keen, dedicated amateurs.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greater Tampa
Posts: 254
Bikes: Lynskey R230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but pack riding ups your aero efficiency to a huge degree.
I usually ride on my own, but anytime I can catch a draft of even one rider, even if it's only for a few seconds, I can up my speed by several mph pretty easily and pretty much slingshot past them.
Riding in a large pack is even better. You can cruise along at 27 or 28 km, coasting and pedaling with modest effort every once in a while, rather than pushing the pedals at moderate effort all the time.
This doesn't account for their incredible time trial speeds, but even there, aero helmets, wheels, frames and skinsuits make a noticeable difference.
I usually ride on my own, but anytime I can catch a draft of even one rider, even if it's only for a few seconds, I can up my speed by several mph pretty easily and pretty much slingshot past them.
Riding in a large pack is even better. You can cruise along at 27 or 28 km, coasting and pedaling with modest effort every once in a while, rather than pushing the pedals at moderate effort all the time.
This doesn't account for their incredible time trial speeds, but even there, aero helmets, wheels, frames and skinsuits make a noticeable difference.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Just imagine, a Usain Bolt type in the sprints with teammates who are like the African marathoners.
Last edited by Garfield Cat; 09-27-15 at 12:39 PM.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Believe me, there's a huge physiological difference between a Cat 1/2 and a domestic pro, and another leap to the world tour guys that has nothing to do with riding in a peloton. Look up individual time trial times and course profiles for any major tour race. The clock doesn't lie. Anyone who thinks it's only 'hard work and time on the bike' that separates the public from the pros is just wrong. As mentioned before, even the lowly world tour domestiques can lay waste to your local 1/2 pro race field.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 854
Bikes: All 80s Schwinns: 88Prologue, 88Circuit, 88Ontare, 88KOM, 86SS, 88Tempo, 88V'ger, 80V'ger, 88LeTour, 82LTLuxeMixte, 87 Cimarron, 86H.Sierra, 92Paramount9c
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I too have only been into road cycling for about a year now. And it is truly amazing what I hear folks can do although I think I'm doing pretty well for a relative newby using vintage equipment and barefoot on platform pedals. Just did a 37 mile ride today that crossed me over 1,000 miles this year - first time I'd ever hit that in a year. And I averaged 17.55 mph including warmup and cooldown and several stops at road crossings and was going at a moderate to hard effort. Hope I'm on my way to doing ok in a duathlon next year.
Pros have many advantages. Most covered above but people just seem to hit on one or two at a time.
1) Genetics. Yes people are born different. Just like how a scrawny dude is highly unlikely to become a winner body builder at the Arnold Classic. When your at the world level, we are talking about the best of the best here.
2) Trainers. Probably have the best trainers in the world analyzing their performance and tweaking their routines based off that. Most amateurs likely won't ever even have a real trainer let alone world class.
3) Training time. Most pros probably don't even have a steady job, and even if they do its probably built around their training and flexible. Us amateurs work regular jobs, overime often... Heck I work shiftwork going back nights and days constantly which has to hurt my system somewhat, and my shifts are 12hrs sitting at a computer (with no 'lunch' break) and 1 hr drive each way. I regularly do a 72hr week once every 5 weeks. Heck if I had 'only' a regular 8hr shift with a short drive I think my performance could jump significantly! Let alone working part time or none at all.
4) Equipment. They got some of the best stuff. Sure some of us could get it too but probably not most. I think even a low end new bike is too much money so I spent a couple hundred on vintage stuff.
5) Drugs. Maybe not every single pro does it but I'm sure most do in varying degrees. I've never taken an illegal or performance enhancing drug in my life (well aside from coffee) and haven't even taken pain killer in several years. I'm proud to be drug free and since I'll never be in contention of winning something big what is the point? I much rather care about my health than shaving a minute off my mediocre time. I am very fond of craft beers and good wine though...
It is quite likely many of the top world athletes in any sport started at a young age too. I am at a distinct disadvantage buying my first road bike at 36 years old. Some of these top competitors were likely child prodigies like the 12yr old kid I saw in a marathon last year. I even cross country in high school but 26 miles? I never would have dreamed I could do that until just a couple years ago.
Well I am sure there are more that seems to be the biggest ones...
Pros have many advantages. Most covered above but people just seem to hit on one or two at a time.
1) Genetics. Yes people are born different. Just like how a scrawny dude is highly unlikely to become a winner body builder at the Arnold Classic. When your at the world level, we are talking about the best of the best here.
2) Trainers. Probably have the best trainers in the world analyzing their performance and tweaking their routines based off that. Most amateurs likely won't ever even have a real trainer let alone world class.
3) Training time. Most pros probably don't even have a steady job, and even if they do its probably built around their training and flexible. Us amateurs work regular jobs, overime often... Heck I work shiftwork going back nights and days constantly which has to hurt my system somewhat, and my shifts are 12hrs sitting at a computer (with no 'lunch' break) and 1 hr drive each way. I regularly do a 72hr week once every 5 weeks. Heck if I had 'only' a regular 8hr shift with a short drive I think my performance could jump significantly! Let alone working part time or none at all.
4) Equipment. They got some of the best stuff. Sure some of us could get it too but probably not most. I think even a low end new bike is too much money so I spent a couple hundred on vintage stuff.
5) Drugs. Maybe not every single pro does it but I'm sure most do in varying degrees. I've never taken an illegal or performance enhancing drug in my life (well aside from coffee) and haven't even taken pain killer in several years. I'm proud to be drug free and since I'll never be in contention of winning something big what is the point? I much rather care about my health than shaving a minute off my mediocre time. I am very fond of craft beers and good wine though...
It is quite likely many of the top world athletes in any sport started at a young age too. I am at a distinct disadvantage buying my first road bike at 36 years old. Some of these top competitors were likely child prodigies like the 12yr old kid I saw in a marathon last year. I even cross country in high school but 26 miles? I never would have dreamed I could do that until just a couple years ago.
Well I am sure there are more that seems to be the biggest ones...
Last edited by T Stew; 09-27-15 at 01:35 PM.
#37
Senior Member
Years of training and racing. That's it.
Hard work and learning the sport from the inside.
I really believe most people, given that desire, could ride at a very high level.
However, life gets in the way most of the time.
There are many talented riders that fail, just as anything in life.
Racing is a bit unique in that there is aero and mechanical advantage that plays into it as well.
A 5'4" rider can keep up with a 6' 2" rider on the flats, as well, a taller, bigger rider can keep up with a featherweight on climbs.
That's unique to our sport.
At the top end of the sport, yes, genetics need to be touched by god as a cost of entry.
Look at Cancellara, Contador or Froome's stats and power output over these large distances. These are devestatingly fast human beings.
Hard work and learning the sport from the inside.
I really believe most people, given that desire, could ride at a very high level.
However, life gets in the way most of the time.
There are many talented riders that fail, just as anything in life.
Racing is a bit unique in that there is aero and mechanical advantage that plays into it as well.
A 5'4" rider can keep up with a 6' 2" rider on the flats, as well, a taller, bigger rider can keep up with a featherweight on climbs.
That's unique to our sport.
At the top end of the sport, yes, genetics need to be touched by god as a cost of entry.
Look at Cancellara, Contador or Froome's stats and power output over these large distances. These are devestatingly fast human beings.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54
Bikes: N/A
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know why people expect they should be able to be close to professionals in skill.
No NFL fan is so delusional to think they can play linebacker for the 49ers but for some reason the cycling fan thinks he is Peter Sagan.
No NFL fan is so delusional to think they can play linebacker for the 49ers but for some reason the cycling fan thinks he is Peter Sagan.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Likely too heavy to be competitive in road racing. Road racing sprinters are not like track sprinters. They also need decent aerobic capacity and power/weight. Usain Bolt is more like Chris Hoy and would never make it to the finish of a road race.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 345
Bikes: 2012 BMC SLR01, 2012 Yeti ASR5, 2013 Trek Crockett
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Alot of the top riders race more miles than I ride total in a year. And on off days they are out riding additional miles. Genetics as others have pointed out are important as well.
I was in Belgium this year during a few of the spring classics. I got the opportunity to see the pros out training. It was impressive how fast they ride even during training rides. I thought I was doing good climbing the Mur de Huy until the french womens national team came blowing by me like it was nothing. Shortly after that I watched a bunch of the mens teams (BMC, Movistar, Cofidis, FDJ, Astana...) fly up that hill. And they had to race the next day. I thought about latching on to some of the groups of pros, but decided against it because I had plenty of miles left to ride those days and didn't want to over do it.
I know I will never be anywhere close to the pros. It took me almost 13 hours to complete a rainy Liege Bastogne Liege course. It took the Pros 6.5 the next day. Even accounting for the big packs they ride in our difference in abilities is huge.
I was in Belgium this year during a few of the spring classics. I got the opportunity to see the pros out training. It was impressive how fast they ride even during training rides. I thought I was doing good climbing the Mur de Huy until the french womens national team came blowing by me like it was nothing. Shortly after that I watched a bunch of the mens teams (BMC, Movistar, Cofidis, FDJ, Astana...) fly up that hill. And they had to race the next day. I thought about latching on to some of the groups of pros, but decided against it because I had plenty of miles left to ride those days and didn't want to over do it.
I know I will never be anywhere close to the pros. It took me almost 13 hours to complete a rainy Liege Bastogne Liege course. It took the Pros 6.5 the next day. Even accounting for the big packs they ride in our difference in abilities is huge.
#42
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
371 Posts
Maybe...
But I don't know how anyone could say that if they haven't trained as long and hard as the so-called 'tiny percentage'
Train that long and that hard and then do the comparisons.
This is no offense to you btw Chasm54 as for all I know, you may have trained as much as a pro.
But I believe that most people who say things like that haven't even attempted to train 1/10th of what the pros have so they really shouldn't be talking about gene pools and things in general they know nothing of.
But I don't know how anyone could say that if they haven't trained as long and hard as the so-called 'tiny percentage'
Train that long and that hard and then do the comparisons.
This is no offense to you btw Chasm54 as for all I know, you may have trained as much as a pro.
But I believe that most people who say things like that haven't even attempted to train 1/10th of what the pros have so they really shouldn't be talking about gene pools and things in general they know nothing of.
I'm faster than 90% of people who ride a bike. Perfect training and perfect diet, I could be faster than 95 % or so. To make a living however you need to be faster than 99.5%, and you simply can't reach that level simply by training a lot.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Aero helps to a significant degree, but it's not the reason the pros are so fast. Remember that somebody up at the front of that pack is pulling at those speeds with no aero benefit at all. The guy on the breakaway is pulling away from the pack -- solo. Forget speed, go see how long you can sustain a pro's threshold power -- you'll see that those guys/gals have a true gift and no amount of training/aero will let the rest of us equal it.
#44
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
(Also cut were all-american record holder montee ball, and future hall of famer reggie wayne).
The active professional rank, in any sport, is the most elite of the elite of the elite. It is god/parent/allah-given talent, polished to perfection.
The 3rd string QB on a roster is a genetic lottery winner. To suggest it is merely a product of "hard work and learning the sport" is absolutely looney
#45
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aero helps to a significant degree, but it's not the reason the pros are so fast. Remember that somebody up at the front of that pack is pulling at those speeds with no aero benefit at all. The guy on the breakaway is pulling away from the pack -- solo. Forget speed, go see how long you can sustain a pro's threshold power -- you'll see that those guys/gals have a true gift and no amount of training/aero will let the rest of us equal it.
It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
#46
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm not saying it accounts for all of the difference. But it makes a huge difference. The TDF starts with 198 riders. This is an enormous aero advantage overall. The riders at front are only pulling a fraction of the time.
It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
For a more realistic comparison, look at the time trials. Bradley Wiggins wasn't drafting anyone when he rode 54.5 kilometres in an hour a couple of months ago.
#47
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I've spent a lot of time on a bike. I've also spent a lot of time around bike racers, including some young ones who are now on the UK olympic development squad and older ones who rode professionally back in the day. The difference between those that "have it" and the rest of us is night and day. And that difference remains obvious even within that elite group. There are thousands of pro cyclists, who seem astoundingly fast and strong and race and train full time. But even among that group, very few ever get to ride for Sky or Movistar or whoever in a Grand Tour, becase they aren't good enough.
If I had trained systematically frm an early age, and had the leisure to do so full time as an adult, I'd have been pretty good. I'd never ever have made the pro ranks, though, I don't have the raw material. And most people who think they'd have been good enough if only they'd trained better are fooling themselves.
If I had trained systematically frm an early age, and had the leisure to do so full time as an adult, I'd have been pretty good. I'd never ever have made the pro ranks, though, I don't have the raw material. And most people who think they'd have been good enough if only they'd trained better are fooling themselves.
Kind of like cage fighters...cut from much different cloth than average people.
There is strength and then there is unfathomable bike handling skill...a side of the sport rarely talked about. And then there is Peter Sagan. Peter Sagan rides a bike like a concert pianist plays a Baldwin. I have never seen anybody handle a bike like him. He has the legs of guy who looks like he can lift up a car. And then that hair. It isn't fair that aside from all his gifts he has hair that good.
#48
cycle-dog spot
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fun story. Makes of it what you will.
One of my friends, co.workers and riding buddies was a domestic pro back in the day. Early 40s now, wife, kids, job, travel. You know, a real life. His training is a few hours of commuting a week.
Every now and again our rides cross some of the local 1/2 racers and he has no problem hanging on. Right off the couch!
Your basic genetic freak from the planet VO2.
One of my friends, co.workers and riding buddies was a domestic pro back in the day. Early 40s now, wife, kids, job, travel. You know, a real life. His training is a few hours of commuting a week.
Every now and again our rides cross some of the local 1/2 racers and he has no problem hanging on. Right off the couch!
Your basic genetic freak from the planet VO2.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not saying it accounts for all of the difference. But it makes a huge difference. The TDF starts with 198 riders. This is an enormous aero advantage overall. The riders at front are only pulling a fraction of the time.
It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
I honestly don't think you understand or want to believe that these guys are from a different part of the genetic pool than you or I. Just curious, have you ever ridden with a world tour caliber rider? I have and let me tell you, it's an eye opener even if you think you're pretty fast and doing well in the local races. And again, please look at the average speeds for individual TT stages in the major tours. Believe me, 99.9% of all the posters here including the racer pages could not hang in the pack in the TdF and would be absolutely embarrassed by their comparative TT times.
#50
Full Member
Cycling is one of few sports where poor diet is a benefit. The euro rider eats moldy cheese, fish caught out of polluted waters, pasta and bread. And they eat stuff like hearts and kidneys, gizzards, and lamb tripe. The average euro rider is much smaller in stature compared to his american counterpart.
The average American is feasting on corn fed beef. Packing on the pounds at an early age. Growing beyond normal size. Those early years of soda, hormone enriched milk, and sugar, lots of sugar, are a detriment. 6 foot 4 inches, 250 pounds, size 15 feet, football or basketball are the sports of real men.
Then you have your British riders. Tea and scone types. How Tommy Godwin could ride 75,000 miles in a year on tea and crackers is a wonder.
The average American is feasting on corn fed beef. Packing on the pounds at an early age. Growing beyond normal size. Those early years of soda, hormone enriched milk, and sugar, lots of sugar, are a detriment. 6 foot 4 inches, 250 pounds, size 15 feet, football or basketball are the sports of real men.
Then you have your British riders. Tea and scone types. How Tommy Godwin could ride 75,000 miles in a year on tea and crackers is a wonder.