Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

What makes pros so much quicker?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

What makes pros so much quicker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-15, 10:47 AM
  #26  
blah blah blah
 
milkbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bakes1
Originally Posted by chasm54
Really, no. Even a routine domestique in a top team is up there in a tiny percentage of the population in terms of the physiology needed for endurance sports. The vast, vast majority of us, including those who race, could never get close to being as good as them no matter how hard we trained.
Maybe...
But I don't know how anyone could say that if they haven't trained as long and hard as the so-called 'tiny percentage'
Train that long and that hard and then do the comparisons.
This is no offense to you btw Chasm54 as for all I know, you may have trained as much as a pro.
But I believe that most people who say things like that haven't even attempted to train 1/10th of what the pros have so they really shouldn't be talking about gene pools and things in general they know nothing of.
Take it from somebody who has trained between 15 to 25 hours a week for years then. It takes natural talent that is then nurtured into results to be that good and be pro. Both me and my ex gf have trained in the 15 to 30 hours per week window for years and while both of us are "good citizen" athletes, meaning other normal people think we are fast (i.e. faster than they can imagine themselves ever being), we are nowhere near the top amateurs much less within the same solar system as the pros. They are almost like a different species compared to us.
milkbaby is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 11:17 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 491
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It all comes down to the size of you engine. Some people have stronger heart muscles then others do. Every sport is the same. A strong heart with dedication and determination.
elmore leonard is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 11:25 AM
  #28  
pluralis majestatis
 
redfooj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206

Bikes: a DuhRosa

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by elmore leonard
It all comes down to the size of you engine. Some people have stronger heart muscles then others do. Every sport is the same. A strong heart with dedication and determination.
You might have heard this saying in football: you can't coach speed.

And by god no to the simplification that a good (physical) heart and dedication is all it takes to be elite in "every sport".

Instinct, reaction, speed, the right build, cardio, strength, mental edge, more - all of it.
redfooj is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 11:55 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but pack riding ups your aero efficiency to a huge degree.

I usually ride on my own, but anytime I can catch a draft of even one rider, even if it's only for a few seconds, I can up my speed by several mph pretty easily and pretty much slingshot past them.

Riding in a large pack is even better. You can cruise along at 27 or 28 km, coasting and pedaling with modest effort every once in a while, rather than pushing the pedals at moderate effort all the time.

This doesn't account for their incredible time trial speeds, but even there, aero helmets, wheels, frames and skinsuits make a noticeable difference.
calimtb is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 12:01 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No need to look beyond time trial times to understand the difference between road professionals and keen, dedicated amateurs.
puddinlegs is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 12:08 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Fldaves's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greater Tampa
Posts: 254

Bikes: Lynskey R230

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by calimtb
I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but pack riding ups your aero efficiency to a huge degree.

I usually ride on my own, but anytime I can catch a draft of even one rider, even if it's only for a few seconds, I can up my speed by several mph pretty easily and pretty much slingshot past them.

Riding in a large pack is even better. You can cruise along at 27 or 28 km, coasting and pedaling with modest effort every once in a while, rather than pushing the pedals at moderate effort all the time.

This doesn't account for their incredible time trial speeds, but even there, aero helmets, wheels, frames and skinsuits make a noticeable difference.
Sooooo true, it's amazing the difference in speed/ endurance when riding alone compared to riding in a peloton.
Fldaves is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 12:35 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Garfield Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085

Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by RISKDR1
It is a combination of genetics, mental toughness, great coaching, team support, opportunity and desire, not necessarily in that order. I have probably missed something but most of the reasons for success as a pro are contained in those areas.
These would apply to other athletic events like Track and Field, especially track. Jamaica a small country with a big share of sprinters, both men and women. In distance events we all know about the Marathon both men and women. Even down to the 1,500 meters. Just incredible. I am waiting to see if the same will translate to cycling.

Just imagine, a Usain Bolt type in the sprints with teammates who are like the African marathoners.

Last edited by Garfield Cat; 09-27-15 at 12:39 PM.
Garfield Cat is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:20 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fldaves
Sooooo true, it's amazing the difference in speed/ endurance when riding alone compared to riding in a peloton.
Believe me, there's a huge physiological difference between a Cat 1/2 and a domestic pro, and another leap to the world tour guys that has nothing to do with riding in a peloton. Look up individual time trial times and course profiles for any major tour race. The clock doesn't lie. Anyone who thinks it's only 'hard work and time on the bike' that separates the public from the pros is just wrong. As mentioned before, even the lowly world tour domestiques can lay waste to your local 1/2 pro race field.
puddinlegs is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:26 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
brianmcg123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 1,286

Bikes: 2013 Trek Madone; 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 35 Posts
They push down harder on the pedals.
brianmcg123 is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:30 PM
  #35  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: mid MO
Posts: 234

Bikes: 12 lynskeys, 1 IF, 2 colnagos

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
They're from another planet
la rosa is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:30 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
T Stew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 854

Bikes: All 80s Schwinns: 88Prologue, 88Circuit, 88Ontare, 88KOM, 86SS, 88Tempo, 88V'ger, 80V'ger, 88LeTour, 82LTLuxeMixte, 87 Cimarron, 86H.Sierra, 92Paramount9c

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I too have only been into road cycling for about a year now. And it is truly amazing what I hear folks can do although I think I'm doing pretty well for a relative newby using vintage equipment and barefoot on platform pedals. Just did a 37 mile ride today that crossed me over 1,000 miles this year - first time I'd ever hit that in a year. And I averaged 17.55 mph including warmup and cooldown and several stops at road crossings and was going at a moderate to hard effort. Hope I'm on my way to doing ok in a duathlon next year.

Pros have many advantages. Most covered above but people just seem to hit on one or two at a time.

1) Genetics. Yes people are born different. Just like how a scrawny dude is highly unlikely to become a winner body builder at the Arnold Classic. When your at the world level, we are talking about the best of the best here.

2) Trainers. Probably have the best trainers in the world analyzing their performance and tweaking their routines based off that. Most amateurs likely won't ever even have a real trainer let alone world class.

3) Training time. Most pros probably don't even have a steady job, and even if they do its probably built around their training and flexible. Us amateurs work regular jobs, overime often... Heck I work shiftwork going back nights and days constantly which has to hurt my system somewhat, and my shifts are 12hrs sitting at a computer (with no 'lunch' break) and 1 hr drive each way. I regularly do a 72hr week once every 5 weeks. Heck if I had 'only' a regular 8hr shift with a short drive I think my performance could jump significantly! Let alone working part time or none at all.

4) Equipment. They got some of the best stuff. Sure some of us could get it too but probably not most. I think even a low end new bike is too much money so I spent a couple hundred on vintage stuff.

5) Drugs. Maybe not every single pro does it but I'm sure most do in varying degrees. I've never taken an illegal or performance enhancing drug in my life (well aside from coffee) and haven't even taken pain killer in several years. I'm proud to be drug free and since I'll never be in contention of winning something big what is the point? I much rather care about my health than shaving a minute off my mediocre time. I am very fond of craft beers and good wine though...

It is quite likely many of the top world athletes in any sport started at a young age too. I am at a distinct disadvantage buying my first road bike at 36 years old. Some of these top competitors were likely child prodigies like the 12yr old kid I saw in a marathon last year. I even cross country in high school but 26 miles? I never would have dreamed I could do that until just a couple years ago.

Well I am sure there are more that seems to be the biggest ones...

Last edited by T Stew; 09-27-15 at 01:35 PM.
T Stew is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:36 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Years of training and racing. That's it.
Hard work and learning the sport from the inside.

I really believe most people, given that desire, could ride at a very high level.
However, life gets in the way most of the time.

There are many talented riders that fail, just as anything in life.

Racing is a bit unique in that there is aero and mechanical advantage that plays into it as well.
A 5'4" rider can keep up with a 6' 2" rider on the flats, as well, a taller, bigger rider can keep up with a featherweight on climbs.
That's unique to our sport.

At the top end of the sport, yes, genetics need to be touched by god as a cost of entry.

Look at Cancellara, Contador or Froome's stats and power output over these large distances. These are devestatingly fast human beings.
cruiserhead is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:54 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Location
Posts: 54

Bikes: N/A

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't know why people expect they should be able to be close to professionals in skill.
No NFL fan is so delusional to think they can play linebacker for the 49ers but for some reason the cycling fan thinks he is Peter Sagan.
phil_k is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 02:00 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by Garfield Cat
Just imagine, a Usain Bolt type in the sprints with teammates who are like the African marathoners.
Likely too heavy to be competitive in road racing. Road racing sprinters are not like track sprinters. They also need decent aerobic capacity and power/weight. Usain Bolt is more like Chris Hoy and would never make it to the finish of a road race.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 02:25 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 345

Bikes: 2012 BMC SLR01, 2012 Yeti ASR5, 2013 Trek Crockett

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Alot of the top riders race more miles than I ride total in a year. And on off days they are out riding additional miles. Genetics as others have pointed out are important as well.

I was in Belgium this year during a few of the spring classics. I got the opportunity to see the pros out training. It was impressive how fast they ride even during training rides. I thought I was doing good climbing the Mur de Huy until the french womens national team came blowing by me like it was nothing. Shortly after that I watched a bunch of the mens teams (BMC, Movistar, Cofidis, FDJ, Astana...) fly up that hill. And they had to race the next day. I thought about latching on to some of the groups of pros, but decided against it because I had plenty of miles left to ride those days and didn't want to over do it.

I know I will never be anywhere close to the pros. It took me almost 13 hours to complete a rainy Liege Bastogne Liege course. It took the Pros 6.5 the next day. Even accounting for the big packs they ride in our difference in abilities is huge.
xjustice09x is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 02:51 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
dksix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616

Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Talent can't be acquired, it's just there or isn't.
dksix is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 03:06 PM
  #42  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times in 371 Posts
Originally Posted by bakes1
Maybe...
But I don't know how anyone could say that if they haven't trained as long and hard as the so-called 'tiny percentage'
Train that long and that hard and then do the comparisons.
This is no offense to you btw Chasm54 as for all I know, you may have trained as much as a pro.
But I believe that most people who say things like that haven't even attempted to train 1/10th of what the pros have so they really shouldn't be talking about gene pools and things in general they know nothing of.
I'm a Cat 3. I've had the opportunity to race against top level pros on occasions in P1,2,3 races. I have also had the opportunity to ride the major climbs of the TDF, and the full length of the US Pro challenge. And at times of my life. I've devoted a lot of time to training. I've also been able to afford elite level coaching.While I could be a bit faster with better training and diet, I have absolutely no delusion that I ever could be a Pro Tour level rider with unlimited time to train.

I'm faster than 90% of people who ride a bike. Perfect training and perfect diet, I could be faster than 95 % or so. To make a living however you need to be faster than 99.5%, and you simply can't reach that level simply by training a lot.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 03:12 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Kopsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by calimtb
I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but pack riding ups your aero efficiency to a huge degree.
Aero helps to a significant degree, but it's not the reason the pros are so fast. Remember that somebody up at the front of that pack is pulling at those speeds with no aero benefit at all. The guy on the breakaway is pulling away from the pack -- solo. Forget speed, go see how long you can sustain a pro's threshold power -- you'll see that those guys/gals have a true gift and no amount of training/aero will let the rest of us equal it.
Kopsis is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 03:33 PM
  #44  
pluralis majestatis
 
redfooj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206

Bikes: a DuhRosa

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by phil_k
I don't know why people expect they should be able to be close to professionals in skill.
No NFL fan is so delusional to think they can play linebacker for the 49ers but for some reason the cycling fan thinks he is Peter Sagan.
NFL cut Tim Tebow this year. Dude came out of high school as a highly highly prized recruit, was selected as the best of the best in college -- almost twice, has untold television time and exposure, benefited from top coaching and training, and now can't even make an NFL roster.

(Also cut were all-american record holder montee ball, and future hall of famer reggie wayne).

The active professional rank, in any sport, is the most elite of the elite of the elite. It is god/parent/allah-given talent, polished to perfection.

The 3rd string QB on a roster is a genetic lottery winner. To suggest it is merely a product of "hard work and learning the sport" is absolutely looney
redfooj is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 04:04 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kopsis
Aero helps to a significant degree, but it's not the reason the pros are so fast. Remember that somebody up at the front of that pack is pulling at those speeds with no aero benefit at all. The guy on the breakaway is pulling away from the pack -- solo. Forget speed, go see how long you can sustain a pro's threshold power -- you'll see that those guys/gals have a true gift and no amount of training/aero will let the rest of us equal it.
I'm not saying it accounts for all of the difference. But it makes a huge difference. The TDF starts with 198 riders. This is an enormous aero advantage overall. The riders at front are only pulling a fraction of the time.

It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
calimtb is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 04:13 PM
  #46  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by calimtb
I'm not saying it accounts for all of the difference. But it makes a huge difference. The TDF starts with 198 riders. This is an enormous aero advantage overall. The riders at front are only pulling a fraction of the time.

It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.
Of course drafting makes a huge difference, but it is just as much a benefit in amateur races as in pro races, it does not account for the difference in class.

For a more realistic comparison, look at the time trials. Bradley Wiggins wasn't drafting anyone when he rode 54.5 kilometres in an hour a couple of months ago.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 04:30 PM
  #47  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
I've spent a lot of time on a bike. I've also spent a lot of time around bike racers, including some young ones who are now on the UK olympic development squad and older ones who rode professionally back in the day. The difference between those that "have it" and the rest of us is night and day. And that difference remains obvious even within that elite group. There are thousands of pro cyclists, who seem astoundingly fast and strong and race and train full time. But even among that group, very few ever get to ride for Sky or Movistar or whoever in a Grand Tour, becase they aren't good enough.

If I had trained systematically frm an early age, and had the leisure to do so full time as an adult, I'd have been pretty good. I'd never ever have made the pro ranks, though, I don't have the raw material. And most people who think they'd have been good enough if only they'd trained better are fooling themselves.
Great post. Pros are different. Much different. Watching the worlds today, its just so apparent. Those guys are basically animals the way they attacked those cobbles...their bodies and legs forged from blue steel.
Kind of like cage fighters...cut from much different cloth than average people.
There is strength and then there is unfathomable bike handling skill...a side of the sport rarely talked about. And then there is Peter Sagan. Peter Sagan rides a bike like a concert pianist plays a Baldwin. I have never seen anybody handle a bike like him. He has the legs of guy who looks like he can lift up a car. And then that hair. It isn't fair that aside from all his gifts he has hair that good.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 04:46 PM
  #48  
cycle-dog spot
 
DinoShepherd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,538

Bikes: Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fun story. Makes of it what you will.

One of my friends, co.workers and riding buddies was a domestic pro back in the day. Early 40s now, wife, kids, job, travel. You know, a real life. His training is a few hours of commuting a week.

Every now and again our rides cross some of the local 1/2 racers and he has no problem hanging on. Right off the couch!

Your basic genetic freak from the planet VO2.
DinoShepherd is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 06:02 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by calimtb
I'm not saying it accounts for all of the difference. But it makes a huge difference. The TDF starts with 198 riders. This is an enormous aero advantage overall. The riders at front are only pulling a fraction of the time.

It's astonishing IME how much riding in the middle or back of even a small pack makes. A couple of rides ago, I was pushing pretty hard, pretty tired and after a few minutes drafting a pack which I happened to catch up with, I became extremely restless and sprinted the rest of the ride home.

I honestly don't think you understand or want to believe that these guys are from a different part of the genetic pool than you or I. Just curious, have you ever ridden with a world tour caliber rider? I have and let me tell you, it's an eye opener even if you think you're pretty fast and doing well in the local races. And again, please look at the average speeds for individual TT stages in the major tours. Believe me, 99.9% of all the posters here including the racer pages could not hang in the pack in the TdF and would be absolutely embarrassed by their comparative TT times.
puddinlegs is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 06:42 PM
  #50  
Full Member
 
DreamRider85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by big chainring
Cycling is one of few sports where poor diet is a benefit. The euro rider eats moldy cheese, fish caught out of polluted waters, pasta and bread. And they eat stuff like hearts and kidneys, gizzards, and lamb tripe. The average euro rider is much smaller in stature compared to his american counterpart.

The average American is feasting on corn fed beef. Packing on the pounds at an early age. Growing beyond normal size. Those early years of soda, hormone enriched milk, and sugar, lots of sugar, are a detriment. 6 foot 4 inches, 250 pounds, size 15 feet, football or basketball are the sports of real men.

Then you have your British riders. Tea and scone types. How Tommy Godwin could ride 75,000 miles in a year on tea and crackers is a wonder.
Wait, how is poor diet a benefit? I could understand how in powerfifting, the extra food helps.
DreamRider85 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.