Cycling... Is it logically fallicious?
#1
wears long socks
Thread Starter
Cycling... Is it logically fallicious?
The "myth debunk" thread got me thinking (which is sometimes a choir).
How many cycling "myths" are out there?
You know, the "facts" that people accept without any real evidence.
The things that may have some benefits, but the actual benefits are very small and likely not measurable.
It seems common for people who are serious about a hobby to use the "it must be worth it, cause everyone else does it/has one" approach.
My contribution...
- Dual sided power meters.
- Oval chain rings.
- Internally routed cables.
- Press fit bottom brackets.
Additions by others...
- health impacts from being overly fit
- cycling is fallicious
- special seat tubes (aero or compliant)
- tire effects on ride quality
- super stiff frames for sprints
- component x will save x seconds on a 40K
- thin tires are faster
- benefits of aero spokes
- rolling weight is different than other weight
@PepeM
How many cycling "myths" are out there?
You know, the "facts" that people accept without any real evidence.
The things that may have some benefits, but the actual benefits are very small and likely not measurable.
It seems common for people who are serious about a hobby to use the "it must be worth it, cause everyone else does it/has one" approach.
My contribution...
- Dual sided power meters.
- Oval chain rings.
- Internally routed cables.
- Press fit bottom brackets.
Additions by others...
- health impacts from being overly fit
- cycling is fallicious
- special seat tubes (aero or compliant)
- tire effects on ride quality
- super stiff frames for sprints
- component x will save x seconds on a 40K
- thin tires are faster
- benefits of aero spokes
- rolling weight is different than other weight
@PepeM
Last edited by 69chevy; 10-14-15 at 10:49 AM. Reason: Adding myths and tagging @pepeM
#2
Vain, But Lacking Talent
Man, this thread alone might get you banned.
#5
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,716
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3090 Post(s)
Liked 2,052 Times
in
1,335 Posts
Cycling... Is it magically delicious?
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#9
buy my bikes
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: my very own customized GUNNAR CrossHairs
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Liked 317 Times
in
202 Posts
i am thinking (and changing my riding / exercise schemes to go along with it) that FITNESS = HEALTH is a myth.
here's a really long article with strong anecdotal evidence that being SUPER FIT may not be HEALTHY.
Cycling to extremes - VeloNews.com
to quote the Master Retro-Curmudgeon of Cycling "Eat Bacon, Don't Jog"
here's a really long article with strong anecdotal evidence that being SUPER FIT may not be HEALTHY.
Cycling to extremes - VeloNews.com
to quote the Master Retro-Curmudgeon of Cycling "Eat Bacon, Don't Jog"
#10
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 260 Times
in
98 Posts
Lol.
I agree on internal cables and oval chainrings, OP.
Other things that I'm dubious about:
Aero shaped seatposts and/or narrow diameter posts for "compliance"
All other things equal, ride quality: tubular > tubeless > clincher. Not sure that's necessarily true.
Needing an uber-stiff frame for sprints
Any claim that such and such modification will make you X seconds faster over a 40K time trial.
And so on.
@PepeM
I agree on internal cables and oval chainrings, OP.
Other things that I'm dubious about:
Aero shaped seatposts and/or narrow diameter posts for "compliance"
All other things equal, ride quality: tubular > tubeless > clincher. Not sure that's necessarily true.
Needing an uber-stiff frame for sprints
Any claim that such and such modification will make you X seconds faster over a 40K time trial.
And so on.
@PepeM
#11
Senior Member
Here's a myth I want to debunk: "If you want to go faster, improve the engine." What a crock! Everyone knows bikes don't have engines!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37,546
Mentioned: 208 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17423 Post(s)
Liked 13,502 Times
in
6,414 Posts
#18
wears long socks
Thread Starter
I'm designing a dual sided cadence meter if anyone wants to pre-order. It's more accurate than a single sided one by at least 5% (plus or minus). Accuracy may vary depending on altitude.
#21
wears long socks
Thread Starter
#22
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 229
Bikes: 87 Raleigh 531C Team Replica, 96 Litespeed Classic, 01 Lemond Tete-De-Course, 99 Mongoose RX10.9, 03 Lemond Wayzata, 00 Litespeed Appalachian, 99 Bianchi XL Boron, 98 Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 50 Times
in
26 Posts
You made me look up the word: fallicious

#23
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9704 Post(s)
Liked 2,807 Times
in
1,659 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 101
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Del Rey, 1990 RB-1, 1995 (?) Coppi Reparto Corse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"rolling weight" is more important than other weight?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
You think that's a problem. Just an hour ago while driving my auto, some sort of hawk swooped down in front of me by the roadside and grabbed some poor creature in its talons - a squirrel I think. Now that's a problem.