Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Why all the internal cable routing hate?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Why all the internal cable routing hate?

Old 10-16-15, 09:10 AM
  #26  
Interocitor Command
 
Doctor Morbius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The adult video section
Posts: 3,375

Bikes: 3 Road Bikes, 2 Hybrids

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by ColaJacket
...I did see a report where internal vs. external cable can save several seconds over a 40km time trial.

GH
I think that all depends on which chain lube was used.
Doctor Morbius is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 09:36 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
ColaJacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,892

Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.3 C - 2014

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
Linky?
It was only a few seconds (<10s), but it makes sense, since most of the aero bikes have internal cabling, and the really expensive ones (e.g. Venge Vias) even route the cables through the handlebars.

I didn't bookmark the article, and I can't find it now.

GH
ColaJacket is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 09:41 AM
  #28  
Stratiotika ktemata
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 286
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
For mechanical shifting I certainly don't see it as an improvement, but what's so wrong about it? So many folks are bashing it, I just thought I would ask.
The real answer is there are a lot of retro-grouches on this forum who hate any bike technology newer than 15 years. Proof: style likes and dislikes thread.
Nikephoros is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 09:57 AM
  #29  
Old Fart
 
Stucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
My bike has internal routing- I consider it just another needless gimmick/complication that adds no tangible benefit. Simple machines are best when kept simple. I suspect internal routing was invented just so the bikes could be different, and to make older bikes seem "old-fashioned and out-dated"- like most other cycling technologies. I don't hate internal routing....but given the choice, I'd rather have it the old-fashioned way.
Stucky is offline  
Likes For Stucky:
Old 10-16-15, 10:08 AM
  #30  
Heck on Wheels
 
SloButWide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: USA Midwest
Posts: 1,100

Bikes: In Signature

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
We got crazies?

We all crazies.

Fixed that for you.
__________________
"I had a great ride this morning, except for that part about winding up at work."

Bikes so far: 2011 Felt Z85, 80's Raleigh Sovereign (USA), 91 Bianchi Peregrine, 91 Austro-Daimler Pathfinder, 90's Trek 730 Multitrack, STOLEN: 80 Schwinn Voyageur (Japan)

SloButWide is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 11:27 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ColaJacket
It was only a few seconds (<10s), but it makes sense, since most of the aero bikes have internal cabling, and the really expensive ones (e.g. Venge Vias) even route the cables through the handlebars.

I didn't bookmark the article, and I can't find it now.

GH
I don't doubt there is a very very small aero benefit, but a few seconds is no real benefit to most road riders on this forum.
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 11:37 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Dave Mayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,384
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1155 Post(s)
Liked 411 Times in 242 Posts
I've bought two high-end carbon frames over the last 3 years. One with external and one with internal routings.

The frame with internal routing is outstanding, in terms of weight (<900g), stiffness, ride quality, aero profile ... everything.

But the setup for the internal routing was wretched misery - something that I do not plan on repeating. A few months after getting this bike running, I bust a front derailleur cable, and the fix requires I pull out both cables (front and rear derailleurs) and re-install. I could not be bothered, so a $5,000 bike hangs on a hook. I have a fleet of other bikes.

There are a lot of great bikes out there, but I'll purchase ones with external routing.
Dave Mayer is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 12:00 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Mayer
I've bought two high-end carbon frames over the last 3 years. One with external and one with internal routings.

The frame with internal routing is outstanding, in terms of weight (<900g), stiffness, ride quality, aero profile ... everything.

But the setup for the internal routing was wretched misery - something that I do not plan on repeating. A few months after getting this bike running, I bust a front derailleur cable, and the fix requires I pull out both cables (front and rear derailleurs) and re-install. I could not be bothered, so a $5,000 bike hangs on a hook. I have a fleet of other bikes.

There are a lot of great bikes out there, but I'll purchase ones with external routing.
replacing cables on an internally routed bike is infinitely easier than running them initially if there are no guides. Send it over this way if its such a hassle
redlude97 is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 12:07 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Dave Mayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,384
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1155 Post(s)
Liked 411 Times in 242 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
replacing cables on an internally routed bike is infinitely easier than running them initially if there are no guides. Send it over this way if its such a hassle
Don't have a clue what you're referring to. I've built up dozens of bikes from parts. External routed frames have housing terminators attached to the outside of the frame. If they are missing then you take the frame back for a refund.
Dave Mayer is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 12:57 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Mayer
Don't have a clue what you're referring to. I've built up dozens of bikes from parts. External routed frames have housing terminators attached to the outside of the frame. If they are missing then you take the frame back for a refund.
We're talking about the internally routed bike you are complaining about. To replace the cables you just use fishing line/floss to attach to the end of the cable as you pull through the old cable, then use that as a guide to pull the new cable through. It takes no extra time at all.
redlude97 is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 01:03 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Mayer
Don't have a clue what you're referring to. I've built up dozens of bikes from parts. External routed frames have housing terminators attached to the outside of the frame. If they are missing then you take the frame back for a refund.
He means that once you get it put together the first time, after that it is easy to do it again. You can attach a cord to the end of the wire and pull it through as a guide for replacing the wire, OR you can run outer cable liner over the wire, pull it through, and leave it in the frame to guide the wire back in. Both methods work. But if those things fail, or for the initial setup, as I said in my case, with a wide open BB shell, there shouldn't be much problem running the wires. All you have to do is uninstall the crank and BB if they are in place. Not fun, but not the end of the world either.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 02:13 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
I <3 Robots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,657

Bikes: Cervelo S2, Workswell 062, Banshee Spitfire

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have two bikes with internal cables. Its hit or miss. Sometimes I can thread the cable just right and it pops out the bottom...other times...I need to bust out the coat hanger and fish for it. The worst experience I had so far is with my mountain bike. I had to route the brake hose from the back of the frame. That took me all afternoon to do.

It's something I don't fiddle with often. It's been two years since I've messed with the shifter cables on my S2 and since April (when I got the frame) on my MTB. IMO...people seem to blow this out of proportion...and it's the guys that don't have internally routed frames that do it.
I <3 Robots is offline  
Old 10-16-15, 05:58 PM
  #38  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 391

Bikes: Davidson ’81

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times in 121 Posts
On my Cervelo (old Al frame model) the internal routing is as easy as any external routed bike I've ever seen in my life. Both shift cables exit the frame right in front of the guide under the BB shell. The rear brake cable comes out a large opening in the bottom of the top tube and has a fitting for the cable housing ferrule that completely fills the opening.
C9H13N is offline  
Old 10-21-15, 11:27 AM
  #39  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,620

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1322 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times in 555 Posts
Why the hate?

I can tell you that fishing a replacement inner through a frame blindly with a racer, their father and mother, team members and officials surrounding you while the rest of the field is on the start line all while the official is asking every 30 seconds "how much more time will be needed gentlemen" is a "blast" compared with being able to run an external inner through cable stops in seconds at most.

Why not just follow it with floss or fishing line or a re-used tubing from the frame initially? This was a walk up at a race minutes before the start because his inner snapped in half and was lost in the frame. Shiz happens.

All of the stories in here are always through the reference of a home mechanic with all the time int he world or a chop mechanic who has all the tools and time as well as the nice indoor weather and lighting of a shop.

In the shop I can run most internals in very little time. Internal hydraulic disc brake lines have caused some heartache before, but for the most part all new frames come with routing tubes. I have stacks of those saved so the time it takes to run replacement routings is small.

So is internal routing OK? It can be. It sure has gotten a lot better. Is it the best? IMHO - no. If you're racing I would prefer to see you on external routing as just about any race mechanic can re-run new lines in a minute or two if need be. Do I hate internal routings? ....I guess the answer is yes.

So...that's why I hate them.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Likes For Psimet2001:
Old 10-21-15, 11:36 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
Why the hate?

I can tell you that fishing a replacement inner through a frame blindly with a racer, their father and mother, team members and officials surrounding you while the rest of the field is on the start line all while the official is asking every 30 seconds "how much more time will be needed gentlemen" is a "blast" compared with being able to run an external inner through cable stops in seconds at most.

Why not just follow it with floss or fishing line or a re-used tubing from the frame initially? This was a walk up at a race minutes before the start because his inner snapped in half and was lost in the frame. Shiz happens.

All of the stories in here are always through the reference of a home mechanic with all the time int he world or a chop mechanic who has all the tools and time as well as the nice indoor weather and lighting of a shop.

In the shop I can run most internals in very little time. Internal hydraulic disc brake lines have caused some heartache before, but for the most part all new frames come with routing tubes. I have stacks of those saved so the time it takes to run replacement routings is small.

So is internal routing OK? It can be. It sure has gotten a lot better. Is it the best? IMHO - no. If you're racing I would prefer to see you on external routing as just about any race mechanic can re-run new lines in a minute or two if need be. Do I hate internal routings? ....I guess the answer is yes.

So...that's why I hate them.
Excellent answer Rob, and it is not one bit diminished by the fact that my question was purely rhetorical.

I keed!

Seriously, thanks for the input from the viewpoint of participants in organized events. Most of what you hear on the 41 is griping from amateurs with the implication that it is easy for the pros. It is nice to see a different perspective on this.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 10-21-15, 12:55 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Jeremy_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Fort Worth Tx
Posts: 291

Bikes: 15 Fuji Altamira 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've restrung my Podium twice in less than 20 minutes both times. No fishing line no cables no nothing. Out with the old, in with the new. Just manipulate the frame in one hand to make the cable fall where you need it as you push through.
Jeremy_S is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 06:27 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
So What The Consensus

Is internal cabling worth it? I'm particularly interested if its worth it if you don't ride often in the rain. Infact I only ride in the rain if I get caught in it by mistake!

Originally Posted by Stucky
My bike has internal routing- I consider it just another needless gimmick/complication that adds no tangible benefit. Simple machines are best when kept simple. I suspect internal routing was invented just so the bikes could be different, and to make older bikes seem "old-fashioned and out-dated"- like most other cycling technologies. I don't hate internal routing....but given the choice, I'd rather have it the old-fashioned way.
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
For electronic it makes sense for the wires to not be exposed...at least to me. For mechanical shifting I certainly don't see it as an improvement, but what's so wrong about it? So many folks are bashing it, I just thought I would ask.

I was dreading running the cables on my new Chinese carbon frame (Cervelo design through and through), but it was stupid easy. The Cervelo-style cable management system is so damn good, it makes running the cables a total non-issue. And the cables are routed so they don't touch the inside walls of the tubes. No internal cable slap noise so far, so I am a happy camper. I did the routing before pressing in the bottom bracket along with its sleeve so I had the whole open BB shell to work in. That was pretty easy. It will be interesting to see how it goes to change out cables if I choose to leave the BB installed when I do that. But RMS13 reports that he ran the cables with the BB in place, so it can't be that big of a deal.
raria is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 06:33 AM
  #43  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,263

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 557 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21755 Post(s)
Liked 8,186 Times in 3,828 Posts
Originally Posted by raria
Is internal cabling worth it? I'm particularly interested if its worth it if you don't ride often in the rain. Infact I only ride in the rain if I get caught in it by mistake!
LIke most inquiries on here, the correct answer is "it depends."

I don't think rain is really a factor though.

p.s. this is a 3 year old thread, but possibly better than most threads that have been posted since then.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 06:56 AM
  #44  
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,517

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 707 Times in 501 Posts
The main problem with internal routing is that the hard work of doing it properly is invisible, just like the heinous sins of omission that more often occur. There's very little incentive beyond a good work ethic to do it right.

Also, the ways of doing it wrong include not just making maintenance a hassle, but also potentially stuffing up shift quality, an unthinkable proposition with external routing. Giant, of all companies, performed a monumental cock-up on the old Propel, where the shift housing from the bars meets a stop in the top tube, then goes through a couple of lengths of brake housing type stuff, just flopping around in the downtube. This mess, including the top tube stop, is just held in place with cable tension!

What a joke.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 07:12 AM
  #45  
I pedal in my sleep...
 
str8jakett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Radford VA
Posts: 637

Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced 2015, Giant Propel Advanced Pro 2015, Giant TCR Advanced 0 ISP 2008, Cube Cross Race SL 2018, Chapter2 TOA 2022

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 37 Posts
Yeah I hate the top tube cable stop on my Propels but it seems (from what I can see) that I have two full length aluminum housings running from those stops all the way to the bottom bracket where the FD cable will route through the plastic guide up through the seat tube and the RD cable into the chain stay. The housing is secured through the downtube as it isn't loose at all. I really appreciate all the internal routing (too the point of upgrading my handlebar to internal routing) but I could definitely do without the two cable loops diving into the top tube right behind the headset. Making these minimal and clean puts a lot of pressure on that top tube stop so it doesn't sit pretty.
str8jakett is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 07:36 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,199
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1306 Post(s)
Liked 311 Times in 210 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
For electronic it makes sense for the wires to not be exposed...at least to me. For mechanical shifting I certainly don't see it as an improvement, but what's so wrong about it? So many folks are bashing it, I just thought I would ask.

I was dreading running the cables on my new Chinese carbon frame (Cervelo design through and through), but it was stupid easy. The Cervelo-style cable management system is so damn good, it makes running the cables a total non-issue. And the cables are routed so they don't touch the inside walls of the tubes. No internal cable slap noise so far, so I am a happy camper. I did the routing before pressing in the bottom bracket along with its sleeve so I had the whole open BB shell to work in. That was pretty easy. It will be interesting to see how it goes to change out cables if I choose to leave the BB installed when I do that. But RMS13 reports that he ran the cables with the BB in place, so it can't be that big of a deal.
Your experiences may not reflect other ppls experiences. Lots of ppl have complained its a chore replacing cables on internally routed bikes. For instance, replacing the whole outer, brifter to rear DR, when you could in many cases just replace the loop, does seem like a chore to me.
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 07:54 AM
  #47  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
It's annoying. It's unlikely that to the average person, any possible gains of having the cables inside the frame could ever be offset by the hassle of dealing with installation/removal. Anyone who makes the claim that internal cables are as easy to run as traditional frame stops... is pulling our collective leg.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 08:22 AM
  #48  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,164

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10516 Post(s)
Liked 6,953 Times in 3,923 Posts
I have 2 road bikes from the mid/late 80s with internal rear brake routing.
both are pretty easy to set up. Just dont pull both the cable and housing st the same time. Keep on in the frame at all times and the other routes easily.
These are both full housing.

on the frame i built this winter, we set it up with internal rear brake housing, but with cable stops. The bare cable is routed inside the top tube with a thin tube of brass thats brazed to the cable stops.

its fantastic. But i dont race or need to replace the internal cables at the last second. That could be frustrating for sure.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 08:29 AM
  #49  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Man, what a blast from the past. I really talk too much.

But another thought: How often are you changing cables? If once or even twice a year on the extreme end, is the extra hassle really reducing your quality of life that much? If you know what you're doing on an already cabled bike and have the cable sheath stuff to run through the frame, you're only adding like a couple of minutes to the job.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 05-31-18, 08:38 AM
  #50  
Old Fart
 
Stucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by raria
Is internal cabling worth it? I'm particularly interested if its worth it if you don't ride often in the rain. Infact I only ride in the rain if I get caught in it by mistake!
It doesn't matter either way. Internal cabling has no practical benefits over traditional cabling- it's just an aesthetic thing- strictly for looks/fashion; a gimmick. And it just makes life more difficult when you need to change a cable. Bicycles are simple machines. They were perfected decades ago; the marketers keep coming up with new gimmicks and adding new technologies which often add nothing to the cycling experience (and often detract from it) just to have new features to tout, and to try and shame the fashion-conscious into buying the latest bikes.

So choose what you like. If you do your own maintenance and repair, the internal cabling will prove to be an unneeded headache, especially if you plan on keeping your bike for many years.
Stucky is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.