Recommend a pocket camera?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Recommend a pocket camera?
Here's what I'm after:
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
A used Sony RX100 will go for about $300 (or $400 new) and will fit in a jersey pocket or saddle pack. I can't think of any cheaper cameras that will take sharp and detailed 8x10 prints.
#3
Boots lost in transit
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 271
Bikes: 1989 Ritchey Outback, 2014 All-City Macho Man Disc, 2016 Wilier GTS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Here's what I'm after:
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
I'm sure there are plenty out there with great camera suggestions, but I hate carrying extra stuff if I don't have to.
#4
Vain, But Lacking Talent
The RX100 was my first thought as well. I don't know if it does 3:2 format shots (what I assume they mean by 2x3). Either way, it's the undisputed champ of pocket cameras if you can find one used for that price. I think they're on mark IV or something like that now.
#5
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Ricoh gr
Its smaller and lighter than the sony rx
And by smaller not just on paper dimension, but overall design is more streamlined than the rx
Has better grip on the body texture and design, and far superior 1-handed operation, than the sony
Has a snap-focus feature. Essentially you arent relying on AF for each shot.
Has a 28mm (equivalent) field of view
Should be slightly faster in operation than sony...
As far as printing 8x10....there hasnt been any camera in years that cant print sharply at that size. But at any rate this ones got a 16MP resolution captured on a large 2x3 aspect aps-c sensor
Its smaller and lighter than the sony rx
And by smaller not just on paper dimension, but overall design is more streamlined than the rx
Has better grip on the body texture and design, and far superior 1-handed operation, than the sony
Has a snap-focus feature. Essentially you arent relying on AF for each shot.
Has a 28mm (equivalent) field of view
Should be slightly faster in operation than sony...
As far as printing 8x10....there hasnt been any camera in years that cant print sharply at that size. But at any rate this ones got a 16MP resolution captured on a large 2x3 aspect aps-c sensor
#7
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
99 Posts
Here's what I'm after:
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...le-riding.html
I ended up getting a Canon S110 used on Ebay for about $150, they are even cheaper now.
I enjoy it and it takes photos that are noticeably sharper than my iPhone 6S, even though they're the same resolution. It's also tiny and fits into my jersey in a baggie without even being noticeable.
Since your budget is higher, you could easily afford an S120 which is improved in some areas. They're both still smaller sensors than the Sony Rx100, though, so the Sony's shots will a bit sharper in 8x12 prints but I have some perfectly lovely 8x12s at my desk right now that I shot with my S110 in Hawaii.
There are a couple of other options to look at.
The Ricoh GR is very pocketable and has a much larger sensor than any of the cameras mentioned here, it's APS-C so the same as many DSLRs, but it's fixed at 28mm focal length so you may not want that.
You can also look at the Canon G9X, it's the same size as the S110/20 but with the same 1 inch sensor as the Rx100. It's relatively new and I don't think you can find it for under $300, but worth checking.
Last thought- Nikon just announced a line of 1-inch sensor fixed lens cameras. There's one that has an 18-50mm lens that looks extremely interesting, but they will probably be $600+ when they are released.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Southern California
Posts: 254
Bikes: 2011 Specialized Roubaix Comp SRAM Rival, 2008 LeMond Victoire Dura Ace, 1994 Santana Sovereign Tandem, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Shimano Deore, 1975 Raleigh Super Course Mark II
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The RX100 was my first thought as well. I don't know if it does 3:2 format shots (what I assume they mean by 2x3). Either way, it's the undisputed champ of pocket cameras if you can find one used for that price. I think they're on mark IV or something like that now.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 Digital Camera (Black) DSCRX100/B B&H
Sony AG-R2 Attachment Grip AG-R2 B&H Photo Video
#9
Portland Fred
I've been liking my Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT5. I take it on ski and kayak trips all the time and it takes decent shots. Performance in the dark is subpar, and although I've rolled my boat with it out, I wouldn't want to take it snorkeling despite waterproof claims. The 5x optical zoom is nice.
This thing takes way better photos than any phone I've ever seen (iphones don't hold a candle to these), and it's way tougher and easier to use. It's not GoPro tough, but GoPros take such miserable pictures that they're not worth messing with. I'm taking my Lumix off the coast this weekend where storms will make for wild seas.
This thing takes way better photos than any phone I've ever seen (iphones don't hold a candle to these), and it's way tougher and easier to use. It's not GoPro tough, but GoPros take such miserable pictures that they're not worth messing with. I'm taking my Lumix off the coast this weekend where storms will make for wild seas.
Last edited by banerjek; 03-10-16 at 03:40 PM.
#10
Vain, But Lacking Talent
Me too-the Sony RX100 is highly capable, has a larger sensor than the vast majority of P&S cameras, shoots RAW, 20 MP, has great auto and manual modes, etc. I didn't jump right in because it is heavier than many P&S, though I do occasionally carry it with me without a problem. $398 right now at B & H. I would highly advise a grip for it, which will allow easier one handed operation. Excellent camera, better than a phone if you need that capability!
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 Digital Camera (Black) DSCRX100/B B&H
Sony AG-R2 Attachment Grip AG-R2 B&H Photo Video
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 Digital Camera (Black) DSCRX100/B B&H
Sony AG-R2 Attachment Grip AG-R2 B&H Photo Video
#11
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,983
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11954 Post(s)
Liked 6,611 Times
in
3,469 Posts
That was my first thought, too.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#12
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
99 Posts
I'll post a couple side by side photos from my 6s phone compared to my little S110 Canon, at normal web sizes they look similar but if you're printing you'll notice the far greater detail smearing on the iPhone photos. To be honest, I think my wife's iPhone 6 takes better shots than the 6s, they went up in resolution from 8 to 12 megapixels but it just adds noise and smudge.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,667
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6 .... Miyata One Thousand
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
22 Posts
I just bought a used Panasonic Lumix (Leica lens, 10 megapixels, wide angle, macro etc etc) .... paid £33 .... and am well impressed with the quality and much better pics that an Iphone ... nice and small aswell
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Did a little research real quick, it looks like the RX100 iii is when this camera got a 24 mm lens. Can't seem to find it for less than $700 new. Older ones are cheaper but they only go to 28 mm so they're off the table. Any thoughts where to look for a used one, if the local shops and craigslist don't pan out? I just checked adorama and keh, no luck. But this looks really promising.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I ended up getting a Canon S110 used on Ebay for about $150, they are even cheaper now.
...
Since your budget is higher, you could easily afford an S120 which is improved in some areas. They're both still smaller sensors than the Sony Rx100, though, so the Sony's shots will a bit sharper in 8x12 prints but I have some perfectly lovely 8x12s at my desk right now that I shot with my S110 in Hawaii.
...
Since your budget is higher, you could easily afford an S120 which is improved in some areas. They're both still smaller sensors than the Sony Rx100, though, so the Sony's shots will a bit sharper in 8x12 prints but I have some perfectly lovely 8x12s at my desk right now that I shot with my S110 in Hawaii.
I like the price too. My last three P&S cameras died after being abused in ways I knew would be really bad for them. But I got some pictures that were worth more to me than I paid for the cameras.
Thanks!
#18
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
99 Posts
Did a little research real quick, it looks like the RX100 iii is when this camera got a 24 mm lens. Can't seem to find it for less than $700 new. Older ones are cheaper but they only go to 28 mm so they're off the table. Any thoughts where to look for a used one, if the local shops and craigslist don't pan out? I just checked adorama and keh, no luck. But this looks really promising.
Look for the Canon S120- it starts at 24mm and they are selling for less than 300-
Canon PowerShot S120 12 1 MP Digital Camera Black Boxed 013803228991 | eBay
The G9X is just outside your price range, but it has the same sensor as the Rx100 and it starts at 24mm, it's also notably smaller/lighter-
Canon PowerShot G9X 20 2MP Compact HD Digital Camera w 3X Zoom Lens Superb 0013803247466 | eBay
#19
Serious Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308
Bikes: Emonda SL6
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
99 Posts
That makes a lot of sense, but there are a few issues I can't get over. Like I don't think any phone has a 24 mm wide angle, and that's a deal breaker right there.
Thanks for the suggestions! This sounds like a winner. I have a 5D3 and a 24 mm f/1.4 v2, I like the way Canons render colors and their low noise generally. And obviously the fact that these have the right wide angle.
I like the price too. My last three P&S cameras died after being abused in ways I knew would be really bad for them. But I got some pictures that were worth more to me than I paid for the cameras.
Thanks!
Thanks for the suggestions! This sounds like a winner. I have a 5D3 and a 24 mm f/1.4 v2, I like the way Canons render colors and their low noise generally. And obviously the fact that these have the right wide angle.
I like the price too. My last three P&S cameras died after being abused in ways I knew would be really bad for them. But I got some pictures that were worth more to me than I paid for the cameras.
Thanks!
Here's DPReview's sample gallery, you can view it at 8X12 size on your monitor to decide whether it meets your print needs.
Sample galleries: Digital Photography Review
It isn't as good in low light as the Rx100/G9X, but if you're using it on the bike that shouldn't be an issue since who the hell rides at night? Oh, wait...
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18353 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
It is a little bulky for a phone, but well worth it.
The S5/K Zoom is a little slicker, 3x the cost.
S4 Zoom Specs:
4.3" 540x960 screen
16 MP, 10x optical zoom camera 24 - 240 mm
Android
8gb memory + MicroSD
GSM (ATT/T-Mobile)
S5/K Zoom Specs
4.8" 720x1280 screen
20.7 MP, 10x optical zoom, 24-240mm
8gb + MicroSD
GSM (ATT/T-Mobile)
I use E-Bay phones. I get a significant discount on monthly rates based on using my own phone.
One other option I've experimented with is the Samsung Galaxy GC110/120/200
They are a nice smart camera with full Android features. The GC120 is Verizon (CMDA) enabled, allowing roaming internet connectivity, but lacking the phone features. The other two are just WIFI enabled.
The GC110/120 are quite a bit bulkier than the S4 Zoom.
16.3 MP
21x optical Zoom
f = 4.1 ~ 86.1mm (35mm film equivalent : 23 ~ 483mm)
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Northern California
Posts: 145
Bikes: RitcheyAscent, FisherMontare
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
iPhones only offer optical image stabilization (IS) w/the 6S. The Canon S100, S110, or S120 have it as well as the 24mm FOV you want. IS is a must in a small, light camera, IMO. I've used the S100 for several years and am satisfied.
Keep in mind that any posted example photos are irrelevent when your objective is printing. Screen resolution is low, while you'll need a minimum ~200 dpi for quality prints (~3.2 megapixels for an 8x10 print from the full frame). I use RAW format and PhotoShop/LightRoom to make sharp 14 x 17" prints from the S100. You may be satisfied w/results from the Canon jpegs - many are.
There are many pocketable quality cameras out there. The Canon S100/110/120 is one good choice, IMO.
Keep in mind that any posted example photos are irrelevent when your objective is printing. Screen resolution is low, while you'll need a minimum ~200 dpi for quality prints (~3.2 megapixels for an 8x10 print from the full frame). I use RAW format and PhotoShop/LightRoom to make sharp 14 x 17" prints from the S100. You may be satisfied w/results from the Canon jpegs - many are.
There are many pocketable quality cameras out there. The Canon S100/110/120 is one good choice, IMO.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344
Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times
in
189 Posts
Here's what I'm after:
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
* 24 mm field of view
* Good 8x12 inch prints
* Able to frame the shot in 2x3 mode
* Comfortable in a pocket while riding (why I'm asking here instead of on dpreview)
Mostly I'll use it on the bike. Also occasionally on hikes when I don't want to bring my SLR. I'm looking to spend $300 or less because I'm hard on point and shoots, it probably won't last a year.
My phone takes disappointing pictures, I finally have a gravel bike, and spring is in the air which means some of the nicer rides are starting to open up.
#24
Senior Member
Canon Powershot N would be a budget option (only 28mm though). Very small and perfect for a jersey pocket.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerSho.../dp/B00AWYN2CW
I just bought one for exactly this purpose. Cheap, compact, and just beats my phone for pictures (Nexus 5X, generally considered a good camera).
Smartphones have decent cameras, but usability really fails. Its basically impossible to use a smartphone one-handed (try it). Oh, and if I drop/damage it, it was $130. I've got a 6D for when I really want to take good pictures. The Sony and Ricoh options looked good, but I personally couldn't justify the cost for marginal uses. I've already got a smartphone and DSLR, buying another ~$400 camera is a bit too much.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerSho.../dp/B00AWYN2CW
I just bought one for exactly this purpose. Cheap, compact, and just beats my phone for pictures (Nexus 5X, generally considered a good camera).
Smartphones have decent cameras, but usability really fails. Its basically impossible to use a smartphone one-handed (try it). Oh, and if I drop/damage it, it was $130. I've got a 6D for when I really want to take good pictures. The Sony and Ricoh options looked good, but I personally couldn't justify the cost for marginal uses. I've already got a smartphone and DSLR, buying another ~$400 camera is a bit too much.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18353 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
I'm not sure why one couldn't do most of the S4 Zoom operations with one hand. It has a real button for taking photos. The around lens zoom feature is odd, but pretty easy to use. Anyway, it doesn't seem to be any more complex than any other camera with a multitude of features.