Dura Ace vs Ultegra
03-31-16, 04:39 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Dura Ace vs Ultegra
Trying to decide, thought some here might have some helpful feedback.
What is important to me is, primarily, function. Bling doesn't matter. Impressing others doesn't matter. Comparisons with others' bikes and componentry doesn't matter.
Fine workmanship matters, but is not exactly primary. Feel matters -- smoothness matters.
Money factors in -- I can afford the Dura Ace, but I don't like wasting money. If Dura Ace were slightly more, it wouldn't be an issue; but it is a lot more.
Durability matters. I am more familiar with Shimano XT and XTR componentry. XT can be more durable. XTR is lighter and more race-oriented. I am not familiar enough with Dura Ace vs Ultegra in these areas.
Thanks in advance for any helpful input.
What is important to me is, primarily, function. Bling doesn't matter. Impressing others doesn't matter. Comparisons with others' bikes and componentry doesn't matter.
Fine workmanship matters, but is not exactly primary. Feel matters -- smoothness matters.
Money factors in -- I can afford the Dura Ace, but I don't like wasting money. If Dura Ace were slightly more, it wouldn't be an issue; but it is a lot more.
Durability matters. I am more familiar with Shimano XT and XTR componentry. XT can be more durable. XTR is lighter and more race-oriented. I am not familiar enough with Dura Ace vs Ultegra in these areas.
Thanks in advance for any helpful input.
03-31-16, 04:56 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 535
Bikes: 2015 Redline Conquest Elite; 2014 Fuji Tahoe 1.1 27.5er; 2006 Scott Speedster S30 (sold); 2001 Specialized S-Works CX; 1990 Trek 750 (sold); 1999 Bianchi Volpe; 1988 Bianchi Campione D'Italia.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm sure others will chime in to disagree, but if you think of them like XT vs XTR, you're not too far off the mark.
03-31-16, 05:17 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 530
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by lightspree
Trying to decide, thought some here might have some helpful feedback.
What is important to me is, primarily, function. Bling doesn't matter. Impressing others doesn't matter. Comparisons with others' bikes and componentry doesn't matter.
Fine workmanship matters, but is not exactly primary. Feel matters -- smoothness matters.
Money factors in -- I can afford the Dura Ace, but I don't like wasting money. If Dura Ace were slightly more, it wouldn't be an issue; but it is a lot more.
Durability matters. I am more familiar with Shimano XT and XTR componentry. XT can be more durable. XTR is lighter and more race-oriented. I am not familiar enough with Dura Ace vs Ultegra in these areas.
Thanks in advance for any helpful input.
What is important to me is, primarily, function. Bling doesn't matter. Impressing others doesn't matter. Comparisons with others' bikes and componentry doesn't matter.
Fine workmanship matters, but is not exactly primary. Feel matters -- smoothness matters.
Money factors in -- I can afford the Dura Ace, but I don't like wasting money. If Dura Ace were slightly more, it wouldn't be an issue; but it is a lot more.
Durability matters. I am more familiar with Shimano XT and XTR componentry. XT can be more durable. XTR is lighter and more race-oriented. I am not familiar enough with Dura Ace vs Ultegra in these areas.
Thanks in advance for any helpful input.
03-31-16, 05:17 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Middletown NY
Posts: 1,495
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix EVO w Hi-Mod frame, Raleigh Tamland 1 and Giant Anthem X
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
****.... because this will go south quickly
03-31-16, 05:36 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Ultegra will probably do everything you need it to but I have never regretted buying premium stuff...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
03-31-16, 05:39 PM
#9
Achtung!
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
Posts: 1,553
Bikes: 60.1, Marvel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 214 Times
in
129 Posts
I bought 6800 because most of the articles I read said it operated very close to 9000, but with a weight penalty that I didn't feel was material for my riding.
03-31-16, 05:48 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you're going mechanical, Ultegra. If you're looking at electronic, wait for the Dura Ace refresh later this year (I'd still go with the Ultegra chainring/cassette though)IMO.
03-31-16, 05:53 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109
Bikes: s-1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ultegra, or save some serious money and go 5800, as the 105 is now 11spd. if you look closely a lot of "ultegra" and "DA" bikes use 105 cassettes and chains now to save a few bucks.
03-31-16, 06:02 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
when picking a group for my last build, I went Ultegra 10 because the crank was more aesthetically pleasing to me than the DA version.
but, I did go DA C24 for wheels.
but, I did go DA C24 for wheels.
03-31-16, 06:08 PM
#14
Boots lost in transit
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 271
Bikes: 1989 Ritchey Outback, 2014 All-City Macho Man Disc, 2016 Wilier GTS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by patrickgm60
Between the two, I'd start with Ultegra, except, perhaps, for the wheels. My only DA component is a set of C24 clinchers.
Likes For tiiger:
03-31-16, 06:26 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,420
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3351 Post(s)
Liked 365 Times
in
248 Posts
Ultegra sounds like what you want. The DA finish is a bit nicer and it is a bit lighter, but the durability is about the same, or edge to Ultegra.
Best I know they are interchangeable. We have both sets and I have not had the need to swap them.
Best I know they are interchangeable. We have both sets and I have not had the need to swap them.
03-31-16, 06:41 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,911
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4695 Post(s)
Liked 1,863 Times
in
992 Posts
Originally Posted by FLvector
Ultegra. Unless you're a weight weenie.
Weight, bling, and cost are really the only appreciable differences between 9000 and 6800. I use Ultegra because the difference isn't worth the cost to me. If I was buying Di2 versions though, the weight difference might change my choice.
03-31-16, 07:06 PM
#18
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,514
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1019 Post(s)
Liked 1,627 Times
in
1,124 Posts
I've got both. After more than four years the DA works a little better and feels a little more solid. The finish on DA looks new. But both function well.
03-31-16, 07:09 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,911
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4695 Post(s)
Liked 1,863 Times
in
992 Posts
Originally Posted by rms13
105 unless you're a weight weenie
I haven't done the math, but is the price to weight difference $1 per gram? That is the budget WeightWeenie measuring stick I go by.
I can justify $100 to cut 100g of weight.
03-31-16, 07:25 PM
#20
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,514
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1019 Post(s)
Liked 1,627 Times
in
1,124 Posts
I posted DA held up slightly better for me. Then I remembered I used the Ultegra bike for two years at the Cheaspeake Bay in the salt air and some sand. So that probably accounts for the difference.
03-31-16, 07:46 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,911
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4695 Post(s)
Liked 1,863 Times
in
992 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
I posted DA held up slightly better for me. Then I remembered I used the Ultegra bike for two years at the Cheaspeake Bay in the salt air and some sand. So that probably accounts for the difference.
Does that make sense?
03-31-16, 07:48 PM
#22
Kit doesn't match
The folks at Art's Cyclery offered this and their picks for "the best value Shimano road components":
Rear Derailleur: 105 5800
Front Derailleur: Dura Ace 9000
Shifters/Brake Levers: Dura Ace 9001 or 105 5800 depending on budget
Cassette: Ultegra 6800
Chain: Ultegra 6800
Crankset: Ultegra 6800
Brakeset: 105 5800
So when I bought a new groupset I went all Ultegra except for shifters, where I coughed up the extra $100 for DA.
Art's Cyclery Blog » Shimano Road Components ? Where to Spend Your Money
Rear Derailleur: 105 5800
Front Derailleur: Dura Ace 9000
Shifters/Brake Levers: Dura Ace 9001 or 105 5800 depending on budget
Cassette: Ultegra 6800
Chain: Ultegra 6800
Crankset: Ultegra 6800
Brakeset: 105 5800
So when I bought a new groupset I went all Ultegra except for shifters, where I coughed up the extra $100 for DA.
Art's Cyclery Blog » Shimano Road Components ? Where to Spend Your Money
03-31-16, 07:54 PM
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,911
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4695 Post(s)
Liked 1,863 Times
in
992 Posts
Originally Posted by GuitarBob
The folks at Art's Cyclery offered this and their picks for "the best value Shimano road components":
Rear Derailleur: 105 5800
Front Derailleur: Dura Ace 9000
Shifters/Brake Levers: Dura Ace 9001 or 105 5800 depending on budget
Cassette: Ultegra 6800
Chain: Ultegra 6800
Crankset: Ultegra 6800
Brakeset: 105 5800
So when I bought a new groupset I went all Ultegra except for shifters, where I coughed up the extra $100 for DA.
Art's Cyclery Blog » Shimano Road Components ? Where to Spend Your Money
Rear Derailleur: 105 5800
Front Derailleur: Dura Ace 9000
Shifters/Brake Levers: Dura Ace 9001 or 105 5800 depending on budget
Cassette: Ultegra 6800
Chain: Ultegra 6800
Crankset: Ultegra 6800
Brakeset: 105 5800
So when I bought a new groupset I went all Ultegra except for shifters, where I coughed up the extra $100 for DA.
Art's Cyclery Blog » Shimano Road Components ? Where to Spend Your Money
Back with 6600 and 7800 shifters, the difference was obvious. What parameter influenced the 9001 upgrade?
03-31-16, 08:07 PM
#24
Kit doesn't match
Originally Posted by noodle soup
just curious, why the 9001 shifter over 6800.
Back with 6600 and 7800 shifters, the difference was obvious. What parameter influenced the 9001 upgrade?
Back with 6600 and 7800 shifters, the difference was obvious. What parameter influenced the 9001 upgrade?
Two things, really. First, I had read that materials were modestly better in the internals of the DA shifters, so they might be less likely to fail over the long term (who knows). Second, I had ridden 6800 so I knew front and rear shifting were excellent, though I thought the action of the shifters was ever so slightly imprecise (they work freaking great, don't get me wrong); I had hoped DA might be slightly better. Is it? Maybe. A little.
03-31-16, 08:13 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,911
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4695 Post(s)
Liked 1,863 Times
in
992 Posts
Originally Posted by GuitarBob
Fair question -- if I had a compelling answer I would have included it in my original comment ;-)
Two things, really. First, I had read that materials were modestly better in the internals of the DA shifters, so they might be less likely to fail over the long term (who knows). Second, I had ridden 6800 so I knew front and rear shifting were excellent, though I thought the action of the shifters was ever so slightly imprecise (they work freaking great, don't get me wrong); I had hoped DA might be slightly better. Is it? Maybe. A little.
Two things, really. First, I had read that materials were modestly better in the internals of the DA shifters, so they might be less likely to fail over the long term (who knows). Second, I had ridden 6800 so I knew front and rear shifting were excellent, though I thought the action of the shifters was ever so slightly imprecise (they work freaking great, don't get me wrong); I had hoped DA might be slightly better. Is it? Maybe. A little.
Both 6800 and 9001 work so well that it's very difficult to tell the difference. Longevity might be different, but with 25k miles on my 6800 shifters, I can't feel a difference in performance yet
