Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Surprising results after dropping bars 2"

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Surprising results after dropping bars 2"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-16, 06:49 AM
  #1  
wears long socks
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Surprising results after dropping bars 2"

I got back into road cycling last year and after working pretty hard last Summer, I got my average speed on a 25 mile (fairly hilly) ride to 16.75mph.

I have an H2 (tall head tube) Trek that I rode all of last year. I have the stem "slammed" but wanted to go lower.

I decided this winter to track down an old frame that matched the first bike I owned and built it up for sentimental reasons.

It's a much racier geometry and being 6'3" I was able to get the bars much lower while still keeping the fit within what I can comfortably ride.

After shaking it down and riding my regular loop 3 times this year, my average speed is 17.25mph.

The bikes weight almost exactly the same, with the new one being about 1lb heavier.

I didn't ride this winter due to coaching a basketball team.

Maybe the .5mph is coming from the lower bars, maybe not.. I just find it very interesting that I now finish with a higher speed, less fatigue and nearly all things are equal except my fitness which is actually lower.
69chevy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 07:00 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Same tires on both bikes?

Even though .5 mph on one ride is not a lot to hang your hat on, I have no trouble believing it. Two inches makes a big difference in position if you're flexible enough to ride lower and it sounds like you are.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 07:04 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've found that being in a motivated state of mind is good for at least another 15-30W. When you're happy on your bike, things just sorta click.

Originally Posted by wphamilton
Two inches makes a big difference in position if you're flexible enough
giggity.
silversx80 is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 07:06 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 2,076
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You're up .5mph on your average speed? That's probably about a 41 watt increase I'd guess.
therhodeo is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 07:52 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times in 395 Posts
My average speed usually varies by at least .5mph on every ride on the same bike.
Lazyass is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:12 AM
  #6  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
I felt like I got faster when I took the spacers out from under my stem-- but I'm now pretty sure it was placebo effect. The bike fits better now, so I'm more comfortable, but I don't think it improved my aerodynamics to such a degree as to actually improve my speed. My daily rides fall into a +/-1.5mph range, so I can't say that any one thing is responsible for gains or losses... other than the engine, which is a weird aggregation of parts that has radically different power output levels from one day to another. Some days it feels easier to average 19mph than it does to do 15mph on others. The bike is just sort of along for the ride.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:17 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
Two things I would add:

1. Just because your bars are lower does not necessarily mean you're more 'aero.'

2. If you want to get lower on the Trek you could just get a different stem. An 'H2' geometry can be made 'aggressive,' head tube size is not all that matters.
PepeM is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:36 AM
  #8  
wears long socks
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
Two things I would add:

1. Just because your bars are lower does not necessarily mean you're more 'aero.'

2. If you want to get lower on the Trek you could just get a different stem. An 'H2' geometry can be made 'aggressive,' head tube size is not all that matters.
The stem on my Trek is slammed and-17.

I didn't build my new bike to get lower, I was just able to because of the lower head tube.

I don't know I am more aero, I just know for the last three rides, I am faster and fresher when I finish.

It may have nothing to do with the drop.

Going from 5" to 7" seat to bar drop isn't a "huge" difference, but it seems to be affecting me since tires, wheels, gearing are all the same.
69chevy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:42 AM
  #9  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
The stem on my Trek is slammed and-17.

I didn't build my new bike to get lower, I was just able to because of the lower head tube.

I don't know I am more aero, I just know for the last three rides, I am faster and fresher when I finish.

It may have nothing to do with the drop.

Going from 5" to 7" seat to bar drop isn't a "huge" difference, but it seems to be affecting me since tires, wheels, gearing are all the same.
I've got an H2 geometry frame, probably the same size as yours (60cm, same height as you). Have you ever looked into getting a lower topcap to cover the integrated headset bearing? I'm not sure if the design allows for it, but the topcap seems to add maybe half an inch of unnecessary height that I'd be interested in cutting down at some point. Mine has an FSA headset, I imagine yours is similar.
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:43 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
bmthom.gis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 2,977

Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 Rival; 2014 Cannondale Trail 7 29; 1972 Schwinn Suburban, 1996 Proflex 756, 1987(?) Peugeot, Dahon Speed P8; 1979 Raleigh Competition GS; 1995 Stumpjumper M2 FS, 1978 Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Prologue

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
You aren't riding low until you're riding @timtak level of low.
bmthom.gis is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:46 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
I would say 2 extra inches of drop is a considerable change fitwise, although the taller you are the smaller of a difference it makes I guess.
PepeM is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:46 AM
  #12  
wears long socks
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
I've got an H2 geometry frame, probably the same size as yours (60cm, same height as you). Have you ever looked into getting a lower topcap to cover the integrated headset bearing? I'm not sure if the design allows for it, but the topcap seems to add maybe half an inch of unnecessary height that I'd be interested in cutting down at some point. Mine has an FSA headset, I imagine yours is similar.
I already have the Cobb 5mm cap on it.
69chevy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:48 AM
  #13  
wears long socks
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
I would say 2 extra inches of drop is a considerable change fitwise, although the taller you are the smaller of a difference it makes I guess.
I'm tall, long torso, long arms (37 sleeve dress shirt).
69chevy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:52 AM
  #14  
wears long socks
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazyass
My average speed usually varies by at least .5mph on every ride on the same bike.
For sure. This was last years average over 6 rides, against 3 ride average this year.

I know it's not a lot of data. Just a casual observation
69chevy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 08:59 AM
  #15  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
I already have the Cobb 5mm cap on it.
Where did you find that cap, and does it fit over the bearing without issue? I'd love to get a little lower as well.
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 09:16 AM
  #16  
wears long socks
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
Where did you find that cap, and does it fit over the bearing without issue? I'd love to get a little lower as well.
5mm Top Cap - Cobb Cycling

It comes with "micro shims".

Add one at a time until the cap no longer touches the head tube.
69chevy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 09:57 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
The stem on my Trek is slammed and-17.

I didn't build my new bike to get lower, I was just able to because of the lower head tube.

I don't know I am more aero, I just know for the last three rides, I am faster and fresher when I finish.

It may have nothing to do with the drop.

Going from 5" to 7" seat to bar drop isn't a "huge" difference, but it seems to be affecting me since tires, wheels, gearing are all the same.
As long as you don't consider a 40% increase huge... BTW, you are now in the Adam Hansen and Ryder Hesyedal range of drop, so more than most professional riders today. Not that there is anything wrong with that, if you are finding your new position comfortable, of course.
Fiery is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 10:17 AM
  #18  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,532

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Yep. That's why trad road position is what it is: faster and more comfortable. That you can use it simply means that you are fit. Good on 'ya.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 05-25-16, 10:31 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
OP, you are seeing the revelation I saw when I got my Fuji Professional mid-season of my second year of racing. Fit rules! I will bet that the bars being 2" lower is not the only difference between your two bikes. But more important, you just learned some key information about your body and what works for you.

Document it! Measure up that bike. Specifically, measure: Distance to seat vertically and horizontally from the bottom bracket. Same to handlebar tops. Note the seat you have and handlebars (reach, drop and width - drop and width may not have options for your particular bars).

Now, someone could steal your bike and you know what you are looking for if you have to get another. Get the seat in that right place and likewise the handlebars (quite possibly using a very different stem) and your next bike will be as fast. It's all about the engine and the engine here is the combination of your body and the bike that is supporting it. Small differences can make real differences in horsepower, both max and comfortable sustained. Aerodynamics also plays into this but 2" of HB drop isn't a huge aero difference.

I got my racing bike with radically different geometry than anything I had ever ridden and was immediately taking minutes off my 45 mile training loop. Same wheels. Almost the same weight. But it was right for this body and I have used what I learned from that bike as my template ever since.

Ben
79pmooney is online now  
Old 05-25-16, 05:40 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
timtak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yamaguchi City, Japan
Posts: 1,091

Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2 SL 2007, Look KG386, R022 Re-framed Azzurri Primo, Felt Z5, Trek F7.3 FX

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 404 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 73 Posts
Originally Posted by 69chevy
The stem on my Trek is slammed and-17.
I have a spare 150mm -30 stem (and home made angled spacer).
Slamthatstem by
Timothy Takemoto
, on Flickr
timtak is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZapoTeX
Road Cycling
15
12-01-16 01:26 PM
WVU_Engineer
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
40
07-08-16 01:28 PM
Frizlefrak
Fifty Plus (50+)
8
10-16-14 08:25 PM
treadtread
General Cycling Discussion
21
09-03-13 10:24 AM
stapfam
Fifty Plus (50+)
9
06-09-10 02:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.