Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Best Bottom Bracket For Build?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Best Bottom Bracket For Build?

Old 06-22-16, 06:54 PM
  #1  
nzube14
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Best Bottom Bracket For Build?

I'm building a new road bike wth a 6800 groupset and Bowman Palace gray frame. The bottom bracket is Press-Fit BB86, and I've slimmed down my choices of bottom brackets to:

Shimano BB86 PressFit ($20)
Hope PF41 Ceramic ($125)
Wheels Mfg. Angular Contact Bearings ($83)
Wheels Mfg. Ceramic ($78)

I've read that angular contact bearings usually last longer especially when pedaling side to side, but I have read that ceramic bearings have significantly less friction. Can't make up my mind

If ceramic is the way to go, why should (or shouldn't) I get the Hope PF41 ceramic if the Wheels Mfg. ceramic is much cheaper?

EDIT: Intended use of bike is commuting, endurance runs, little "racing"

Last edited by nzube14; 06-22-16 at 06:55 PM. Reason: Bike purpose
nzube14 is offline  
Old 06-23-16, 09:40 AM
  #2  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,604

Bikes: Alps, JP Routens, ANT, various Schwinns

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 470 Times in 272 Posts
You won't actually feel the difference between normal and ceramic or angular bearing BBs, nor will they give you a performance advantage for your uses.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Old 06-23-16, 10:04 AM
  #3  
rms13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,517
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by TenGrainBread
You won't actually feel the difference between normal and ceramic or angular bearing BBs, nor will they give you a performance advantage for your uses.
Yeah, ceramic bearings are probably the #1 scam in cycling. Worst $ spent on upgrades. There is no noticeable weight or performance difference. Maybe you get some longevity, but at what cost? I've had bottom brackets on bikes that where 10-20 years old before they needed to be replaced. Even if you are riding bad conditions and say you need to replace after 3-5 years if you getting BB that cost $20-50 you can go through several before you get up to the price of ceramic
rms13 is offline  
Old 06-23-16, 11:10 AM
  #4  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1187 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Shimano press fit BB. Loctite it in place for best probability of quiet free operation.
Save the rest of your money for tires
Campag4life is offline  
Old 06-23-16, 03:19 PM
  #5  
smarkinson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,003
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 332 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
I saw something about bb drag recently. Couldn't find the exact article but I found this:
https://www.bikeradar.com/au/road/gear/article/friction-facts-measuring-bottom-bracket-drag-39233/
Unfortunately the individual results are behind a paywall but the basics are the best steel bb had a drag of 0.32 Watts while the best ceramic bb had a drag of 0.29 Watts. The worst bb was 1.64 watts but that was an outlier. The average drag was 0.77 Watts.
More interestingly is that of the five manufacturers who had comparable steel and ceramic models three of them had lower drag for the steel rather than the ceramic.
smarkinson is offline  
Old 06-24-16, 03:39 PM
  #6  
nzube14
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks everyone. Forgot to add that I already have the Shimano press fit BB. It's plastic. Just wondering if I should replace it with another, metal bottom bracket, or just keep it. I've seen bike builds of the Bowman Palace use the Hope BB, and now that the Pound has tanked, I could get the Hope PF41 for ~$111. Any thoughts?
nzube14 is offline  
Old 06-24-16, 04:16 PM
  #7  
rms13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,517
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nzube14
Thanks everyone. Forgot to add that I already have the Shimano press fit BB. It's plastic. Just wondering if I should replace it with another, metal bottom bracket, or just keep it. I've seen bike builds of the Bowman Palace use the Hope BB, and now that the Pound has tanked, I could get the Hope PF41 for ~$111. Any thoughts?
Plastic is lighter then metal and $111 is 3-4 times as much as I would pay for a bottom bracket
rms13 is offline  
Old 06-24-16, 06:04 PM
  #8  
nzube14
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rms13
Plastic is lighter then metal and $111 is 3-4 times as much as I would pay for a bottom bracket
Thanks for the reply. Think I'll stick with my plastic BB then
nzube14 is offline  
Old 06-24-16, 07:18 PM
  #9  
noodle soup
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,915
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4698 Post(s)
Liked 1,877 Times in 995 Posts
T47 is the bottom bracket standard you want.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 06-24-16, 07:51 PM
  #10  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 20,369

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8844 Post(s)
Liked 3,360 Times in 1,814 Posts
Originally Posted by rms13
Yeah, ceramic bearings are probably the #1 scam in cycling. Worst $ spent on upgrades. There is no noticeable weight or performance difference. Maybe you get some longevity, but at what cost? I've had bottom brackets on bikes that where 10-20 years old before they needed to be replaced. Even if you are riding bad conditions and say you need to replace after 3-5 years if you getting BB that cost $20-50 you can go through several before you get up to the price of ceramic
The Shimano BB is AG's P3 went bad in a year. Probably due to water ingress. That said, how many times could I replace it for the cost of ceramics? Six? Effitol.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spectastic
Bicycle Mechanics
19
04-24-16 11:17 AM
Ronno6
Bicycle Mechanics
11
12-15-13 04:46 PM
lobstermike
Tandem Cycling
2
06-03-12 12:41 PM
benajah
Touring
23
02-14-11 10:11 PM
operator
Bicycle Mechanics
3
12-14-09 01:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.