![]() |
Group ride pace
I'm contemplating joining a club for some group rides. This is posted on their website:
Groups are usually organized by speed and distance. ‘A’ groups are the fastest and longest (approximately 90-110km at an average speed in the low 30’s kph). ‘B’ is the intermediate group (60-80km at an average in the high 20’s kph), followed by ‘C’, the slowest (about 60km at an average in the low 20’s kph). Within each category of A, B and C we may break the groups down into subgroups (e.g. A1, A2 etc). Our goal is to have groups of 8 to 10 compatible riders (with a maximum of 16). So I'm curious, when they say average in the low 30's kph, is this the speed they normally maintain on flats, or is it like actual average, entire ride distance/total time? Obviously, having never ridden in a group I'd start with Group C to learn the ropes, but I'm just wondering |
It would very much depend on WHO shows up for the different groups.
Give it a try. You may make some new riding friends. |
The fact that they say average probably indicates an average speed, if you are in a flat area, then an average pace of 30kph sounds fast, but if you are only pulling on front 1/10 of that time, it will take the same energy as averaging 22-25kph by yourself. Still, it's no place for an beginning rider...it probably would include some times reaching up near 40kph on flats.
But as said, if the ride splits, the slower group would be the ones not wanting to push that hard. |
Usually the avg speed... How hard that is depends on the route and number of riders. Going with the C would be a good intro. Then maybe ask one of the people who did the other groups after to see what they actually did.
12strings you see that he said Kph not Mph right.. 30kph is only 18.5 avg.. on a flat ride that would be the B group on the club/shop rides in my area. |
Ride average
And those are pretty good stratification for training ride |
Should be ride average. I suggest you pick a ride pace that is a bit on the easy side first. Move up as you get a sense of the "real" pace.
|
Don't discount distance either...
I could ride at your describe A speed for about 40 km, but not for 100km, probably not even 60. |
Haven't made up my mind about joining. It be something different for me as I always ride solo. I'm just still unsure about trusting myself (and others) to be in such close quarters.
As far as my own pace is concerned I am normally in the high 20's kph riding solo, up to 100 km, on moderately hilly terrain, so I'd probably settle into the B Group after learning the ropes. It may or may not happen. We'll see. Thanks for your comments. |
Originally Posted by mcours2006
(Post 18933454)
Groups are usually organized by speed and distance.
‘A’ groups are the fastest and longest (approximately 90-110km at an average speed in the low 30’s kph). ‘B’ is the intermediate group (60-80km at an average in the high 20’s kph), followed by ‘C’, the slowest (about 60km at an average in the low 20’s kph). Within each category of A, B and C we may break the groups down into subgroups (e.g. A1, A2 etc). Our goal is to have groups of 8 to 10 compatible riders (with a maximum of 16). Just because I can't ride 22 MPH average doesn't mean that I want to do a shorter ride. |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 18933810)
I don't understand why clubs and ride organizers always assume that those who can't ride as fast are incapable of riding longer miles.
Just because I can't ride 22 MPH average doesn't mean that I want to do a shorter ride. |
Start slow, work your way up.
Postings like that are notorious for not representing actual speeds. I would take the intent to be that their average as shown on their bike speedometers is that speed at the end of the ride. And they may go substantially faster at times. And they may go substantially faster uphill into a headwind, for that matter, it just all depends on the riders. |
Originally Posted by mcours2006
(Post 18933454)
I'm contemplating joining a club for some group rides. This is posted on their website:
Groups are usually organized by speed and distance. ‘A’ groups are the fastest and longest (approximately 90-110km at an average speed in the low 30’s kph). ‘B’ is the intermediate group (60-80km at an average in the high 20’s kph), followed by ‘C’, the slowest (about 60km at an average in the low 20’s kph). Within each category of A, B and C we may break the groups down into subgroups (e.g. A1, A2 etc). Our goal is to have groups of 8 to 10 compatible riders (with a maximum of 16). So I'm curious, when they say average in the low 30's kph, is this the speed they normally maintain on flats, or is it like actual average, entire ride distance/total time? Obviously, having never ridden in a group I'd start with Group C to learn the ropes, but I'm just wondering 2. Groups always inflate their advertised avg pace (delusions of grandeur). 3. Clarify that it is a no-drop ride and you'll be fine. 4. Enjoy! |
Originally Posted by mcours2006
(Post 18933799)
Haven't made up my mind about joining. It be something different for me as I always ride solo. I'm just still unsure about trusting myself (and others) to be in such close quarters.
As far as my own pace is concerned I am normally in the high 20's kph riding solo, up to 100 km, on moderately hilly terrain, so I'd probably settle into the B Group after learning the ropes. It may or may not happen. We'll see. Thanks for your comments. |
Originally Posted by mcours2006
(Post 18933822)
Is this not a logical assumption? Beginner tend to ride slower and also shorter distances. Sure, one can ride 100 kph at 20 km/h, and one can certainly ride 35 kph for 50 km. But it's uncommon as I imagine not many are interested in doing 20 kph for five hours, or doing a fast ride for an hour unless that's part of the training.
I didn't say anything about beginners and have been riding road bikes for 39 years. Beginner is your assumption. You did exactly what mentioned in my previous post. Just because I can't hold a 22 MPH pace doesn't mean that I can't ride a metric century. The same is true of many people I ride with. Not only am I capable of riding 100km at 17MPH, I and many of the people I ride with are quite happy to do so. Just because we are not fast doesn't mean we are beginners. -Tim- |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 18934009)
I didn't say anything about beginners and have been riding road bikes for 39 years. Beginner is your assumption. You did exactly what mentioned in my previous post.
Just because I can't hold a 22 MPH pace doesn't mean that I can't ride a metric century. The same is true of many people I ride with. Not only am I capable of riding 100km at 17MPH, I and many of the people I ride with are quite happy to do so. Just because we are not fast doesn't mean we are beginners. -Tim- FWIW 27+ kph for 100 km is not slow, at least not to me. |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 18934009)
Just because I can't hold a 22 MPH pace doesn't mean that I can't ride a metric century. The same is true of many people I ride with. Not only am I capable of riding 100km at 17MPH, I and many of the people I ride with are quite happy to do so.
Just because we are not fast doesn't mean we are beginners. -Tim- and it sure reflects local observation and my own progression here. maybe the pace and distance you describe represents some sort of audax/randon-inspired type riding, but those kind of riders arent the ones interested in joining the common local groups, anyway |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 18934009)
I didn't say anything about beginners and have been riding road bikes for 39 years. Beginner is your assumption. You did exactly what mentioned in my previous post.
Just because I can't hold a 22 MPH pace doesn't mean that I can't ride a metric century. The same is true of many people I ride with. Not only am I capable of riding 100km at 17MPH, I and many of the people I ride with are quite happy to do so. Just because we are not fast doesn't mean we are beginners. -Tim- |
Do not co-mingle experienced group riders and beginners unless it is a "beginners" ride.*
*Confucius say |
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 18933945)
Honestly, if you are reasonably fit, i'd ask about hanging with the B group. Hang at the back if you have to for a bit, but there's little that you can learn from that C group.
|
I did a couple of rides here with the BikeRoswell group, a pleasant group of folks during the rides but the C ride was slow, short, frequent stops - boring. B group was faster but not really the advertised pace with the regrouping stops, nor was the A bunch in my opinion except on a few flat stretches.
I gather that every riding group puts their own take on this, and [MENTION=381746]mcours2006[/MENTION] basically has to try it and see. i really think that the concern about learning group riding is overblown for anyone with enough solo miles since at least half of the group riders I observed in all of the groups were, to my eye, a little sketchy in handling skills. |
Originally Posted by mcours2006
(Post 18933822)
Haven't made up my mind about joining. It be something different for me as I always ride solo. I'm just still unsure about trusting myself (and others) to be in such close quarters.
As far as my own pace is concerned I am normally in the high 20's kph riding solo, up to 100 km, on moderately hilly terrain, so I'd probably settle into the B Group after learning the ropes.
Originally Posted by velociraptor
(Post 18933897)
1. Ridiculous nonsense is bolded above. It made me laugh. Disregard.
|
Originally Posted by kbarch
(Post 18934866)
What's so ridiculous about limiting the size of a group? I've been on plenty of mega group rides, and they're generally OK, but 6-12 riders really is an ideal size for a paceline; if you get too many more, it's too easy to get strung out, or devolve into a mob.
usually, the problem sorts itself out after the 1st or 2nd climb, when the group halves. further, 10+ for causes traffic issue whether single or double-paced |
Originally Posted by Nachoman
(Post 18934660)
Not true around here. The "C" groups are specifically set up to teach a newbie how to ride in a group, ride in a paceline, etc. And from what I understood the OP has never done a group ride.
|
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 18933810)
I don't understand why clubs and ride organizers always assume that those who can't ride as fast are incapable of riding longer miles.
Just because I can't ride 22 MPH average doesn't mean that I want to do a shorter ride. The different groups will all try to end at approximately the same time so that people can socialize. |
Originally Posted by kbarch
(Post 18934866)
Or were you just laughing at the idea that the leaders would know who's "compatible" with whom, or that such a policy would be enforced?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.