![]() |
Originally Posted by Wested
(Post 19083582)
Presumably the rear tire is more prone to pinch flatting since there is more load?
|
But then I will always have a partially worn rear tire, so it will have a diminished lifespan compared to just putting a new tire on the rear. Moving a half worn front to the rear means 3k as a front, and at the absolute best, 1.5k on the rear, meaning it lasted 4.5k miles. Left alone as a front, it's good for 6k. That "new" front will move to the rear with only 1.5k on it, meaning it's only 1/4 worn, and should last... 2k? Maybe 2.2k?
It's a hassle. I average just over 1,000 a month, so rotation seems pointless anyway. Same reason I don't clean chains anymore. They'll be dead within 12 weeks of installation, no sense in fussing over them. |
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
(Post 19083526)
You're right of course, as far as you take it. Yes, if you only own 2 tires, and both of them are the on the bike, and you're worried about finishing that 500 mile tour thru Europe that you're on because the rear is more worn than the front, then rotate them to maximize the lifespan of this finite pair of tires. Otherwise, scrap the rear tire when it's worn out and replace with a new one.
EDIT: Re-read your post. I guess I might ask though what constitutes or how do you figure out when the rotation is supposed to happen, assuming you have two tires both of which are not worn past a place where you'd want to use them (on either wheel)? I guess I'm of a mind that if I'm unsure whether a tire is prone to blowing out, on whatever wheel, then I'm not going to want to put it on either wheel. |
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
(Post 19083675)
But then I will always have a partially worn rear tire, so it will have a diminished lifespan compared to just putting a new tire on the rear. Moving a half worn front to the rear means 3k as a front, and at the absolute best, 1.5k on the rear, meaning it lasted 4.5k miles. Left alone as a front, it's good for 6k. That "new" front will move to the rear with only 1.5k on it, meaning it's only 1/4 worn, and should last... 2k? Maybe 2.2k?
It's a hassle. I average just over 1,000 a month, so rotation seems pointless anyway. Same reason I don't clean chains anymore. They'll be dead within 12 weeks of installation, no sense in fussing over them. |
Originally Posted by softreset
(Post 19083575)
Where's the data to back this up, anecdotal?
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19083701)
Why are you asking me? Why not ask Marcus Ti who said there was more chance of puncturing the rear. Isn't it for him to prove?
|
Robert...
Robert... Robert... |
I replace both my tires at the point that they cosmetically displease me.
|
Originally Posted by softreset
(Post 19083723)
I've re-read his post multiple times and I can't find the part about spoke breakage. You added that and it's why I quoted you. I see far more front wheel spokes busted than rear wheels. So I figured you had data to back up your claim seeing it contradicts my shop's experiences.
|
Originally Posted by Doug28450
(Post 19083730)
Robert...
Robert... Robert... |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19083766)
Be careful. My name may be like Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice.
|
Never had a front tire puncture... I hope that lasts.
I wouldn't rotate, but that's because I'm lazy, and am not blasting down any mountains usually. |
I never rotate. Once I have a clean build, I leave it alone. I just replace the rear since I get twice as much mileage out of the front as the rear. Why take a chance on damaging the tire or tube by removal and reinstallation?
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19083766)
Be careful. My name may be like Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice.
|
I used to replace the rear tire and leave the front as is. I changed my thinking after a long nervous descent in pouring rain. I always put the best tire on the front now. The front does most of your braking and that other thing called steering too. I seem to burn through tires at the same rate.
|
Originally Posted by dmanthree
(Post 19084535)
I never rotate. Once I have a clean build, I leave it alone. I just replace the rear since I get twice as much mileage out of the front as the rear. Why take a chance on damaging the tire or tube by removal and reinstallation?
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19084631)
Wut?
|
Originally Posted by dmanthree
(Post 19084659)
Every time you break down a tire and remove the tube for rotation, you chance a pinch on the tube. Why take the chance when all you really need is a new rear tire? Just wear it down and replace it.
|
Lol someone forgot their Brandt
More Flats on Rear Tires by Jobst Brandt My own personal data is 31,000 miles; 22 rear flats due to puncture, 1 front flat due to puncture. ETA: same mileage and I've broken 4 spokes in the rear and zero in the front. |
Is your image that of a Conti Gatorskin? Looks just like mine so must be a Conti something. I don't bother rotating front to back. But maybe its more due to my laziness than anything else. The wear indicators are good. In general, I just replace them when the middle starts getting flat. It can be left on longer. However, I had multiple flats with screwed up tire casing the last time I did that. So not recommended.
|
Originally Posted by San Pedro
(Post 19084277)
Never had a front tire puncture... I hope that lasts.
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19084735)
With good technique, you should never pinch a tube while changing a tire. The security of a new to early new front tire at all time is a significant advantage and is worth the trouble and small pinch risk.
There are time I do rotate tires, though. I switch to GP 4 Seasons for the winter months and rarely wear them out during that time. So when I put them back on the following fall I always put the better tire on the back. But the summer tires, the 4000s? I go through at least two on the rear every year. |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19084735)
With good technique, you should never pinch a tube while changing a tire. The security of a new to early new front tire at all time is a significant advantage and is worth the trouble and small pinch risk.
|
Originally Posted by dmanthree
(Post 19085002)
There are time I do rotate tires, though. I switch to GP 4 Seasons for the winter months and rarely wear them out during that time. So when I put them back on the following fall I always put the better tire on the back. But the summer tires, the 4000s? I go through at least two on the rear every year.
|
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19085081)
Sure, whatever works for you, but just keep in mind that is backwards to the recommendation. Unlike auto tires, thebobject is not even wear, but rather having your better tire on the front.
Strange thing about some auto makers, though. My sister in law bought a Mercedes 300, and the tires are different sizes on the front and rear, so you can't rotate them. I've noticed that on a few sport sedans. Not so much with my Outback, though. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.