Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Spoke Count and CF Wheels - Will I crush these at my weight?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Spoke Count and CF Wheels - Will I crush these at my weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-16, 09:52 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Different gauge on the DS and NDS does nothing to balance tension in the spokes on the two sides. It helps to balance tensile stress as you pointed out. That isn't tension. It relates to making the spoke elongation more similar at different tensions. But still, if that is what you want to do, you need a 1.5 mm spoke on the NDS to match the elongation of a 2.0 mm spoke on the DS, tensions being the same.
I am aware of that, and as stated a few times, I think the Campy method offers improvements. I build about a hundred wheels in the 80s, not so much now, and then was skipping holes to achieve what Campy does now. We designed and built one of Bill Mccready's (Santana) hubs for 140mm dishless rear wheels.

But...
Highest cost, and lightest wheels in the world do not employ a balanced tension method.
From ax-lightness SRT 24 to Extralight Hyper whatevers to LEW Racing RZRs junior used 3 years ago.
The best performing wheels we happened to have ever owned have the same number of spoke on both sides.
Doge is offline  
Old 10-25-16, 05:05 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
fa63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,586

Bikes: A couple

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
No, stiffness in any direction is a matter of rim stiffness and spoke stiffness. Spoke stiffness is a function of spoke gauge and number of spokes. Tension is not a factor.
But how does a spoke derive its stiffness? A spoke, which is essentially a tiny metal pillar no matter what gauge it is, cannot carry a compressive load unless it is pre-loaded to a level meeting or exceeding the expected load. You said yourself that "elongation needs to be increased" to prevent slackening. When a metal wire is elongated, it is being pre-loaded (tensioned). Increasing the elongation, all else being equal, means increasing the tension, no?

Last edited by fa63; 10-25-16 at 06:34 AM.
fa63 is offline  
Old 10-25-16, 06:20 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: Canyon Endurace

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1041 Post(s)
Liked 922 Times in 539 Posts
Before this goes too much more off topic... thank you for your input.
TakingMyTime is offline  
Old 10-25-16, 10:01 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Huntington Harbor, CA
Posts: 399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TakingMyTime
OK, crush may be a bit of an exaggeration. I've also read all the other threads regarding spoke count, but unfortunately I have to ask about this particular situation. Since I may be dropping 2K+ on a bike (which I consider a lot for a bike), I'd like to have all the info I can get.

I really like the new Trek ALR 6 Pro. But... the "Vision Metron 40 LTD" wheelset appears to have 18 spokes in the front and 21(?) in the rear. I contacted Trek and they said the spoke count is the same for all size frames/builds. I understand these are very nice wheels but at my weight 210#, I worry about such a low spoke count. Granted, I do ride on very smooth well maintained roads and paths here in Southern California and this bike/wheels would not be abused, but I still worry about durability and longevity (which I care about more than weight etc). Also, I'm not a powerful rider by any means.

Should I be concerned about such a low spoke count or just shut up and ride it?

It depends on which part of Southern Cal (OC) you ride. Riding flat is fine. Considering your weight, I probably would not descend >10% slope with these wheels (eg Ridge Park/Vista Ridge @ Newport, Park Ave @ Laguna Beach...)
hsuehhwa is offline  
Old 10-25-16, 10:18 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by fa63
But how does a spoke derive its stiffness? A spoke, which is essentially a tiny metal pillar no matter what gauge it is, cannot carry a compressive load unless it is pre-loaded to a level meeting or exceeding the expected load. You said yourself that "elongation needs to be increased" to prevent slackening. When a metal wire is elongated, it is being pre-loaded (tensioned). Increasing the elongation, all else being equal, means increasing the tension, no?
All I know is that rims can't take spoke tensions that would be required to make a 20 hole wheel have the same total tension as a 36 or even 32 spoke wheel. And they don't seem to need to. Spokes just don't go slack in normal riding.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...

Last edited by rpenmanparker; 10-25-16 at 10:33 AM.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TakingMyTime
Road Cycling
8
07-23-13 06:16 PM
Ronno6
Bicycle Mechanics
12
05-28-13 11:21 AM
ninjanoir78
Road Cycling
17
09-02-10 10:52 AM
sprocket47
Bicycle Mechanics
19
05-19-10 07:02 AM
sprocket47
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
4
05-16-10 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.