Recommendations on Carbon Clincher Wheelset
Looking at getting a set of Carbon Clinchers for my road bike. I will be using them for daily training rides. Looking for recommendations! Pics would be good too :).
B@t™ |
Can't go wrong with Zipps. I have 303 and use them everyday... 11,000 miles over the past 2 seasons and they are still straight and true.
http://glenn-ring.com/emonda/preserve.jpg |
Get em while they're hot. Boyd Cycling
|
I have 404 NSWs and am extremely happy with them. I'm putting Boyd's on my next build. You probably won't go wrong with any of the name brand rims (Zipp, Enve, Boyd, etc). On the Boyd's website there are links to wheel builders who can build a number of different brand rims with the hub, spoke option of your choice.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/0r...w3072-h4096-no |
B@t™ |
if you absolutely have to go aero on training rides, flo60 are nice. they're aero enough at much nicer cost
|
Reynolds Assault/Attack/Strike options are pretty solid, big name, options at reasonable prices.
Boyd and Alto wheels are also good options. And last I saw, Boyd was offering free White Ind. hub upgrades. |
Originally Posted by topflightpro
(Post 19220013)
Boyd and Alto wheels are also good options. And last I saw, Boyd was offering free White Ind. hub upgrades.
|
Originally Posted by spectastic
(Post 19219780)
if you absolutely have to go aero on training rides, flo60 are nice. they're aero enough at much nicer cost
|
|
Very happy with my Williams 58s.
|
Originally Posted by spectastic
(Post 19219780)
if you absolutely have to go aero on training rides, flo60 are nice. they're aero enough at much nicer cost
B@t™ |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 19221554)
Very happy with my Williams 58s.
|
Originally Posted by Bluebatmobile
(Post 19215553)
Looking at getting a set of Carbon Clinchers for my road bike. I will be using them for daily training rides. Looking for recommendations! Pics would be good too :).
B@t™ |
Originally Posted by oldnslow2
(Post 19215674)
Can't go wrong with Zipps. I have 303 and use them everyday... 11,000 miles over the past 2 seasons and they are still straight and true.
|
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
(Post 19223146)
If I was going to buy a set of Zipps, it would be 303s. Really great balance between aerodynamics, weight, and cross-breeze handling. Nice all around wheels. Well, better than "nice." But I think the 303 is their most balanced wheelset, the best one if you don't have a pigeonhole.
|
Wait, what? 404s lighter than 303s?
|
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
(Post 19223196)
Wait, what? 404s lighter than 303s?
2012 404 FC tubulars with Conti Competitions 22mm 2014 303 FC tubulars with Conti GP4000s II 22/23mm Same skewers, both 11-speed 11-28 cassettes. All in: 404 - 2200 grams 303 - 2240 grams |
Good luck with the new wheels!
After you've had them for a few months, here's the link to the regrets thread so you can post about them- http://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...tted-most.html ;) |
Originally Posted by dalava
(Post 19223269)
Caveat:
2012 404 FC tubulars with Conti Competitions 22mm 2014 303 FC tubulars with Conti GP4000s II 22/23mm Same skewers, both 11-speed 11-28 cassettes. All in: 404 - 2200 grams 303 - 2240 grams |
Originally Posted by cycledogg
(Post 19223381)
:foo:
I think the later model 303s are just a smidge wider, not on the brake track, but the widest point on of the rim about 1cm below the brake track. |
one can argue that deeper wheels like 404's can accelerate faster than 303's, especially at high speeds, due to its aerodynamic advantage, despite the higher weight in the rims. when choosing between aero and weight, aero wins every single time. in climbing weight doesn't actually matter that much - they tested this. in all other situations, aero wins, by a mile.
so long as you can handle the cross winds, always go deeper also, since rim width was brought up, you want to go wider. zipps are notoriously successful because they've optimized the wheel cross section to include the tire that you'll be using, such that their combined cross section is in a tear drop shape, where the middle of the rim is actually wider than the tire. for example, if you're using 25 tires on a narrow rim, you're loosing a lot of the aero benefits due to the non-smooth junction between the tire and the rim, such that a wider 40mm wheel would actually be more aero than a narrow 60mm wheel. I can go on.. but I'd be a hypocrite, because I ride and race on shallow aluminum clinchers.. none of this **** matters. it's all mental. |
Originally Posted by spectastic
(Post 19223600)
so long as you can handle the cross winds, always go deeper
|
1 Attachment(s)
These came tonight - they had some great Black Friday deals (These were different).
We have their Tubulars, Clinchers. Also likely getting a hill climbing set too - not sure. I'm struggling with the extra weight of the wider width - rims and tires. But that is off topic. Attachment 544639 |
Originally Posted by dalava
(Post 19223269)
Caveat:
2012 404 FC tubulars with Conti Competitions 22mm 2014 303 FC tubulars with Conti GP4000s II 22/23mm Same skewers, both 11-speed 11-28 cassettes. All in: 404 - 2200 grams 303 - 2240 grams I understand the clincher attraction - I had my first flat in the last two years this AM and it only cost me a tube. But for performance they are not even close. I'm really close to being willing to pay $110/flat/year and use the cell phone and just have a better ride. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.