Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Who is fed up with carbon frames?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Who is fed up with carbon frames?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-17, 10:06 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
That iron bike is hot. Shame about all the plastic bits.
PepeM is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 10:19 AM
  #52  
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times in 1,164 Posts
Steel is iron with some carbon atoms included.
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 10:20 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
Which is why I ride iron bikes. None of that asplosive carbon for me!
PepeM is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 11:14 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
If you're not careful you'll be turned to steel in the great magnetic field where you traveled time for the future of mankind.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 11:23 AM
  #55  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times in 1,929 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
Many newer riders (i.e., those who weren't riding high-end bikes back when steel was all there was) would be surprised to learn the rate at which steel frames cracked or otherwise failed. In fact, few, if any, European manufacturers offered any frame warranty at all in those days.
I can't speak for all manufacturers, but when I worked for Trek back in the 80s, we had a lifetime warranty on the frame for the original owner. And we handled warranty replacement for Gitane as well, so they also stood behind their steel frames.

Last edited by JohnDThompson; 05-30-17 at 11:34 AM.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 11:31 AM
  #56  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times in 1,929 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
I agree. I believe most lugs used for steel frames are investment cast, a process with which I'm quite familiar. If you ever want to see a piece of metal with a bunch of flaws, from voids to contamination, check out an investment cast part. Luckily, most of that is all hidden under the paint so just like carbon fiber you never see those flaws.
When I was with Trek, we designed our own investment cast frame fittings, which were cast by Signicast in Milwaukee. Voids and flaws are quite obvious on thin parts like lugs, and were rejected at the foundry. I can't recall a single frame failure that could have been attributed to a casting flaw.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 11:51 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,364
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2479 Post(s)
Liked 2,948 Times in 1,674 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
I can't speak for all manufacturers, but when I worked for Trek back in the 80s, we had a lifetime warranty on the frame for the original owner. And we handled warranty replacement for Gitane as well, so they also stood behind their steel frames.
I think that Treks were sold with a lifetime frame warranty even as early as 1978 or 1979, when the shop I worked in picked up the line (we were the first Trek dealer in Maryland).

Great bikes, even though assembly of each Trek was time-consuming in the early days (frame in one box, everything else in another box; wheels with tension problems due to having been farmed out to folks with arthritic fingers in retirement homes in Waterloo, or so the sales rep told us).

As I said in an earlier post, I don't remember when manufacturers other than Schwinn, Trek, and Cannondale began offering lifetime frame warranties. Trek's short-lived Gitane experiment took place in around 1983, I think. Not sure whether Gitane was already giving frame warranties at that point or whether Bevil Hogg and John Burke leaned on them to do so.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 12:00 PM
  #58  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times in 1,929 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
Trek's short-lived Gitane experiment took place in around 1983, I think. Not sure whether Gitane was already giving frame warranties at that point or whether Bevil Hogg and John Burke leaned on them to do so.
I'm not sure either, but it seems we had an advantage over e.g. Bianchi USA in that we could do frame repair and repainting in-house, reducing the turn-around time. I still have a pile of Simplex dropouts Gitane sent us because of a run of defective dropouts on some of their frames.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 12:08 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,364
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2479 Post(s)
Liked 2,948 Times in 1,674 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
I'm not sure either, but it seems we had an advantage over e.g. Bianchi USA in that we could do frame repair and repainting in-house, reducing the turn-around time. I still have a pile of Simplex dropouts Gitane sent us because of a run of defective dropouts on some of their frames.
I remember seeing the paint booth during a tour of the factory. The guy who owned the shop where I worked asked how they could paint with Imron in that booth, since it didn't look EPA-compliant. The Trek guy said, "We just pay the fines."

I wonder where all the framebuilding equipment is now that used to be in the factory. There were a lot of very clever custom in-house designs there, such as the foot-operated multiheaded torch that popped up into position around the bottom bracket.

Last edited by Trakhak; 05-30-17 at 12:12 PM.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 12:52 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,653

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,936 Times in 1,763 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
There are people here who are real students of bike history---I know only what I've gathered since I started racing bikes in the mid-1960s and managing bike shops in the early 1970s---but I believe that Schwinn was the first company to introduce a lifetime warranty for their bikes.

By the late 1970s and early 1980s, other companies had begun slowly and reluctantly following suit so that they could compete in the U.S. market (I don't know how this worked out elsewhere in the world).

A pertinent story from the mid-1980s---I once asked our Bianchi sales rep how their warranty program worked for the Italian-built bikes: were frames to be covered under warranty shipped back to Italy, or what?

He said that Bianchi USA offered the warranty, not Bianchi of Italy, and that supplying the warranty replacement frames was simply a cost of doing business.

According to him, the people who ran Bianchi in Italy thought it was funny that people in the US expected frame warranties on high-performance steel frames. He was once told, jokingly, "Sure, we can sell you frames with a warranty. They'll weigh 2 kg more, though."
Good insight, thanks!

I looked at Schwinn's warranty earlier today from in the early 80s and couldn't tell if the lifetime warranty meant the frame too or not after the first year.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is online now  
Old 05-30-17, 01:44 PM
  #61  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
I've owned and ridden some fine steel bikes, but now I own a carbon road bike, a carbon cross bike, a steel mountain bike, an aluminum mountain bike, and a carbon mountain bike and a few steel frames hanging around the garage. Meh, they all ride pretty nicely.


My Trek Emonda rides faster and better than a few of my older steel bikes I had, and it is just as comfortable....lighter too.
RJM is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 01:46 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
When I was with Trek, we designed our own investment cast frame fittings, which were cast by Signicast in Milwaukee. Voids and flaws are quite obvious on thin parts like lugs, and were rejected at the foundry. I can't recall a single frame failure that could have been attributed to a casting flaw.
If you section the parts, you'll often find small internal voids. It's just the nature of the gravity-fed process. And given that many investment casters are using scrap metal from other processes and adding other metal into the mix to target a specific alloy, the content of the alloy is frequently fairly off from the nominal content for a given alloy spec, frequently at the bottom end of the percentage content for all the expensive stuff in it.

Your last point is basically the same point I was making, though. Despite any 'flaws', the parts still function fine, just like 'flawed' carbon fiber.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 02:51 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
About the only negative you can say about CF is that it's not worth the money, although it's only ~$500 more than an alloy frame for CF. Still, it's not like pole vaulting where you don't really have any other acceptable options. It is true that you get less and less value for the dollar by the time you've passed the $3K price point but in my view, while I love my old 853 Lemonds, there's a good reason they both came with CF forks.
McBTC is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 03:03 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18353 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times in 3,346 Posts
Did the OP, eddiepliers, ever verify whether the crack he saw was actually a crack and not a scratch, paint defect, or road goo? Warranty?

A lot of complaints without verifying that the CF is actually a problem.

I do ride CF, Steel, Titanium, and Aluminum. Different bikes for different purposes. My current CF ride is a 20 year old frame purchased used, and rides like a champ, plus I like the vintage lines. I'll eventually get more modern CF.

There are stories of failures of every frame material, with each having a slightly different failure mode. Fatigue vs Impact. Well, lots of examples of impact damaged steel too. RUST (which isn't a problem for CF).
CliffordK is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 03:42 PM
  #65  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times in 1,929 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
I wonder where all the framebuilding equipment is now that used to be in the factory.
I have some of it in my basement. Not the fancy pneumatic, multi-head stuff that came later, but the original frame fixtures from the 70s.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 04:00 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,802

Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 118 Posts
My next bike will be steel or Ti (prob Ti, due to the weight) but I have had zero issues with any of my carbon bikes. I like the idea of a cool steel bike though, so we will see. On long climbs (for me) like the one I did last weekend, I prefer taking my lightest bikes. I did 64 miles and 5,000 feet of climbing. Most of my rides are not that intense, so a steel or Ti bike would fit in really well, especially if it is comfortable.
Chandne is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 04:51 PM
  #67  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,299

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 712 Times in 366 Posts
Originally Posted by jamesdak
Not even close! It's 19 lbs 9 ozs as pictured.

But it rides so lightly under me! I've had, or currently have, lighter bikes but none feel as good as this.

Others can have their 13 lb bikes I'll take this one that's been sprinkled with pixie dust by the bike gods!
6 1/2 pounds is enough weight to make a noticeable difference.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 06:20 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,653

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,936 Times in 1,763 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
6 1/2 pounds is enough weight to make a noticeable difference.

Not when your bike is blessed by the bike gods!!!

This thing is so light on it's tires I have to anchor it to my U-08 to keep it from floating away.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is online now  
Old 05-30-17, 06:42 PM
  #69  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
6 1/2 pounds is enough weight to make a noticeable difference.
But bike reviewers tell me that even 65 lb ebikes "are so well engineered they ride almost exactly like much lighter bikes."
speshelite is offline  
Old 05-30-17, 10:51 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356

Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Not sick of em, owned a couple, and determined I prefer steel and Ti. If I had a lot of money, I would definitely own a super light carbon bike, and I'm sure I would ride it. That said, I do notice a difference between my custom steel and other bikes, and I prefer the custom steel. I have also ridden steel that didn't feel awesome (Jamis Satellite) so it isn't just intrinsic to the material.
garciawork is offline  
Old 05-31-17, 04:44 AM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
kbarch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
...if all goes well my next bike will definitely be a carbon framed model.

...it's not about material, it's about execution.
What could go wrong?
kbarch is offline  
Old 05-31-17, 05:25 AM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
If you section the parts, you'll often find small internal voids. It's just the nature of the gravity-fed process. And given that many investment casters are using scrap metal from other processes and adding other metal into the mix to target a specific alloy, the content of the alloy is frequently fairly off from the nominal content for a given alloy spec, frequently at the bottom end of the percentage content for all the expensive stuff in it.

Your last point is basically the same point I was making, though. Despite any 'flaws', the parts still function fine, just like 'flawed' carbon fiber.
Aiming for the bottom of the specification on expensive ingredients is an old-school approach to cost savings. Modern quality management theory and practice have both discredited that approach. But the ignorant and the foolish are slow to catch on.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 05-31-17, 06:49 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
exmechanic89's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618

Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
I'm a big fan of all the main frame materials, each produces a fantastic bike if made correctly. I can never understand haters of one material or the other, they all have something to offer.
exmechanic89 is offline  
Old 05-31-17, 06:55 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
WhyFi is offline  
Old 05-31-17, 09:08 AM
  #75  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phloom
i never had a carbon fiber frame. Not impressed with a plastic frame with some embedded carbon fibers. Seems like the first pot hole i hit, a carbon frame would crack. My all out new bike is titanium. Almost all titanium. Not as strong as steel but lighter and corrosion resistant. I don't like paint either so titanium was the best material for me.
....pictures please!!!!!
SavageSam is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.