Carbon clinchers - yay or nay?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 125
Bikes: 1999 Trek 2000T 47cm, 2017 Ribble R872 Ultegra Di2 47cm, 2010 Trek Top Fuel 9.8 15.5in
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon clinchers - yay or nay?
I never liked carbon braking tracks. They always seem to get wavy and have alot of problems with heat, developing pits, wear, etc...
I was wondering if there is a special magic brake pad designed to minimize wear on the braking track? I dont even care too much about braking performance, especially since I live in dry hot Arizona. Im just worried the wheels will be ruined with normal use.
I once had a set of tubular Zipps that developed a permanent pulsing during braking. I do live in a hot, hilly area and was using el cheapo "carbon safe" pads...
How good can braking get on carbon? Ive always wondered about those $50 pads... Are carbon clinchers doable durability wise in the mountains with the right setup? I should I really just stick with a good alloy wheelset? I just want one set of wheels to use for group ride hammerfests, training long days in the hills and wind, and doing a couple amateur cat 4 races a year.
Last edited by Eyedrop; 07-04-17 at 10:18 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,917
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4702 Post(s)
Liked 1,878 Times
in
995 Posts
I've had no problems with carbon clinchers in high heat, but Phoenix doesn't have the long descents of the Prescott area. Maybe the problem isn't the air temps, but rather a braking technique issue.
#3
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
The magic brake that minimizes wheel rim wear and tear...are called discs.
#4
Senior Member
Carbon clinchers: No.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
#5
Senior Member
These work for me.

Riding Chinese carbon clincher knock-offs as my everyday wheelset, clydesdale racer, putting out enough torque to break frames, yet my rims/wheels with these brakes have never given me any trouble.
Except: on long, steep, winding descents. Take one of those out of that equation and I'm fine. All three? Enough heat to melt the carbon glue and delaminate the carbon layers in the rim.

Riding Chinese carbon clincher knock-offs as my everyday wheelset, clydesdale racer, putting out enough torque to break frames, yet my rims/wheels with these brakes have never given me any trouble.
Except: on long, steep, winding descents. Take one of those out of that equation and I'm fine. All three? Enough heat to melt the carbon glue and delaminate the carbon layers in the rim.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
For me, it's a nay. I have 2 sets of carbon clinchers sitting in bags in my basement closet collecting dust.
#7
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,215
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 556 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21716 Post(s)
Liked 8,158 Times
in
3,815 Posts
#8
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,215
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 556 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21716 Post(s)
Liked 8,158 Times
in
3,815 Posts
You might want to sell them so someone can use them and you can buy some other schwag...
#9
Recusant Iconoclast
Carbon clinchers: No.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Mid-Atlantic, USA
Posts: 357
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac 2017 - TREK Madone - Cannondale CAPO
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon clinchers: No.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
#12
Recusant Iconoclast
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Mid-Atlantic, USA
Posts: 357
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac 2017 - TREK Madone - Cannondale CAPO
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Yeah, I know, but I'm not good at selling stuff and am too lazy to try to box and ship them, so I generally will only sell stuff to local friends, teammates, etc. I have a set of Enve 6.7, front freshly rebuilt by ENVE after I melted it, haven't used it so it's essentially a new wheel. Have a set of Zipp 303 firecrests too. The Zipps have been fine in that I haven't melted them, but I personally hate all the noises that carbon braking surfaces make, even tubulars. I also have a set of Zipp 404/808 tubular with the brand new Vittoria Corsa graphene tires glued on that I also have never used because I don't race anymore. What a waste! I like the silence of an alloy brake track.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm not aware of any UCI world tour pro teams on carbon clinchers that aren't also discs or on TT bikes. Triathlon pros use carbon clinchers for aero reasons, but they also don't ride up or down many hills or use the brakes much (I think, what little I know about triathlon)
Last edited by Silvercivic27; 07-04-17 at 04:38 PM.
#16
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,215
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 556 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21716 Post(s)
Liked 8,158 Times
in
3,815 Posts
Yeah, I know, but I'm not good at selling stuff and am too lazy to try to box and ship them, so I generally will only sell stuff to local friends, teammates, etc. I have a set of Enve 6.7, front freshly rebuilt by ENVE after I melted it, haven't used it so it's essentially a new wheel. Have a set of Zipp 303 firecrests too. The Zipps have been fine in that I haven't melted them, but I personally hate all the noises that carbon braking surfaces make, even tubulars. I also have a set of Zipp 404/808 tubular with the brand new Vittoria Corsa graphene tires glued on that I also have never used because I don't race anymore. What a waste! I like the silence of an alloy brake track.
#17
Senior Member
Pros aren't paid to brake, they are being paid to win, not lose.
Secondly, if the rims deform from braking, pros are SPONSORED. Do you have 150 spare wheels in your mechanic's truck?
Also... Pros don't get a choice, it's in their contract to ride gear provided by their sponsors, lulz.
You need to know the pros personally to know why they use their team's sponsor provided wheels? lulz
Why did Team Cofidis ride a light weight climbing bike from Orbea on flat races when all their competitors are riding aero bikes? Do you need to know a Cofidis rider personally to know, the reason is because they didn't have a choice, they rode whatever Orbea told them to ride?
Secondly, if the rims deform from braking, pros are SPONSORED. Do you have 150 spare wheels in your mechanic's truck?
Also... Pros don't get a choice, it's in their contract to ride gear provided by their sponsors, lulz.
You need to know the pros personally to know why they use their team's sponsor provided wheels? lulz
Why did Team Cofidis ride a light weight climbing bike from Orbea on flat races when all their competitors are riding aero bikes? Do you need to know a Cofidis rider personally to know, the reason is because they didn't have a choice, they rode whatever Orbea told them to ride?
Last edited by zymphad; 07-04-17 at 07:57 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,792
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 178 Times
in
115 Posts
A set of disc 303s or 3.4s sounds good to me. I'll stick with alloy on my BMC but the Tarmac is begging for carbon wheels.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Mid-Atlantic, USA
Posts: 357
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac 2017 - TREK Madone - Cannondale CAPO
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pros aren't paid to brake, they are being paid to win, not lose.
Secondly, if the rims deform from braking, pros are SPONSORED. Do you have 150 spare wheels in your mechanic's truck?
Also... Pros don't get a choice, it's in their contract to ride gear provided by their sponsors, lulz.
You need to know the pros personally to know why they use their team's sponsor provided wheels? lulz
Why did Team Cofidis ride a light weight climbing bike from Orbea on flat races when all their competitors are riding aero bikes? Do you need to know a Cofidis rider personally to know, the reason is because they didn't have a choice, they rode whatever Orbea told them to ride?
Secondly, if the rims deform from braking, pros are SPONSORED. Do you have 150 spare wheels in your mechanic's truck?
Also... Pros don't get a choice, it's in their contract to ride gear provided by their sponsors, lulz.
You need to know the pros personally to know why they use their team's sponsor provided wheels? lulz
Why did Team Cofidis ride a light weight climbing bike from Orbea on flat races when all their competitors are riding aero bikes? Do you need to know a Cofidis rider personally to know, the reason is because they didn't have a choice, they rode whatever Orbea told them to ride?
#20
Chases Dogs for Sport
If you're using rim brakes, "nay" to carbon clinchers. The performance just isn't there.
But if you're using discs? "yay" Disc brake carbon clinchers offer the best of all worlds. Lighter weight. Better rim shaping. And the best available braking performance.
But if you're using discs? "yay" Disc brake carbon clinchers offer the best of all worlds. Lighter weight. Better rim shaping. And the best available braking performance.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,101 Times
in
1,415 Posts
Yay. For my application (road racing in the dry), with good tires it's 90% of the performance with 10% of the hassle of tubulars.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have ridden for years with a large guy on enve 3.4 clinchers disc brake. He loves them and they are very fast.
I still prefer tubular myself, but if I had disc brakes I would try clincher
I still prefer tubular myself, but if I had disc brakes I would try clincher
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
18 Posts
Pros aren't paid to brake, they are being paid to win, not lose.
Secondly, if the rims deform from braking, pros are SPONSORED. Do you have 150 spare wheels in your mechanic's truck?
Also... Pros don't get a choice, it's in their contract to ride gear provided by their sponsors, lulz.
You need to know the pros personally to know why they use their team's sponsor provided wheels? lulz
Why did Team Cofidis ride a light weight climbing bike from Orbea on flat races when all their competitors are riding aero bikes? Do you need to know a Cofidis rider personally to know, the reason is because they didn't have a choice, they rode whatever Orbea told them to ride?
Secondly, if the rims deform from braking, pros are SPONSORED. Do you have 150 spare wheels in your mechanic's truck?
Also... Pros don't get a choice, it's in their contract to ride gear provided by their sponsors, lulz.
You need to know the pros personally to know why they use their team's sponsor provided wheels? lulz
Why did Team Cofidis ride a light weight climbing bike from Orbea on flat races when all their competitors are riding aero bikes? Do you need to know a Cofidis rider personally to know, the reason is because they didn't have a choice, they rode whatever Orbea told them to ride?

#24
NYC
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,718
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1168 Post(s)
Liked 103 Times
in
59 Posts
Carbon clinchers: No.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
Let's think this through... you want carbon for weight savings. You may think you want carbon to allow for deep aero wheels, but these are possible in alu as well. They are just heavier.
Carbon rims do not brake as well as alu - either wet or dry - this is unavoidable, regardless of the pads; I've tried multiple pads on carbon. Plus the well-documented heat dissipation problems. Carbon tubular rims handle heat dissipation somewhat better than carbon clinchers.
If your objective is elite-level performance wheels, then you'll be on tubulars. Clincher rims cannot match the weight and structural benefits of tubular rims, regardless of price. If you want superior braking and heat shedding for general riding, then alu.
Bottom line: carbon clinchers are an awkward kludge that seemingly have no function.
Today you can get high temp resin wheels with great braking tracks, and swissstop black pads for carbon, and they stop as good as alloy when dry, and almost as good when wet.
I have a set of Roval CLX40's I picked up on ebay for around $1k with new 25mm tubeless schwalbe pro ones (already installed). Added a new set of pads and some titanium skewers (~80g lighter than Roval skewers) and I am loving them.
Light enough (1375 grams), aero enough (at 40mm), and just a great all around wheel set.
#25
Senior Member
Ummm.. you can pick up a sub-1,000 gram carbon tubular wheelset for less than $600. New.
Not only would you shave a pound of rotating mass, but you'd have the tubular advantages of no pinch flats, no rim strip failures, and the ability to ride your tires at pressures anywhere between 50-170 psi.
Plus tubular rims are far more resistant to impacts, and if necessary, you can ride a flat tubular in relative safely.
Why is everyone so fussed about getting little glue on their hands?
Not only would you shave a pound of rotating mass, but you'd have the tubular advantages of no pinch flats, no rim strip failures, and the ability to ride your tires at pressures anywhere between 50-170 psi.
Plus tubular rims are far more resistant to impacts, and if necessary, you can ride a flat tubular in relative safely.
Why is everyone so fussed about getting little glue on their hands?