Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Lighter Wheels: Climb vs Descend Benefits

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Lighter Wheels: Climb vs Descend Benefits

Old 07-13-17, 03:35 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lighter Wheels: Climb vs Descend Benefits

I have a set of Axis 1.0 Wheels which weight about 2000g+ and I'm lookng to get a new wheelset. Something in the 1500g range.

Now I know reducing rotational weight will help improve speed and climbing but does the same increase on climbs decrease the speed on my descending because theirs less weight going down the hill?
B1KE is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 03:40 PM
  #2  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 42,957

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22513 Post(s)
Liked 8,843 Times in 4,113 Posts
Originally Posted by B1KE
I have a set of Axis 1.0 Wheels which weight about 2000g+ and I'm lookng to get a new wheelset. Something in the 1500g range.

Now I know reducing rotational weight will help improve speed and climbing but does the same increase on climbs decrease the speed on my descending because theirs less weight going down the hill?
Yes.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 03:41 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,432 Times in 2,811 Posts
For descending, you need these.

Tech: HED launches descending special | Cyclingnews.com
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 03:44 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
Yes.
So why in this case do people say wheels should be the first upgrade if the benefit are only on climbing and you have reduced speed on descending?
B1KE is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 03:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 609
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 19 Posts
Math - w/out getting too detailed you spend more time climbing than descending.
RShantz is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 04:01 PM
  #6  
pluralis majestatis
 
redfooj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206

Bikes: a DuhRosa

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
your tuck and line choice i.e. descending technique plays a bigger part in downhill speed than wheels.

also most people get a higher sense of reward dropping time off a climb than a descent.
redfooj is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 04:09 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Da Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 349

Bikes: Tarmac, Allez Sprint, Nashbar beater

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Need to clarify if we're talking acceleration or max speed.
Da Reef is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 04:43 PM
  #8  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,501

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times in 1,369 Posts
I built a set of wheels recently which I didn't weigh, not having a suitable scale, but the parts sum = 1450g. They're Kinlin XC279 23mm X 28mm rims, 460g, 20H and 24H, CX-Ray spokes. Parts cost was $340. I run 23mm Conti 4KIIs on them. I did a non-technical 3000' pass descent with a group this past Sunday. I had to wait a good minute at the bottom for the next rider, another minute or so for the 3rd guy, then more waiting. I'm a short-legged 145 lb. guy on a 52 with a slammed stem, so my bars are only 5cm below my saddle. I was doing 35-40 mph most of the way. They were even further back on the preceding pass descent.

The right lightish wheel and tire combo descends just fine.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 04:52 PM
  #9  
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,459
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3638 Post(s)
Liked 5,315 Times in 2,700 Posts
I often brake going downhill. Not too often when climbing. Yes, I know, but folks are fessing up to all sorts of flaws on BF these days....
shelbyfv is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 04:53 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times in 1,823 Posts
Possibly because you are doing hard work to climb, and doing very little work descending.

if the descent is long or steep enough, you might not even be pedaling.

But if you don't pedal, you don't climb.

Obviously if you had a 400-lb bike you would have a lot more momentum on the downhill. Of course, it would take a pretty long hill to get up to speed, but it would overcome as Lot of wind resistance with inertia.

Of course, you probably wouldn't be able to ride the thing on the flats, hardly, and forget climbing.

Also ... no matter how fast you go on the downhill ... the next climb is just as steep and hard. You might climb at 10 mph for an hour, zip down the other side at 50 mph and get there in 12 minutes .... and have another hour climb at 10 mph. And then, another.

With a heavier bike, you might climb a six mph for an hour and 40 minutes, zip down the far side at 60 mph and finish in ten minutes ... and now have to haul that heavy bike up that hill and it might take you two hours this time. And ... you get two minutes less recovery.

By the third hill, you might say "Eff it." You have already spent two-and-a-half hours climbing and have a huge hill left.

Meanwhile the guy on the lighter bike has climbed for three hours and is heading on that long final downhill. He will only hit 50 mph ... but he will be home soon. You will be out in the middle of the mountains, exhausted, trying to find cell phone reception so you can get a ride.

But yeah, your heavier bike might go a little faster on the downhills.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 07:06 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Da Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 349

Bikes: Tarmac, Allez Sprint, Nashbar beater

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think aerodynamics are more important to descending.
Da Reef is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 07:13 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: MD
Posts: 28

Bikes: Trek FXS5 and Rumblefish 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't see the light wheels being an issue on decent. They still have to spin up and heavier wheels are going to spin up slower even going downhill.

The extra little bit of weight of a heavier wheel is not going to help you much going down hill. It adds a little more potential energy but this is lost to the increased rotational energy being sucked up by the wheel.
On the climb, the reduced weight helps a tiny bit in the (less weight in general is better when climbing) and the reduced rotational energy is a positive too.

Bottom line, don't worry about the affect on the downhill. I don't think you will be able to see any difference.
cb5107 is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:06 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by B1KE
So why in this case do people say wheels should be the first upgrade if the benefit are only on climbing and you have reduced speed on descending?
Who said that?
Doge is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:09 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
On a straight, low wind buff, un-braked decent, go aero. But most descents are twisty. Handling matters, as does aero. You have to figure it out, but if you are thinking brakes will be involved, use the lighter better handling wheels.
Doge is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:24 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by B1KE
So why in this case do people say wheels should be the first upgrade if the benefit are only on climbing and you have reduced speed on descending?
You don't have reduced speed on the downhill if you're riding with others. No one's going to drop you on a descent because your wheels are too light. On the other hand on a long steep climb saving a couple of pounds of weight could make a substantial difference in your time up the hill.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:28 PM
  #16  
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,918
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 964 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times in 343 Posts
The new wheels weigh about a pound less than the old ones. 500 grams is the weight 17 ounces of water. Can you tell the difference on a climb if your bottle is full or mostly empty? It'll cut a couple of seconds off your climb, perhaps.

Light wheels that spin up quicker also spin down quicker, so the net effect is quite tiny. But they seem faster. My replacement wheels went from 2000 grams to 1550, and I noticed a quicker steering response. And they felt faster, but was that a real effect or just expectations?
rm -rf is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:35 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by shelbyfv
I often brake going downhill. Not too often when climbing. Yes, I know, but folks are fessing up to all sorts of flaws on BF these days....
This is the real answer. Your speed going up a hill is limited by your fitness; going down, it's limited by your skill, by traffic, road and weather conditions, etc.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:45 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
The new wheels weigh about a pound less than the old ones. 500 grams is the weight 17 ounces of water. Can you tell the difference on a climb if your bottle is full or mostly empty? It'll cut a couple of seconds off your climb, perhaps.
About 13 seconds on a 40min climb. Whether that's important depends if you're racing or riding in a competitive event where you're trying to maintain contact with faster riders. A 13 second gap could mean the difference between staying with and being dropped from a group. If you're dropped the ultimate time difference will be far greater.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 08:56 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,453 Times in 1,823 Posts
People generally suggest upgrading wheels because A.) a lot of bikes come with soft, heavy wheels, and B.) it is a much more meaningful upgrade for most bikes than the ones people do.

If you can save a pound of rotating weight you are improving your bike's performance potential a lot more than the almost imperceptible change of going up one level in group set, and way more than a new stem or seat post with a flashier logo.

Strong, stiff, light wheel waste less energy. Every time you speed up and slow down they offer a small benefit.

Will you be able to feel that benefit? Maybe doubtful, maybe imaginary ....

I swap between a CF climbing bike (not super light but pretty light) and a pair of aluminum endurance/tourers which weight 25 or 26 lbs ... 8-10 lbs more.

When I first climb onto the different bike I can tell ... for at least the first 20 yards.

Then it is just another bike ride.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 10:05 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,597

Bikes: 2017 Cannondale CAAD12 105, 2014 Giant Escape City

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 820 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
If light wheels are better climbing and heavy wheels are better descending ... this isn't rocket science. Climb on light wheels, swap to heavy wheels at the top. Problem solved.
memebag is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 10:18 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,432 Times in 2,811 Posts
Originally Posted by memebag
If light wheels are better climbing and heavy wheels are better descending ... this isn't rocket science. Climb on light wheels, swap to heavy wheels at the top. Problem solved.
Or... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Robic
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 10:23 PM
  #22  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,870

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3939 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times in 87 Posts
Originally Posted by B1KE
I have a set of Axis 1.0 Wheels which weight about 2000g+ and I'm lookng to get a new wheelset. Something in the 1500g range.

Now I know reducing rotational weight will help improve speed and climbing but does the same increase on climbs decrease the speed on my descending because theirs less weight going down the hill?
Only actual weight affects climbing and descending. So getting wheels that are 500 gm lighter is the same as reducing some other component by 500 gm. Rotational weight affects acceleration/deceleration. Lighter wheels accelerate a little faster and but lose speed faster, so you might surge and lag compared to heavier wheels which tend to even out your speed a bit, but the overall speed comes out the same.

Last edited by cooker; 07-13-17 at 10:27 PM.
cooker is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 10:33 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
The new wheels weigh about a pound less than the old ones. 500 grams is the weight 17 ounces of water. Can you tell the difference on a climb if your bottle is full or mostly empty? It'll cut a couple of seconds off your climb, perhaps.
...
500g on wheels <> 500g on bike.
There is a huge amount of side to side movement (change in velocity = acceleration) even when the bike is going the same speed.
Doge is offline  
Old 07-13-17, 10:36 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by memebag
... and heavy wheels are better descending ...
Who said that?
Doge is offline  
Old 07-14-17, 05:52 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Light, aero wheels is your best choice.

Many options available in the 1500-1600 g range.

In any case, do you sprint at the top of every descent until you reach max speed, then go into a full-on top tube tuck with your chin on the stem, hitting the apex of every turn with reckless abandon? If no, this is a completely useless question.
rubiksoval is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.