Caad12 or Carbon?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Caad12 or Carbon?
I've been reading that Caad12 is fun, fast, smooth, and comfortable. If so, why pay more for Carbon, like SuperSix?
#2
Senior Member
Because the brainwashed market doesn't understand that although the top of the line bikes are all carbon and not aluminum ... the best aluminum bikes are WAY better than the entry level carbon bikes.
So the market demands carbon, and drives up the prices of many carbon bikes that may be inferior to quality aluminum- like the CAADs.
So the market demands carbon, and drives up the prices of many carbon bikes that may be inferior to quality aluminum- like the CAADs.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Because the brainwashed market doesn't understand that although the top of the line bikes are all carbon and not aluminum ... the best aluminum bikes are WAY better than the entry level carbon bikes.
So the market demands carbon, and drives up the prices of many carbon bikes that may be inferior to quality aluminum- like the CAADs.
So the market demands carbon, and drives up the prices of many carbon bikes that may be inferior to quality aluminum- like the CAADs.
#4
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Difference between carbon and Al now is mostly weight. Ride quality and stiffness has been addressed mostly with latest AL bikes like the CAAD12, Spesh Allez, Trek Emonda ALR etc. Weight diff isn't much...maybe 200 grams at extreme...depending on frame size and models compared etc.
To many if not most, now that AL has been improved and I posit this has occurred due to being able to form Al similar to what was learned by changing the mold and shape of carbon, for the money Al is the better value bike.
But all said, a good low miles carbon bike can still be had off ebay for cheap. Just picked up an Emonda SL6 with full Ultegra...a demo...off ebay for $1500 for a friend. He looked at lower level carbon and new Al at bike shops. Pretty hard to beat a SL6 and a fantastic bike for the money. Is there really much difference between the ALR Emonda and the SL6 other than a few grams? Not really. But you don't have to pay retail for carbon is the point and all said, some will still prefer carbon. I really like the new Al bikes and am a big fan if buying new.
There is review of the CAAD12 to the Super Six out on the web whereby the reviewer preferred the CAAD12...and definitely preferred it considering the money difference. I have ridden the EVO and its an amazing bike. Al without a doubt is the best value in modern road bikes...with excellent ride, pretty lightweight and great stiffness where you want it. The rest is wheel choice and what groupset you prefer.
To many if not most, now that AL has been improved and I posit this has occurred due to being able to form Al similar to what was learned by changing the mold and shape of carbon, for the money Al is the better value bike.
But all said, a good low miles carbon bike can still be had off ebay for cheap. Just picked up an Emonda SL6 with full Ultegra...a demo...off ebay for $1500 for a friend. He looked at lower level carbon and new Al at bike shops. Pretty hard to beat a SL6 and a fantastic bike for the money. Is there really much difference between the ALR Emonda and the SL6 other than a few grams? Not really. But you don't have to pay retail for carbon is the point and all said, some will still prefer carbon. I really like the new Al bikes and am a big fan if buying new.
There is review of the CAAD12 to the Super Six out on the web whereby the reviewer preferred the CAAD12...and definitely preferred it considering the money difference. I have ridden the EVO and its an amazing bike. Al without a doubt is the best value in modern road bikes...with excellent ride, pretty lightweight and great stiffness where you want it. The rest is wheel choice and what groupset you prefer.
Last edited by Campag4life; 10-01-17 at 05:41 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Also, I don't think one can generalize to aluminum bikes that haven't benefited from the same level of R&D as the CAAD12. Most big bike makers focus on carbon because that's where the demand is.
#7
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Only pay more if you prefer carbon to aluminum. It's subjective. I rode both and didn't, so I bought a CAAD12.
Also, I don't think one can generalize to aluminum bikes that haven't benefited from the same level of R&D as the CAAD12. Most big bike makers focus on carbon because that's where the demand is.
Also, I don't think one can generalize to aluminum bikes that haven't benefited from the same level of R&D as the CAAD12. Most big bike makers focus on carbon because that's where the demand is.
Also, most of the big bike makers make an Al bike comparable to the CAAD12. Some may in fact prefer the Specialized Allez or even Trek Emonda ALR with a bit more relaxed H2 geometry. Spesh Allez for 2018 now comes in two different geometries unlike the CAAD12 which is pretty much a race geometry.
Last edited by Campag4life; 10-01-17 at 07:53 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 464
Bikes: No. 22 Bicycle Great Divide, Lynskey R260, Salsa Colossal Ti, Litespeed T5, Lynskey Peloton, Bianchi Vigorelli, CAAD 10, Giant FastRoad CoMax 1, C-Dale Quick 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
18 Posts
I have two SuperSixes, a 2010 and a 2012. 2010 has Ultegra, RS-80 wheelset; the 2012 has full SRAM Red w/Boyd Altamont wheels. My 2011 CAAD 10 has DuraAce, SLK crank & Boyd Altamont wheels. Bought the CAAD ($2400) from lbs, the two SuperSixes on ebay ($1200 & $2000), both were new, old stock. The CAAD weighs virtually the same as the 2010 SS and the 2012 SS weighs a pound less. I like the ride of the CAAD 10 the best, especially on longer rides. Carbon is a myth, my best riding/performing bikes are my titaniums and steel Bianchi.
#9
Erik the Inveigler
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The California Alps
Posts: 2,303
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1310 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I have two SuperSixes, a 2010 and a 2012. 2010 has Ultegra, RS-80 wheelset; the 2012 has full SRAM Red w/Boyd Altamont wheels. My 2011 CAAD 10 has DuraAce, SLK crank & Boyd Altamont wheels. Bought the CAAD ($2400) from lbs, the two SuperSixes on ebay ($1200 & $2000), both were new, old stock. The CAAD weighs virtually the same as the 2010 SS and the 2012 SS weighs a pound less. I like the ride of the CAAD 10 the best, especially on longer rides. Carbon is a myth, my best riding/performing bikes are my titaniums and steel Bianchi.
#11
Senior Member
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#14
Senior Member
I have a CAAD 12 and a Supersix Evo, with exact the same fit. The SuperSix Evo is lighter and with all the components costs three times as much. If you're already very lean and love long climbing (>3000 ft elevation difference), the difference is very noticeable.
All my climbing PRs were achieved by Supersix Evo. All my descent PRs were done by CAAD 12.
#15
Senior Member
I have a CAAD 12 and a Supersix Evo, with exact the same fit. The SuperSix Evo is lighter and with all the components costs three times as much. If you're already very lean and love long climbing (>3000 ft elevation difference), the difference is very noticeable.
All my climbing PRs were achieved by Supersix Evo. All my descent PRs were done by CAAD 12.
All my climbing PRs were achieved by Supersix Evo. All my descent PRs were done by CAAD 12.
#16
Senior Member
The CAAD 12 I have is just a backup bike. I never rode it to serious mountain roads or group rides until earlier Sep when I had my LBS upgrade the groupsets of my evo.
Now I've been riding CAAD 12 for a month, including two trips to 5500 ft Crystal Lake in San Gabriel Mtns in South Cal. I feel after 4000 ft of climbing and on the 8-10% grade, the difference between CAAD 12 and my Evo was like day and night I didn't have a power meter but I rode this route all the time.
On my Tuesday group ride with people I rode with for years, my performance with the CAAD 12 on climbing and flat were definitely slower, except I was descending faster.
Last month with the CAAD 12 I broke all my PRs in descending. Most of the PRs were made a few years earlier when I was 5-7 lb heavier and more fearless.
CAAD 12 is definitely heavier. I don't weight much (~140 lbs). I bought the entry level 105 group set CAAD 12 without any upgrade. All my components on the Evo are carbon, except the custom built Boyd Aluminum climbing wheel. I don't like carbon wheels for long steep descents due to some earlier unpleasant experiences.
#17
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
The CAAD 12 I have is just a backup bike. I never rode it to serious mountain roads or group rides until earlier Sep when I had my LBS upgrade the groupsets of my evo.
Now I've been riding CAAD 12 for a month, including two trips to 5500 ft Crystal Lake in San Gabriel Mtns in South Cal. I feel after 4000 ft of climbing and on the 8-10% grade, the difference between CAAD 12 and my Evo was like day and night I didn't have a power meter but I rode this route all the time.
On my Tuesday group ride with people I rode with for years, my performance with the CAAD 12 on climbing and flat were definitely slower, except I was descending faster.
Last month with the CAAD 12 I broke all my PRs in descending. Most of the PRs were made a few years earlier when I was 5-7 lb heavier and more fearless.
CAAD 12 is definitely heavier. I don't weight much (~140 lbs). I bought the entry level 105 group set CAAD 12 without any upgrade. All my components on the Evo are carbon, except the custom built Boyd Aluminum climbing wheel. I don't like carbon wheels for long steep descents due to some earlier unpleasant experiences.
Now I've been riding CAAD 12 for a month, including two trips to 5500 ft Crystal Lake in San Gabriel Mtns in South Cal. I feel after 4000 ft of climbing and on the 8-10% grade, the difference between CAAD 12 and my Evo was like day and night I didn't have a power meter but I rode this route all the time.
On my Tuesday group ride with people I rode with for years, my performance with the CAAD 12 on climbing and flat were definitely slower, except I was descending faster.
Last month with the CAAD 12 I broke all my PRs in descending. Most of the PRs were made a few years earlier when I was 5-7 lb heavier and more fearless.
CAAD 12 is definitely heavier. I don't weight much (~140 lbs). I bought the entry level 105 group set CAAD 12 without any upgrade. All my components on the Evo are carbon, except the custom built Boyd Aluminum climbing wheel. I don't like carbon wheels for long steep descents due to some earlier unpleasant experiences.
No reason the CAAD12 should take the criticism for not being a good climbing frame because all the parts attached to the frame are heavy. OMO.
#18
Senior Member
Agree with you 100%, CAAD 12 frame shouldn't take all the blame.
I WASN"T comparing CAAD 12 frame to Evo Frame.
I made it pretty clear I WAS comparing a <$2k aluminum bike to a >$6k carbon bike (bike = frame + components + wheels...), with very similar geometry.
My point is, based on my personal experience, the more expensive components (which happened to be lighter and stiffer), does make a noticeable difference, particularly in long continuous climbing.
#19
Senior Member
The bottom line is if you ride and climb enough, have enough experience/skills to appreciate the $$ difference. They both look extremely good hanging on the wall.
#20
Senior Member
#21
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Given what I've seen of dented CAADs, I'd go with the SuperSix because I believe it would be more durable.
Shocking, I know.
Shocking, I know.
#22
Senior Member
Last week I was in a 4 bike wreck. 3 CF bikes and my CAAD12. The only bike to sustain major damage was the CF Dogma.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Antioch, IL
Posts: 2,330
Bikes: 2013 Synapse 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
don't misunderstand, I'd ride an AL in a flat second if that is what fit my needs and etc. I'm not hung up on carbon at all, I have one carbon and one AL road bike at the moment. I just think your premise is no longer completely valid, though there are a few examples that could be true it's just not a valid blanket statement these days.
#25
Banned.
Both good bikes. All comes down to preference. The geometry night be different. A good aluminum bike will ride better than a bad carbon one. I just think having a carbon bike is cool. I do ride a majority of my time a caad 12 though. Great bikes. Just depends on the riding characteristics you like. Gotta ride them because all bikes feel different
Unless you're racing really doubt 1-2 lbs going to make a difference
I've rode super harsh carbon frames and super smooth aluminim frames.
I would get the supersix. Get a nice set of wheels and tires. Unless it's a beater bike. Then caad with nice wheels and tires.
Unless you're racing really doubt 1-2 lbs going to make a difference
I've rode super harsh carbon frames and super smooth aluminim frames.
I would get the supersix. Get a nice set of wheels and tires. Unless it's a beater bike. Then caad with nice wheels and tires.