Do you have social issues that influence bike gear companies you deal with?
#101
Senior Member
You have to understand, LeMond retired when he did because the dopers had taken over. He couldn't be competitive unless he started doping so he retired a few years before his time. That's what he said. Armstrong was a jerk to him before anyone even knew who Armstrong was. Then when LeMond saw him going up HC climbs barely breathing he knew from experience that Armstrong was doping. Dopers like Armstrong drove him to retirement so he had a right to sound off.
But boycotting companies over social issues? That's stupid. Get a life. People today are poisoned with hate over this BS, then they lecture about tolerance. Sad to see.
But boycotting companies over social issues? That's stupid. Get a life. People today are poisoned with hate over this BS, then they lecture about tolerance. Sad to see.
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
What kind of life do you suggest? Seems to me that what we're talking about is examining the things one does and making thoughtful decisions; the unexamined life is not worth living.
But yes, it's sad to see the gross oversimplification of issues and all the imitation mindfulness - not mere 'virtue signaling,' but the ridiculous broadcasting of it and bandwagon jumping-on. If you ask, I'll tell you whether I intend to buy anything from some controversial source, and if you ask why, I'll try to make a convincing case why others should follow suit - that's totally reasonable, isn't it? - but I'm not going to go around telling everyone about the things I will or won't do, especially when my decisions are based on something as weak and insubstantial as a handful of social media postings. Meanwhile, having a strongly expressed moral point of view does not preclude tolerance, and tolerance doesn't necessarily mean indifference. One can be tolerant of what one knows and proclaims to be wrong if there issues in mitigation, extenuation, and if one has a forgiving nature.
I wouldn't say the boycotters are particularly 'poisoned with hate.' Seems to me that those who take the other side out of spite are more so; it's certainly not amusing.
But yes, it's sad to see the gross oversimplification of issues and all the imitation mindfulness - not mere 'virtue signaling,' but the ridiculous broadcasting of it and bandwagon jumping-on. If you ask, I'll tell you whether I intend to buy anything from some controversial source, and if you ask why, I'll try to make a convincing case why others should follow suit - that's totally reasonable, isn't it? - but I'm not going to go around telling everyone about the things I will or won't do, especially when my decisions are based on something as weak and insubstantial as a handful of social media postings. Meanwhile, having a strongly expressed moral point of view does not preclude tolerance, and tolerance doesn't necessarily mean indifference. One can be tolerant of what one knows and proclaims to be wrong if there issues in mitigation, extenuation, and if one has a forgiving nature.
I wouldn't say the boycotters are particularly 'poisoned with hate.' Seems to me that those who take the other side out of spite are more so; it's certainly not amusing.
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The internet isn't going to bring people together and make them see the fellow humanity in others unless they want to - in fact, sometimes it seems to be doing a better job of just the opposite.
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
Yeah. That's just prejudice. Coming from Texas, some of my best friends have been 'redneck' (well, maybe not 'best friends,' but close acquaintances anyhow), and descending from a line of farmers and tradesmen (not all the most enlightened sort) I can't deny there are even some in my family.
The internet isn't going to bring people together and make them see the fellow humanity in others unless they want to - in fact, sometimes it seems to be doing a better job of just the opposite.
The internet isn't going to bring people together and make them see the fellow humanity in others unless they want to - in fact, sometimes it seems to be doing a better job of just the opposite.
#105
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,279 Times
in
739 Posts
Reading on wiki Greg changed his story multiple times for why he could not compete. Lance was never dominant during that time and the only race they both competed in in 94 they both dropped out. It may be true about the doping but to put it all on Lance was totally not fair. He also said he cried (of happiness) when Lance won. So I find it hard to believe their was animosity beyond the typical competitiveness back then.
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,958
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4340 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times
in
995 Posts
Reading on wiki Greg changed his story multiple times for why he could not compete. Lance was never dominant during that time and the only race they both competed in in 94 they both dropped out. It may be true about the doping but to put it all on Lance was totally not fair. He also said he cried (of happiness) when Lance won. So I find it hard to believe their was animosity beyond the typical competitiveness back then.
Greg and Lance were not competing against each other much, but Lance certainly typifies that changes to pro cycling that drove Lemond and Graeme Obree out of the sport, as well as one of the reasons Lemond left PDM in 1988. The various claims that Lemond must have been doping, too, always sound like sour grapes compared to the guy's actual actions and performance when he was a pro. If he was doping, then he would have continued to perform well after 1990.
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
So you mean to say that you'd boycott a company if they got political? You do realize that that's why people are boycotting Vista, right? Vista is a big supporter of the NRA and has their own PAC to financially support politicians that'll push agendas on their behalf. That's pretty political, no?
#108
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SGV So Cal
Posts: 883
Bikes: 80's Schwinn High Plains, Motobecane Ti Cyclocross
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times
in
21 Posts
I bought my first mountaineering kit from REI back in 1970.
I just sent them an Email a month or so ago telling them that I will no longer patronize or recommend them since they decided to quit carrying Giro, Bell and Camelbak. (they long ago ceased to be anything except an overpriced store for wanabe's)
I wonder how long till they quit carrying Gregory since it's owned by Bianchi which is owned by BAE?
Not interested in supporting any SJWs that want to circumvent my rights.
I just sent them an Email a month or so ago telling them that I will no longer patronize or recommend them since they decided to quit carrying Giro, Bell and Camelbak. (they long ago ceased to be anything except an overpriced store for wanabe's)
I wonder how long till they quit carrying Gregory since it's owned by Bianchi which is owned by BAE?
Not interested in supporting any SJWs that want to circumvent my rights.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I bought my first mountaineering kit from REI back in 1970.
I just sent them an Email a month or so ago telling them that I will no longer patronize or recommend them since they decided to quit carrying Giro, Bell and Camelbak. (they long ago ceased to be anything except an overpriced store for wanabe's)
I wonder how long till they quit carrying Gregory since it's owned by Bianchi which is owned by BAE?
Not interested in supporting any SJWs that want to circumvent my rights.
I just sent them an Email a month or so ago telling them that I will no longer patronize or recommend them since they decided to quit carrying Giro, Bell and Camelbak. (they long ago ceased to be anything except an overpriced store for wanabe's)
I wonder how long till they quit carrying Gregory since it's owned by Bianchi which is owned by BAE?
Not interested in supporting any SJWs that want to circumvent my rights.
Unless it grows on trees or we make it ourselves, someone else has to make it and sell it. If they agree with us that whatever it is we want is OK, then everything is fine - they'll keep making or selling it - other people making a stink about it won't matter. But if they capitulate to the SJW or simply agree with others (i.e., more reasonable and less vehement types) who think that making and selling something we want is not such a good idea and figure it would be a better idea to make or sell something else, well, we're SOL. It was never about us (or our rights) to begin with. It's their business - we're only taking advantage of it.
Last edited by kbarch; 04-08-18 at 06:57 PM.
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,958
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4340 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times
in
995 Posts
So you mean to say that you'd boycott a company if they got political? You do realize that that's why people are boycotting Vista, right? Vista is a big supporter of the NRA and has their own PAC to financially support politicians that'll push agendas on their behalf. That's pretty political, no?
Anyone who is a member of a trade union should be able to understand not wanting to leave the union even when the union backs a candidate you don't like. How many Teamsters are actually Democrats?
I do not envy the position firearms company's are currently in. The usefulness of the NRA's influence in politics is still greater than the liability to the public - but it is getting close to parity.
#112
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,279 Times
in
739 Posts
I don't feel sorry for the NRA or the firearms manufacturers. They brought this on themselves by opposing any reasonable gun control and stoking fear in their membership. Had they attempted to be active in finding solutions to gun violence it may not have gotten to this point. Refusing to support the Dickey Amendment would have been a good start. FWIW, I am a gun owner, have a permit to carry and my son is an armorer and has an FFL. IMO the NRA is complicit in the firearm deaths in this country and they will bear much of the blame when the pendulum swings and we start losing our Second Amendment rights. Now, I'm done on that subject.
#113
Senior Member
Nothing is ever so cut and dried as a boycott would presume. Lance's fall from grace has overwhelmed his miraculous recovery from cancer. His Livestrong foundation and its publicity has quite possibly led to the treatments that saved my life last year.
So called "rednecks" supply nearly all of the 1% that is our nation's military, and they happily accept the insults from the coastal elites they defend.
As for guns, my daughter lost a friend at Sandy Hook. What would you pay to have seen the headline that day be, "Principal with Illegal Handgun Kils Armed Intruder." Just several weeks ago in Martland, an officer killed a potential school shooter and the story quickly faded from the news. Two sides, or more, to every story. Didn't Lemond take a gunshot to the leg, while hunting?
That said, I try to shop locally to support my neighbors. I buy gas with the lowest price, in hopes of the market driving costs down. And I like the " Handmade in the USA" emblems on my Cannondale, even though they are no longer made here. Emotion driven boycotts and product shaming turn my stomach.
It's 8am, I think I need a drink.
So called "rednecks" supply nearly all of the 1% that is our nation's military, and they happily accept the insults from the coastal elites they defend.
As for guns, my daughter lost a friend at Sandy Hook. What would you pay to have seen the headline that day be, "Principal with Illegal Handgun Kils Armed Intruder." Just several weeks ago in Martland, an officer killed a potential school shooter and the story quickly faded from the news. Two sides, or more, to every story. Didn't Lemond take a gunshot to the leg, while hunting?
That said, I try to shop locally to support my neighbors. I buy gas with the lowest price, in hopes of the market driving costs down. And I like the " Handmade in the USA" emblems on my Cannondale, even though they are no longer made here. Emotion driven boycotts and product shaming turn my stomach.
It's 8am, I think I need a drink.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
#118
nothing to see here
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 564
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times
in
78 Posts
I don't feel sorry for the NRA or the firearms manufacturers. They brought this on themselves by opposing any reasonable gun control and stoking fear in their membership. Had they attempted to be active in finding solutions to gun violence it may not have gotten to this point. Refusing to support the Dickey Amendment would have been a good start. FWIW, I am a gun owner, have a permit to carry and my son is an armorer and has an FFL. IMO the NRA is complicit in the firearm deaths in this country and they will bear much of the blame when the pendulum swings and we start losing our Second Amendment rights. Now, I'm done on that subject.
As far as the NRA is concerned they exist because there are millions of people who agree with their philosophy and understand what the words "shall not be infringed" actually mean. Plenty of lobbyists put out much more money to fund politicians than the NRA. What about planned parenthood or anti American Nazi George Soros pushing their agenda on the politicians? Seems like it's ok for Democrats to take their money and influence for some reason.
If the current President is actually the second coming of Hitler as some say then why would the American public be so stupid as to voluntarily disarm themselves? History has proven that fascist regimes prefer their subjects to be defenseless. Remember Tiananmen square? How about the women of Iran disappearing after protesting the hijab? Maybe we can be more like Britain with no guns but plenty of bombings, knife attacks, acid attacks, car and truck attacks? No matter how hard you try, you cannot legislate against the human capacity to kill another person. But social issues and changing the constitution at will does no good. Remember the alchohol ban? 10 years of prohibition proved that you can't legislate human nature. What happens when some people decide to change another amendment? Losing the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 15th amendments would be a serious blow to the liberty all Americans enjoy.
As for the boycotts, the recent court case about the bakery who didn't want to bake a cake for the gay couple proves that businesses are free to operate as they please. Which to me is a very American way of thinking.
I choose to spend my money however and with whom I choose. My choice. Same with the rest of us, there is no problem with that.
I support Specialized in part because of their policy of not selling bikes online. You need to go to a local bike shop and do business with your neighbors.
I do not like to shop with Amazon due to the fact that they take advantage of the USPS with almost free shipping, sell products at or below their cost just to gain market share, and get lucrative tax breaks all while putting locally owned shops and stores out of business. Not to mention making this Bezos guy the richest man in the world.
I am not here to say boycotts shouldn't happen or somehow victimize the companies who get targeted. My point is to look deeper into the issue and see where all the noise is coming from. You may not like who is pulling the strings behind the scenes.
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,214
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,492 Times
in
7,316 Posts
Hello. What's this thread about?
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
#123
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550
Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
145 Posts
Oooh, politics!
#124
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,979
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11952 Post(s)
Liked 6,602 Times
in
3,466 Posts
Yeah it’s about that time.
This is why we can’t have nice things.
This is why we can’t have nice things.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon