1mph gain switching to narrower tires
#26
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1187 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I don't know if it would affect your results either way, but you should have very different pressures in a 28 and a 21 as the ideal is based on tire volume and rider weight. It sounds like you have them filled to similar pressures.
This chart is by weight per wheel, so you take rider and bike weight then split it 45/55 front and rear.

As you'll note, the difference in optimal pressures for a 21 and 28 are something like 45 psi. You almost certainly have one or both of your tire pressures way off of optimal if they 'ping' the same. It wouldn't surprise me if the 28s are slow for you because you have them much over-inflated.
This chart is by weight per wheel, so you take rider and bike weight then split it 45/55 front and rear.

As you'll note, the difference in optimal pressures for a 21 and 28 are something like 45 psi. You almost certainly have one or both of your tire pressures way off of optimal if they 'ping' the same. It wouldn't surprise me if the 28s are slow for you because you have them much over-inflated.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,439
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3342 Post(s)
Liked 770 Times
in
515 Posts
Until they hit a bump with the front wheel and the weight shifts. But you are correct that the split might be higher than what I used as an example - it depends both on rider position and frame geometry, as longer chainstays shift weight to the front wheel.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17839 Post(s)
Liked 4,277 Times
in
3,190 Posts
Standing, it puts at least some of the weight forward.
I would assume a steep descent in the drops would do the opposite, with at least 60%, or more of the weight forward (also a reason for a light touch on the front brake).
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17839 Post(s)
Liked 4,277 Times
in
3,190 Posts
Oh... so another pissing contest about tires and wheels. 
I've been riding my cross bike and drop converted hybrid all spring.
I just got my road bike back on the road... 23 or 25mm tires. Oh, it feels nice.
Not a lot of solid data, but I've been pushing my speed and hitting JRA PR's. Although, also feeling a bit of road buzz in the hands
Still, I suppose the question should be comparing apples to apples. For example, finding a bike that will fit multiple tire sizes, and sourcing a single brand like gatorskins in multiple sizes.

I've been riding my cross bike and drop converted hybrid all spring.
I just got my road bike back on the road... 23 or 25mm tires. Oh, it feels nice.

Not a lot of solid data, but I've been pushing my speed and hitting JRA PR's. Although, also feeling a bit of road buzz in the hands

Still, I suppose the question should be comparing apples to apples. For example, finding a bike that will fit multiple tire sizes, and sourcing a single brand like gatorskins in multiple sizes.
#30
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1187 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
It also varies with ride conditions. So, if I'm climbing seated, I can hit closer to 90%, I think. It is a bit disturbing when I hit 100% on the rear.
Standing, it puts at least some of the weight forward.
I would assume a steep descent in the drops would do the opposite, with at least 60%, or more of the weight forward (also a reason for a light touch on the front brake).
Standing, it puts at least some of the weight forward.
I would assume a steep descent in the drops would do the opposite, with at least 60%, or more of the weight forward (also a reason for a light touch on the front brake).
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17839 Post(s)
Liked 4,277 Times
in
3,190 Posts
One's hands and one's rump are also very different contact points.
There are usually far more complaints of hand numbness than rump numbness (although numbness in the sitting area does occur and can be very serious).
I presume one's arms absorb shock a bit better too, while hitting a hard bump sitting hard on the seat can really pound the bike.
Lots of different theories... fatter tires up front, skinny on the rear. Fatter on the rear, skinny up front. Perhaps it doesn't really matter.
I have started setting the rear tire pressure slightly higher than the front, but even that doesn't seem to be a big deal.
Personally, I usually only pump with a gauge once every few weeks, then like the OP, the rest of the time, just use my thumb as a guide. And, of course, pumping after a flat is usually on the road with the hand pump and no gauge.
#33
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
There are steep climbs in Wilmette?
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17839 Post(s)
Liked 4,277 Times
in
3,190 Posts

My own driveway has a short section of > 15% climbing. And, I don't drive enough to keep the fir needles clear (they act like roller bearings), so when it is wet, there is a fine line between sitting and getting wheelies, and standing and spinning.
There are a few steep spots around here, but I don't hit them too frequently. I should try it a bit more. I did one ride towards Crater Lake that had a sustained 10% or so climb for several miles, put me over the top when I was riding a loaded touring bike.
Someone has developed 3 ABSOLUTELY INSANE half century rides up in Portland. I think the average climb is about 10%, with some hitting over 20%.

Anyway, mainly my experience on my driveway gives me a good view of weight distribution and traction.
I don't do much gravel/dirt, but can feel how it also affects that with a few climbs up to canal trails.
#35
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 56
Bikes: Seven Evergreen // Serotta SS // Calfee Bamboo SS // Spot Rallye SS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I don't think even velodrome racers use 21mm anymore. Unless you're averaging 25mph+, the better time had almost nothing to do with tire width; and if you were averaging that speed, the 28mm would likely still be faster.
#37
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
On the open road, there is more to consider than weight and rolling resistance. I went from 23 mm on a narrow rim to 25 mm on a slightly wider rim and the difference in comfort and confidence has lead to a noticeable increase in overall speed on 20-100 mile rides. Road buzz was reduced and the bike feels much more secure on curves and sketchy surfaces, such as sand kicked or washed up from a shoulder or old rough pavement. In short, the tires might not be faster, but I am because my hands aren't numb and I can keep my speed up in situations where the 23s might feel squirrely.
BTW, on my long rides (50-100 miles) the difference in speed between my road bike with 25 mm tires and my flat-bar mutt bike with 32 mm tires, of the same brand and model, is between 1 and 2 mph on the same route under similar weather conditions. Even with the same bike and the same tires, my rides can vary by 1 mph or more because of slight differences in weather, hydration, or how I'm feeling that day.
BTW, on my long rides (50-100 miles) the difference in speed between my road bike with 25 mm tires and my flat-bar mutt bike with 32 mm tires, of the same brand and model, is between 1 and 2 mph on the same route under similar weather conditions. Even with the same bike and the same tires, my rides can vary by 1 mph or more because of slight differences in weather, hydration, or how I'm feeling that day.
#38
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6841 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times
in
465 Posts
The OP had a completely different brand and model of tire mounted on a different wheelset.
Tire width isn't the only thing which changed. It is a completely different setup.
Tire width isn't the only thing which changed. It is a completely different setup.
#39
Rice Baker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
+1 on specific tire mattering. My training gatorskins have noticeably high rolling resistance when I run much less than 100 PSI with their stiff/durable sidewalls. Whereas 320 TPI vittoria corsas roll and ride great at the right (low) pressure.
#40
Rhapsodic Laviathan
#41
Non omnino gravis
#42
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1187 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
The 60/40 is probably a good rule of thumb, but riding is never really in a steady state. I like to stand from time to time even on the level which pushes the weight forward.
One's hands and one's rump are also very different contact points.
There are usually far more complaints of hand numbness than rump numbness (although numbness in the sitting area does occur and can be very serious).
I presume one's arms absorb shock a bit better too, while hitting a hard bump sitting hard on the seat can really pound the bike.
Lots of different theories... fatter tires up front, skinny on the rear. Fatter on the rear, skinny up front. Perhaps it doesn't really matter.
I have started setting the rear tire pressure slightly higher than the front, but even that doesn't seem to be a big deal.
Personally, I usually only pump with a gauge once every few weeks, then like the OP, the rest of the time, just use my thumb as a guide. And, of course, pumping after a flat is usually on the road with the hand pump and no gauge.
One's hands and one's rump are also very different contact points.
There are usually far more complaints of hand numbness than rump numbness (although numbness in the sitting area does occur and can be very serious).
I presume one's arms absorb shock a bit better too, while hitting a hard bump sitting hard on the seat can really pound the bike.
Lots of different theories... fatter tires up front, skinny on the rear. Fatter on the rear, skinny up front. Perhaps it doesn't really matter.
I have started setting the rear tire pressure slightly higher than the front, but even that doesn't seem to be a big deal.
Personally, I usually only pump with a gauge once every few weeks, then like the OP, the rest of the time, just use my thumb as a guide. And, of course, pumping after a flat is usually on the road with the hand pump and no gauge.
Wheel slippage is a very small percentage of this difference. Front wheel also turns the bike therefore there is scrub angle in front as well. Difference in wear is due to the weight difference front to rear. The rear shoulders much more of overall weight baring for majority of riding. The butt of a rider can endure much more weight than the hands of a rider on a sustained basis. Why you don't see many 80 y.o.'s on a drop bar bike.
#44
Senior Member
Huh? I got bigger tires because the pavement around here sucks. I had been working hard at getting stronger, and didn't expect the kind of gains I saw with the new tires, so it was actually a disappointment.
#45
Senior Member
#48
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
I once set a KOM on a MUP heading back from grinding some gravel with knobby 30s that I haven't come close to beating with my 23s. The science is in.
#49
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 43
Bikes: 2011 Cannondale CAAD10-4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
McBeth Road and Highway 242 come to mind.
On topic: my bike came with 23mm tires. I switched to 25mm tires. Irode felt faster. And I got faster as the season went on. Now, I'm slower, because I've been lazy this year, and have gotten fat and out of shape. Conclusion: tires help the bike roll, and not slide out in a corner.
On topic: my bike came with 23mm tires. I switched to 25mm tires. I
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18881 Post(s)
Liked 10,643 Times
in
6,053 Posts
Humans are natural story-tellers, it's how we related to the world. I changed my tires, and now I'm a lot faster. Maybe. Maybe it was the amount of shampoo he used that day that got him 1 mph. We also have a tendency to change one thing, because we believe it'll be a good change, and then to attribute any good or bad things that happen to it. Finally that also gives us this weird sort of placebo effect, where you expect some change to make you faster, the excitement makes you push harder. A power meter would let everyone know to what extent that last one is at play.