Curious About Individual Road Averages? Where We 'Stand'...
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,613
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1066 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times
in
502 Posts
Sure, but which is "road average" that OP was asking about?
Also I'd be inclined to add a third option (which I suspect most people use) which would only include actually traveled on the road. Starting after a half mile in a parking lot for example, or disregarding a mile of MUP or sidewalk.
Nice ride!
Also I'd be inclined to add a third option (which I suspect most people use) which would only include actually traveled on the road. Starting after a half mile in a parking lot for example, or disregarding a mile of MUP or sidewalk.
Nice ride!
Thanks for the
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sure, but which is "road average" that OP was asking about?
Also I'd be inclined to add a third option (which I suspect most people use) which would only include actually traveled on the road. Starting after a half mile in a parking lot for example, or disregarding a mile of MUP or sidewalk.
Also I'd be inclined to add a third option (which I suspect most people use) which would only include actually traveled on the road. Starting after a half mile in a parking lot for example, or disregarding a mile of MUP or sidewalk.
The differential of average speed while moving and average speed based on elapsed time is a meaningless number. I often do a 50-60 mile ride out to have lunch with my wife. Between the lunch and stoplights on the way there and back, my move ratio might be 0.66.
On another day, I might do 40, 50, or 60 miles and never dismount the bike. Might do 30 miles and never touch a foot to the ground. Whether the move ratio is 1.00 or 0.50 tells nothing of the ride's intensity.
On another day, I might do 40, 50, or 60 miles and never dismount the bike. Might do 30 miles and never touch a foot to the ground. Whether the move ratio is 1.00 or 0.50 tells nothing of the ride's intensity.
Like some riders, I do not have a minimum speed set to shut off my 920XT Garmin. When I come to a red traffic light and continue to ride closed circular loops instead of stopping while waiting for the light to change, the 2mph moving speed at that time factors into lowering the average mph. We usually have a 5 mile warm-up (neutral zone riding ) after which some on the ride then start their computer whereas mine is on from the start again lowering the average.
#53
Non omnino gravis
Total mileage > average speed
Probably +95% of my rides start and end in my driveway. The computer is started in the driveway when I leave, and stopped when I return. The notion of starting the clock only after I've warmed up and stopping it before cooldown is ridiculous.
Mostly because it takes me about 40 minutes to warm up.
Probably +95% of my rides start and end in my driveway. The computer is started in the driveway when I leave, and stopped when I return. The notion of starting the clock only after I've warmed up and stopping it before cooldown is ridiculous.
Mostly because it takes me about 40 minutes to warm up.
#54
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Really! People trying to fudge their average?!! Sure doesn't work on a brevet. You start when you start and you get there when you get there. Same with saddle time. The clock is running whenever the wheels are turning. Both moving and ET averages are useful to keep track of. Obviously the more you stop the faster you can go between stops. So both are good things to keep track of. If you're too embarrassed to post your real averages, well, don't post them. No problem. On the ride I posted above, I was 15' slower in saddle time this year, however I was 15' faster on ET than last year. Meaning I spent a whole 1/2 longer last year faffing. Good to know! It's often faster on ET to ride solo like I did this year.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Time and effort.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
No, I'm afraid it's totally hopeless, guys. The only way to compare "average speeds" as a measure of performance or achievement is to compare identical rides or sets of rides. Aside from folks enrolled in the same training program, maybe, who could ever do that? Not a bunch of random folks on the interwebs, that's for sure!
#57
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Like some riders, I do not have a minimum speed set to shut off my 920XT Garmin. When I come to a red traffic light and continue to ride closed circular loops instead of stopping while waiting for the light to change, the 2mph moving speed at that time factors into lowering the average mph. We usually have a 5 mile warm-up (neutral zone riding ) after which some on the ride then start their computer whereas mine is on from the start again lowering the average.
Thanks for the
Thanks for the
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,936
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,284 Times
in
2,941 Posts
2013 = 1,965 miles (145.5 miles a week) in 105 hours at 18.7 mph average.
2014 = 8,703 miles (167.3 miles a week) in 450.8 hours at 19.3 mph average
2015 = 9,345 miles (179.7 miles a week) in 476 hours at 19.6 mph average.
2016 = 9,944 miles (191.2 miles a week) in 494.5 hours at 20.1 mph average..
2017 = 8,581 miles (165 miles a week) in 421.5 hours at 20.3 mph average.
2018 = 4,484 miles (163 miles a week) in 226.6 hours at 19.8 mph average.
2014 = 8,703 miles (167.3 miles a week) in 450.8 hours at 19.3 mph average
2015 = 9,345 miles (179.7 miles a week) in 476 hours at 19.6 mph average.
2016 = 9,944 miles (191.2 miles a week) in 494.5 hours at 20.1 mph average..
2017 = 8,581 miles (165 miles a week) in 421.5 hours at 20.3 mph average.
2018 = 4,484 miles (163 miles a week) in 226.6 hours at 19.8 mph average.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,613
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1066 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times
in
502 Posts
The differential of average speed while moving and average speed based on elapsed time is a meaningless number. I often do a 50-60 mile ride out to have lunch with my wife. Between the lunch and stoplights on the way there and back, my move ratio might be 0.66.
On another day, I might do 40, 50, or 60 miles and never dismount the bike. Might do 30 miles and never touch a foot to the ground. Whether the move ratio is 1.00 or 0.50 tells nothing of the ride's intensity.
On another day, I might do 40, 50, or 60 miles and never dismount the bike. Might do 30 miles and never touch a foot to the ground. Whether the move ratio is 1.00 or 0.50 tells nothing of the ride's intensity.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Solo yesterday https://www.relive.cc/view/1703214169
#61
Non omnino gravis
Solo this morning. Two Toe Taps
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If you have Strava or GPS unit set to auto-pause when you stop.
Even with that set, it takes at least few seconds for the GPS and strava to realize you stopped, so city riding with frequent stops lowers your average noticeably
Even with that set, it takes at least few seconds for the GPS and strava to realize you stopped, so city riding with frequent stops lowers your average noticeably
#64
Senior Member
Thread Starter
All good information covering a lot of riding styles, distances, methods of measuring performance, ages, frequency of activity and many other things to consider to arrive at a meaningful individualized analysis... enough so that I think for sure I'm pretty slow (avg. 12.6 mph max). But, I do think the overall average while the wheels are rolling is a worthwhile metric to work on and into a training program so... on my wireless CatEye Strada with RPM emphasized as it is in a big digital number at the top of the small screen, I plan to leave the tiny number on the bottom set to at avg. mph. If on the same ride out and back I ever get close to 13, I'll work like hell to nail it down.
Last edited by McBTC; 07-16-18 at 12:45 PM.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I don't understand the fascination with RPM. RPM fluctuates a huge amount according to a number of factors. As an example, today I was between 70 and 136 rpms in a 25 mile, 20.8 mph avg. ride. Trying to lock yourself in to a specific rpm sounds awful and not very efficient.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I agree. I don't get it either. In fact one of the benefits of the old school FG winter training was that most of the time you are in the wrong gear. Got a headwind? Mash it. Got a tailwind? Spin it. And that is to get comfortable with a wider range of RPMs and essentially broaden your power band.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by Strava
#68
Senior Member
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 523
Bikes: Trek Domane, Surly Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 103 Times
in
68 Posts
I'm not a fast rider ... a month shy of 65 years old. I most often ride solo and don't have speed as a goal although I do check my average speed after each ride. Having said that, it's not a real meaningful number in my case. This past weekend, for example, I did a 56 mile ride, probably around 3,000 feet of climbing and ended the ride with a 13.6 mph average speed. It was in a new area for me (well, the second time I did it, but I forget a lot, so it's almost like the first time). So, there's the usual lights and stop signs, a couple of snack stops - one for an energy bar another stop rolling into a farm store for their locally made ice cream. Then, there's a few spots where I'm kind of slowing down, meandering, missing a turn, circling back, etc. Then, I thought I'd check out a side road to see how it looked and kind of meandered down that and back. Finally, I got waved down by two ladies on horses who wanted to know the fastest way back to the horse stable where they started from (true story). Not saying I would have set any land speed records with no stopping, but the 13.6 probably isn't terribly meaningful (that's ok, it was a great day on the bike!).
#70
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I don't understand the fascination with RPM. RPM fluctuates a huge amount according to a number of factors. As an example, today I was between 70 and 136 rpms in a 25 mile, 20.8 mph avg. ride. Trying to lock yourself in to a specific rpm sounds awful and not very efficient.
#71
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I agree. I don't get it either. In fact one of the benefits of the old school FG winter training was that most of the time you are in the wrong gear. Got a headwind? Mash it. Got a tailwind? Spin it. And that is to get comfortable with a wider range of RPMs and essentially broaden your power band.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
Really! People trying to fudge their average?!! Sure doesn't work on a brevet. You start when you start and you get there when you get there. Same with saddle time. The clock is running whenever the wheels are turning. Both moving and ET averages are useful to keep track of. Obviously the more you stop the faster you can go between stops. So both are good things to keep track of. If you're too embarrassed to post your real averages, well, don't post them. No problem. On the ride I posted above, I was 15' slower in saddle time this year, however I was 15' faster on ET than last year. Meaning I spent a whole 1/2 longer last year faffing. Good to know! It's often faster on ET to ride solo like I did this year.
Actually the reverse IME. Every stop requires slowing, and then accelerating, so the more stops, the lower the average speed, and a rest stop does not tend to give a 15% speed boost.
I suspect this is true even on very long rides, for example 3 hrs at 14.5 mph takes you 43.5 miles.
If the next 3 hours includes a 20min stop and then 16 mph ave, you'd go 42.5 miles, and the cruising speed would have to be even higher to compensate for the stopping & starting, and more, shorter stops makes it worse.
#73
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Actually the reverse IME. Every stop requires slowing, and then accelerating, so the more stops, the lower the average speed, and a rest stop does not tend to give a 15% speed boost.
I suspect this is true even on very long rides, for example 3 hrs at 14.5 mph takes you 43.5 miles.
If the next 3 hours includes a 20min stop and then 16 mph ave, you'd go 42.5 miles, and the cruising speed would have to be even higher to compensate for the stopping & starting, and more, shorter stops makes it worse.
I suspect this is true even on very long rides, for example 3 hrs at 14.5 mph takes you 43.5 miles.
If the next 3 hours includes a 20min stop and then 16 mph ave, you'd go 42.5 miles, and the cruising speed would have to be even higher to compensate for the stopping & starting, and more, shorter stops makes it worse.
There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
Back before I was in good-enough shape, on long climbs I'd stop for 1-2 minutes every hour. It seemed to me I was faster up the pass that way. Maybe not, maybe so. In any case, it's always "faster" not to DNF. Strava counts the stops, most bike computers are set not to.
There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.
There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.
This was hashed out in the thread about moving average vs overall average speeds
with the idea that it's kind of cheating to call out moving average because you can stop & rest, then ride faster.
But in terms of going fast, stopping definitely slows you down.
#75
Senior Member
There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.