Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Curious About Individual Road Averages? Where We 'Stand'...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Curious About Individual Road Averages? Where We 'Stand'...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-18, 02:04 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,613

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1066 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times in 502 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Sure, but which is "road average" that OP was asking about?

Also I'd be inclined to add a third option (which I suspect most people use) which would only include actually traveled on the road. Starting after a half mile in a parking lot for example, or disregarding a mile of MUP or sidewalk.

Nice ride!
Like some riders, I do not have a minimum speed set to shut off my 920XT Garmin. When I come to a red traffic light and continue to ride closed circular loops instead of stopping while waiting for the light to change, the 2mph moving speed at that time factors into lowering the average mph. We usually have a 5 mile warm-up (neutral zone riding ) after which some on the ride then start their computer whereas mine is on from the start again lowering the average.

Thanks for the
OldTryGuy is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 04:01 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
kbarch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Sure, but which is "road average" that OP was asking about?

Also I'd be inclined to add a third option (which I suspect most people use) which would only include actually traveled on the road. Starting after a half mile in a parking lot for example, or disregarding a mile of MUP or sidewalk.
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
The differential of average speed while moving and average speed based on elapsed time is a meaningless number. I often do a 50-60 mile ride out to have lunch with my wife. Between the lunch and stoplights on the way there and back, my move ratio might be 0.66.

On another day, I might do 40, 50, or 60 miles and never dismount the bike. Might do 30 miles and never touch a foot to the ground. Whether the move ratio is 1.00 or 0.50 tells nothing of the ride's intensity.
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
Like some riders, I do not have a minimum speed set to shut off my 920XT Garmin. When I come to a red traffic light and continue to ride closed circular loops instead of stopping while waiting for the light to change, the 2mph moving speed at that time factors into lowering the average mph. We usually have a 5 mile warm-up (neutral zone riding ) after which some on the ride then start their computer whereas mine is on from the start again lowering the average.
No, I'm afraid it's totally hopeless, guys. The only way to compare "average speeds" as a measure of performance or achievement is to compare identical rides or sets of rides. Aside from folks enrolled in the same training program, maybe, who could ever do that? Not a bunch of random folks on the interwebs, that's for sure!
kbarch is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 04:33 PM
  #53  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Total mileage > average speed

Probably +95% of my rides start and end in my driveway. The computer is started in the driveway when I leave, and stopped when I return. The notion of starting the clock only after I've warmed up and stopping it before cooldown is ridiculous.

Mostly because it takes me about 40 minutes to warm up.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 05:30 PM
  #54  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Really! People trying to fudge their average?!! Sure doesn't work on a brevet. You start when you start and you get there when you get there. Same with saddle time. The clock is running whenever the wheels are turning. Both moving and ET averages are useful to keep track of. Obviously the more you stop the faster you can go between stops. So both are good things to keep track of. If you're too embarrassed to post your real averages, well, don't post them. No problem. On the ride I posted above, I was 15' slower in saddle time this year, however I was 15' faster on ET than last year. Meaning I spent a whole 1/2 longer last year faffing. Good to know! It's often faster on ET to ride solo like I did this year.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 05:48 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Time and effort.
caloso is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 07:18 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by kbarch
No, I'm afraid it's totally hopeless, guys. The only way to compare "average speeds" as a measure of performance or achievement is to compare identical rides or sets of rides. Aside from folks enrolled in the same training program, maybe, who could ever do that? Not a bunch of random folks on the interwebs, that's for sure!
All true, but we won't let that stop us from arguing and pontificating about it. It's traditional.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 08:14 PM
  #57  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
Like some riders, I do not have a minimum speed set to shut off my 920XT Garmin. When I come to a red traffic light and continue to ride closed circular loops instead of stopping while waiting for the light to change, the 2mph moving speed at that time factors into lowering the average mph. We usually have a 5 mile warm-up (neutral zone riding ) after which some on the ride then start their computer whereas mine is on from the start again lowering the average.

Thanks for the
Which brings up a mildly interesting thing. When I bought my Edge 800, new from the factory, it came with a cut-off speed of 2 mph. I changed that right away to Stopped. But I did think it quite curious to have that as the default.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 08:20 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,936

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,284 Times in 2,941 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
2013 = 1,965 miles (145.5 miles a week) in 105 hours at 18.7 mph average.
2014 = 8,703 miles (167.3 miles a week) in 450.8 hours at 19.3 mph average
2015 = 9,345 miles (179.7 miles a week) in 476 hours at 19.6 mph average.
2016 = 9,944 miles (191.2 miles a week) in 494.5 hours at 20.1 mph average..
2017 = 8,581 miles (165 miles a week) in 421.5 hours at 20.3 mph average.
2018 = 4,484 miles (163 miles a week) in 226.6 hours at 19.8 mph average.
Quick.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 07-14-18, 08:47 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,613

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1066 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times in 502 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
The differential of average speed while moving and average speed based on elapsed time is a meaningless number. I often do a 50-60 mile ride out to have lunch with my wife. Between the lunch and stoplights on the way there and back, my move ratio might be 0.66.

On another day, I might do 40, 50, or 60 miles and never dismount the bike. Might do 30 miles and never touch a foot to the ground. Whether the move ratio is 1.00 or 0.50 tells nothing of the ride's intensity.
When I do my midnight departure no touch 100 milers, they do indeed yield actual comparable averages since the route is repeated. I did that often when preparing for my first and second Ironman Florida and since I have decided to attempt my third IMFL in November 2019 as a 69yo OlderTryGuy, I will be checking my averages for improvement.
OldTryGuy is offline  
Old 07-15-18, 07:30 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Solo yesterday https://www.relive.cc/view/1703214169
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 07-15-18, 07:48 PM
  #61  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Solo this morning. Two Toe Taps
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 10:46 AM
  #62  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Quick.
Indeed. His signature will explain that.
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 11:11 AM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Strava calculates overall mph based on moving time.
If you have Strava or GPS unit set to auto-pause when you stop.

Even with that set, it takes at least few seconds for the GPS and strava to realize you stopped, so city riding with frequent stops lowers your average noticeably
bikebreak is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 12:40 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
All good information covering a lot of riding styles, distances, methods of measuring performance, ages, frequency of activity and many other things to consider to arrive at a meaningful individualized analysis... enough so that I think for sure I'm pretty slow (avg. 12.6 mph max). But, I do think the overall average while the wheels are rolling is a worthwhile metric to work on and into a training program so... on my wireless CatEye Strada with RPM emphasized as it is in a big digital number at the top of the small screen, I plan to leave the tiny number on the bottom set to at avg. mph. If on the same ride out and back I ever get close to 13, I'll work like hell to nail it down.

Last edited by McBTC; 07-16-18 at 12:45 PM.
McBTC is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 12:52 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
I don't understand the fascination with RPM. RPM fluctuates a huge amount according to a number of factors. As an example, today I was between 70 and 136 rpms in a 25 mile, 20.8 mph avg. ride. Trying to lock yourself in to a specific rpm sounds awful and not very efficient.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 01:47 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I agree. I don't get it either. In fact one of the benefits of the old school FG winter training was that most of the time you are in the wrong gear. Got a headwind? Mash it. Got a tailwind? Spin it. And that is to get comfortable with a wider range of RPMs and essentially broaden your power band.
caloso is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 01:50 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by bikebreak
If you have Strava or GPS unit set to auto-pause when you stop.

Even with that set, it takes at least few seconds for the GPS and strava to realize you stopped, so city riding with frequent stops lowers your average noticeably
No, Strava ignores your GPS unit's auto-pause or lack thereof.

WhyFi is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 02:53 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 335

Bikes: Mosaic RT-1, Trek Boone, Cervelo R3 Team, Surly Cross Check, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chicagogal
100-150 miles per week.

solos rides: 15.5-17mph average (each ride has at least one 20min climb).

group rides: 17-20mph
There are no 20 minute climbs in Chicago.
profjmb is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 03:43 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 523

Bikes: Trek Domane, Surly Disc Trucker

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 103 Times in 68 Posts
I'm not a fast rider ... a month shy of 65 years old. I most often ride solo and don't have speed as a goal although I do check my average speed after each ride. Having said that, it's not a real meaningful number in my case. This past weekend, for example, I did a 56 mile ride, probably around 3,000 feet of climbing and ended the ride with a 13.6 mph average speed. It was in a new area for me (well, the second time I did it, but I forget a lot, so it's almost like the first time). So, there's the usual lights and stop signs, a couple of snack stops - one for an energy bar another stop rolling into a farm store for their locally made ice cream. Then, there's a few spots where I'm kind of slowing down, meandering, missing a turn, circling back, etc. Then, I thought I'd check out a side road to see how it looked and kind of meandered down that and back. Finally, I got waved down by two ladies on horses who wanted to know the fastest way back to the horse stable where they started from (true story). Not saying I would have set any land speed records with no stopping, but the 13.6 probably isn't terribly meaningful (that's ok, it was a great day on the bike!).
dennis336 is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 08:53 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
I don't understand the fascination with RPM. RPM fluctuates a huge amount according to a number of factors. As an example, today I was between 70 and 136 rpms in a 25 mile, 20.8 mph avg. ride. Trying to lock yourself in to a specific rpm sounds awful and not very efficient.
That's because it's spinning is something you can take for granted-- I could never do 135 RPM (not even 100). For some of us, spinning is anything in the mid-70s and over. I only recently understood, from the banana-eating Aussie bike-review guy, durianrider (he's very pro-spinning), who everyone loves to hate, that mashing is anything below 80 and that you're not spinning until you get above 90, which means after years of trying to become a better spinner (like championship-doper LA taught us), I've only managed to not be a masher. Anyone count the RPMs of all those knees of all the peloton riders in the ongoing 2018 TdF? Not a masher in the batch.
McBTC is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 09:05 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
I agree. I don't get it either. In fact one of the benefits of the old school FG winter training was that most of the time you are in the wrong gear. Got a headwind? Mash it. Got a tailwind? Spin it. And that is to get comfortable with a wider range of RPMs and essentially broaden your power band.
Horsepower is a function of rpms and torque and for some of us who have to get by with what we've got in the way of 'torque' we need more rpms because we 'jus ain't got the horses without the bees' knees. But, it turns out, increasing rpms is about as difficult as putting on more muscle.
McBTC is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 10:12 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Really! People trying to fudge their average?!! Sure doesn't work on a brevet. You start when you start and you get there when you get there. Same with saddle time. The clock is running whenever the wheels are turning. Both moving and ET averages are useful to keep track of. Obviously the more you stop the faster you can go between stops. So both are good things to keep track of. If you're too embarrassed to post your real averages, well, don't post them. No problem. On the ride I posted above, I was 15' slower in saddle time this year, however I was 15' faster on ET than last year. Meaning I spent a whole 1/2 longer last year faffing. Good to know! It's often faster on ET to ride solo like I did this year.

Actually the reverse IME. Every stop requires slowing, and then accelerating, so the more stops, the lower the average speed, and a rest stop does not tend to give a 15% speed boost.

I suspect this is true even on very long rides, for example 3 hrs at 14.5 mph takes you 43.5 miles.

If the next 3 hours includes a 20min stop and then 16 mph ave, you'd go 42.5 miles, and the cruising speed would have to be even higher to compensate for the stopping & starting, and more, shorter stops makes it worse.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 10:50 PM
  #73  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by woodcraft
Actually the reverse IME. Every stop requires slowing, and then accelerating, so the more stops, the lower the average speed, and a rest stop does not tend to give a 15% speed boost.

I suspect this is true even on very long rides, for example 3 hrs at 14.5 mph takes you 43.5 miles.

If the next 3 hours includes a 20min stop and then 16 mph ave, you'd go 42.5 miles, and the cruising speed would have to be even higher to compensate for the stopping & starting, and more, shorter stops makes it worse.
Back before I was in good-enough shape, on long climbs I'd stop for 1-2 minutes every hour. It seemed to me I was faster up the pass that way. Maybe not, maybe so. In any case, it's always "faster" not to DNF. Strava counts the stops, most bike computers are set not to.

There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 07-16-18, 11:23 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Back before I was in good-enough shape, on long climbs I'd stop for 1-2 minutes every hour. It seemed to me I was faster up the pass that way. Maybe not, maybe so. In any case, it's always "faster" not to DNF. Strava counts the stops, most bike computers are set not to.

There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.

This was hashed out in the thread about moving average vs overall average speeds

with the idea that it's kind of cheating to call out moving average because you can stop & rest, then ride faster.

But in terms of going fast, stopping definitely slows you down.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 07-17-18, 12:11 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
There's an old story about a couple of LD racers who argued about this. One ate only on the bike. The other ate real meals. Unfortunately, I don't remember the names of the riders. Anyway, the guy who ate on the bike was faster on a very long brevet, but not by the margin one might expect. The real meals rider averaged 14.5, IIRC, so these were pretty quick riders.
What about eating real meals on the bike? Fork and knife and some steak dinners stashed in a handlebar bag?
HTupolev is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.