![]() |
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
(Post 20575711)
Slowing down to any speed above walking in order to make the light without actually stopping, will be faster than speeding up to the intersection and stopping abruptly. Nothing consumes more time than accelerating from a standstill.
|
Originally Posted by tagaproject6
(Post 20572025)
I stop pedaling and get ready to either stop or keep going. The situation is dynamic so you get ready to adjust.
/end thread This is quite important on a singlespeed where momentum is key. |
Originally Posted by SylvainG
(Post 20577679)
Not true. Take for example a 30 seconds red light and going 35 km/h. To gradually (and linearly to simplify the maths) slow down to 5 km/h at the turn of the green light, then 5 seconds to go back to your 35 km/h from the 5 km/h, your average speed would be 20 km/h. If on the other hand you stay at 35 km/h until the last 5 seconds then stop (moving speed also stops counting) then go from 0 km/h to 35 km/h in 7 seconds, your average moving speed would be 29,3 km/h.
|
Originally Posted by SHBR
(Post 20577742)
Full stops and starts require substantially greater effort....
|
Originally Posted by kbarch
(Post 20577889)
Are they trying to conserve their shift cables or something?
Gears have made me lazy, I use my geared bikes for more relaxed riding. |
Originally Posted by SHBR
(Post 20577742)
Full stops and starts require substantially greater effort, great for interval training, not so great for relaxed commuting or long distance riding.
|
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 20577213)
you interpreted it that way, whil noisebeam and I interpreted it as farther off.
In this area, we can usually see stoplights a half mile away. Per the OP: "[The red light in the distance] could have just changed or it could be changing to green any moment. What do you do? " The only practical answer is pedal until one can get more info - whether it be a change in light or being able to see x-walk signals or change in cross traffic, etc. This will happen much closer than 1/2 or 1/4 mile away. |
Originally Posted by tagaproject6
(Post 20572025)
I stop pedaling and get ready to either stop or keep going. The situation is dynamic so you get ready to adjust.
Plus it's the best for being able to look around and be aware of traffic. While I do watch traffic signals I first watch cars. "The light was green but I got hit by a car" is a terrible outcome for me, much worse than "I accidentally went through a red light but there were no cars" or "I stopped but turns out I didn't need to". |
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
(Post 20582793)
Same thing here as well. You don't know how things will go, no point in losing energy by breaking, no point in continuing to pedal because you might need to break and lose it as well.
Plus it's the best for being able to look around and be aware of traffic. |
1. Look for any cute honeys on the sidewalk
Yes? -> Brake and downshift in one swift motion, unclip and assertively set my foot down on the pavement as my wheels simultaneously roll to a stop. Set my forearms on the tops of my bars and give them the Lance glance No? -> ??? |
One point to (soft) PEDALING ;) when approaching a signaled intersection is to keep track of what gear one is in, and to adjust as appropriate to set up for the re-acceleration.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.