Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Failed Experiment

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Failed Experiment

Old 10-04-18, 08:47 PM
  #1  
colnago62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Failed Experiment

When I bought my Madone, I wasn’t able to get the cockpit setup I wanted; no 44cm bar and 13cm stem was available. So I went with the 44/12 bar. When I bought a Domane I had a 13cm Thomson stem put on. What a difference in comfort. I felt my breathing was better and I was more comfortable in the drops. A few years ago, Trek started making a kit for riders who wanted a different cockpit than the 1 piece bars. I made the switch and I am initially happy. We will see if I still feel that way in a month.

colnago62 is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 01:14 AM
  #2  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 156 Posts
Well it looks nice and all, but seems to be Enve equipment not Thompson or Bontrager. But what part of this is a “failed experiment”, sounds like it’s working for you?
robbyville is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 01:43 AM
  #3  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times in 153 Posts
Could you of gone up one frame size or would that of made the bars too high even with the stem slammed?
Dean V is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 03:56 AM
  #4  
waters60
Senior Member
 
waters60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 553
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked 101 Times in 58 Posts
I am wrestling with a similar issue, trying to get my Synapse set up similarly to my ‘92 Merckx Century. I know the Synapse is supposed to be more on the endurance side, but that should not preclude me from getting the reach / drop to where I want it. I have tried two stems but still feel cramped up on the drops, particularly if I want to get more aero. One nice thing about the new stems is being able to swap them out so easily.
waters60 is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 07:26 AM
  #5  
seau grateau
Senior Member
 
seau grateau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948

Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 396 Times in 192 Posts
Integrated bar/stems are some of the worst bike tech going around these days. I really hope they go out of style and don't trickle down into the affordable bike market.
seau grateau is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 12:27 PM
  #6  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 156 Posts
Originally Posted by seau grateau
Integrated bar/stems are some of the worst bike tech going around these days. I really hope they go out of style and don't trickle down into the affordable bike market.
True that, talk about limiting!

I went with mine purely because the bike was custom built for me so reach/drop was factored in, and I really wanted the full Speedvagen paint of bars and stem (Integrated) vs just the painted to match stem. Had it not been for that I never would go with an integrated combo.
robbyville is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 03:04 PM
  #7  
colnago62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
I tend to ride 59-60cm road frames. That frame is a 60cm the next size, I think, is a 62cm. which is way too large.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 03:55 PM
  #8  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1187 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Your post makes no sense really. Sorry. Are you really comparing a Domane to a Madone in geometry?...by changing stem size? A Domane has a higher stack and shorter top tube unless you changed frame sizes which makes your stem length point irrelevant.

I would never buy a bike with integrated handlebar/stem. Big cash cow for manufacturers and consumers get screwed and for what? 2 watts at 30mph?

You can always put a regular cockpit with conventional stem on a Madone as well.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 07:39 PM
  #9  
colnago62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
I have a Project one Domane which gives you the choice of H1 frame. So both my Madone and Domane are H1. The pictures are of my Madone with Enve bars.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 10-05-18, 10:01 PM
  #10  
robbyville
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 156 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
I have a Project one Domane which gives you the choice of H1 frame. So both my Madone and Domane are H1. The pictures are of my Madone with Enve bars.
understood I guess I’m wondering what the question is or what the failed experiment is? I’d love to be helpful....
robbyville is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 12:01 AM
  #11  
colnago62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
I guess I didn’t explain the failed part very well. When Trek built its Madone 9, they originally used a one piece stem and bar that was proprietary and then had very limited selection of bar/stem combination. The new Madone has a separate stem and bar so it is easier to get the best setup for the individual. Proprietary one piece was the failure. It would have been better if Trek had just used a component already on the market like the Pro bar/stem and rebranded like they did with the TRP brakes.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 03:54 AM
  #12  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1187 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
I guess I didn’t explain the failed part very well. When Trek built its Madone 9, they originally used a one piece stem and bar that was proprietary and then had very limited selection of bar/stem combination. The new Madone has a separate stem and bar so it is easier to get the best setup for the individual. Proprietary one piece was the failure. It would have been better if Trek had just used a component already on the market like the Pro bar/stem and rebranded like they did with the TRP brakes.
Makes a bit more sense. Yes, most here would agree that integrated stem/bar is a $500 failure at the amateur level. Pro's are a bit more refined in their fit and of course money is no object. No problem riding a $15K bike. Some amateurs in fact start out riding a shorter stem in the beginning of the season.
The whole integrated bar/stem is a manufacturing hustle. Trek was likely losing sales on the Madone for this inflexible design and why they changed it a more conventional cockpit.

They also offer a couple of options. The bike more reasonably priced at just over $4K, they install a conventional stem thankfully. Cables are routed adjacent to but not through the stem. All cables still route through the frame including the steerer. There is virtually less than a handful of watts lost with this cable routing approach and its nice and tidy compared to conventional bikes even with internal cable routing where the cables are exposed between handlebar and frame.

The Madone is one of my favorite aero bikes even though routing cables through the frame are a PITA but certainly doable for the decent home mechanic with patience. Only way to order the bike is with Di2 or Etap IMO. Di2 would get the nod in my case...my preference. Easier to route electrical cable through the frame than conventional groupset cables.

Trek did a great job on the Madone...beautiful, slippery and compliant with H2geometry available that won't break a rider's back or neck or for those long of inseam compared to torso length.
Also, wonderfully, they smelled coffee on their aero seat mast and finally incorporated a 2 bolt saddle clamp. When hemmed into a corner of only being able to use a proprietary seat mast, great to have the 2 bolt design which is so much better. They should do this for all their road bikes.

Last edited by Campag4life; 10-06-18 at 04:02 AM.
Campag4life is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chr0m0ly
Classic & Vintage
46
04-10-19 08:28 PM
SamSpade1941
Classic & Vintage
26
02-06-19 10:02 AM
cycledogg
Road Cycling
24
12-31-18 03:38 AM
Phamilton
Classic & Vintage
32
08-13-18 09:44 PM
masi61
Classic & Vintage
13
05-03-18 01:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.