Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Alloy Rim of Choice?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Alloy Rim of Choice?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-18, 09:12 PM
  #26  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
so 23 Internal and about 29 external?

if I saw a rim that size which weighed the same as an archetype, had the same mid-V profile, and was a similar price- I wouldnt be opposed to it at all for gravel.

most any gravel bike will have at least 35mm tires, usually 38-43mm tires, and sometimes something wide like 48mm tires.
a 23mm internal could fit great for that that range.
I'm think a rim with 23 Internal would be about 27 External. Weight would need to be close to the Archetype with a welded seam to be comparable.

What's the IN WIDTH for the Archetype?
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 09:18 PM
  #27  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I'm think a rim with 23 Internal would be about 27 External. Weight would need to be close to the Archetype with a welded seam to be comparable.

What's the IN WIDTH for the Archetype?
17.5mm internal and 23mm external for the Archetype.



since I have your ear, thanks for making a really uncommon but SUPER useful product- the offset rim brake holders.
I built a steel frame last winter, my first one, and mismeasured the rear brake bridge, but didn't realize until after paint while building the bike up. Your offset holders make everything work perfectly.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 09:21 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
So how wide is too wide in terms of internal widths? For road or gravel? Would something maybe 22mm or 23mm Internal be too much for gravel?
I've been riding a set of wheels with 25 mm internal width. Pavement, hard packed dirt, and gravel. I have nothing negative to say about those wheels. The stuff you're looking at will work great.

I must be the odd man out. I have a set of HED Ardennes, disc brake, and my opinion is "meh." That's a little unfair because I'm comparing them to stupidly expensive carbon hoops. Those are the two wheelsets I've been on in the last couple years.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 09:25 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
motosonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I'm partial to Easton EA90SLX, but I have a soft spot for the Shimano RS81's, too. But, HED Ardennes are nice as well. All great options for both racing or every day use.
motosonic is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 09:37 PM
  #30  
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
 
Marcus_Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331

Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
So how wide is too wide in terms of internal widths? For road or gravel? Would something maybe 22mm or 23mm Internal be too much for gravel?
​​​​​
wouldn't be too wide, the problem is finding it...particularly in alloy rims. I think Easton made a 24mm wide internal rim for road pressures for a few years...but that is it. All the other rims that wide are carbon
Marcus_Ti is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 09:57 PM
  #31  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
17.5mm internal and 23mm external for the Archetype.



since I have your ear, thanks for making a really uncommon but SUPER useful product- the offset rim brake holders.
I built a steel frame last winter, my first one, and mismeasured the rear brake bridge, but didn't realize until after paint while building the bike up. Your offset holders make everything work perfectly.
I love it when a plan comes together.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 09:59 PM
  #32  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Marcus_Ti
​​​​​
wouldn't be too wide, the problem is finding it...particularly in alloy rims. I think Easton made a 24mm wide internal rim for road pressures for a few years...but that is it. All the other rims that wide are carbon
What about something like this? Maybe 490g?
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-27-18, 10:00 PM
  #33  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by motosonic
I'm partial to Easton EA90SLX, but I have a soft spot for the Shimano RS81's, too. But, HED Ardennes are nice as well. All great options for both racing or every day use.
Can you buy just the Shimano rims? Link?
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-28-18, 06:04 AM
  #34  
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times in 1,003 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
What about something like this? Maybe 490g?
So my $.02 is the gravel bike riders also sometimes want to convert/ride their bikes on road. So I might ask what the narrowest tire you could safely mount on the above.
Even though many have pretty much dismissed the ETRTO charts (below).. for those wanting to run a 40mm tire, why go wider than a 21mm internal -- aero gain?

Sy Reene is offline  
Old 11-28-18, 06:16 AM
  #35  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
So my $.02 is the gravel bike riders also sometimes want to convert/ride their bikes on road. So I might ask what the narrowest tire you could safely mount on the above.
Even though many have pretty much dismissed the ETRTO charts (below).. for those wanting to run a 40mm tire, why go wider than a 21mm internal -- aero gain
The 23 INTERNAL WIDTH rim seems pretty gravel specific to me. Honestly, I'd have a second set of wheels to swap in for the road vs changing tires. It may be cost prohibitive for some but trying to make one wheelset that can optimally run everything from 23c-40c seems like the holy grail, to me.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-28-18, 06:22 AM
  #36  
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,637

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times in 1,003 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina


The 23 INTERNAL WIDTH rim seems pretty gravel specific to me. Honestly, I'd have a second set of wheels to swap in for the road vs changing tires. It may be cost prohibitive for some but trying to make one wheelset that can optimally run everything from 23c-40c seems like the holy grail, to me.
I guess that's kinda what I'm asking. In what way does a 23c rim run a 40mm tire better than eg. a more run of the mill 19-21c rim?
I'd probably myself opt (if I had disc brakes) for something like the DT RR421 rim sizing.
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 11-28-18, 06:23 AM
  #37  
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
 
Marcus_Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331

Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina


The 23 INTERNAL WIDTH rim seems pretty gravel specific to me. Honestly, I'd have a second set of wheels to swap in for the road vs changing tires. It may be cost prohibitive for some but trying to make one wheelset that can optimally run everything from 23c-40c seems like the holy grail, to me.

The only thing stopping you is alloy rims. Carbon fiber, this already exists. The problem in finding super-wide rims in alloy is max rated pressure (for road use). Lots of wide alloy rims exist, if you look at MTB rims--BUT, they cannot take even middling pressures. Even HED Belgium+ have a max PSI limit of 90PSI...which for many is "low".

Easton's R90SL is limited to 120PSI...although it isn't as wide
https://www.eastoncycling.com/media/...20pressure.pdf
Marcus_Ti is offline  
Old 11-28-18, 06:32 AM
  #38  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
I guess that's kinda what I'm asking. In what way does a 23c rim run a 40mm tire better than eg. a more run of the mill 19-21c rim?
I'd probably myself opt (if I had disc brakes) for something like the DT RR421 rim sizing.
It puts more tread on the ground.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-29-18, 02:32 PM
  #39  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Another Kinlin XC279 (23 X 28) user. I use these rims for both my fast carbon road bike and our steel tandem. Bigger tires on the tandem. I build them both with CX-Ray spokes, more on the tandem, fewer on the road bike. I like the way the road bike looks with 23mm tires. Looks fast anyway. These rims are nice in that they come in drillings from 20-36, build up easily, and have easy tire changes.

And $50 from bikehubstore.
__________________
Results matter

Last edited by Carbonfiberboy; 11-29-18 at 02:36 PM.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 11-29-18, 06:24 PM
  #40  
DOS
Senior Member
 
DOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arlington, VA USA
Posts: 2,108
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 253 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
I guess that's kinda what I'm asking. In what way does a 23c rim run a 40mm tire better than eg. a more run of the mill 19-21c rim?
I'd probably myself opt (if I had disc brakes) for something like the DT RR421 rim sizing.
Supposedly there is an aero benefit. Wider rims means less light bulb shape to the tire so more even airflow. No idea if this is true, but my wheel builder, in recommending Belgium plus over Belgium C2 for my road bike, claimed they offered “20% better performance both in aerodynamics and cornering” when paired with standard 23 or 25mm tires.
DOS is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 11:41 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
What about something like this? Maybe 490g?
Seems similar to the Stan's crest or a wider Grail. I'd prefer something in the 30mm deep range if its being marketed for road. Couldn't add that much weight would it?
redlude97 is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 11:47 AM
  #42  
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
 
Marcus_Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331

Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
Seems similar to the Stan's crest or a wider Grail. I'd prefer something in the 30mm deep range if its being marketed for road. Couldn't add that much weight would it?
Would be well over 500g per rim. AForce's AL33 is nominal 505g and 19.6mm internal...so probably more like 530g at least.

https://www.bikehubstore.com/product-p/al33-ceram.htm
Marcus_Ti is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 12:02 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Marcus_Ti
Would be well over 500g per rim. AForce's AL33 is nominal 505g and 19.6mm internal...so probably more like 530g at least.

https://www.bikehubstore.com/product-p/al33-ceram.htm
Yea. Probably close to 600g if its anything like the FLO30 which is 26x30. Which isn't horrible for a rim that wide, assuming you aren't too worried about weight if you are running a rim like that with 28mm+ tires. Otherwise it makes sense to start transitioning to carbon
redlude97 is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 12:16 PM
  #44  
Mr. Dopolina
Thread Starter
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
All of the above.

A 600g alloy rim seems excessive. Honestly, I think it's just mediocre extrusion but hey, that's just shade.

At that size of rim, carbon kicks alloy's arse. There's just no point.

The doodle I posted would seem more gravel specific. I think 23mm IN WIDTH is far beyond what's practical for road. I think 19-20 IN WIDTH is about the limit for 25c - 28c road tires.

What say you all?
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 12:19 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by DOS


Supposedly there is an aero benefit. Wider rims means less light bulb shape to the tire so more even airflow. No idea if this is true, but my wheel builder, in recommending Belgium plus over Belgium C2 for my road bike, claimed they offered “20% better performance both in aerodynamics and cornering” when paired with standard 23 or 25mm tires.
I think it's more complicated than that. The tire width should be matched to the rim width, and who knows what else?
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 12:41 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Matt Gaunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,304
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
I think it's more complicated than that. The tire width should be matched to the rim width, and who knows what else?
Yes. This.

What's interesting is that a Belgium+ (internal width of 20.5mm) is being recommended for use with a 23mm tyre. That is considerably wider than the H Plus Son Archetype rim I am running on 23mm tyres and even that isn't recommended under the ERTRO table (which I'll grant you is probably too conservative).

Back on topic though, I really love the Archetype. I have the hard anodised version laced to Miche high flange track hubs on my fixed wheel commuter.
Matt Gaunt is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 12:42 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
All of the above.

A 600g alloy rim seems excessive. Honestly, I think it's just mediocre extrusion but hey, that's just shade.

At that size of rim, carbon kicks alloy's arse. There's just no point.

The doodle I posted would seem more gravel specific. I think 23mm IN WIDTH is far beyond what's practical for road. I think 19-20 IN WIDTH is about the limit for 25c - 28c road tires.

What say you all?
I'd say for road there's a market for wide rims matched to wider tires, Rovals, Eastons are 28mm wide? Enve 31? Of course all in carbon and meant to be mated to 28mm+ tires. A 550g 27x~25-30mm alloy rim would probably have a market that overlapped between road and gravel. But carbon rims just make more sense in these widths paired with discs
redlude97 is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 12:49 PM
  #48  
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
 
Marcus_Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331

Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
All of the above.

A 600g alloy rim seems excessive. Honestly, I think it's just mediocre extrusion but hey, that's just shade.

At that size of rim, carbon kicks alloy's arse. There's just no point.

The doodle I posted would seem more gravel specific. I think 23mm IN WIDTH is far beyond what's practical for road. I think 19-20 IN WIDTH is about the limit for 25c - 28c road tires.

What say you all?
Yup.

Not sure why Easton seem to have taken their ARC24 off the market:

https://www.eastoncycling.com/produc...ils/arc-24-rim

Seems to be right about what you doodled
Marcus_Ti is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 01:13 PM
  #49  
DOS
Senior Member
 
DOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arlington, VA USA
Posts: 2,108
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 253 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt Gaunt



Yes. This.


What's interesting is that a Belgium+ (internal width of 20.5mm) is being recommended for use with a 23mm tyre. That is considerably wider than the H Plus Son Archetype rim I am running on 23mm tyres and even that isn't recommended under the ERTRO table (which I'll grant you is probably too conservative).


Back on topic though, I really love the Archetype. I have the hard anodised version laced to Miche high flange track hubs on my fixed wheel commuter.

The ERTRO table seems way our of sync with what has become standard practice but I think you also have to factor in that what is 23mm tire on one rim won't be the same on another. I have both Belgium+ and Archetype rims and run primarily 25mm tires on both; but tires blow up considerably wider on the wider rims than they do on the narrower Archetypes. For example, conti 4000s on my Archetypes blow up to about 25mm but more like 28mm on the HED rims. I am now running tubeless on the HED rims and my 25mm tires blowup to almost 30mm while 23mm tires expand to 26mm or so. What limited research I did on this seems to indicate that running wider rims yields more air volume in the tire, which results in better handling and lower rolling resistance as compared to same tire on a narrower rim. On the aero side, on my Schwalbe tubeless tires, a calculator I found showed that the ideal aerodynamic configuration for Belgium+ was to run 23mm because it created uniform profile with the tire so minimized turbulence. Haven't a clue if any or the this is born out by actual science (but when have the views of strangers on the internet ever been wrong?), but I like my Archetype rims and really love my HED rims with tubeless. Very plush ride. At the moment I am running 23mm on the front and 25 on the back to have more tire under my fat ass.

Editing to add this link to an article on web page of the wheel builder from whom I bought my HED rims: https://sugarwheelworks.com/blog/how...tire-size.html

Last edited by DOS; 11-30-18 at 01:23 PM.
DOS is offline  
Old 11-30-18, 01:46 PM
  #50  
Banned.
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times in 337 Posts
I just ordered some Pacenti Forza rims from bikehubstore.com. They have a nice package discount with CX-Ray spokes. I realize that Pacenti had some cracking issues with their older rims but the Forza's have been beefed up and I like the idea of the offset rear. At any rate, that's the path I've chosen so we'll see.

The rims that seem to hold almost universal acclaim are the HED Belgium C2 & Plus, and the Easton R90 SL. There are other excellent rims as referenced in this thread too so the decision on what to go with can cause information overload if you are the analytical type. On the other hand it's hard to go wrong these days so...
Nessism is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.