Training Experiment Question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716
Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
110 Posts
Training Experiment Question
I didn't have much time today and weather was crappy anyway. So I did a short, but relatively intense, indoor ride (intense by my 69 year old standards, anyway).
A question came to my mind during one of the lighter segments of the ride. Assume that rider A has been riding 8-9 hours per week for a long time (year or more). No particular training plan (or racing intentions). "A" just rides hard when he (she) feels good, takes it easier on days where he/she is clearly tired, and kind of in between when he/she is neither fresh or tired. And A's FTP is pretty stable at a value of X.
For whatever reason A starts doing the following four days per week - no other riding or other training. 5 min warm-up, 2x15 min at 95% to 105% of X with a 5 minute rest. End of workout.
What is going to happen to A's FTP over time in such a scenario? Just curious - do not intend to do this. It just occurred to me during today's 'ride'.
dave
A question came to my mind during one of the lighter segments of the ride. Assume that rider A has been riding 8-9 hours per week for a long time (year or more). No particular training plan (or racing intentions). "A" just rides hard when he (she) feels good, takes it easier on days where he/she is clearly tired, and kind of in between when he/she is neither fresh or tired. And A's FTP is pretty stable at a value of X.
For whatever reason A starts doing the following four days per week - no other riding or other training. 5 min warm-up, 2x15 min at 95% to 105% of X with a 5 minute rest. End of workout.
What is going to happen to A's FTP over time in such a scenario? Just curious - do not intend to do this. It just occurred to me during today's 'ride'.
dave
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Probably not much assuming they've been training for a few years at a range of intensities and durations. They may get a little better at doing 2x15 mins, though.
Then they'll probably quit because that sounds awful.
Then they'll probably quit because that sounds awful.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716
Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
110 Posts
I am guessing that biker A's 'tested ftp' (say with a typical 20 min test) would be roughly unchanged. A 'real' one hour ftp test - quite likely a different result (I am guessing).
dave
dave
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think you are asking about what happens when volume drops but intensity still stays sorta high. If the athlete never gets any volume, ever, for years, then fitness will decline (or he will just give up cycling because it stops being fun!). However, athletes training through very cold winters often find themselves relegated to the trainer for a few months. If they do shorter workouts (no long endurance rides) at a prescribed intensity, they can be ready to compete in the spring. Fitness is fine, and the winter can be a good time to sharpen other aspects.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fstrnu
Training & Nutrition
123
03-06-19 01:57 PM