Tire width different front - rear question
#1
Just Keep Pedaling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,355
Bikes: 99 Schwinn Mesa GS MTB, 15 Trek Domane 5.9 Dura-Ace, 17 Trek Emonda SL6 Pro & 18 Bianchi Vigorelli
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 67 Times
in
34 Posts
Tire width different front - rear question
I recently had an issue with Continental tire. They sent me a replacement but in 23 not the 25 it replaced. Rather than deal with trying to send back for a 25 I wonder if I can use it on bike with other tire being 25.....if so...better to have 23 on front or back?
I rode motorcycles and front was skinnier than rear tire so am guessing ok to use 23 on front and 25 on back.
A friend just told me they run 23 on back wheel and 25 on front for “stability on descents as well as speed”. This person doesn’t like descending steep grades. Has vertigo.
So what would be best overall for handling and safety?
I rode motorcycles and front was skinnier than rear tire so am guessing ok to use 23 on front and 25 on back.
A friend just told me they run 23 on back wheel and 25 on front for “stability on descents as well as speed”. This person doesn’t like descending steep grades. Has vertigo.
So what would be best overall for handling and safety?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,896
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked 696 Times
in
415 Posts
I had a 23c in front when I wanted fender clearance. I swapped it for a 25c after deciding some fender rub was better than the sketchy handling I experienced with the 23c in urban environments.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,713
Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 449 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times
in
108 Posts
When the 23 that I have on the rear wears out, I plan to replace it with a 25. But 23 is the biggest that fits on the front, so I will be riding 25R and 23F.
dave
dave
#4
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,589
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 540 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
352 Posts
I'd put it on the front because the comfort and handling is more important there.
#6
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,589
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 540 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
352 Posts
Sorry for mixing that up, no put the 25 up front. There are benefits to going both ways though, so the correct answer is of course "it depends".
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tires.html#mixing
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tires.html#mixing
Likes For znomit:
#7
Senior Member
when I use 2 sizes I always put the 23 on the front and never seems to be a problem. I'm also a heavier rider so prefer a 25 on the back
#8
Heft On Wheels
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,124
Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times
in
346 Posts
I run two different sizes on my two of my bikes.
I have 28R 25F on one bike and 25R and 23F on another. Never had an issues. I try to stuff the largest tires on my road bikes I can and this is what I can do on two particular bikes with good enough clearance. I would run what you got and don't worry about it. When it wears out buy what you like.
I have 28R 25F on one bike and 25R and 23F on another. Never had an issues. I try to stuff the largest tires on my road bikes I can and this is what I can do on two particular bikes with good enough clearance. I would run what you got and don't worry about it. When it wears out buy what you like.
#9
Non omnino gravis
#10
Just Keep Pedaling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,355
Bikes: 99 Schwinn Mesa GS MTB, 15 Trek Domane 5.9 Dura-Ace, 17 Trek Emonda SL6 Pro & 18 Bianchi Vigorelli
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 67 Times
in
34 Posts
Thanks everyone. Think I will go with my initial instinct of 23 on front. As an Athena I think I prefer the 25 on rear wheel. Doubt I would experience handling issues. Have experience with 23’s on bike before switching to 25’s. Plus motorcycle experience with front being not as wide on my sport bike.
#11
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,471
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4528 Post(s)
Liked 2,745 Times
in
1,767 Posts
For awhile last year I ran 23 front/25 rear. No problems. Ditto on my hybrid, 32/35. No problems with handling.
I've since switched back to 700x25 front and rear on one bike, both 23 on the other, and 700x42 on the hybrid. But that's just because I settled on tires I liked better for comfort. Not an issue with handling on turns.
I've since switched back to 700x25 front and rear on one bike, both 23 on the other, and 700x42 on the hybrid. But that's just because I settled on tires I liked better for comfort. Not an issue with handling on turns.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,143
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Liked 2,912 Times
in
1,589 Posts
you'll be just fine and i doubt you'll really notice much difference between the two. rocking a '28 up front and a '25 in back on
a mid-80's steel bike that doesn't have clearance for the '28 in back. thought it did. take it on the road and light dirt and it does just fine.
i do like to switch it up occasionally and swap the wheels with '23's from the other bike. the mid-80's bike feels like a new, racier bike at that point.
a mid-80's steel bike that doesn't have clearance for the '28 in back. thought it did. take it on the road and light dirt and it does just fine.
i do like to switch it up occasionally and swap the wheels with '23's from the other bike. the mid-80's bike feels like a new, racier bike at that point.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20789 Post(s)
Liked 9,429 Times
in
4,662 Posts
Yeah, unless we were talking about gravel/dirt, I'd put the larger on the rear so that I can run a little lower pressure (vs the smaller tire) without increasing the chances of a pinch flat. For gravel/dirt, some prefer the larger tire up front for handling on loose surfaces, iirc.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20789 Post(s)
Liked 9,429 Times
in
4,662 Posts
Oh wait - I forgot a classic BF answer:
Put the smaller tire up front so that you're always riding on a slight downhill, bruh!
Put the smaller tire up front so that you're always riding on a slight downhill, bruh!
Likes For WhyFi:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 559
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
149 Posts
I run a 23mm on the front of my Ritchey Road Logic 2.0 simply because I can't fit a larger tire. A 25mm rubs the underside of the Campag Skeleton brake. A 25mm or 28mm fits in the rear no problem. I've had no issues with it setup this way.
#16
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,517
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 707 Times
in
501 Posts
Here's a tip from @FBinNY from the mechanics forum: epoxy a couple of short lengths of spoke in each dropout, then you can run a 25.
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Brentwood WLA
Posts: 326
Bikes: 50/34, 11-40, 11 Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
52 Posts
My personal experience, (YMMV) IMO was black and white is to go wider on the front on mismatched sizes. It produced better handling and a more comfortable ride.
Likes For Point:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,466
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3369 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
252 Posts
The front tire is more important for grip. the rear tends to hit things you may dodge with the front. So for that - bigger on rear is better.
But...if you don't wack things, the smaller profile on the power wheel is more responsive.
You can do either. Pros and cons to both.
But...if you don't wack things, the smaller profile on the power wheel is more responsive.
You can do either. Pros and cons to both.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 559
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
149 Posts
Here's a tip from @FBinNY from the mechanics forum: epoxy a couple of short lengths of spoke in each dropout, then you can run a 25.
#21
bike whisperer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,517
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 707 Times
in
501 Posts
By that logic, anything bonded should eventually asplode.
Gotta glue to clean surfaces. I'd build up the epoxy to surround the bits of spoke, to form a new arch for the dropout.
IMO the biggest issue with it is what it'd do to the geometry by raising the front 4mm instead of 2.
Gotta glue to clean surfaces. I'd build up the epoxy to surround the bits of spoke, to form a new arch for the dropout.
IMO the biggest issue with it is what it'd do to the geometry by raising the front 4mm instead of 2.
__________________
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
Sheldon Brown's bike info ~~~ Park Tools repair help
Half-step triple, using double gear ~~~ 6400 STI rebuild walkthrough ~~~ Want 8/9/10s @126mm OLD? OCR. ~~~ Shimano cassette body overhaul ~~~ Ergopower Escape wear repair ~~~ PSA: drivetrain wear
List of US/Canada bike co-ops ~~~ Global list
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 559
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
149 Posts
By that logic, anything bonded should eventually asplode.
Gotta glue to clean surfaces. I'd build up the epoxy to surround the bits of spoke, to form a new arch for the dropout.
IMO the biggest issue with it is what it'd do to the geometry by raising the front 4mm instead of 2.
Gotta glue to clean surfaces. I'd build up the epoxy to surround the bits of spoke, to form a new arch for the dropout.
IMO the biggest issue with it is what it'd do to the geometry by raising the front 4mm instead of 2.
No, my logic is that most mechanics are not well versed in properly bonding metals with adhesives. They won't get an adequate surface prep (likely needs to be etched,) the joint will fail and the spokes will fall out somewhere down the road, usually at the most inconvenient time. Like my buddy who had the spoke fall out while fixing a flat on Mt Evans, just after 11 switchbacks. Shifted the tire enough that it hit the fork. He said he walked a LONG way carrying the front of his bike before someone offered him a ride.
Frame manufacturers typically know how to prep the joints properly. Cleaning only part of the surface preparation.
#23
Rhapsodic Laviathan
If anything; pure aestetics alone dictate skinnier tire up front.
Sportbike
Hotrod
Dragster
Sand Rail
Chopper
Wouldn't look right any other way.
Sportbike
Hotrod
Dragster
Sand Rail
Chopper
Wouldn't look right any other way.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 137
Bikes: 2020 T-Lab X-3 w/GRX Di2, 2018 Trek FX-5S with GRX/Xt 1x drive train
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times
in
25 Posts
Yeah, unless we were talking about gravel/dirt, I'd put the larger on the rear so that I can run a little lower pressure (vs the smaller tire) without increasing the chances of a pinch flat. For gravel/dirt, some prefer the larger tire up front for handling on loose surfaces, iirc.
#25
Non omnino gravis
My "SoCal fire road" setup is Panaracer Gravelking SKs, 700x43 in the front and 700x38 in the back. Partly because the chainstays won't clear a 43, but also because for whatever reason the 43 has two more rows of knobs than the 38. When it gets loose, I'm very thankful for those two extra rows.