Climbing on 35's
#1
Sophomore Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
Climbing on 35's
I have 1976 Raleigh Competition that will clear 35 mm tires, so I have been doing some rides in the mountains on some nice Panaracer 35's (I normally run 23's), I have ridden several times in the mountains using this setup, and I find the comfort is good, and the cornering grip is very much improved.
But wide tires seem noticeably slower going uphill, at least on climbs over a mile or so. I'm a terrible climber, so I need all the help I can get in the hills, and these honestly seem like a step backwards to me.
The 35's seem great for flat or rolling terrain, and riding in dirt and gravel, but I'm thinking twice about using them again on very hilly or mountainous paved roads (pretty much all of my riding these days). Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
But wide tires seem noticeably slower going uphill, at least on climbs over a mile or so. I'm a terrible climber, so I need all the help I can get in the hills, and these honestly seem like a step backwards to me.
The 35's seem great for flat or rolling terrain, and riding in dirt and gravel, but I'm thinking twice about using them again on very hilly or mountainous paved roads (pretty much all of my riding these days). Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times
in
4,663 Posts
With chunkier, heavier tires in general, yes.
Last year, I had to send one of my road wheels off for repair so I threw on the gravel wheels (heavier wheels with 35mm G-One Allrounds - a reasonably fast rolling tire on pavement). They were on for a couple weeks, for both solo and group rides - very noticeable difference. I think that a large part of if it for me is the more ponderous feeling when out of the saddle - those heavier wheels really resist changing orientation, so the bike swaying side to side under me feels like a lot more work. To a lesser extent, in-the-saddle climbing efforts feel less smooth, like there's a slow-down between each down-stroke. Regardless, my climbing relative to my group ride peers was definitely impacted and, even solo, it just felt like more work, though teasing that out of the numbers isn't always easy.
Last year, I had to send one of my road wheels off for repair so I threw on the gravel wheels (heavier wheels with 35mm G-One Allrounds - a reasonably fast rolling tire on pavement). They were on for a couple weeks, for both solo and group rides - very noticeable difference. I think that a large part of if it for me is the more ponderous feeling when out of the saddle - those heavier wheels really resist changing orientation, so the bike swaying side to side under me feels like a lot more work. To a lesser extent, in-the-saddle climbing efforts feel less smooth, like there's a slow-down between each down-stroke. Regardless, my climbing relative to my group ride peers was definitely impacted and, even solo, it just felt like more work, though teasing that out of the numbers isn't always easy.
#3
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,613
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times
in
997 Posts
I have 1976 Raleigh Competition that will clear 35 mm tires, so I have been doing some rides in the mountains on some nice Panaracer 35's (I normally run 23's), I have ridden several times in the mountains using this setup, and I find the comfort is good, and the cornering grip is very much improved.
The 35's seem great for flat or rolling terrain, and riding in dirt and gravel, but I'm thinking twice about using them again on very hilly or mountainous paved roads (pretty much all of my riding these days). Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
The 35's seem great for flat or rolling terrain, and riding in dirt and gravel, but I'm thinking twice about using them again on very hilly or mountainous paved roads (pretty much all of my riding these days). Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
#4
Senior Member
Seem slower ? You should time it.
There are many different tyres out there and your 35 may be slower than your 23, but are you comparing apples to apples? The weight penalty only accounts for a few seconds on a 2 km climb. Hardly perceptible without a stopwatch.
There are many different tyres out there and your 35 may be slower than your 23, but are you comparing apples to apples? The weight penalty only accounts for a few seconds on a 2 km climb. Hardly perceptible without a stopwatch.
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
'76 Raleigh Competition is 27" not 700C isn't it? or 630 x nn as opposed to 622 x nn
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
30mm Schwalbe G-One Speed tires would be a great compromise.
https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalb...00c-98628.html
https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalb...re-129402.html
https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalb...00c-98628.html
https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalb...re-129402.html
Likes For noodle soup:
#9
Sophomore Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
Those sure look like 27's though, would not be surprised.
Last edited by Lemond1985; 03-14-20 at 08:45 AM.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
I was thinking that 77 was the first year that 700C's appeared on the Raleigh Comp. But I now see that it's some of the lesser model Raleighs that still had 27" tires.
Curious what rim you are running those on? Do you know what the internal width is on the rims?
I know it's in the picture, but........
Curious what rim you are running those on? Do you know what the internal width is on the rims?
I know it's in the picture, but........
#12
Senior Member
I haven't carefully tested different tires widths on the same bike, but across bikes I haven't noticed anything that's easily-distinguishable.
Even on my gravel bike with its 2.1" tires, my paved climbing speeds tend to be about 5-6% slower than what I get on my Emonda, which is mostly explained by its 10lb weight penalty: for me that's a bike+rider difference of about 5%, nearly all of which is coming from things other than the tires. That's on top of a silly high-trail steering geometry which makes the gravel bike feel very floppy out of the saddle at low speeds.
Even on my gravel bike with its 2.1" tires, my paved climbing speeds tend to be about 5-6% slower than what I get on my Emonda, which is mostly explained by its 10lb weight penalty: for me that's a bike+rider difference of about 5%, nearly all of which is coming from things other than the tires. That's on top of a silly high-trail steering geometry which makes the gravel bike feel very floppy out of the saddle at low speeds.
Likes For HTupolev:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I notice the tire squish when standing climbing.
Like on a mtn bike with the fork not locked- that's got to slow one down up the hills relative to a higher tire pressure.
Like on a mtn bike with the fork not locked- that's got to slow one down up the hills relative to a higher tire pressure.
#14
Senior Member
I have a theory...
I've found that narrower tires (or higher pressures) provide better acceleration than wider tires (or lower pressure).
Well, if that's true, then narrower tires (higher pressure) should climb better since you're effectively accelerating when countering the effects of gravity (after all, g is measured in m/s^2).
I've found that narrower tires (or higher pressures) provide better acceleration than wider tires (or lower pressure).
Well, if that's true, then narrower tires (higher pressure) should climb better since you're effectively accelerating when countering the effects of gravity (after all, g is measured in m/s^2).
#15
Senior Member
It seems rolling resistance increases with the load. So perhaps the same is true for hill climbing. If thats the case, and rolling resistance makes up a much higher proportion of power required to climb, then it stands to reason tires with less rolling resistance might climb faster.
That said some 50 mm tires have no more rolling resistance then some much smaller ones (28 mm). So if we use them the difference should be negligible when both tires are inflated to the correct pressure (15%drop). But often the wider tires have more tread, and if the casing is less supple they will require more power to motivate.
Also perception plays an important role. Unless we do controled trials it's hard to say for sure.
That said some 50 mm tires have no more rolling resistance then some much smaller ones (28 mm). So if we use them the difference should be negligible when both tires are inflated to the correct pressure (15%drop). But often the wider tires have more tread, and if the casing is less supple they will require more power to motivate.
Also perception plays an important role. Unless we do controled trials it's hard to say for sure.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 03-17-20 at 02:34 PM.