Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Climbing on 35's

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Climbing on 35's

Old 03-14-20, 06:48 AM
  #1  
Sophomore Member
Thread Starter
 
Lemond1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times in 631 Posts
Climbing on 35's

I have 1976 Raleigh Competition that will clear 35 mm tires, so I have been doing some rides in the mountains on some nice Panaracer 35's (I normally run 23's), I have ridden several times in the mountains using this setup, and I find the comfort is good, and the cornering grip is very much improved.

But wide tires seem noticeably slower going uphill, at least on climbs over a mile or so. I'm a terrible climber, so I need all the help I can get in the hills, and these honestly seem like a step backwards to me.

The 35's seem great for flat or rolling terrain, and riding in dirt and gravel, but I'm thinking twice about using them again on very hilly or mountainous paved roads (pretty much all of my riding these days). Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
Lemond1985 is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 07:51 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,436 Times in 4,663 Posts
Originally Posted by Lemond1985
Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
With chunkier, heavier tires in general, yes.

Last year, I had to send one of my road wheels off for repair so I threw on the gravel wheels (heavier wheels with 35mm G-One Allrounds - a reasonably fast rolling tire on pavement). They were on for a couple weeks, for both solo and group rides - very noticeable difference. I think that a large part of if it for me is the more ponderous feeling when out of the saddle - those heavier wheels really resist changing orientation, so the bike swaying side to side under me feels like a lot more work. To a lesser extent, in-the-saddle climbing efforts feel less smooth, like there's a slow-down between each down-stroke. Regardless, my climbing relative to my group ride peers was definitely impacted and, even solo, it just felt like more work, though teasing that out of the numbers isn't always easy.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:17 AM
  #3  
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,613

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times in 997 Posts
Originally Posted by Lemond1985
I have 1976 Raleigh Competition that will clear 35 mm tires, so I have been doing some rides in the mountains on some nice Panaracer 35's (I normally run 23's), I have ridden several times in the mountains using this setup, and I find the comfort is good, and the cornering grip is very much improved.

The 35's seem great for flat or rolling terrain, and riding in dirt and gravel, but I'm thinking twice about using them again on very hilly or mountainous paved roads (pretty much all of my riding these days). Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
So not to be obvious, but if you're riding paved roads, I'd hazard a guess that 35s would generally always be slower whether climbing, descending or going flat (albeit less so here) than some narrower tire. Maybe look for a happy medium somewhere between your 23s and 35s ?
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:17 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,224
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 316 Times in 214 Posts
Seem slower ? You should time it.

There are many different tyres out there and your 35 may be slower than your 23, but are you comparing apples to apples? The weight penalty only accounts for a few seconds on a 2 km climb. Hardly perceptible without a stopwatch.
Racing Dan is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:18 AM
  #5  
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
'76 Raleigh Competition is 27" not 700C isn't it? or 630 x nn as opposed to 622 x nn
Iride01 is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:25 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 658

Bikes: Norco search xr

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 90 Posts
The slowdown could be because of the knobs on the tire verses slick tires.
Gconan is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:33 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Maybe look for a happy medium somewhere between your 23s and 35s ?
30mm Schwalbe G-One Speed tires would be a great compromise.

https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalb...00c-98628.html

https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalb...re-129402.html
noodle soup is offline  
Likes For noodle soup:
Old 03-14-20, 08:34 AM
  #8  
ups
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
'76 Raleigh Competition is 27" not 700C isn't it? or 630 x nn as opposed to 622 x nn
He may have replaced the wheels. 27's usually only come up to a 1 1/4" or 32c.

Panaracer makes the RibMo in 35c.
ups is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:36 AM
  #9  
Sophomore Member
Thread Starter
 
Lemond1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times in 631 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
'76 Raleigh Competition is 27" not 700C isn't it? or 630 x nn as opposed to 622 x nn
Not sure, the original 1976 Raleigh catalogue said it came stock with 700c wheels, but the amount of clearance suggests it could possibly use either size wheel.




Those sure look like 27's though, would not be surprised.


Last edited by Lemond1985; 03-14-20 at 08:45 AM.
Lemond1985 is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 08:48 AM
  #10  
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
I was thinking that 77 was the first year that 700C's appeared on the Raleigh Comp. But I now see that it's some of the lesser model Raleighs that still had 27" tires.

Curious what rim you are running those on? Do you know what the internal width is on the rims?

I know it's in the picture, but........
Iride01 is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 09:00 AM
  #11  
Sophomore Member
Thread Starter
 
Lemond1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times in 631 Posts
They're some Shimano 500's, 21 mm OD, so the inside diameter is probably ~17-19 mm.
Lemond1985 is offline  
Old 03-14-20, 10:57 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1971 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times in 629 Posts
Originally Posted by Lemond1985
Anyone else notice slower climbing speeds on wide tires?
I haven't carefully tested different tires widths on the same bike, but across bikes I haven't noticed anything that's easily-distinguishable.

Even on my gravel bike with its 2.1" tires, my paved climbing speeds tend to be about 5-6% slower than what I get on my Emonda, which is mostly explained by its 10lb weight penalty: for me that's a bike+rider difference of about 5%, nearly all of which is coming from things other than the tires. That's on top of a silly high-trail steering geometry which makes the gravel bike feel very floppy out of the saddle at low speeds.
HTupolev is offline  
Likes For HTupolev:
Old 03-14-20, 11:11 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
I notice the tire squish when standing climbing.

Like on a mtn bike with the fork not locked- that's got to slow one down up the hills relative to a higher tire pressure.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 03-17-20, 12:41 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: MA
Posts: 512

Bikes: 2015 Niner RLT9, 1987 Atala

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a theory...

I've found that narrower tires (or higher pressures) provide better acceleration than wider tires (or lower pressure).

Well, if that's true, then narrower tires (higher pressure) should climb better since you're effectively accelerating when countering the effects of gravity (after all, g is measured in m/s^2).
athrowawaynic is offline  
Old 03-17-20, 02:30 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Posts: 531

Bikes: 2018 Giant Sedona

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 95 Posts
It seems rolling resistance increases with the load. So perhaps the same is true for hill climbing. If thats the case, and rolling resistance makes up a much higher proportion of power required to climb, then it stands to reason tires with less rolling resistance might climb faster.

That said some 50 mm tires have no more rolling resistance then some much smaller ones (28 mm). So if we use them the difference should be negligible when both tires are inflated to the correct pressure (15%drop). But often the wider tires have more tread, and if the casing is less supple they will require more power to motivate.

Also perception plays an important role. Unless we do controled trials it's hard to say for sure.

Last edited by xroadcharlie; 03-17-20 at 02:34 PM.
xroadcharlie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.