Do patched up inner tubes slow you down?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Do patched up inner tubes slow you down?
So i wanted to save some money and just repair inner tubes with a patch kit. I was wondering if this would increase my rolling resistance?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 36,656
Mentioned: 206 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16912 Post(s)
Liked 12,410 Times
in
5,878 Posts
Nothing slows me down except myself.
Likes For indyfabz:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,792
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4129 Post(s)
Liked 3,086 Times
in
2,010 Posts
Probably if you can find equipment accurate enough and can eliminate every other factor. (Most people would call this obsessive.)
Real life - I've patched many tubes many times and the only time I notice the patches is when I pull the tube out. My norm at tube replacement is 5 patches. Now, 5 patches does add some weight but not a lot. A small REMA patch kit weighs maybe an half an ounce. That (edit) half ounce includes 6 patches, one of which is large, a tube, a casing patch and sandpaper. The box itself weighs probably 1/'3 the total. If my guesses are close, the rest weighs 10g. So maybe 5 grams for 5 patches and glue used. On a 70 gram tire. ON a 1000g wheel. On a 7000g bike. Ridden by a 70,000g rider. I would expect the additional rolling resistance to play out about the same.
Real life - I've patched many tubes many times and the only time I notice the patches is when I pull the tube out. My norm at tube replacement is 5 patches. Now, 5 patches does add some weight but not a lot. A small REMA patch kit weighs maybe an half an ounce. That (edit) half ounce includes 6 patches, one of which is large, a tube, a casing patch and sandpaper. The box itself weighs probably 1/'3 the total. If my guesses are close, the rest weighs 10g. So maybe 5 grams for 5 patches and glue used. On a 70 gram tire. ON a 1000g wheel. On a 7000g bike. Ridden by a 70,000g rider. I would expect the additional rolling resistance to play out about the same.
Last edited by 79pmooney; 03-19-20 at 01:01 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Fondriest Squadra Corse; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 580 Post(s)
Liked 413 Times
in
237 Posts
Unless you patch them incorrectly and they lose air... no.
Likes For ridelikeaturtle:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,533
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 342 Times
in
194 Posts
Personally, my race day wheelset is either tubular or tubeless. When I was racing on tubes, my race day wheelset had an unpatched latex tube. But I wouldn't (and haven't) hesitate(d) to use my backup wheelset with a patched tube in a race, and will train on patched tubes all day long.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton

#6
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 2,792
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 749 Post(s)
Liked 1,116 Times
in
664 Posts
Only if the patch fails and you have to do it again.
Likes For delbiker1:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The banks of the River Charles
Posts: 1,958
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease, 2020 Seven Evergreen, 2019 Honey Allroads Ti, 2018 Seven Redsky XX, 2017 Trek Boon 7, 2014 Trek 520
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 666 Post(s)
Liked 820 Times
in
449 Posts
Won’t the wheel be out of balance?
#8
Advocatus Diaboli
Patched tubes are faster than no tubes (unless you have tubeless tires, then it's a moot point).
#9
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 739 Post(s)
Liked 831 Times
in
355 Posts
I've been wondering this for a while. I asked Josh Poertner on his Marginal Gains podcast about it: he thought it would but he hadn't tested it either. OTOH, Tom Anhalt thinks it won't. If you know these two guys you'll recognize that they rarely disagree, so I'll take it that the question is currently unresolved. I'll probably test it at some point but I haven't yet had a chance.
Likes For RChung:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Fondriest Squadra Corse; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 580 Post(s)
Liked 413 Times
in
237 Posts
Seriously, if anyone can successfully measure a statistically significant difference, *and replicate it*, then that research should be published. You'll win an Ig Nobel prize.
#11
Advocatus Diaboli
The real question is.. does a patched tube use less additional watts than carrying the additional weight of a spare fresh tube in your back pocket or saddlebag?
#12
Senior Member
I've been wondering this for a while. I asked Josh Poertner on his Marginal Gains podcast about it: he thought it would but he hadn't tested it either. OTOH, Tom Anhalt thinks it won't. If you know these two guys you'll recognize that they rarely disagree, so I'll take it that the question is currently unresolved. I'll probably test it at some point but I haven't yet had a chance.
But giving Tom and Josh their due respect, I would be hesitant to rely solely on what is essentially a hand waving argument by analogy.
Last edited by asgelle; 03-20-20 at 07:20 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
Huh.
So if the patch is about .75" it would be about 1/112 of the wheel circumference and about 1/4 of the tube circumference.
The thickness of a patch is similar to the difference in thickness between a standard tube, and a lighter tube.
The difference in rolling resistance between those tubes is about 1 watt for pair of tires at 45kph,
so a patch could theoretically require about .0022 watts at 45kph.
https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/inner-t...ing-resistance
Then, if I have the math right, they suggest a 4 second difference in a 40k TT for 1 watt of RR,
so a tube patch could cost you .0088 of a second over a 40k time trial at 45kph.
So if the patch is about .75" it would be about 1/112 of the wheel circumference and about 1/4 of the tube circumference.
The thickness of a patch is similar to the difference in thickness between a standard tube, and a lighter tube.
The difference in rolling resistance between those tubes is about 1 watt for pair of tires at 45kph,
so a patch could theoretically require about .0022 watts at 45kph.
https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/inner-t...ing-resistance
Then, if I have the math right, they suggest a 4 second difference in a 40k TT for 1 watt of RR,
so a tube patch could cost you .0088 of a second over a 40k time trial at 45kph.
Last edited by woodcraft; 03-20-20 at 09:12 PM.
Likes For woodcraft:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Southern California
Posts: 158
Bikes: 70's frame, newer parts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
26 Posts
This is what I call the "standing on a sheet of paper argument". In theory if you are taller you can see farther. So does standing on a sheet of paper enable you to see farther?
There are many things like this that in theory should matter but the effect is so small as to be impossible to measure.
There are many things like this that in theory should matter but the effect is so small as to be impossible to measure.
Likes For ChrisAlbertson:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
This is what I call the "standing on a sheet of paper argument". In theory if you are taller you can see farther. So does standing on a sheet of paper enable you to see farther?
There are many things like this that in theory should matter but the effect is so small as to be impossible to measure.
There are many things like this that in theory should matter but the effect is so small as to be impossible to measure.
Sez you!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,834
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3153 Post(s)
Liked 5,604 Times
in
2,261 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
Likes For FeltF2Tarmac:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,760
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 1,565 Times
in
904 Posts
I have quite a few bikes in my stable that are rotated frequently. I can’t remember which ones have patched tubes so I really don’t know. Each bike has a seat pack or handlebar bag with a spare tube and a patch kit. I always end up patching over replacing the tube . I am not a racer so I really don’t care about speed as much as comfort and feel of the bike itself. I have noticed a difference in tires for sure ,but tubes?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,206
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 854 Times
in
542 Posts
Huh.
So if the patch is about .75" it would be about 1/112 of the wheel circumference and about 1/4 of the tube circumference.
The thickness of a patch is similar to the difference in thickness between a standard tube, and a lighter tube.
The difference in rolling resistance between those tubes is about 1 watt for pair of tires at 45kph,
so a patch could theoretically require about .0022 watts at 45kph.
https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/inner-t...ing-resistance
Then, if I have the math right, they suggest a 4 second difference in a 40k TT for 1 watt of RR,
so a tube patch could cost you .0088 of a second over a 40k time trial at 45kph.
So if the patch is about .75" it would be about 1/112 of the wheel circumference and about 1/4 of the tube circumference.
The thickness of a patch is similar to the difference in thickness between a standard tube, and a lighter tube.
The difference in rolling resistance between those tubes is about 1 watt for pair of tires at 45kph,
so a patch could theoretically require about .0022 watts at 45kph.
https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/inner-t...ing-resistance
Then, if I have the math right, they suggest a 4 second difference in a 40k TT for 1 watt of RR,
so a tube patch could cost you .0088 of a second over a 40k time trial at 45kph.
Likes For woodcraft:
#22
Quidam Bike Super Hero
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,150
Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
282 Posts
If patched tubes slowed me down, I would soon be cycling in reverse!

Likes For Digger Goreman:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,558
Bikes: 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C being made an all arounder.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
212 Posts
I bought smaller patches so they won’t slow me down.

Likes For biker128pedal:
Likes For eduskator: