2 part Lance special...u watch?
06-02-20, 01:18 PM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 845
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
159 Posts
"He was a prodigy at a very young age." Yes. But he wasn't a three week stage racer who could win a yellow jersey. He was a one day classics rider. The World Championships, the races in Belgium. His body took to that new drug, EPO and benefited more than most. In part, because, for such a powerful build, heart, longs, etc., he had a rather low VO2max. Before his use of EPO, the best three week riders had much higher VO2max levels naturally and recovered better after hard efforts, So, before EPO, Armstrong faired poorly after days of hard racing, but after EPO, it was a different story. IN the early years of testing for EPO, they simply measured VO2max and assumed everyone over 50% was drugging. Those at 48# naturally couldn't touch EPO. But Armstrong, at ~35%, could take a whole lot of it. It was several Tour wins before the testing got more sophisticated. By then, the US Postal/Discovery team had worked out how to get around the tests.
Doping has been going on forever in pro cycling. But until EPO, the riders were human. Doping could win you races but at a cost. When riders were racing well over 100 races a year, you could only dope for certain races or your career was going to be short. EPO changed the game.
Ben
Doping has been going on forever in pro cycling. But until EPO, the riders were human. Doping could win you races but at a cost. When riders were racing well over 100 races a year, you could only dope for certain races or your career was going to be short. EPO changed the game.
Ben
Some people benefited far more from EPO than others. Not to mention that Lance undoubtedly had the most sophisticated program of all riders. Ensuring maximum recovery during the TdF as well. The whole "they all doped, it was a level playing field" is a massive red herring.
06-02-20, 01:32 PM
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times
in
445 Posts
Unfortunately we'll never really know - given that he dominatedd the peloton for 7 years even though it's likely that most/all of his rivals were also doping, I imagine that, while he might not have won 7 in a row, I could see him winning at least one, possibly more - Ullrich, his perennial rival, was also a doper, but Armstrong clearly outclassed him in the mountains and in most of the TTs. Basso may have been his equal in the high mountains, but he didn't have the TT chops. What can't be taken away from Armstrong was his singleminded campaign to win a single event - the advanced scouting of the routes, the building of an entire team around one purpose etc - this was a revelation in a sport where teams planned on season-long campaigns, started in the spring, riding into fitness for the Grand Tours and supporting "your guy" as much as intra-team politics would allow, and ending in some post-GT exhibition crits, then getting a little chubby over the winter and starting again next year. Was he "the hardest-working guy in cycling"? Quite possibly. Even if his doping had been merely on a par with the rest of the potential Tour contenders (instead of being way more advanced), I think his sheer competitive drive, coupled with intense preparation and a dedicated team - plus, whatever you think of him as a person, the guy could ride a bike - would have earned him at least several Tour wins. But being "another Greg Lemond" wasn't enough for him
Last edited by Litespud; 06-02-20 at 01:44 PM.
06-02-20, 01:47 PM
#53
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,525
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3397 Post(s)
Liked 5,422 Times
in
2,570 Posts
This is a factor that is pretty much always overlooked/avoided in the Lance stories. He trained and prepared in a way that was different than what others were doing - a single focus designed to hit an absolute peak for one event.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
06-02-20, 01:54 PM
#54
So it is
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 20,471
Bikes: Luzerne, 684, Boreas, Wheelhouse, Alize©®, Bayamo, Cayo
Mentioned: 245 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10736 Post(s)
Liked 4,104 Times
in
2,410 Posts
Not to mention, the whole team got the good stuff, not just the elite rider or riders. That whole team was a relentless machine, and the peloton never got a rest when ol Lance was wearing yellow.
__________________
Originally Posted by Jorgediaz
Fellow riders, the only free cheese is in the mousetrap!
06-02-20, 01:56 PM
#55
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 31,625
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 317 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10836 Post(s)
Liked 5,081 Times
in
2,747 Posts
Right at the very end he bemoaned the fates of Pantani, Ulrich, and himself.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
06-02-20, 02:15 PM
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,819
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4137 Post(s)
Liked 3,117 Times
in
2,023 Posts
Yes, Armstrong did his special training with that single focus (and kept himself out of the public's and officials' view) until the Tour. Meant that he could focus on a drug regime that was impossible for a rider racing all spring.
Ben
06-02-20, 02:19 PM
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 450 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 54 Times
in
27 Posts
I like this quote from 2005.
Umm, dude. It got taken away. He cheated. And no doubt, Mr. Pena, you cheated too.
“What Lance achieved nobody can take away,” Pena, who helped Armstrong to three of his seven Tour victories, told Colombia’s Caracol radio Tuesday. Pena said Armstrong was so closely watched during the Tour that it would have been impossible for him to use performance-enhancing drugs.
“Not only did the sports laboratories constantly test him, but video cameras were set up in his room and police agents constantly monitored Lance’s movements and who was visiting him and even his phone conversations,” Pena said.
“Not only did the sports laboratories constantly test him, but video cameras were set up in his room and police agents constantly monitored Lance’s movements and who was visiting him and even his phone conversations,” Pena said.
Likes For Radish_legs:
06-02-20, 02:22 PM
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times
in
445 Posts
"He was a prodigy at a very young age." Yes. But he wasn't a three week stage racer who could win a yellow jersey. He was a one day classics rider. The World Championships, the races in Belgium. His body took to that new drug, EPO and benefited more than most. In part, because, for such a powerful build, heart, longs, etc., he had a rather low VO2max. Before his use of EPO, the best three week riders had much higher VO2max levels naturally and recovered better after hard efforts, So, before EPO, Armstrong faired poorly after days of hard racing, but after EPO, it was a different story. IN the early years of testing for EPO, they simply measured VO2max and assumed everyone over 50% was drugging. Those at 48# naturally couldn't touch EPO. But Armstrong, at ~35%, could take a whole lot of it. It was several Tour wins before the testing got more sophisticated. By then, the US Postal/Discovery team had worked out how to get around the tests.
Doping has been going on forever in pro cycling. But until EPO, the riders were human. Doping could win you races but at a cost. When riders were racing well over 100 races a year, you could only dope for certain races or your career was going to be short. EPO changed the game.
Ben
Doping has been going on forever in pro cycling. But until EPO, the riders were human. Doping could win you races but at a cost. When riders were racing well over 100 races a year, you could only dope for certain races or your career was going to be short. EPO changed the game.
Ben
06-02-20, 02:30 PM
#59
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,525
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3397 Post(s)
Liked 5,422 Times
in
2,570 Posts
He and the team also benefited from inside help that other teams and riders did not get. His first Tour, he tested positive first or second stage but was allowed to slide. probably because he was a feel-good story as a cancer survivor. Later a drug tester was kept locked outside the team's house for an hour while Armsrrong diluted is blood to pass the surprise test, (The team's inside informer missed that one, Usually they got a phone call in advance so he could be ready.) Keeping a tester waiting more than 10 minutes is an automatic positive but that was allowed to slide. Other teams didn't get that benefit. In fact, Armstrong's team could place a call to the governing body and say "we know so and so is doping." (So and so just happening to be very close to Amstrong in that particular Tour's general classification race- the fight for the yellow jersey. So and so gets a surprise test which he does not pass and Armstrong has one less rival to worry about. That happened several times. Those riders were disqualified and disgraced while Armstrong rode on to another yellow jersey.
Yes, Armstrong did his special training with that single focus (and kept himself out of the public's and officials' view) until the Tour. Meant that he could focus on a drug regime that was impossible for a rider racing all spring.
Ben
Yes, Armstrong did his special training with that single focus (and kept himself out of the public's and officials' view) until the Tour. Meant that he could focus on a drug regime that was impossible for a rider racing all spring.
Ben
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
06-02-20, 02:34 PM
#60
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 241
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 79 Times
in
53 Posts
"He was a prodigy at a very young age." Yes. But he wasn't a three week stage racer who could win a yellow jersey. He was a one day classics rider. The World Championships, the races in Belgium. His body took to that new drug, EPO and benefited more than most. In part, because, for such a powerful build, heart, longs, etc., he had a rather low VO2max. Before his use of EPO, the best three week riders had much higher VO2max levels naturally and recovered better after hard efforts, So, before EPO, Armstrong faired poorly after days of hard racing, but after EPO, it was a different story. IN the early years of testing for EPO, they simply measured VO2max and assumed everyone over 50% was drugging. Those at 48# naturally couldn't touch EPO. But Armstrong, at ~35%, could take a whole lot of it. It was several Tour wins before the testing got more sophisticated. By then, the US Postal/Discovery team had worked out how to get around the tests.
Doping has been going on forever in pro cycling. But until EPO, the riders were human. Doping could win you races but at a cost. When riders were racing well over 100 races a year, you could only dope for certain races or your career was going to be short. EPO changed the game.
Ben
Doping has been going on forever in pro cycling. But until EPO, the riders were human. Doping could win you races but at a cost. When riders were racing well over 100 races a year, you could only dope for certain races or your career was going to be short. EPO changed the game.
Ben
06-02-20, 02:37 PM
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times
in
445 Posts
UCI benefited from the rider performances and subsequent publicity that doping enabled, and suffered as the sport did when dopers were caught. While the organization may not have been "pro-doping", it was certainly "anti-testing" or rather "anti-dopers-getting-caught". I don't know how involved UCI is in PED monitoring, what with USADA and WADA, but IMO it shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the process, because it's far from a disinterested neutral party.
06-02-20, 02:47 PM
#62
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,525
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3397 Post(s)
Liked 5,422 Times
in
2,570 Posts
UCI benefited from the rider performances and subsequent publicity that doping enabled, and suffered as the sport did when dopers were caught. While the organization may not have been "pro-doping", it was certainly "anti-testing" or rather "anti-dopers-getting-caught". I don't know how involved UCI is in PED monitoring, what with USADA and WADA, but IMO it shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the process, because it's far from a disinterested neutral party.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
06-02-20, 02:53 PM
#63
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 31,625
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 317 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10836 Post(s)
Liked 5,081 Times
in
2,747 Posts
This is sort of my perspective too. They were all doping. He was probably better at it. But he was also quite viscous to anyone who challenged him and ruined their lives.
This sums up pretty much everyone at the top of their game/profession. Pretty much all great athletes - look at Tiger or Jordan - and CEOs, billionaires, politicians are pricks,
This sums up pretty much everyone at the top of their game/profession. Pretty much all great athletes - look at Tiger or Jordan - and CEOs, billionaires, politicians are pricks,
But ya know, I have to say . . . how many of us in his position would not have done similar? Here's a guy that finds himself in possession of immense talent and success, and one day you come to realize that the only way to compete in your sport is to cheat like everybody else. Now you find yourself on top of your sport and on top of the world where the lights are brighter and the rewards richer than anything you have ever imagined. Unbelievable fame and fortune. It's intoxicating. It is utterly surreal.
Now you come to realize that in order to maintain this fame you have to lie, of course. And when you see people endangering your position you decide you must discredit them to save yourself. It's either you or them . . . and you pick you. How many people wouldn't do the same in his position. My guess is at least 50% of us would, we don't know, because we have never been in his position of possessing incredible, mind boggling talent and fame. And riches. My argument is that lacking a true appreciation of what that's like you cannot predict what you would do or how far you would go to protect your interests. You THINK you do, but you really don't. Many of us would do it for the riches alone, and go to church routinely on Sunday like nothing happened.
Is he the worst person walking the earth? Far, far from it. (***** is. lol) I just have always thought the Lance hate was just a bit over the top compared to a lot of the creatures walking around disguised as human beings. He cheated in his sport and made a mess of trying to cover it up. We can look around us and find individuals doing things a lot worse every day. And given the opportunity, I'd bet at least half of us would do the same thing.
Just saying.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
Likes For BillyD:
06-02-20, 03:01 PM
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,333
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20620 Post(s)
Liked 9,286 Times
in
4,599 Posts
Haven't read the comments but, given the title, it's sorely missing something...
Ah, that's better.
Ah, that's better.
06-02-20, 03:02 PM
#65
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 31,625
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 317 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10836 Post(s)
Liked 5,081 Times
in
2,747 Posts
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
06-02-20, 04:58 PM
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SoCal USA
Posts: 188
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times
in
33 Posts
imo, If it was a clean sport, Lance would still have won a lot of races
We will never know cycling as a clean sport to this day, but not because of Lance
We will never know cycling as a clean sport to this day, but not because of Lance
Likes For RedBullFiXX:
06-04-20, 11:02 AM
#67
Senior Member
He was a relentless businessman who was ready of anything to win.
but he wasn’t mafia, he didn’t kill. Destroyed lives and other’s businesses for him to prevail.
he is the opppsite of what sportsmanship meant to be
but he wasn’t mafia, he didn’t kill. Destroyed lives and other’s businesses for him to prevail.
he is the opppsite of what sportsmanship meant to be
06-04-20, 11:58 AM
#68
Member
06-06-20, 05:26 AM
#69
Senior Member
Where is it available
is it on Netflix or another platform
is it on Netflix or another platform
06-06-20, 07:05 AM
#70
longtime noob
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 140
Bikes: 2018 Trek Domane SL 6 // 1999 Trek 5000 // Burley Encore X
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times
in
28 Posts
06-06-20, 07:42 AM
#71
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,122
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1362 Post(s)
Liked 539 Times
in
285 Posts
The difference between Lance and the other dopers though is that he is sociopath and narcissist. Take Jan, be it his upbringing in Eastern Germany and socialist influence, but he was a team player. He raced for the team, Lance raced for himself. Shame how his life turned out in comparison.
Based on those limited observations and reading most everything written about Armstrong, I think you’re likely correct that he’s a sociopath, or at least has strong sociopathic tendencies. Sociopaths do not have empathy for other people. I don’t think Armstrong has ever shown any true feeling or remorse for the people he hurt.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
06-07-20, 01:52 AM
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,736
Bikes: Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Ritchey Outback,Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times
in
31 Posts
I can’t say I really know Armstrong, but I did meet him as long ago as the KMart Classic, back in the 90’s in WV, I’m fairly well acquainted with a number of people who know him well, and I had the opportunity to talk to Landis at the Tour of the Bahamas stage race after all this went down.
Based on those limited observations and reading most everything written about Armstrong, I think you’re likely correct that he’s a sociopath, or at least has strong sociopathic tendencies. Sociopaths do not have empathy for other people. I don’t think Armstrong has ever shown any true feeling or remorse for the people he hurt.
Based on those limited observations and reading most everything written about Armstrong, I think you’re likely correct that he’s a sociopath, or at least has strong sociopathic tendencies. Sociopaths do not have empathy for other people. I don’t think Armstrong has ever shown any true feeling or remorse for the people he hurt.
Last edited by BillyD; 06-07-20 at 04:06 PM. Reason: P&R
06-07-20, 08:23 AM
#73
Vandalized since 2002
06-08-20, 02:45 AM
#74
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,412
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4497 Post(s)
Liked 2,658 Times
in
1,722 Posts
I'm not excusing his behavior by any means, he was an arrogant, entitled, nasty dick by any measure.
But ya know, I have to say . . . how many of us in his position would not have done similar? Here's a guy that finds himself in possession of immense talent and success, and one day you come to realize that the only way to compete in your sport is to cheat like everybody else. Now you find yourself on top of your sport and on top of the world where the lights are brighter and the rewards richer than anything you have ever imagined. Unbelievable fame and fortune. It's intoxicating. It is utterly surreal.
Now you come to realize that in order to maintain this fame you have to lie, of course. And when you see people endangering your position you decide you must discredit them to save yourself. It's either you or them . . . and you pick you. How many people wouldn't do the same in his position. My guess is at least 50% of us would, we don't know, because we have never been in his position of possessing incredible, mind boggling talent and fame. And riches. My argument is that lacking a true appreciation of what that's like you cannot predict what you would do or how far you would go to protect your interests. You THINK you do, but you really don't. Many of us would do it for the riches alone, and go to church routinely on Sunday like nothing happened.
Is he the worst person walking the earth? Far, far from it. (***** is. lol) I just have always thought the Lance hate was just a bit over the top compared to a lot of the creatures walking around disguised as human beings. He cheated in his sport and made a mess of trying to cover it up. We can look around us and find individuals doing things a lot worse every day. And given the opportunity, I'd bet at least half of us would do the same thing.
Just saying.
But ya know, I have to say . . . how many of us in his position would not have done similar? Here's a guy that finds himself in possession of immense talent and success, and one day you come to realize that the only way to compete in your sport is to cheat like everybody else. Now you find yourself on top of your sport and on top of the world where the lights are brighter and the rewards richer than anything you have ever imagined. Unbelievable fame and fortune. It's intoxicating. It is utterly surreal.
Now you come to realize that in order to maintain this fame you have to lie, of course. And when you see people endangering your position you decide you must discredit them to save yourself. It's either you or them . . . and you pick you. How many people wouldn't do the same in his position. My guess is at least 50% of us would, we don't know, because we have never been in his position of possessing incredible, mind boggling talent and fame. And riches. My argument is that lacking a true appreciation of what that's like you cannot predict what you would do or how far you would go to protect your interests. You THINK you do, but you really don't. Many of us would do it for the riches alone, and go to church routinely on Sunday like nothing happened.
Is he the worst person walking the earth? Far, far from it. (***** is. lol) I just have always thought the Lance hate was just a bit over the top compared to a lot of the creatures walking around disguised as human beings. He cheated in his sport and made a mess of trying to cover it up. We can look around us and find individuals doing things a lot worse every day. And given the opportunity, I'd bet at least half of us would do the same thing.
Just saying.
I don't have his ruthlessness to destroy the lives of people around me. But I could see myself justifying doping at that age and level of ability to get back into the game, knowing it's rigged and everyone else is using PEDs. Heck, Indurain probably did but nobody cares because he's such a nice guy and didn't screw over teammates and business associates.
That was a revelation. I was pretty cynical about Armstrong until I was in a similar situation.
Heck, I take all kinds of over the counter stuff now that's legal to buy and use but would probably be banned even in some amateur competitions. I eat beef liver that's probably swimming in hormones. At 62 I'm not competing so it's irrelevant. I was just willing to try anything legal that I could afford to get back to the condition I was in before the injury and illness. I kinda doubt it helps much, but who knows.
Likes For canklecat:
06-08-20, 06:43 AM
#75
Senior Member
He doped from age 21 and has no regrets
That says it all to me.
The following is good. The last point that he wouldnt change a thing really shows he is a prick. I think that's because he is still healthy and has $50M
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cyc...ary-456506/amp
The following is good. The last point that he wouldnt change a thing really shows he is a prick. I think that's because he is still healthy and has $50M
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cyc...ary-456506/amp
