You Don't Need Those Light Weight Wheels
#26
Senior Member
#27
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 19,550
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8336 Post(s)
Liked 3,045 Times
in
1,624 Posts
What did we do before we had GCN to enlighten us?
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#28
Version 3.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12,850
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 1,892 Times
in
1,117 Posts
I will give up my lightweight wheels when you can pry them from my cold dead hands.
Likes For Hermes:
Likes For tyrion:
#30
more daylight today!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 12,498
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5122 Post(s)
Liked 3,613 Times
in
2,509 Posts
Maybe I'm wrong but everyone seems to be minimizing the importance of wheel mass for when it counts the most.
Lets say two riders identical in power output weight and every thing else physiological. Bikes are identical in every way including weight, but one has lighter rims. (don't over think it guys, I know some of you are having trouble with identical bikes but ligher rims. GET OVER IT! <GRIN>
Any how, after a 180 km stage on a tour they arrive at the 200 meter mark from the finish line at the same time having exactly the same energy reserves. Who wins the sprint? The one with the lighter wheels?
Don't tell me that the little bit of difference doesn't mean any thing. A win is a win.
Now if we are strictly talking about us wannabe's then probably I can see there isn't enough there to really matter. Even so, lighter wheels are generally an easy way to lighten an existing bike.
Lets say two riders identical in power output weight and every thing else physiological. Bikes are identical in every way including weight, but one has lighter rims. (don't over think it guys, I know some of you are having trouble with identical bikes but ligher rims. GET OVER IT! <GRIN>

Any how, after a 180 km stage on a tour they arrive at the 200 meter mark from the finish line at the same time having exactly the same energy reserves. Who wins the sprint? The one with the lighter wheels?
Don't tell me that the little bit of difference doesn't mean any thing. A win is a win.
Now if we are strictly talking about us wannabe's then probably I can see there isn't enough there to really matter. Even so, lighter wheels are generally an easy way to lighten an existing bike.
#31
Senior Member
Is there a possibility in this universe that the sprint is longer, and the heavier wheels carry enough momentum to allow the rider to coast past the one with lighter wheels when their sprint energy is flagging?
#32
Senior Member
I don't care either way myself but was it Moser who had the wheels he used for his hour record declared illegal or maybe they set the minimum weight after his attempt (might have been some diameter issues too). I wonder if there are any online vids on it. I'll have to look. Of course, in an hour record you only want to accelerate at the beginning (maybe the end if you've got a little juice left but that would mean you left some time on the table). Do you keep some heavy aero wheels for time trialing? I've been out of the cycling world for awhile. What are triathletes using nowadays? Yes, no answers just questions.

#33
Senior Member
well, they look cool... i guess..
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
Maybe I'm wrong but everyone seems to be minimizing the importance of wheel mass for when it counts the most.
Lets say two riders identical in power output weight and every thing else physiological. Bikes are identical in every way including weight, but one has lighter rims. (don't over think it guys, I know some of you are having trouble with identical bikes but ligher rims. GET OVER IT! <GRIN>
Any how, after a 180 km stage on a tour they arrive at the 200 meter mark from the finish line at the same time having exactly the same energy reserves. Who wins the sprint? The one with the lighter wheels?
Don't tell me that the little bit of difference doesn't mean any thing. A win is a win.
Now if we are strictly talking about us wannabe's then probably I can see there isn't enough there to really matter. Even so, lighter wheels are generally an easy way to lighten an existing bike.
Lets say two riders identical in power output weight and every thing else physiological. Bikes are identical in every way including weight, but one has lighter rims. (don't over think it guys, I know some of you are having trouble with identical bikes but ligher rims. GET OVER IT! <GRIN>

Any how, after a 180 km stage on a tour they arrive at the 200 meter mark from the finish line at the same time having exactly the same energy reserves. Who wins the sprint? The one with the lighter wheels?
Don't tell me that the little bit of difference doesn't mean any thing. A win is a win.
Now if we are strictly talking about us wannabe's then probably I can see there isn't enough there to really matter. Even so, lighter wheels are generally an easy way to lighten an existing bike.
Makes sense. That's probably why tennis pros use the lightest racquets- so they something left at the end of a five set match.
#36
Some Weirdo
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Rexburg, ID
Posts: 502
Bikes: '86 Maruishi Excellence, '86 Schwinn Prelude, '88 Cannondale SR2000, '74 C. Itoh "Racer"
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times
in
92 Posts
So at what point does added weight become negative? Maybe we all need to ride disc wheels made of steel.

__________________
Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
#37
Senior Member
The added weight would become a negative once accelerating it hurt efficiency in a noticeable way. Biking through stop and start traffic in a 50-10 combo, for example, would be really noticeably inefficient. If the rim is heavy enough to make you feel that, but on a smaller level and hundreds or thousands of times during a ride--then it's probably too heavy.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,585
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2993 Post(s)
Liked 5,193 Times
in
2,109 Posts

Which is why pro cyclists never attack -- it's a waste of time since it doesn't actually produce any acceleration. I guess most pro cyclists just try to "out-average" the other riders.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,585
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2993 Post(s)
Liked 5,193 Times
in
2,109 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,430
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 739 Post(s)
Liked 410 Times
in
229 Posts
I agree. Know who you are and what your strengths and weaknesses are. I know guys who rarely brake on downhills. Heat build up for them is not an issue. Me, I am a chicken, also heavy. I stick with aluminum brake tracks. As you stated, carbon clinchers have been around long enough so we know they are safe. Things can happen, but we can say that about any carbon product.
#42
Senior Member
Riding to watts is definitely a thing--especially on climbs where the maybe the goal is to just survive and not lose too much time on that stage. Riders good enough to compete on a grand tour though I suspect are close enough to each other in ability that the differences in power are less important than team tactics.
#43
Senior Member
Consider the concept of quasi-steady state then see if it applies to road racing situations.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,513
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4001 Post(s)
Liked 2,885 Times
in
1,875 Posts
In a race where the sprinters' teams are in full control, the pace may not be that hard, But in a race where the non-sprinter feel they have a chance, they know that their job is to get away or split the field. Those races may well be slower races but can be a lot harder.
So it isn't just breaking away. But if you are trying to go with a breakaway that's leaving, getting a foot or two closer may be the difference between latching on and being reabsorbed by the field after wasting a lot is energy.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: adelaide, australia
Posts: 2,801
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 219 Post(s)
Liked 352 Times
in
143 Posts
I'm probably beating a dead horse since my earlier post here. But anyway I do have a set of sub 1000g hors category wheels, there awesome like everyone says about light wheels but I notice just as much when powers taken out of the cranks they stop dead fast.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,585
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2993 Post(s)
Liked 5,193 Times
in
2,109 Posts
I don't see anything quasi-steady state when a pro cyclist attacks in a race. The whole point is to accelerate quickly to create a gap, so that anyone following the attack has to put in a big effort to stay with the attacker. Anything that helps the attacker accelerate more quickly (or slows the followers' accelerations) can make a difference.
#47
Senior Member
Likes For asgelle:
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,585
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2993 Post(s)
Liked 5,193 Times
in
2,109 Posts
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,585
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2993 Post(s)
Liked 5,193 Times
in
2,109 Posts
No, but if you look at the equations of motion as in Martin et al. https://www.recumbents.com/wisil/Mart...%20cycling.pdf you would see there are acceleration terms relating to wheel rotation. A simple scaling analysis would show that the magnitude of these terms, proportional to acceleration, are orders of magnitude less than the terms dependent on velocity to some power. Therefore when integrating the equations to get speed or distance travelled, ignoring these acceleration terms doesn’t affect the result in any meaningful way.