How to not get dropped in the rolling hills
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2620 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Saddle height is measured from a single point on the BB to the saddle. When the saddle is moved fore or aft, from that single point it's distance from the BB changes. So if you move the saddle back the distance from the BB is greater, which means you have to lower it to the pre measured distance to match the original height. There's no math to it just simple geometry, fore thought and logic.
If a rider's position is unknown, then 10% of the unknown seat height = slam your saddle as far back as safety allows.
Yeah. Thanks for all of the insight. You're a bastion of useful information.
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
I do agree that saddle further back will tend to engage hamstrings more and so use more muscle groups,
potentially helping endurance over long rides, but I'd guess pretty much nobody slides further back on the saddle
when trying to keep up with a blistering group.
potentially helping endurance over long rides, but I'd guess pretty much nobody slides further back on the saddle
when trying to keep up with a blistering group.
#129
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
If your saddle height is 70cm your setback is 7cm from the BB there's the 10% math. There are some variables, saddle length, saddle rail length, seat post setback. Two things happen when mfgs tilt seat tubes forward.
1. The BB is moved back. 2. The seat tube moves forward. Both nearly move the center about 12mm on a saddle height of 67cm.
Like I said earlier, my suggestion didn't have anything to do with FIST.
It was a suggestion. I don't know why you can't get over that.
Did you like my picture of Dan in the workshop? I think that was day 2 of the road bike session. I just bought that camera, I had to take it back, there was something wrong with the auto focus. I use that same fit bike the dude in blue is sitting on. That was back in 2012. At that time, FIST was one of the suggested schools that Trek recommended on a job application. I attended on my vacation from Lockheed Martin where I worked as an Aircraft Maintenance Support Engineer. I quit that job and started a bike shop. Turns out I suck at sales. I refused to sell bikes to people that wouldn't fit them. I bet if I was able to sell one of the big 4 I'd still be open today. People slobber all over those bikes. I hate their geometry on the small bikes though, maybe I should have just faked it. Oh well, I learned a lot. There are a zillion reasons why starting a bike shop is one of the hardest businesses to succeed in. I just didn't think honesty was one of them. It didn't help that the credit card service f'd up my service credentials and sent a months worth of sales to the wrong account.
It's all good though, I still get to ride my bikes. Peace.
#130
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
According to the inventor and builder of the first TRI specific road bike, Quintana Roo, California 1989. TRI bikes are designed to save the running muscle for the run. Aerodynamics is a byproduct of that design. Meaning, some available muscle isn't used on purpose. So to me, logically, moving the saddle back allows one to use more muscle, equating to more power. There are always going to be trade offs. Experimenting with position to see what works best for rider and environment is always good.
Last edited by aceSSone; 11-24-20 at 11:26 AM.
#131
Senior Member
Dan Empfield's design was an attempt to address the needs of fitting with aerobars, which were already dominant in high-level triathlon at that time. Aerodynamics wasn't a "byproduct", it was an implicit requirement. His steep seat angle wasn't an attempt to fix a problem with drop-bar road fits, it was an attempt to fix a problem with how people were doing aggressive aerobar fits, one major issue being that the "shallow" seat positions were creating problematically scrunched hip angles*.
It's true that you can point to studies showing that Empfield's design resulted in improved performance on the run. But these same studies often show improvements on the bike as well. This 2002 article by Empfield is a fun read, for instance.
*The other major issue being that a more-forward fit demands a longer front-center, lest you feel like you're pitched forward off the front of the bike.
#132
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I think you're making an inaccurate inference.
Dan Empfield's design was an attempt to address the needs of fitting with aerobars, which were already dominant in high-level triathlon at that time. Aerodynamics wasn't a "byproduct", it was an implicit requirement. His steep seat angle wasn't an attempt to fix a problem with drop-bar road fits, it was an attempt to fix a problem with how people were doing aggressive aerobar fits, one major issue being that the "shallow" seat positions were creating problematically scrunched hip angles*.
It's true that you can point to studies showing that Empfield's design resulted in improved performance on the run. But these same studies often show improvements on the bike as well. This 2002 article by Empfield is a fun read, for instance.
*The other major issue being that a more-forward fit demands a longer front-center, lest you feel like you're pitched forward off the front of the bike.
Dan Empfield's design was an attempt to address the needs of fitting with aerobars, which were already dominant in high-level triathlon at that time. Aerodynamics wasn't a "byproduct", it was an implicit requirement. His steep seat angle wasn't an attempt to fix a problem with drop-bar road fits, it was an attempt to fix a problem with how people were doing aggressive aerobar fits, one major issue being that the "shallow" seat positions were creating problematically scrunched hip angles*.
It's true that you can point to studies showing that Empfield's design resulted in improved performance on the run. But these same studies often show improvements on the bike as well. This 2002 article by Empfield is a fun read, for instance.
*The other major issue being that a more-forward fit demands a longer front-center, lest you feel like you're pitched forward off the front of the bike.
#133
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,334
Bikes: Venge, Shiv, Factor LS
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 626 Times
in
294 Posts
JHFC.
Now i remember why i stopped reading Bikeforums all these years. People can just make their points and stop, but no, it always devolves into a ******g pissing contest where everyone has to get the last word in.
Now i remember why i stopped reading Bikeforums all these years. People can just make their points and stop, but no, it always devolves into a ******g pissing contest where everyone has to get the last word in.
Likes For guadzilla:
Likes For growlerdinky:
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,585
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2993 Post(s)
Liked 5,193 Times
in
2,109 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#136
Duke Ulysses
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 799
Bikes: An old orange one for dirt, and for the other stuff: a white one, a kinda mint green one, and a black one.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 175 Times
in
86 Posts
During interviews in recent years LeMond acknowledged that much of what he was taught, believed and, in turn, taught to others was totally wrong. That includes frame design, crank length and other factors that go into the ideal fit and energy transfer, and being wrong all the time.
#138
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Nooooo kidding. I'm thinking you should go back and read a few posts. They discuss my position why I think moving the saddle back could help, using the example of why one is moved forward on a TRI bike. I wasn't the first one to write tri bike someone else used it as an example why to move the saddle forward.
Likes For guadzilla:
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2620 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Nooooo kidding. I'm thinking you should go back and read a few posts. They discuss my position why I think moving the saddle back could help, using the example of why one is moved forward on a TRI bike. I wasn't the first one to write tri bike someone else used it as an example why to move the saddle forward.
#142
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2620 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Do they always include this guy? rubiksoval View Post
You've got that down.
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
Yesterday it was even stronger with a bunch of young bucks showed up. Did everything people told me but still got dropped. Just trusting the process at this point.
I don't know your background. have been doing endurance sports in some shape or form since 1995. 25 years of almost uninterrupted racing, exercising, training. I am not gifted or anything genetically. Played basketball in HS, I was so weak I would throw up in the middle of practice workouts. It took time.
People giving really really smart advice here. Listen to them. I got stuck in a similar training routine past few years. I got used to it mentally, my body adjusted to it. You gotto shake things up.
Me going from 185 to 170-75 helped me tremendously past few years. 175 is good but 170 is dancing on the pedals like nirvana though found it harder to sustain.
MILLION TIMES THIS. Like I wrote above I've been stuck in the same training routine the past few years. It's been convenient but I couldn't push my ceiling higher. this is about to change.
I don't know your background. have been doing endurance sports in some shape or form since 1995. 25 years of almost uninterrupted racing, exercising, training. I am not gifted or anything genetically. Played basketball in HS, I was so weak I would throw up in the middle of practice workouts. It took time.
People giving really really smart advice here. Listen to them. I got stuck in a similar training routine past few years. I got used to it mentally, my body adjusted to it. You gotto shake things up.
Me going from 185 to 170-75 helped me tremendously past few years. 175 is good but 170 is dancing on the pedals like nirvana though found it harder to sustain.
MILLION TIMES THIS. Like I wrote above I've been stuck in the same training routine the past few years. It's been convenient but I couldn't push my ceiling higher. this is about to change.
I'm picturing you with a slammed aero position, straight back, saddle as far back as it will go, having not eaten for days, on a tri bike, and you still got dropped??
