Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Carbon vs aluminum

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Carbon vs aluminum

Old 12-31-20, 04:55 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
cxwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times in 1,489 Posts
Originally Posted by woodcraft
The pros are
- basically no pinch flats
- no fragile bead hook profile
- pretty much eliminates heat dissipation/ delamination issues for rim brakes
- lighter
- better safety margin for high speed punctures
- can run lower pressure
- arguably fewer flats
- bargain priced used available.
^This^
cxwrench is offline  
Old 12-31-20, 05:23 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18882 Post(s)
Liked 10,643 Times in 6,053 Posts
Don't buy tubulars this day in age.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 12-31-20, 06:00 PM
  #28  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,597

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 543 Post(s)
Liked 705 Times in 353 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave Mayer
For a wheelset, low rotational inertia is the #1 performance requirement, which helps you to reconnect with the wheel in front of you coming out of corners. If you are behind a group of say 10 riders, at 40kph, you are basically coasting. But if you drop 10 feet back, exposed to the wind, you have to amp up the watts to close to that of the pacemaker. As in 100 to 400 watts ASAP. If you cannot, and drop back, then you are finished: solo for the rest of the ride.
How many watts does it take to spin a pair of wheel up from 30 to 40kph?
znomit is offline  
Old 12-31-20, 06:02 PM
  #29  
Drip, Drip.
 
Moisture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575

Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1033 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times in 162 Posts
Originally Posted by akirapuff
Its a lighter wheelset for one. Also weight savings from tires and better feel. I understand the maintenance is harder.
Shaving a bit of weight off your wheelset is a ckmlelte waste of time and money.
Moisture is offline  
Old 01-01-21, 03:45 PM
  #30  
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,517

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 707 Times in 501 Posts
Logic says any gain in acceleration you get from lighter weight is offset by a loss of inertia; you have to work harder to maintain speed. You get a slight benefit for climbing, and maybe improved braking.

Another benefit of a lighter bike that occurs to me is less unsprung weight; every time the bike has to move over a bump, that's proportionately less energy lost from whatever fraction of the force that doesn't end up moving the rider too (rider could be unweighting, seatpost could flex). That might be approaching significance, but I haven't seen anybody talking about that, let alone trying to quantify it. The unsprung weight factor might also be relevant for grip.

But it's all pretty marginal stuff.

What isn't marginal is what a frikken beast your whip feels like when it's rocking a deep 1kg wheelset.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 01-01-21, 03:51 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 751

Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 62 Times in 44 Posts
I love my tubeless setup, but no way do they have the same feel as sew-ups, especially silk sew-ups. And with tubeless, I am slightly less confident that I can get up and rolling again if there's a flat.

Last edited by Robert A; 01-01-21 at 04:02 PM.
Robert A is offline  
Old 01-01-21, 03:55 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,477
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1000 Post(s)
Liked 426 Times in 251 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
...every time the bike has to move over a bump, that's proportionately less energy lost from whatever fraction of the force that doesn't end up moving the rider too (rider could be unweighting, seatpost could flex). That [i]might be approaching significance, but I haven't seen anybody talking about that, let alone trying to quantify it.
Read up on impedance and rolling resistance. This has been covered.
https://blog.silca.cc/part-4b-rollin...-and-impedance
asgelle is offline  
Old 01-01-21, 03:59 PM
  #33  
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,517

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 707 Times in 501 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle
Read up on impedance and rolling resistance. This has been covered.
https://blog.silca.cc/part-4b-rollin...-and-impedance
I've read that. There's no investigation of the effect of bike weight on impedance. And it'd be tough to test for - how do you control for the rider's degree of unweighting?
Kimmo is offline  
Old 01-01-21, 04:02 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,477
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1000 Post(s)
Liked 426 Times in 251 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
I've read that. There's no investigation of the effect of bike weight on impedance.
That the break point is a function of system weight has absolutely been discussed, perhaps not in the one article I cited, but in the context of understanding the factors that determine when the breakpoint occurs. There's little point in understanding the slope of the Crr curve beyond that point as it doesn't make sense to ride there at all.
asgelle is offline  
Old 01-01-21, 04:22 PM
  #35  
bike whisperer
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,517

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 707 Times in 501 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle
system weight
That's rider and bike, but it's a gross oversimplification given there's no rigid connection between the two.
Kimmo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.