Closely-spaced ratios = quicker shift?
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times
in
4,597 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,545
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2958 Post(s)
Liked 5,155 Times
in
2,088 Posts
#103
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It's definitely noticeable. I guess it's like a really red jersey, some people will think it's tacky, some will notice and not care, some even prefer it. You notice if you don't have a high or low enough gear too, so the question is which one is going to bother you more? 🙂
This may help or it may muddy the waters, but...
To go a given speed, you need to output a specific amount of power. To put out that specific amount of power is a balancing act between torque and cadence - you can go with low cadence and high torque or high cadence and low torque or mix of the two anywhere in between. More or less, high torque taxes the legs more whereas high cadence taxes the cardiovascular more.
Gaps in gearing are problematic when you're at high power output and you can't quite find the ideal balance - legs can't sustain on one cog and heart will explode on the other. In that type of situation, you just can't quite maintain that specific power, which means that you can't quite maintain that given speed, which is when you drop off your desired pace and you watch your PR or your group ride slip off beyond your reach.
To go a given speed, you need to output a specific amount of power. To put out that specific amount of power is a balancing act between torque and cadence - you can go with low cadence and high torque or high cadence and low torque or mix of the two anywhere in between. More or less, high torque taxes the legs more whereas high cadence taxes the cardiovascular more.
Gaps in gearing are problematic when you're at high power output and you can't quite find the ideal balance - legs can't sustain on one cog and heart will explode on the other. In that type of situation, you just can't quite maintain that specific power, which means that you can't quite maintain that given speed, which is when you drop off your desired pace and you watch your PR or your group ride slip off beyond your reach.
Likes For Ataylor:
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
Gotcha! Thanks. 🙂
It does help. More so on an intellectual level than experiential, since I neither race nor do I go on group rides. I mean I think I always knew deep down that this sport was complex and didn't simply involve sitting on a bike and pedaling fast, but it's still somewhat surprising to me that such a small gap between riders can affect someone significantly enough to leave them trailing behind their group. I might just have to join a group one day - at least until I hit the 17th cog on my 11/28 - just to see (from behind, of course) what all the fuss is really about.
It does help. More so on an intellectual level than experiential, since I neither race nor do I go on group rides. I mean I think I always knew deep down that this sport was complex and didn't simply involve sitting on a bike and pedaling fast, but it's still somewhat surprising to me that such a small gap between riders can affect someone significantly enough to leave them trailing behind their group. I might just have to join a group one day - at least until I hit the 17th cog on my 11/28 - just to see (from behind, of course) what all the fuss is really about.
FIFY

#105
Senior Member
Thread Starter
If I understand you correctly, SoSmellyAir mentioned that above, about how some have a more broad power band that can handle wider cadences without worry. For the rest of us, however? A bike bar in one hand and binoculars in the other comes to mind. Or at least that seems to be the conventional wisdom around here.
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,330
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20611 Post(s)
Liked 9,283 Times
in
4,597 Posts
...but it's still somewhat surprising to me that such a small gap between cogs can affect someone significantly enough to leave them trailing behind their group. I might just have to join a group one day - at least until I hit the 17th cog on my 11/28 - just to see (from behind, of course) what all the fuss is really about.
If you don't ride in situations like that or if you're stronger than the people that you ride with, or if you're not looking to squeak out long-standing PRs, etc, then all of this means pretty much squat.
Likes For WhyFi:
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
If I understand you correctly, SoSmellyAir mentioned that above, about how some have a more broad power band that can handle wider cadences without worry. For the rest of us, however? A bike bar in one hand and binoculars in the other comes to mind. Or at least that seems to be the conventional wisdom around here.
Falling behind the group by just a few bike lengths at >20mph can lead to losing the group and it's advantage entirely. This is where having just the right gear ratio matters, being able to keep up at crucial moments.
For the bar & binoculars scenario, having a bike with nice slack geometry for no-hands riding is most important, IMO.

Likes For woodcraft:
#108
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Riding closely behind others can reduce the effort needed by up to 1/3 because of less wind resistance & the faster the speed, the more it matters. In groups, riders commonly take turns at the front and then rest at the back of the group, so the group as a whole can go faster than the individuals can.
Falling behind the group by just a few bike lengths at >20mph can lead to losing the group and it's advantage entirely. This is where having just the right gear ratio matters, being able to keep up at crucial moments.
Falling behind the group by just a few bike lengths at >20mph can lead to losing the group and it's advantage entirely. This is where having just the right gear ratio matters, being able to keep up at crucial moments.

#109
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Anyway, ya'll. Thanks again for your help. I'm all set on this end, so there won't be a need for me to check for updates to this thread as often anymore. So I bid you guys a safe and happy riding season. Hope each of you enjoys it in good health. Take care.
#111
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,376
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1203 Post(s)
Liked 789 Times
in
579 Posts
Let us know how it goes with the 11-28 cassette. I hope it is as life changing for you as the 12-25 was for me.
#112
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,634
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 859 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times
in
209 Posts
Di2
You are getting Di2? It's a very fast, very reliable shift on any rear cassette. And the front is quite fast and drama free. I shift all the time, often for just a few pedal strokes, then shift again. A few years ago on a group ride, we went around a bend in the road and right there was an unexpected short steep climb. The three Di2 riders shifted way down, and were climbing the 30 foot hill in the small chainring and low gear, sitting down. The mechanical shift riders were still in their big ring, mashing up the hill. They didn't even attempt to shift the front.
28 vs 32 as a low gear
The 32 is 14% easier. The ratio, 32/28 = 1.14 That's a little more than "one more gear", since gear shifts can range from around 5% to maybe 15% or so. 10% is a reasonable rule of thumb for typical shifts.
My 32 is the difference between sitting or having to stand up on a 10-12% grade. And it's extremely helpful on really steep grades, like 15-18%
Close ratio cassettes
Some riders don't seem to notice if they have big jumps between gears, so that their cadence changes quite a bit. Others want a cadence all the time that's "just right". It's way less critical at easier paced riding, where cadence is often a bit lower anyway.
A few years ago, I liked a local cycle club ride that was fairly flat and a bit too fast for me. It would hit 20-23 mph at times, and I was going all-out to keep that pace. So I'd shift to the next larger cog, but then I'd be spinning too fast. Shifting back to the harder gear, I'd be pushing too hard on the pedal. It was back-and-forth, trying to find that good cadence.
From a BF post, I ended up making a Shimano 14-32. Perfect for that ride!
14-32 cassette
This is the largest 5 cogs from an 11-32 (on two cog carriers), and the other 6 from the 14-28 "junior racing cassette"
The 50-34 front and 14-32 at typical flat road cadences:
This has very close shifts from 18-25 mph, just where I needed it. And the low gears to get up the occasional steep hills.
The downside is that it spins out at 28-29 mph. That's okay, I'll just coast on steeper downhills.
And the 34 chainring tops out around 17 mph, instead of 21 mph with an 11-32.
The other problem with this gearing: shifting the front chainring needs 4-5 shifts in the back, instead of about 3 shifts. But the Di2 can do that quickly and easily.

11-32
During Covid, I only rode with 3-5 riders, and no drafting. We would push hard on climbs, but cruise on the flats. So close gearing isn't necessary.
Here's the standard 11-32. Big jumps between shifts in the 20-25 mph range.
Good spacing in the 15-20 mph range, for either the 50 or 34 chainring. That's good for many riders.
(note that this chart goes to 35 mph, not 30.)
You are getting Di2? It's a very fast, very reliable shift on any rear cassette. And the front is quite fast and drama free. I shift all the time, often for just a few pedal strokes, then shift again. A few years ago on a group ride, we went around a bend in the road and right there was an unexpected short steep climb. The three Di2 riders shifted way down, and were climbing the 30 foot hill in the small chainring and low gear, sitting down. The mechanical shift riders were still in their big ring, mashing up the hill. They didn't even attempt to shift the front.
28 vs 32 as a low gear
The 32 is 14% easier. The ratio, 32/28 = 1.14 That's a little more than "one more gear", since gear shifts can range from around 5% to maybe 15% or so. 10% is a reasonable rule of thumb for typical shifts.
My 32 is the difference between sitting or having to stand up on a 10-12% grade. And it's extremely helpful on really steep grades, like 15-18%
Close ratio cassettes
Some riders don't seem to notice if they have big jumps between gears, so that their cadence changes quite a bit. Others want a cadence all the time that's "just right". It's way less critical at easier paced riding, where cadence is often a bit lower anyway.
A few years ago, I liked a local cycle club ride that was fairly flat and a bit too fast for me. It would hit 20-23 mph at times, and I was going all-out to keep that pace. So I'd shift to the next larger cog, but then I'd be spinning too fast. Shifting back to the harder gear, I'd be pushing too hard on the pedal. It was back-and-forth, trying to find that good cadence.
From a BF post, I ended up making a Shimano 14-32. Perfect for that ride!
14-32 cassette
This is the largest 5 cogs from an 11-32 (on two cog carriers), and the other 6 from the 14-28 "junior racing cassette"
The 50-34 front and 14-32 at typical flat road cadences:
This has very close shifts from 18-25 mph, just where I needed it. And the low gears to get up the occasional steep hills.
The downside is that it spins out at 28-29 mph. That's okay, I'll just coast on steeper downhills.
And the 34 chainring tops out around 17 mph, instead of 21 mph with an 11-32.
The other problem with this gearing: shifting the front chainring needs 4-5 shifts in the back, instead of about 3 shifts. But the Di2 can do that quickly and easily.

11-32
During Covid, I only rode with 3-5 riders, and no drafting. We would push hard on climbs, but cruise on the flats. So close gearing isn't necessary.
Here's the standard 11-32. Big jumps between shifts in the 20-25 mph range.
Good spacing in the 15-20 mph range, for either the 50 or 34 chainring. That's good for many riders.
(note that this chart goes to 35 mph, not 30.)

Last edited by rm -rf; 03-15-21 at 06:48 PM.