Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Humbled by hills

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Humbled by hills

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-21, 09:52 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy

I wouldn't blame the weight gain too much. You can run your numbers through this calculator: Bicycle Speed (Velocity) And Power Calculator
I suspect that 10 lbs. might cost you .3 mph on a long 10% climb
To me, the flaw in that is a rider doesn't just slow down .3 mph in a group ride,, the rider will try to keep up and exert more power and blow up, then drag ass the rest of the ride.
As the backmarker on hundreds of mountain rides, this happens to me. Then they wait, so, not wanting them to wait too long, I try even harder to limit my losses. Of course, when I get there, they are tired of waiting and take off immediately giving me no chance to rest.
big john is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 09:56 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by cubewheels
Flats can be as difficult as the steepest hills if you're trying to sustain average speeds above 22 mph solo on a road bike with road kit
No. On flats you can back off a bit or even stop pedaling for a few seconds. If lucky, you can get in a line or behind someone large. Steep climbs are all about power to weight. When riders get close to 200 pounds or over, it's very difficult to climb with lighter highly trained climbers. On the flats, I used to be able to make them pay but now I am 67.
big john is offline  
Likes For big john:
Old 04-30-21, 10:06 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
From personal experience, I've learned that my aerobic power on flat terrain comes back quickly (weeks), my climbing power comes back more slowly (months).

Especially on longer, steeper grades (>8%). That type of fitness appears to take the longest.

If you're like me, just give it time. Those climbing legs will come back, eventually.
Haven't seen you around for a while. Are you still on the comeback trail?
big john is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 10:21 AM
  #29  
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,101

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3425 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times in 1,790 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
Are you still on the comeback trail?
Well, I'm on "a" trail, back on the bike for 5 weeks now. Currently, I'm just happy to be healthy and able to ride.

I did beat Ned Overend's time on a short Strava segment climb yesterday. A glimmer of some fitness.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 10:49 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 528 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times in 161 Posts
Originally Posted by CoogansBluff
Pre-pandemic, I was doing group rides 1-2x/week with a group that's 25 miles north, and the group then usually road further north, meaning hillier terrain.

During pandemic, with no group rides, I was naturally staying closer to home on flatter roads. It's not like the mountains vs. the sea, but probably 1,000-1,500 climbs vs. 2,000-3,000 on typical rides of 30-40 miles.

So my first group ride back earlier this month, I surprise myself and average 20.5 mph over a 43-mile group ride, climbing 1,250 (which is relatively flat for that distance around Raleigh). This is near home. I'm thinking I'm as strong as I've ever been.

Days later, I go north with my old gang and get dropped on 18 mph rides twice in three days on 40-mile routes climbing 2,400. Now, I'm thinking I've lost more ground than they have over the pandemic.'

Not that it matters, just having fun, but I'm curious. How did that happen?

I should add that I weigh about 10, maybe 15 pounds, more than I did when riding w/ the northern group in 2019. But I'm posting similar times on my old solo routes around home.

So, what is the best explanation for these recent performances?

-Haven't been riding hills enough lately. Give it a month.

-Engine is fine, as evidenced by good speeds over flat, but added weight is taking a toll up hill.

-Hills are just the devil. That's all it is.

I also might've just been more ''up'' for the first ride. It was my first group ride back, and I didn't think I could hang w/ them, so I was busting it. On the hillier ones, I was overconfident and perhaps not mentally ready to grind.
Maybe you got asymptomatic covid, but performance is slightly affected.

On the other hand, the group rides with more climbing were only 2.5mph slower than the flat one. I don't now how steep your climbs are, but on some around me my average speed drops like 5-6km/h on rides with a lot of climbing.

Do you have a power meter? Do you know the watts you put out in each of those rides? If not, maybe ask someone from the group. Possible the flat ride people just took it easier.
ZHVelo is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 12:19 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse

I did beat Ned Overend's time on a short Strava segment climb yesterday.
Awesome!
big john is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 03:35 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by UCantTouchThis
What about long sustained rides? Say Breathless Agony or Ride Around the Bear? Would the same go for over 200 pounders be the same difficult level on long climbs like this? Not steep imo but long.


As always, it really depends on the individual. I would say generally, once the grade goes past around 4%, 200 plus lb. riders start suffering if the climb lasts too long.
colnago62 is offline  
Likes For colnago62:
Old 04-30-21, 05:04 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by UCantTouchThis
What about long sustained rides? Say Breathless Agony or Ride Around the Bear? Would the same go for over 200 pounders be the same difficult level on long climbs like this? Not steep imo but long.


It was for me. I did Breathless Agony in 2006 and it kicked my ass. Sure, there are a few big guys who can climb all day but it's generally a disadvantage to be big.
big john is offline  
Likes For big john:
Old 04-30-21, 05:33 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by UCantTouchThis
Have you ever done Ride Around the Bear? If so, did you like one over the other? RAB vs BA ?

I thought RAB was much nicer in every way. Too bad they did away with it, was my favorite ride ever.
I have not but everyone I ever heard from said RAB was a better ride. BA was well supported and I thought Santiago Cycling did a great job. I did the Mulholland Challenge 3 times and I thought the ride was easier because the climbs weren't as long but the support is iffy. I did the Heartbreak Hundred once and some variation of that route many times going back to 1989. I love that route but chickened out on it a couple weeks ago when my club did it.
big john is offline  
Likes For big john:
Old 04-30-21, 05:57 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
spelger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,299

Bikes: yes, i have one

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times in 687 Posts
Not familiar with this climb. What are the units for the graph? Meters, feet, miles, km, time?
spelger is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 06:07 PM
  #36  
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,101

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3425 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times in 1,790 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
I did the Heartbreak Hundred once and some variation of that route many times going back to 1989. I love that route but chickened out on it a couple weeks ago when my club did it.
Hey, there's some good news for us "years enhanced" cyclists: we may not be getting faster, but we are probably getting more resistant to fatigue.

So maybe it's OK to go after some of those longer rides that intimidate us.

Does Older Muscle Fatigue Less Than Young?

Studies conducted in the past decade generally indicate that older muscle fatigues relatively less than young muscle. Healthy older men and women have shown a greater ability to maintain maximal force production under a variety of conditions and in several muscle groups. Skeletal Muscle Fatigue in Old Age
I'm taking this as encouragement to go out and do some longer rides.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 06:10 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by spelger
Not familiar with this climb. What are the units for the graph? Meters, feet, miles, km, time?
The graph shows actual elevation in feet and distance in miles at the bottom. The version I did is called Breathless Agony and has 12,000 feet of climbing in the first 75 miles and the last 40 miles are all downhill. Those numbers might be disputed.
big john is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 06:17 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
Hey, there's some good news for us "years enhanced" cyclists: we may not be getting faster, but we are probably getting more resistant to fatigue.

So maybe it's OK to go after some of those longer rides that intimidate us.



I'm taking this as encouragement to go out and do some longer rides.
Last Saturday I did an 80 mile ride with about 7700 feet of climbing. I did it solo so I could control the pace and stop if I wanted to. It's been a while since I did that much and I was pretty happy with how it went. I had no cramps or nausea but the last few hills were tough and I wondered if I want to do it again.
big john is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 06:57 PM
  #39  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
To me, the flaw in that is a rider doesn't just slow down .3 mph in a group ride,, the rider will try to keep up and exert more power and blow up, then drag ass the rest of the ride.
As the backmarker on hundreds of mountain rides, this happens to me. Then they wait, so, not wanting them to wait too long, I try even harder to limit my losses. Of course, when I get there, they are tired of waiting and take off immediately giving me no chance to rest.
Well, that's certainly true. My normal position was "off the back." Some folks could do a hill repeat and catch me. I worked on getting stronger. Over the years, I also lost 15 lbs, which helped. But the main thing, by far, was increasing my ability to hold high power levels for long periods, i.e. to be able to stay near LTHR and repeat that on successive hills. Riding with faster people was huge. The other thing that helped me the most was doing 3 sets of 30 in the weight room until I could squat almost my body weight that way, and do 700 1RM on the leg sled. That little project took 2 years. I didn't worry about weight loss at all, it just gradually came off. I only did one ride a week at my limit. The rest of the week I did Z2 and a lot of pedaling drills. Like ride rollers for an hour, including pedaling 117 cadence for 1/2 hour and then go to the gym. Also 1-legged pedaling and low cadence pedaling. I did everything I could think of to increase my endurance at high power.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 07:20 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,274
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8273 Post(s)
Liked 9,028 Times in 4,469 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Well, that's certainly true. My normal position was "off the back." Some folks could do a hill repeat and catch me. I worked on getting stronger. Over the years, I also lost 15 lbs, which helped. But the main thing, by far, was increasing my ability to hold high power levels for long periods, i.e. to be able to stay near LTHR and repeat that on successive hills. Riding with faster people was huge. The other thing that helped me the most was doing 3 sets of 30 in the weight room until I could squat almost my body weight that way, and do 700 1RM on the leg sled. That little project took 2 years. I didn't worry about weight loss at all, it just gradually came off. I only did one ride a week at my limit. The rest of the week I did Z2 and a lot of pedaling drills. Like ride rollers for an hour, including pedaling 117 cadence for 1/2 hour and then go to the gym. Also 1-legged pedaling and low cadence pedaling. I did everything I could think of to increase my endurance at high power.
Your discipline is admirable. My problem with that is I don't have any. None. Not with diet or training. I used to enjoy weight training and would do it again if the right situation happened.
big john is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 10:59 PM
  #41  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
what % of FTP do you consider zone 4 and 5. An hour and 15 minutes sounds like a long to be those zones
That ride you are responding to was on our tandem. I do all my early season hard rides on the tandem, just because it's way harder. If you haven't ridden a tandem with your wife on long hilly group rides, you can't imagine. Anyway, as I said above, we don't have power on the tandem because of the expense. We try to match HRs instead. I know my LTHR. That particular ride had a duration of 4 hours and a saddle time of 3 hours. That's enough time to rack up numbers like that if we set our own pace and go moderate everywhere but the climbs. That's my whole week's worth of intensity, right there. Because many short efforts aren't enough to raise to LT, probably power would have shown a bit more Z5.

But yes, that is a long time, which is the whole point. I wouldn't mind being craned off the bike at the end. I often have to lay it down because I'm too tired/crampy to dismount.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 04-30-21, 11:02 PM
  #42  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
Your discipline is admirable. My problem with that is I don't have any. None. Not with diet or training. I used to enjoy weight training and would do it again if the right situation happened.
You have to want it badly enough. I'm an addict.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
Old 05-02-21, 08:17 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
spelger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,299

Bikes: yes, i have one

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times in 687 Posts
i am pretty sure these hills would do me in. that is much more hill than i have even done. would be a nice challenge though.
spelger is offline  
Likes For spelger:
Old 05-04-21, 09:54 PM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
Grouperdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
To the OP, The speed is irrelevant, it’s all about watts. Power is a true measure of effort bc it is not influenced by drafting, elevation, how much you slept, wind, etc. Power is power

If you are in group going 20 mph and it’s a double pace line and it’s flat, your power output in going to be pretty low when not up front. For me, I would be in the 130-140 watt range maybe lower, and maybe 200-210 when pulling at 20 mph ish. Much harder to guess on the hilly ride bc even with elevation not sure if rollers or short punchy climbs or long climbs.

But, the power required is going to be significantly higher on a route with 800-1000 ft of climb every 10 miles. For example, On rollers, even in the peloton I might be hitting 400-600 watts in sustained spurts. The average power for a rolling hilly ride at 18 mph might be 230 versus maybe 145 in the flat group ride depending how much up front. I’m throwing numbers out there but either way that’s a big gap in watts/effort for those two rides as described
Grouperdawg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.