Which Single-sided Power meter?
#27
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,707
Bikes: Holdsworth 1979 Special, C-dale 1993 MT3000 Tandem & 1996 F700CAD3, Cervelo 2022 R5 & 2018 R3, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked 842 Times
in
494 Posts
modern Power Meters are extremely accurate.
I went with the Stages due to better temp compensation.
My coach claimed my Wahoo Kickr Bike and my outdoor road bike with Stages dual were reading differently.
So I borrowed a pair of Garmin Vector 3’s and did a comparison.
rode Wahoo Kickr Bike with Vectors and compared the built in PM with the Vectors.
Rode my outdoor Bike with Stages dual and Vectors.
All three were within 3% (vector end 3% higher in both tests)
So yes……. Expect them to read the same!
Barry
I went with the Stages due to better temp compensation.
My coach claimed my Wahoo Kickr Bike and my outdoor road bike with Stages dual were reading differently.
So I borrowed a pair of Garmin Vector 3’s and did a comparison.
rode Wahoo Kickr Bike with Vectors and compared the built in PM with the Vectors.
Rode my outdoor Bike with Stages dual and Vectors.
All three were within 3% (vector end 3% higher in both tests)
So yes……. Expect them to read the same!
Barry
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
modern Power Meters are extremely accurate.
I went with the Stages due to better temp compensation.
My coach claimed my Wahoo Kickr Bike and my outdoor road bike with Stages dual were reading differently.
So I borrowed a pair of Garmin Vector 3’s and did a comparison.
rode Wahoo Kickr Bike with Vectors and compared the built in PM with the Vectors.
Rode my outdoor Bike with Stages dual and Vectors.
All three were within 3% (vector end 3% higher in both tests)
So yes……. Expect them to read the same!
Barry
I went with the Stages due to better temp compensation.
My coach claimed my Wahoo Kickr Bike and my outdoor road bike with Stages dual were reading differently.
So I borrowed a pair of Garmin Vector 3’s and did a comparison.
rode Wahoo Kickr Bike with Vectors and compared the built in PM with the Vectors.
Rode my outdoor Bike with Stages dual and Vectors.
All three were within 3% (vector end 3% higher in both tests)
So yes……. Expect them to read the same!
Barry
#29
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,111
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 715 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
339 Posts
This is from here, which was a 2017 check on power meters out in the hands of actual riders. Since this was done a few years ago, there weren't many pedal power meters in the study. Nonetheless, while you may expect them to read the same, you really actually have to check to know for sure.

#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
This is from here, which was a 2017 check on power meters out in the hands of actual riders. Since this was done a few years ago, there weren't many pedal power meters in the study. Nonetheless, while you may expect them to read the same, you really actually have to check to know for sure.


#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18880 Post(s)
Liked 10,640 Times
in
6,050 Posts
This is from here, which was a 2017 check on power meters out in the hands of actual riders. Since this was done a few years ago, there weren't many pedal power meters in the study. Nonetheless, while you may expect them to read the same, you really actually have to check to know for sure.



#32
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,111
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 715 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
339 Posts
To be fair, back when that study was done, I think the Stages may have been the only power meter in that study that was left-side only, so another way to look at these would be a single-sided power meter compared to a bunch of devices that read total power generated from both sides.
I feel your pain. I have guys telling me it's impossible to measure aerodynamic and rolling drag on a bike.
Last edited by RChung; 05-23-21 at 08:32 AM.
#33
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,707
Bikes: Holdsworth 1979 Special, C-dale 1993 MT3000 Tandem & 1996 F700CAD3, Cervelo 2022 R5 & 2018 R3, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked 842 Times
in
494 Posts
Regarding my PM, I’m a lot more interested in precision than accuracy.
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.
200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb
That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.
I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.
Barry
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.
200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb
That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.
I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.
Barry
#34
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,111
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 715 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
339 Posts
Regarding my PM, I’m a lot more interested in precision than accuracy.
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.
200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb
That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.
I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.
Barry
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.
200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb
That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.
I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.
Barry
Likes For RChung:
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For RChung:
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Ive just watched the Shane Llama lab test where he discovers the Stages Left-sided PM doubled is more accurate than the LR combined. Interesting. No such issues with the 4iiii, apparently.
#42
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,111
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 715 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
339 Posts
But you said you had a 105 crank set. So that's why I said *if* you wanted a left-side-only crank arm power meter, you should probably consider that a non-upgradeable purchase, and don't think about possibly buying the right side crank in the future "as an upgrade." It wouldn't be.
Last edited by RChung; 05-24-21 at 08:14 AM.
Likes For RChung:
#43
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The problem is with the right side crank, not the left -- more precisely, the problem is with the right side Shimano DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 cranks. More more precisely, it's with putting a strain gage on the right side Shimano DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 crank arms. SRAM, FSA, Rotor, and other right side crank arms appear to be okay, as are crank spiders.
But you said you had a 105 crank set. So that's why I said *if* you wanted a left-side-only crank arm power meter, you should probably consider that a non-upgradeable purchase, and don't think about possibly buying the right side crank in the future "as an upgrade." It wouldn't be.
But you said you had a 105 crank set. So that's why I said *if* you wanted a left-side-only crank arm power meter, you should probably consider that a non-upgradeable purchase, and don't think about possibly buying the right side crank in the future "as an upgrade." It wouldn't be.
Last edited by Doomrider74; 05-24-21 at 10:20 AM.
#44
Member
One arm vs dual sided power meter
I want to get a power meter for outdoor rides. Any reason to spend more for a double sided crank when I can just get a new/used one arm Stages/Precision?
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 849 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
246 Posts
Leg imbalances exist. They also aren't constant. Depending on your current power output and fatigue level, your imbalance might change. This can make maintaining a certain power level by feel difficult.
That's about it.
That's about it.
Likes For smashndash:
#46
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,111
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 715 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
339 Posts
Understood, thanks. As you say, it doesn't seem worth the money. My only reservation is that my left leg is weaker than my right, so I'd expect the numbers to be lower when compared to Zwift. However, could I use that to my advantage? Would having a left sided only PM help me even out the imbalance? If nothing else, it might help me mentally, by forcing me to lead with my left more. Is that a possibility?
In a deep sense, if you can go faster and/or achieve your goals, do you really care if it was because of your left leg rather than your entire aerobic system, however it is bilaterally allocated? (I don't have an answer for that -- I think it will vary by individual).
Likes For RChung:
Likes For Doomrider74:
#48
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I suppose it's a possibility, but a lot depends on why your left is weaker: some things may be correctable, others may not be. I have a friend who's a cycling coach, pretty well known, who had to have his lower left leg amputated after a cycling accident. After a long and arduous recovery, he was able to *exceed* his pre-amputation FTP although his L/R balance was, obviously, unbalanced. There is no way he can "pedal circles" or "pull up" or "scrape the bottom of the stroke": he'd yank his prosthesis off his stump if he tried any of that. All he can do is stomp with it, so he stomps down as hard as he can, and he only pays attention to his total combined one-and-a-half-leg power. Below the knee amputation, so maybe one-and-two-thirds. A dozen or so years ago, I had a very unpleasant experience with sciatica, and my right leg went dead. I'd already had several years of power data so I didn't need separate L/R data to tell me that my right leg was dead and my pedaling was asymmetric -- my total power dropped and I couldn't control my right foot. Over the course of six or nine months I slowly recovered, and I was able to match my power from before. I wasn't specifically concentrating on strengthening my right leg, I was just riding and walking and trying to get back to where I was. I have no idea whether my L/R power production is symmetric now, and I don't care. All I care about is whether I can achieve my goals with as many legs as I have available.
In a deep sense, if you can go faster and/or achieve your goals, do you really care if it was because of your left leg rather than your entire aerobic system, however it is bilaterally allocated? (I don't have an answer for that -- I think it will vary by individual).
In a deep sense, if you can go faster and/or achieve your goals, do you really care if it was because of your left leg rather than your entire aerobic system, however it is bilaterally allocated? (I don't have an answer for that -- I think it will vary by individual).
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18880 Post(s)
Liked 10,640 Times
in
6,050 Posts
Regarding my PM, I’m a lot more interested in precision than accuracy.
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.
200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb
That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.
I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.
Barry
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.
200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb
That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.
I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.
Barry
#50
Senior Member