![]() |
40T to 42T switch in a hybrid. Big difference?
My wife bought a Sirrus X5.0.
Has a 40T crank. The rear cassette is 11-51T I wonder if switching that 40T to a 42T would make a big difference in terms of speed. We don't live in an area with lots of hills. Thoughts? |
The difference is 5%. If she kept the same cadence and was going 15 mph with the 40T, she'd go 15.75 mph with the 42T.
|
Why not a 44t or even 46t? If there aren't lots of hills, how often does she (or anyone) really need a ratio that is that low?
|
Originally Posted by dvai
(Post 22197716)
My wife bought a Sirrus X5.0.
Has a 40T crank. The rear cassette is 11-51T I wonder if switching that 40T to a 42T would make a big difference in terms of speed. We don't live in an area with lots of hills. Thoughts? A 11-51 cassette seems to be grossly unnecessary if you "don't live in an area with lots of hills," and the huge gaps between cogs in this cassette cannot be good for maintaining a steady cadence or for acceleration. |
Originally Posted by dvai
(Post 22197716)
My wife bought a Sirrus X5.0.
Has a 40T crank. The rear cassette is 11-51T I wonder if switching that 40T to a 42T would make a big difference in terms of speed. We don't live in an area with lots of hills. Thoughts? |
Is a new bike. Sirrus X5.0
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t. What would be the easiest way to improve speed? Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios? And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette? |
Top speed would occur in the 40/11 combination. Changing to a 44 tooth chain ring and a 1 inch longer chain would produce 10% more speed potential. So would a change to a cassette starting with a 10T sprocket, if available.
|
I would definitely go to a 46t, Increasing the ring by 2 teeth just is not a big enough difference to bother with, usually. However, if she only needs a small increase in top end, that might be enough. Personally, I would still go to at least a 44t.
|
Have you looked at what the gear calculators on line show you? This is my go to one for just it's simplicity, but it gives more info about gears you may not have in the results.
https://www.bikecalc.com/speed_at_cadence With a 1x front changing the front ring will impact the entire range of gearing. So if the current low ratio gears are needed for any of the riding done on that bike, then they will be gone if you increase the size of the front rings. If the bike is only ridden on pavement or packed gravel, it's hard to imagine the low gears are currently needed though. |
Originally Posted by dvai
(Post 22197716)
My wife bought a Sirrus X5.0.
Has a 40T crank. The rear cassette is 11-51T I wonder if switching that 40T to a 42T would make a big difference in terms of speed. We don't live in an area with lots of hills. Thoughts? With the stock 38mm tires, 80rpm in the 40x11 = 23.81mph. 100rpm = 29.76rpm If you upsize to a 42T, those numbers will go up to 24.91mph and 31.23mph. I run a 44T on my 1x CX bike for summer gravel/dirt becuase I was occasionally spinning out the stock 40T (with an 11-32 cassette) when hammering in group rides, big tailwinds, descents, etc. I can't imagine spending enough time at those speeds on a Sirrus to warrant swapping to a larger ring, but that bike also has a massive 11-51 12sp cassette, so even with a 44T there would still be plenty of low-end gearing for any small hills. |
Originally Posted by Random11
(Post 22197730)
The difference is 5%. If she kept the same cadence and was going 15 mph with the 40T, she'd go 15.75 mph with the 42T.
I don't think taller gears are the answer if 15mph is the top speed we're talking about. |
Not sure where the "15 mph" number came from.
I would ask the OP, does your wife use the top couple of cogs? I might go for both a bigger chain ring and a smaller cassette. 40x51 is ridiculous unless you are climbing mountains. Apparently there are 10x45 cassettes available, which would (very, very) slightly increase top end, while providing closer gearing and still plenty of climbing potential .... which you say she doesn't need anyway. With a 46-tooth ring and a 10-45 cassette your wife would have decent road gearing and still have the same climbing capacity as a 50-34x11-32 combo which is pretty normal for a road bike used for climbing. In any case .... 44 or 46 teeth on the ring sounds like a good place to start. |
IMO, there is no benefit. 40/11 on 700x38 is a 100 inch gear and already at the maximum gearing allowed for junior racing. Plenty of gear on a hybrid. Changing the chainring just shifts all the gears a little bit. YMMV.
Otto |
Originally Posted by dvai
(Post 22198133)
Is a new bike. Sirrus X5.0
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t. What would be the easiest way to improve speed? Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios? And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette? As long as she doesn't have the same power to weight ratio as you she will always be slower for most things. |
Originally Posted by dvai
(Post 22198133)
What would be the easiest way to improve speed?
In the 11 tooth sprocket in the 40 tooth chain ring (with a 700C wheel with a 38mm tire), the following shows the speed for different pedal RPM (cadence). 40 11.9 mph 50 14.9 mph 60 17.9 mph 70 20.8 mph 80 23.8 mph 90 26.8 mph With some practice, people can easily do 80 RPM. The current set-up is likely good enough for the flats (it might be on the low side when going down hill). |
Originally Posted by dvai
(Post 22198133)
Is a new bike. Sirrus X5.0
Has a 40T single ring on the front and a Shimano SLX M7100, SGS, 12-speed rear Derailleur. The cassette on the rear is 11-51t. What would be the easiest way to improve speed? Change the cassette? If yes, which ratios? And would a large cage rear derailleur accommodate that cassette? I would let her ride the bike and see what gears she uses. If she never goes anywhere near the 51T on the back then you might want to get a closer spaced cassette. But I would try it first. |
If the OP's wife wants to go faster .... then we can assume that at her comfortable max revs in top gear, she is not going as fast as she wants. He does not mention his own pace.
My question would be, is she spinning as fast as she comfortably can, but she Could spin faster, but nor with pleasure? if that is the case she probably has power to turn a higher ratio. If she is spinning as fast as her power allows .... then changing cogs or rings wouldn't matter. I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable. I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14x34 (it think 34) 7-cog cassette on my old Cannondale tourer. I often find myself wishing for the extra couple teeth I am missing compared to my other bikes, most of which are 50-34 with 1- or 11-28 or -32. Sure I could definitely just spin faster in 48x14 .... but it is not a pleasant experience for me. I have a certain natural cadence where I feel most comfortable. So I would assume that the OP's wife, if she Could spin the 40x11 faster, could also be happy with a 44 or 46 ring. The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell. |
Originally Posted by Maelochs
(Post 22198479)
If the OP's wife wants to go faster .... then we can assume that at her comfortable max revs in top gear, she is not going as fast as she wants. He does not mention his own pace.
My question would be, is she spinning as fast as she comfortably can, but she Could spin faster, but nor with pleasure? if that is the case she probably has power to turn a higher ratio. If she is spinning as fast as her power allows .... then changing cogs or rings wouldn't matter. I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable. I have a 48-38-28 triple with a 14x34 (it think 34) 7-cog cassette on my old Cannondale tourer. I often find myself wishing for the extra couple teeth I am missing compared to my other bikes, most of which are 50-34 with 1- or 11-28 or -32. Sure I could definitely just spin faster in 48x14 .... but it is not a pleasant experience for me. I have a certain natural cadence where I feel most comfortable. So I would assume that the OP's wife, if she Could spin the 40x11 faster, could also be happy with a 44 or 46 ring. The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell. |
Originally Posted by Maelochs
(Post 22198479)
If the OP's wife wants to go faster .... then we can assume that at her comfortable max revs in top gear, she is not going as fast as she wants. He does not mention his own pace.
It's fairly common for new riders to think that a bigger gear means they'll go faster. It's fairly common for new riders to use a low cadence.
Originally Posted by Maelochs
(Post 22198479)
I think most of assume (possibly incorrectly, but I did say "assume") is that 40x11 is simply too low a gear combo to get the speed his wife wants, comfortably and consistently, on the terrain they normally ride (mostly flat.) The fact that she might only be spinning 80 rpm isn't the issue .... if that is where she is comfortable.
Originally Posted by Maelochs
(Post 22198479)
The goal here is a happy rider. She isn't racing for cash or anything. She just wants to enjoy her ride, and finds her bike to be undergeared .... as far as I can tell.
|
I do love the thought of someone out on their new hybrid and just cruising along on a flat road in top gear at 25mph and being like "why is this bike so slow?".
|
Originally Posted by njkayaker
(Post 22198623)
It's fairly common for new riders to think that a bigger gear means they'll go faster. It's fairly common for new riders to use a low cadence. |
Originally Posted by PeteHski
(Post 22198488)
As far as I can tell she hasn’t even ridden the bike yet.
Anyway ..... it's only BF, after all ....... |
Originally Posted by msu2001la
(Post 22198885)
I do love the thought of someone out on their new hybrid and just cruising along on a flat road in top gear at 25mph and being like "why is this bike so slow?".
|
Thank you all for the comments. We changed the order for a "non x" Sirrus that comes with a more road-oriented 48/32
|
Lol OP your wife sounds like a beast if she can spin a 40/11, that's a super heavy ratio on the flats for a new rider...
also not to be a jerk, but she probably won't really notice the difference between any of the setups mentioned. The top end is too high for her to use anyways unless she's a monster (and even then she should just spin faster) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.