Polarized VS Non-polarized
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Polarized VS Non-polarized
My experience has been that non-polarized sunglasses work better on the bike. It seems that polarized sunglasses can sometime hide road hazards especially when sunlight is filtering through the trees.. Now that I'm looking for new cycling glasses, I find that everyone wants to sell polarized glasses. Am I missing something? Do others have different experiences?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,014
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 284 Times
in
200 Posts
I agree. Polarized lenses make it harder to see in some light conditions, and they black out the screen on my phone/garmin/general electronics. I have a pilot friend who has to buy non-polarized for reading instruments and determining cloud layers from above etc, and he has a similar problem to you; can’t get good glasses with non-polarized lenses without spending a fortune on special order shades.
Someone will probably be along in short order to tell us that true polarization that you get with $500 Oakleys shows you the true colours of the world, and without it you’re going to crash into a tree. Don’t listen to them.
Someone will probably be along in short order to tell us that true polarization that you get with $500 Oakleys shows you the true colours of the world, and without it you’re going to crash into a tree. Don’t listen to them.
#4
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 11,561
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9587 Post(s)
Liked 5,366 Times
in
2,881 Posts
Polarized lenses are indispensable for sailing and snow sports, nice for driving, unnecessary for cycling.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 520
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times
in
179 Posts
I love my polarized phototec Tifosi sunglasses. With my contact lenses in my eyes are very sensitive to the light and the polarized sunglasses means I can actually see. Really cuts down on glare. The major negative is they have a narrow range of photosensitivity so even though they can adjust to how much light there is the range isn't very large. It's something like 11-25% light allowed in. I have a non-polarized pair and it lets in 11-90%. I'd still wear the polarized in most riding conditions, though.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,263
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5150 Post(s)
Liked 3,407 Times
in
2,232 Posts
big fan of clear lenses. only wear shades when I know I will be in full sun for the whole ride. polarized vs no polarized less of an issue, but if I have a choice I'll go w/ polarized due to the inherent features & benefits. just got some non-polarized glasses at a flea market for $10. I liked the design & form factor. meaning slim design & no lower or edge frames which obstructs my peripheral vision
Likes For Germany_chris:
#8
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,413
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4594 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
941 Posts
Interesting in that I've been really happy with fit and styling of Smith sunglasses for cycling. Curious I went to take a look online at their offerings, and actually they don't offer anything polarized in a cycling design. I can't say I actively avoided polarized but don't miss it.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,252
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6493 Post(s)
Liked 10,137 Times
in
4,343 Posts
Where are you looking? In my experience, most (almost all) cycling sunglasses come with non-polarized lenses. Try looking at Oakley, which offers an enormous range of lenses.
Likes For Koyote:
#10
Senior Member
I also do not like polarized glasses, almost disorienting. Some marketing department convinced people that polarized glasses are needed for all activities, so companies are caving in to unnecessary market demand.
I like Oakley's PRIZM technology. I live in SoCal, so constant blue skies. Sunglasses are important.
I like Oakley's PRIZM technology. I live in SoCal, so constant blue skies. Sunglasses are important.
Last edited by Tycho Brahe; 10-13-21 at 01:50 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20789 Post(s)
Liked 9,429 Times
in
4,662 Posts
Screens on electronic devices are sometimes (often?) polarized, too, so that can be a detriment with polarized glasses - if the alignment clashes, you won't see your display at all, unless you cock your head sideways.
Likes For WhyFi:
#12
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 15,557
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8881 Post(s)
Liked 9,955 Times
in
5,056 Posts
Concur - polarized for driving - unless you really want to see the reflection of the top of your dashboard in front of you. Unpolarized for cycling - because you want to be able to see your head unit.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,891
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 833 Post(s)
Liked 694 Times
in
414 Posts
I've never had a problem with seeing my head unit while wearing polarized lenses. Maybe a low-end or decade-old unit would be improperly designed.
Anyway concur that there are a ton of non-polarized lenses. I have half a dozen Oakley lenses and only one is polarized, for good reason as it blocks reflections off asphalt on extremely sunny days while riding in the direction of the sun.
Anyway concur that there are a ton of non-polarized lenses. I have half a dozen Oakley lenses and only one is polarized, for good reason as it blocks reflections off asphalt on extremely sunny days while riding in the direction of the sun.
Likes For surak:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20789 Post(s)
Liked 9,429 Times
in
4,662 Posts
It's not really a matter of improper design. You can polarize two ways: linear or circular. Linear is more common and less expensive, but you'll have issues if both filters aren't aligned in the same direction and, even if they are, visibility can still suffer as you move about. This isn't really an issue with CPLs, but they're definitely less common; I'm not even sure how many sunglass manufacturers make them.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,891
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 833 Post(s)
Liked 694 Times
in
414 Posts
It's not really a matter of improper design. You can polarize two ways: linear or circular. Linear is more common and less expensive, but you'll have issues if both filters aren't aligned in the same direction and, even if they are, visibility can still suffer as you move about. This isn't really an issue with CPLs, but they're definitely less common; I'm not even sure how many sunglass manufacturers make them.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,755
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1389 Post(s)
Liked 1,398 Times
in
823 Posts
I have been using polarized lenses for so long now that maybe I've just gotten used to them and don't notice the negative aspects people are mentioning in this thread.
The next cycling glasses I purchase will be photochromatic so that they are more usable for early morning rides before the sun is up (or as the sun is rising). Polarization? Not something I would specifically seek out or avoid.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 847
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
159 Posts
I went from somewhat expensive Rudy glasses to cheapish Uvex ones. The photochromatic ability of the cheaper Uvex is better and the comfort, too.
Only slight drawback is that if I face down, they tend to slide by maybe like 0.5-1mm (though the Rudy did that too) down the nose, so when I look up, I see the frame. I don't get why people wear polarized (other than for the looks).
Only slight drawback is that if I face down, they tend to slide by maybe like 0.5-1mm (though the Rudy did that too) down the nose, so when I look up, I see the frame. I don't get why people wear polarized (other than for the looks).
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Regarding the Oakley recommendation... I'm sure they're great glasses, but I also think they're seriously over-priced. Sooner or later my sunglasses are going to get scratched and I don't want to pay $100 (or more) to replace something that I think of as a very utilitarian product.
There's got to be something in the $20 to $30 dollar range to compete with the name brands.
There's got to be something in the $20 to $30 dollar range to compete with the name brands.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,014
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 284 Times
in
200 Posts
Only thing I’ll say against them is the reflective coating can deteriorate badly, so I make sure to buy the versions with matt lenses.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Goodr or Tifosi Swank. $25, comfortable, light, durable. I’ve had several pairs of both, lost them, replaced them. Scratched them, replaced them. Had a frame crack, the shop swapped them out for me.
Only thing I’ll say against them is the reflective coating can deteriorate badly, so I make sure to buy the versions with matt lenses.
Only thing I’ll say against them is the reflective coating can deteriorate badly, so I make sure to buy the versions with matt lenses.
#21
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,954
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1515 Post(s)
Liked 1,097 Times
in
778 Posts
Oakley sport glasses are quite overpriced but the lenses meet ANSI Z78.1 standard for impact resistance. Once, I was riding head down (yes, careless) and crashed (at low speed) into a work truck parked in the bike lane with barely visible hazard lights and no trailing safety cones. My right lens hit the ball hitch mount and the only damage to the lens was a chip in the Prizm coating. Yes, I recognize that this is only an isolated, anecdotal experience and not at all a valid test of impact resistance, but I have been a believer since then. Just buy them when they are on sale.
Last edited by SoSmellyAir; 10-14-21 at 03:47 AM.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Richfield, WI
Posts: 684
Bikes: Trek Domane SL7 Disc, Cannondale F29
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 373 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times
in
176 Posts
I bought two pairs of identical Tifosi glasses, one polarized and one not. Not only did the polarization add no noticeable benefit while cycling, I couldn't stand wearing the polarized glasses while driving my car as they lenses created odd color shifts when looking through tinted windows. Polarization has it's benefits, like for reducing glare on water when fishing and reducing glare in photography, but I don't see any benefit for cycling.
#23
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,413
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4594 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times
in
941 Posts
Yeah, you've probably been looking at eg. the Kapvoe or other odd-named brands on Amzn etc given your pricepoint. No idea why they're all polarized. Probably because they're not knowledgeable enough to know that cyclists don't really want or need polarization.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,006
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 990 Post(s)
Liked 1,038 Times
in
594 Posts
my old pair of prescription glasses were polarized and i really liked them. they cut down on road glare in sunny conditions and did not effect the shaded parts much resulting is less of a light differential allowing me to see crap in the shared areas much better. i miss them.
#25
Banned
I want 100% UVA and UVB protection for my eyes to avoid cataracts. Polarizing lens is supposed to reduce glare but I have only seen this work on water surfaces and not glare from light reflected off of cars. Some LCD screens have wavy lines when viewed with polarized lenses and so I started buying "safety glasses" that provide excellent protection and I buy them in dark gray and in yellow tints. They are available as a bifocal with various levels of magnification which helps with older eyes to read the bike computer display.