Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Steel road bike comfort- carbon vs aluminum wheels

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Steel road bike comfort- carbon vs aluminum wheels

Old 04-30-22, 09:03 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Racing Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,216
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1326 Post(s)
Liked 315 Times in 213 Posts
Power to overcome air drag increases by the CUBE of the speed. Double the speed and power increases eight (!) fold. That is, as base2 alludes to, the reason wheel manufacturers like to quote watt savings referencing very high speeds. Often 40km/h. Assuming a 10W saving* at 40, but if riding speed is 30km/h you are only saving 4.2W, at best.

*Also the saving is usually measured against the worst box rim you can imagine. That may not be what you have on the bike. Lots of alloy rims have semi aero shaping, further eroding the achievable gain switching to a aero wheel.
Racing Dan is offline  
Likes For Racing Dan:
Old 04-30-22, 09:10 AM
  #27  
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,889
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2170 Post(s)
Liked 3,309 Times in 1,727 Posts
I have a steel bike with a set of aluminum rims (700C HED Belgium+). The widest tire I can fit in my frame is 38mm.

I have a second set of wheels with carbon 650B rims, and although they are not "aero," they have a bit more of a cowling shape to them, so I am assuming that because the wheels are smaller in diameter, the rims are carbon and designed like they are, and the spokes are significantly shorter, these wheels are likely stiffer. Despite this, the ride is more plush. I assume this is because I have wider tires on these wheels (42mm rear, 48mm front).

If my interpretation is correct, then tire width/inflation >> rim material.

The deep dish pizza aero carbon rims have the indirect effect of making the wheel significantly stiffer, as the spokes are shorter and the rim itself is likely more rigid. I cannot pedal my bicycle fast enough to entertain the idea of these kind of aero wheels, and although they look cool, they presumably weigh a bit more than they have to, and can be challenging in strong cross-winds.

The steel bike frame is more comfortable than any carbon one I have tried. Even with wide tires, I feel the difference (fewer pains on long rough gravel rides).
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 05-01-22, 09:59 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 1,935

Bikes: S works Tarmac, Felt TK2 track

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 179 Times in 111 Posts
Get out of the saddle and sprint and you will notice a diff, more so with a stiff bike. That and the speaker effect.
popeye is offline  
Old 05-02-22, 11:46 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,196

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 551 Times in 441 Posts
Try the pressure calculator at zipp.com. It takes into account the internal rim width, tire size, pavement and tire construction. For 140 rider, 28mm tubeless tires on pavement, 19mm internal width rims, it suggests 62/65. If you're running 25mm tires, on narrower rims and tubes, it will suggest quite a bit higher. I've run 25mm on 17mm internal width zondas at 72 with no problem. Be sure that your pressure gauge is accurate.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 05-02-22, 01:54 PM
  #30  
Full Member
 
ctak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 264 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by signalnc
Thanks for all of the input. I think I will try different psi with the aluminum rims I have now. I have 25mm continental gp5000 front and back. I don't think the frame can accommodate 28s.

I had been riding a carbon bike for 10+years and switched back to steel last year.
28mm gp5000s may actually fit your frame, particularly if it is one of the newer Nitros.
Hunt makes quality carbon rim brake wheelsets. These, in particular, will have considerably better dampening than the Hunt Aero Wide Sprints I have on my Davidson. I'm a fan of the ride quality of shallow-ish 36-40mm carbon wheels on vintage and modern steel tubes.
ctak is offline  
Likes For ctak:
Old 05-02-22, 03:53 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: nc
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ctak
28mm gp5000s may actually fit your frame, particularly if it is one of the newer Nitros.
Hunt makes quality carbon rim brake wheelsets. These, in particular, will have considerably better dampening than the Hunt Aero Wide Sprints I have on my Davidson. I'm a fan of the ride quality of shallow-ish 36-40mm carbon wheels on vintage and modern steel tubes.
It's a 2016. I'll try a 28 to see if it fits. Thanks
signalnc is offline  
Old 05-03-22, 05:51 AM
  #32  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,183

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 2,515 Times in 1,421 Posts
Originally Posted by cxwrench
What? I replied about air pressure. I added a comment about terminology, do you not understand what I was doing or should I have made it more obvious by quoting the other posts?
Yes. Although “more” obvious implies it was obvious to start with… which it was not.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-03-22, 03:36 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,456

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1722 Post(s)
Liked 1,272 Times in 734 Posts
Originally Posted by signalnc
Hi all. I am riding a 2016 steel frame made from Columbus Spirit. (torelli nitro express). It has Easton EA 70 wheels. I'm not thrilled with the wheels, and I am looking to upgrade. Will carbon wheels ride better, dampen road vibrations? or will it have no affect on ride quality. Thanks
My GURU Sidero (steel) is also built with Columbus Spirit. I put Mavic tubeless wheels/tires on it and it is lighter, faster, and more comfortable.
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 05-03-22, 07:32 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: nc
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
My GURU Sidero (steel) is also built with Columbus Spirit. I put Mavic tubeless wheels/tires on it and it is lighter, faster, and more comfortable.
Which Mavic do you have?
signalnc is offline  
Old 05-03-22, 07:35 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
cxwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times in 1,489 Posts
Originally Posted by signalnc
Which Mavic do you have?
Ride quality has nothing to do w/ the wheels he has.
cxwrench is offline  
Likes For cxwrench:
Old 05-04-22, 04:23 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,456

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1722 Post(s)
Liked 1,272 Times in 734 Posts
Originally Posted by signalnc
Which Mavic do you have?
Mavic Ksyrium Elite UST w/ Yksion tires. They come as a package and the wheelset cost me under $500.
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 05-04-22, 08:24 AM
  #37  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times in 999 Posts
Originally Posted by cxwrench
Ride quality has nothing to do w/ the wheels he has.
I disagree with that!

There are many different types of bicycle wheels out there, and even if you maybe haven’t experienced the range of constructions and materials used to make wheels, it’s quite a stretch, from the materials and mechanical properties perspective, to presume none of it makes any difference.
chaadster is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 09:19 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
cxwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times in 1,489 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
I disagree with that!

There are many different types of bicycle wheels out there, and even if you maybe haven’t experienced the range of constructions and materials used to make wheels, it’s quite a stretch, from the materials and mechanical properties perspective, to presume none of it makes any difference.
You obviously don't know as much about wheels as you think you do. Consider that you have a pneumatic tire mounted on the wheel and it's inflated to somewhere between say 80-100psi. This is a normal road size tire, 25-28mm. If you sit on the bike you'll see the tire squish a bit. If you squeeze it with your thumb and finger it'll squish a bit. This happens ALL the time when you're riding, the tire is constantly squishing a bit. Now look at your wheel. The spokes are under a LOT of tension, normally 100-120kgf. For you to feel any difference in ride quality between wheels you can guess what might have to happen. The tire would have to squish to a degree that the rim would be hammered into the tire, much like what happens when you get a pinch flat. Then you'd have to have a rim that would be flexible enough to result in spoke tension going down to near zero or even less than zero and somehow be able to return to exact and proper tension every revolution of the wheel. Do you really think this is what happens? Now look at carbon rims. Even low profile carbon rims are very very stiff radially. I've built hundreds and hundreds of wheels, both aluminum and carbon rims. You don't even build them the same way. They don't get the radial hops that alloy rims do because of the stiffness. Some people talk about carbon wheels damping vibration better than alloy rims. Do you honestly think you'll notice that difference with the pneumatic tire and it's soft tread between you and the road?
cxwrench is offline  
Likes For cxwrench:
Old 05-04-22, 09:26 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,456

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1722 Post(s)
Liked 1,272 Times in 734 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
I disagree with that!

There are many different types of bicycle wheels out there, and even if you maybe haven’t experienced the range of constructions and materials used to make wheels, it’s quite a stretch, from the materials and mechanical properties perspective, to presume none of it makes any difference.
I think this depends on your definition of "ride quality." If it means comfort, a lot of that is in the tires. If it's about ability to spin up quickly then weight comes into the picture. You get the point. When I went from Mavic Ksyrium Elite clinchers to UST's I got better comfort, quicker spin up and lighter weight. So, for me, ride quality was improved. FWIW both wheelsets ran on 25mm tires.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 10:25 AM
  #40  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times in 999 Posts
Originally Posted by cxwrench
You obviously don't know as much about wheels as you think you do. Consider that you have a pneumatic tire mounted on the wheel and it's inflated to somewhere between say 80-100psi. This is a normal road size tire, 25-28mm. If you sit on the bike you'll see the tire squish a bit. If you squeeze it with your thumb and finger it'll squish a bit. This happens ALL the time when you're riding, the tire is constantly squishing a bit. Now look at your wheel. The spokes are under a LOT of tension, normally 100-120kgf. For you to feel any difference in ride quality between wheels you can guess what might have to happen. The tire would have to squish to a degree that the rim would be hammered into the tire, much like what happens when you get a pinch flat. Then you'd have to have a rim that would be flexible enough to result in spoke tension going down to near zero or even less than zero and somehow be able to return to exact and proper tension every revolution of the wheel. Do you really think this is what happens? Now look at carbon rims. Even low profile carbon rims are very very stiff radially. I've built hundreds and hundreds of wheels, both aluminum and carbon rims. You don't even build them the same way. They don't get the radial hops that alloy rims do because of the stiffness. Some people talk about carbon wheels damping vibration better than alloy rims. Do you honestly think you'll notice that difference with the pneumatic tire and it's soft tread between you and the road?
You’ve made a *lot* of assumptions in that comment which I don’t make and wouldn’t agree with, but the most disagreeable is the notion that a pneumatic tire works on the road independently of the wheel and is an impenetrable barrier to feel.
chaadster is offline  
Likes For chaadster:
Old 05-04-22, 10:30 AM
  #41  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times in 999 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
I think this depends on your definition of "ride quality." If it means comfort, a lot of that is in the tires. If it's about ability to spin up quickly then weight comes into the picture. You get the point. When I went from Mavic Ksyrium Elite clinchers to UST's I got better comfort, quicker spin up and lighter weight. So, for me, ride quality was improved. FWIW both wheelsets ran on 25mm tires.
Yes, for sure.
chaadster is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 10:44 AM
  #42  
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,057

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1755 Post(s)
Liked 1,570 Times in 906 Posts
A big part of comfort is spoke length & elasticity.

A relatively low number of Alpine 3's or CX Ray spokes on a large ERD box section 700c or single wall 27 (630mm bad) rim are going to load up a lot more like a spring & have a lot more give than say, 36 12 gauge straight spokes on a deep 20 inch rim.

That extra "give" directly leads to ride quality.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 11:37 AM
  #43  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,183

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 2,515 Times in 1,421 Posts
Originally Posted by cxwrench
You obviously don't know as much about wheels as you think you do. Consider that you have a pneumatic tire mounted on the wheel and it's inflated to somewhere between say 80-100psi. This is a normal road size tire, 25-28mm. If you sit on the bike you'll see the tire squish a bit. If you squeeze it with your thumb and finger it'll squish a bit. This happens ALL the time when you're riding, the tire is constantly squishing a bit. Now look at your wheel. The spokes are under a LOT of tension, normally 100-120kgf. For you to feel any difference in ride quality between wheels you can guess what might have to happen. The tire would have to squish to a degree that the rim would be hammered into the tire, much like what happens when you get a pinch flat. Then you'd have to have a rim that would be flexible enough to result in spoke tension going down to near zero or even less than zero and somehow be able to return to exact and proper tension every revolution of the wheel. Do you really think this is what happens? Now look at carbon rims. Even low profile carbon rims are very very stiff radially. I've built hundreds and hundreds of wheels, both aluminum and carbon rims. You don't even build them the same way. They don't get the radial hops that alloy rims do because of the stiffness. Some people talk about carbon wheels damping vibration better than alloy rims. Do you honestly think you'll notice that difference with the pneumatic tire and it's soft tread between you and the road?
This is a classic example of relying on armchair predictions and ignoring real-world results.

A few years ago I replaced a wheelset on my road/gravel bike. Same bike, same tires. Noticeably different ride quality, even though they were both aluminum.

In the MTB world the difference between CF ans Al wheel is incredibly obvious, and those tires are being run at very low psi.

The fact that you can’t see the spokes bend or collapse does not mean there is no difference in ride quality.

If you want to apply engineering to this question, then use it to explain why things are the way they are… using it to explain why things should be other then the way they is a waste of time.

Last edited by Kapusta; 05-04-22 at 11:45 AM.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 01:22 PM
  #44  
Full Member
 
ctak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 264 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
You’ve made a *lot* of assumptions in that comment which I don’t make and wouldn’t agree with, but the most disagreeable is the notion that a pneumatic tire works on the road independently of the wheel and is an impenetrable barrier to feel.
Couldn't agree more
ctak is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 01:40 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,272
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2387 Post(s)
Liked 2,834 Times in 1,613 Posts
The only test data I was able to locate regarding wheel stiffness represent measurements of lateral deflection. If someone can find similar data for vertical deflection, please post them.

Note that there's not a single mention of vertical deflection in that report. I wonder why.

Actually, I don't wonder. I believe that people truly believe that there's such a thing as significant vertical deflection in modern bike wheels. However, none of them have tested those wheels and found measurable vertical deflection, or else they'd be reporting numbers and not impressions.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 02:05 PM
  #46  
Full Member
 
ctak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 264 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
The only test data I was able to locate regarding wheel stiffness represent measurements of lateral deflection. If someone can find similar data for vertical deflection, please post them.

Note that there's not a single mention of vertical deflection in that report. I wonder why.

Actually, I don't wonder. I believe that people truly believe that there's such a thing as significant vertical deflection in modern bike wheels. However, none of them have tested those wheels and found measurable vertical deflection, or else they'd be reporting numbers and not impressions.
Very similar to Bill Mould's findings, thanks for sharing: "Some believe that a wheel built with tighter spokes is stiffer. It is not. Wheel stiffness does not vary significantly with spoke tension unless a spoke becomes totally slack."

Another point which runs contrary to conventional thought is that deeper rims = more lateral flex. The deeper the rim, the greater the leverage... which certainly can impact a host of variables related to "ride quality".
https://www.velonews.com/gear/deep-w...s-beyond-aero/
ctak is offline  
Likes For ctak:
Old 05-04-22, 02:27 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
cxwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times in 1,489 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
This is a classic example of relying on armchair predictions and ignoring real-world results.

A few years ago I replaced a wheelset on my road/gravel bike. Same bike, same tires. Noticeably different ride quality, even though they were both aluminum.

In the MTB world the difference between CF ans Al wheel is incredibly obvious, and those tires are being run at very low psi.

The fact that you can’t see the spokes bend or collapse does not mean there is no difference in ride quality.

If you want to apply engineering to this question, then use it to explain why things are the way they are… using it to explain why things should be other then the way they is a waste of time.
What difference? Ride quality? Please.

Originally Posted by ctak
Couldn't agree more
Because...feels?
You guys are so sure of your opinion but can't provide any proof of why...how come?
Originally Posted by Trakhak
The only test data I was able to locate regarding wheel stiffness represent measurements of lateral deflection. If someone can find similar data for vertical deflection, please post them.

Note that there's not a single mention of vertical deflection in that report. I wonder why.

Actually, I don't wonder. I believe that people truly believe that there's such a thing as significant vertical deflection in modern bike wheels. However, none of them have tested those wheels and found measurable vertical deflection, or else they'd be reporting numbers and not impressions.
^This^.
Originally Posted by ctak
Very similar to Bill Mould's findings, thanks for sharing: "Some believe that a wheel built with tighter spokes is stiffer. It is not. Wheel stiffness does not vary significantly with spoke tension unless a spoke becomes totally slack."

Another point which runs contrary to conventional thought is that deeper rims = more lateral flex. The deeper the rim, the greater the leverage... which certainly can impact a host of variables related to "ride quality".
https://www.velonews.com/gear/deep-w...s-beyond-aero/
^And this^
cxwrench is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 02:30 PM
  #48  
Method to My Madness
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,529

Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1866 Post(s)
Liked 1,406 Times in 975 Posts
To harmonize above posts #38 through #45 (excluding #39 and #41):

A tire (within its stated range of inflation pressure) is of course more compressible than the wheel on which the tire is mounted, by many orders of magnitude, but to conclude that the wheel has no effect on suspension (e.g., handling, comfort, etc.) is to ignore the interaction between the wheel and frame. The frame and the fork also function as components of the suspension, and even if you replace one wheel with another wheel which is exactly as stiff but weighs more or less, that affects how the suspension works because it affects attenuation.
SoSmellyAir is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 02:43 PM
  #49  
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times in 999 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
The only test data I was able to locate regarding wheel stiffness represent measurements of lateral deflection. If someone can find similar data for vertical deflection, please post them.

Note that there's not a single mention of vertical deflection in that report. I wonder why.

Actually, I don't wonder. I believe that people truly believe that there's such a thing as significant vertical deflection in modern bike wheels. However, none of them have tested those wheels and found measurable vertical deflection, or else they'd be reporting numbers and not impressions.
You’re the first person to bring up “vertical deflection” in this thread.
chaadster is offline  
Old 05-04-22, 03:11 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,272
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2387 Post(s)
Liked 2,834 Times in 1,613 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
You’re the first person to bring up “vertical deflection” in this thread.
The test that I linked to refers to side-to-side movement of bike rims in a built wheel under load as "lateral deflection." If the people attempting to describe differences in comfort among wheels mean something other than "vertical deflection," I hope that they'll clarify what they mean and provide data from a reputable source that quantify that which they are describing.
Trakhak is offline  
Likes For Trakhak:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.